Re: [Testing Needed] Review Board 2.5.2 for RHEL/CentOS 7

On 16 December 2015 at 20:02, Christian Hammond wrote: > That certainly shouldn't be necessary. Sounds like maybe there was a bad > package? > > If it ever happens again, please let me know. I want to be sure we figure > out what's causing that. > > Christian > > -- >

Re: [Testing Needed] Review Board 2.5.2 for RHEL/CentOS 7

That certainly shouldn't be necessary. Sounds like maybe there was a bad package? If it ever happens again, please let me know. I want to be sure we figure out what's causing that. Christian -- Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag,

Re: [Testing Needed] Review Board 2.5.2 for RHEL/CentOS 7

On 15 December 2015 at 19:15, Christian Hammond wrote: > Hi, > > collectstatic isn't meant to be run by end users. It's intended only for > the packaging steps, and running it manually can cause problems. I want to > better understand the need to run this command, though.

Re: [Testing Needed] Review Board 2.5.2 for RHEL/CentOS 7

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:18 AM Ken Erickson wrote: > Done > > On Tuesday, December 15, 2015 at 4:19:50 AM UTC-7, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> >> Ken, Cian and Sean: since you have had positive experiences, would you >> mind signing into Bodhi (instructions in the original

Re: [Testing Needed] Review Board 2.5.2 for RHEL/CentOS 7

Hi, collectstatic isn't meant to be run by end users. It's intended only for the packaging steps, and running it manually can cause problems. I want to better understand the need to run this command, though. Can you go into this a bit more? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com

Re: [Testing Needed] Review Board 2.5.2 for RHEL/CentOS 7

Ken, Cian and Sean: since you have had positive experiences, would you mind signing into Bodhi (instructions in the original message for this thread) and providing positive karma? If all three of you did so, this can go to the stable repo immediately. Otherwise, I have to wait until Friday to push

Re: [Testing Needed] Review Board 2.5.2 for RHEL/CentOS 7

Done On Tuesday, December 15, 2015 at 4:19:50 AM UTC-7, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > Ken, Cian and Sean: since you have had positive experiences, would you > mind signing into Bodhi (instructions in the original message for this > thread) and providing positive karma? If all three of you did

Re: [Testing Needed] Review Board 2.5.2 for RHEL/CentOS 7

I just found it already posted under another thread https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/reviewboard/uXxkNePzSTs On Thursday, December 10, 2015 at 3:00:57 PM UTC-7, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 4:22 PM Ken Erickson > wrote: > >> I just

Re: [Testing Needed] Review Board 2.5.2 for RHEL/CentOS 7

On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 4:22 PM Ken Erickson wrote: > I just installed 2.5.2 on CentOS 7 for testing, other than comments below > I haven't found anything. > I do have a question, I installed the Comment Categorization extension and > added 4 types to it but when I try to

Re: [Testing Needed] Review Board 2.5.2 for RHEL/CentOS 7

I just installed 2.5.2 on CentOS 7 for testing, other than comments below I haven't found anything. I do have a question, I installed the Comment Categorization extension and added 4 types to it but when I try to use it the list is empty on review comments? It acted the same under 2.0 as

Re: [Testing Needed] Review Board 2.5.2 for RHEL/CentOS 7

As it turns out the webpage reporting an older version was a non restarted fastcgi instance and unrelated to the webapi evolution. On Monday, December 7, 2015 at 5:17:51 PM UTC+1, se...@m2mobi.com wrote: > > Hello Stephen, > > I've been patiently waiting for this for weeks now. Glad to see it's

Re: [Testing Needed] Review Board 2.5.2 for RHEL/CentOS 7

(Didn't have coffee yet.) It resolves the dependency issue but not the rb-site upgrade issue. The log was done after installing django evolution from epel-testing (otherwise it broke on version dependency before ever attempting to run the upgrade) On Tuesday, December 8, 2015 at 10:00:18 AM

Re: [Testing Needed] Review Board 2.5.2 for RHEL/CentOS 7

Should've mentioned running exactly that got me past this error already. On Monday, December 7, 2015 at 5:21:16 PM UTC+1, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > Hmm, I thought I fixed that version. I'll push an update immediately. If > you manually run `yum update python-django-evolution >

Re: [Testing Needed] Review Board 2.5.2 for RHEL/CentOS 7

On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 11:21 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > Hmm, I thought I fixed that version. I'll push an update immediately. If > you manually run `yum update python-django-evolution > --enablerepo=epel-testing` and then attempt the upgrade, does that resolve >

Re: [Testing Needed] Review Board 2.5.2 for RHEL/CentOS 7

On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 10:29 AM Paul Fee wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > That's great news, I had been wondering if Fedora/RHEL users would be > seeing RB2.5 soon. > > On Fedora, it looks like the Django packages have moved ahead to 1.8, but > RB still needs 1.6. Hence

Re: [Testing Needed] Review Board 2.5.2 for RHEL/CentOS 7

Hmm, I thought I fixed that version. I'll push an update immediately. If you manually run `yum update python-django-evolution --enablerepo=epel-testing` and then attempt the upgrade, does that resolve your upgrade issue? What version of django-evolution do you have right now? 0.7.5? On Mon, Dec

Re: [Testing Needed] Review Board 2.5.2 for RHEL/CentOS 7

Hello Stephen, I've been patiently waiting for this for weeks now. Glad to see it's getting close. Some issues I found upgrading from EPEL 2.0.18: The RPM requires: python-django-evolution >= 0.7.1 ReviewBoard requires: django-evolution>=0.7.6,<=0.7.999 *and during the rb-site upgrade I get

Re: [Testing Needed] Review Board 2.5.2 for RHEL/CentOS 7

Hi Stephen, That's great news, I had been wondering if Fedora/RHEL users would be seeing RB2.5 soon. On Fedora, it looks like the Django packages have moved ahead to 1.8, but RB still needs 1.6. Hence ReviewBoard has disappeared from Fedora from F22 onwards :( Nice to see that the situation

[Testing Needed] Review Board 2.5.2 for RHEL/CentOS 7

Hello, folks! It's time for a big update. As many of you are probably aware, I maintain the RPMs of Review Board that live in Fedora's EPEL project[1] (Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux). For some time now, EPEL 7 (which provides community-supported add-on software for RHEL 7 and CentOS 7) has