Re: Review Board 1.7 RC 1 is released!

2012-12-10 Thread Christian Hammond
Not sure what you mean by not proper?

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com



On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 10:11 PM, kvr kvr@gmail.com wrote:

 Thanks ! , that resolved the issue ,but UI is not proper.


 On Saturday, December 8, 2012 5:19:51 PM UTC+5:30, Vishal Gautam wrote:

 That worked!!! Installed the latest Djblets 0.7.6 and it worked.

 Thank you so much Chris!


 On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Christian Hammond chi...@gmail.comwrote:

 If you upgrade Djblets to what's in Git, this will go away. I'll see
 about doing another Djblets release tonight, though, to fix it.

 As soon as we finish docs, 1.7 will be released.

 Christian


 On Dec 7, 2012, at 21:21, Vishal Gautam gautam...@gmail.com wrote:

 Turned Debug=True, now i see this  ... any pointers?

 Traceback:
 File /usr/local/lib/python2.6/**site-packages/Django-1.4.2-**
 py2.6.egg/django/core/**handlers/base.py in get_response
   89. response = middleware_method(request)
 File /usr/local/lib/python2.6/**site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.**
 7rc1-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/**admin/middleware.py in process_request
44. load_site_config()
 File /usr/local/lib/python2.6/**site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.**
 7rc1-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/**admin/siteconfig.py in load_site_config
   215. apply_django_settings(**siteconfig, settings_map)
 File /usr/local/lib/python2.6/**site-packages/Djblets-0.7.5-**
 py2.6.egg/djblets/siteconfig/**django_settings.py in
 apply_django_settings
   210. setter(settings, setting_key, value)
  File /usr/local/lib/python2.6/**site-packages/Djblets-0.7.5-**
 py2.6.egg/djblets/siteconfig/**django_settings.py in _set_cache_backend
   48. engine, host, params = parse_backend_uri(value)
  File /usr/local/lib/python2.6/**site-packages/Django-1.4.2-**
 py2.6.egg/django/core/cache/__**init__.py in parse_backend_uri
   58. if backend_uri.find(':') == -1:

 Exception Type: AttributeError at /
 Exception Value: 'dict' object has no attribute 'find'


 On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 12:16 AM, Christian Hammond chi...@gmail.comwrote:

 We're definitely compatible with Python 2.6. All the entries in the log
 you provided are just harmless warnings, so it must be something else
 causing the HTTP 500 error. Is there nothing else after that in the log
 file?

 Christian


 On Dec 7, 2012, at 5:56, Vishal Gautam gautam...@gmail.com wrote:

 Ahh ... that python upgrade caused a lot of damage (being a newbie),
 spent entire day battling it ... since it was a new install, I recreated
 the site with new db, got plethora of errors. Thinking Python 2.7 could be
 an issue I have now downgraded to Python 2.6 and re-installed RB 1.7 and
 recreated the site. Now i get a 500 with following errors in error_log. Is
 RB 1.7 not compatible with Python 2.6?

 [Fri Dec 07 13:39:43 2012] [error] /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-**
 packages/Djblets-0.7.5-py2.6.**egg/djblets/gravatars/__init__**.py:26:
 DeprecationWarning: the md5 module is deprecated; use hashlib instead
 [Fri Dec 07 13:39:43 2012] [error]   from md5 import md5
 [Fri Dec 07 13:39:43 2012] [error] /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-**
 packages/Django-1.4.2-py2.6.**egg/django/views/generic/list_**detail.py:10:
 DeprecationWarning: Function-based generic views have been deprecated; use
 class-based views instead.
 [Fri Dec 07 13:39:43 2012] [error]   DeprecationWarning


 On Friday, December 7, 2012 12:13:16 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond
 wrote:

 Hi,

 First, do you have a backup of the database?

 What actions did you take on the database prior to this attempt? For
 example, did you ever run evolve yourself? Or attempt a downgrade after an
 upgrade?

 Christian

 --
 Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com



 On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Vishal Gautam gautam...@gmail.comwrote:

 Thanks for the response Chris!

 I upgrade CentOS to 5.8, manually installed Python 2.7, upgraded
 setuptools for 2.7, then upgraded RB to 1.7rc1. All this made it fine
 (after getting bunch of issues those I could look up in Google). Now I am
 stuck at upgrading the site  and my RB instance is down ... Please 
 help!

 [root@jira ~]# /usr/local/bin/rb-site upgrade /var/www/
 reviews.xxx..com
 Rebuilding directory structure
 Updating database. This may take a while.
 /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Djblets-0.7.5-py2.7.**e**
 gg/djblets/gravatars/__init__**.**py:26: DeprecationWarning: the md5
 module is deprecated; use hashlib instead
   from md5 import md5
 /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pycrypto-2.6-py2.7-**li**
 nux-x86_64.egg/Crypto/Util/**num**ber.py:57: PowmInsecureWarning:
 Not using mpz_powm_sec.  You should rebuild using libgmp = 5 to avoid
 timing attack vulnerability.
 Creating tables ...
 Project signature has changed - an evolution is required
 Installing custom SQL 

Re: Review Board 1.7 RC 1 is released!

2012-12-09 Thread kvr
Thanks ! , that resolved the issue ,but UI is not proper.

On Saturday, December 8, 2012 5:19:51 PM UTC+5:30, Vishal Gautam wrote:

 That worked!!! Installed the latest Djblets 0.7.6 and it worked. 

 Thank you so much Chris!


 On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Christian Hammond 
 chi...@gmail.comjavascript:
  wrote:

 If you upgrade Djblets to what's in Git, this will go away. I'll see 
 about doing another Djblets release tonight, though, to fix it.

 As soon as we finish docs, 1.7 will be released.

 Christian


 On Dec 7, 2012, at 21:21, Vishal Gautam gautam...@gmail.comjavascript: 
 wrote:

 Turned Debug=True, now i see this  ... any pointers?

 Traceback:
 File 
 /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.2-py2.6.egg/django/core/handlers/base.py
  
 in get_response
   89. response = middleware_method(request)
 File 
 /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7rc1-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/admin/middleware.py
  
 in process_request
44. load_site_config()
 File 
 /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7rc1-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/admin/siteconfig.py
  
 in load_site_config
   215. apply_django_settings(siteconfig, settings_map)
 File 
 /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.7.5-py2.6.egg/djblets/siteconfig/django_settings.py
  
 in apply_django_settings
   210. setter(settings, setting_key, value)
 File 
 /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.7.5-py2.6.egg/djblets/siteconfig/django_settings.py
  
 in _set_cache_backend
   48. engine, host, params = parse_backend_uri(value)
 File 
 /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.2-py2.6.egg/django/core/cache/__init__.py
  
 in parse_backend_uri
   58. if backend_uri.find(':') == -1:

 Exception Type: AttributeError at /
 Exception Value: 'dict' object has no attribute 'find'


 On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 12:16 AM, Christian Hammond 
 chi...@gmail.comjavascript:
  wrote:

 We're definitely compatible with Python 2.6. All the entries in the log 
 you provided are just harmless warnings, so it must be something else 
 causing the HTTP 500 error. Is there nothing else after that in the log 
 file?

 Christian


 On Dec 7, 2012, at 5:56, Vishal Gautam gautam...@gmail.comjavascript: 
 wrote:

 Ahh ... that python upgrade caused a lot of damage (being a newbie), 
 spent entire day battling it ... since it was a new install, I recreated 
 the site with new db, got plethora of errors. Thinking Python 2.7 could be 
 an issue I have now downgraded to Python 2.6 and re-installed RB 1.7 and 
 recreated the site. Now i get a 500 with following errors in error_log. Is 
 RB 1.7 not compatible with Python 2.6?

 [Fri Dec 07 13:39:43 2012] [error] 
 /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.7.5-py2.6.egg/djblets/gravatars/__init__.py:26:
  
 DeprecationWarning: the md5 module is deprecated; use hashlib instead
 [Fri Dec 07 13:39:43 2012] [error]   from md5 import md5
 [Fri Dec 07 13:39:43 2012] [error] 
 /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.2-py2.6.egg/django/views/generic/list_detail.py:10:
  
 DeprecationWarning: Function-based generic views have been deprecated; use 
 class-based views instead.
 [Fri Dec 07 13:39:43 2012] [error]   DeprecationWarning


 On Friday, December 7, 2012 12:13:16 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond 
 wrote:

 Hi,

 First, do you have a backup of the database?

 What actions did you take on the database prior to this attempt? For 
 example, did you ever run evolve yourself? Or attempt a downgrade after an 
 upgrade?

 Christian

 -- 
 Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com



 On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Vishal Gautam gautam...@gmail.comwrote:

 Thanks for the response Chris!

 I upgrade CentOS to 5.8, manually installed Python 2.7, upgraded 
 setuptools for 2.7, then upgraded RB to 1.7rc1. All this made it fine 
 (after getting bunch of issues those I could look up in Google). Now I am 
 stuck at upgrading the site  and my RB instance is down ... Please 
 help!

 [root@jira ~]# /usr/local/bin/rb-site upgrade /var/www/
 reviews.xxx..com
 Rebuilding directory structure
 Updating database. This may take a while.
 /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-**packages/Djblets-0.7.5-py2.7.**
 egg/djblets/gravatars/__init__**.py:26: DeprecationWarning: the md5 
 module is deprecated; use hashlib instead
   from md5 import md5
 /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-**packages/pycrypto-2.6-py2.7-**
 linux-x86_64.egg/Crypto/Util/**number.py:57: PowmInsecureWarning: Not 
 using mpz_powm_sec.  You should rebuild using libgmp = 5 to avoid timing 
 attack vulnerability.
 Creating tables ...
 Project signature has changed - an evolution is required
 Installing custom SQL ...
 Installing indexes ...
 Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s)
 The stored evolutions do not completely resolve all model changes.
 Run `./manage.py evolve --hint` to see a suggestion for the 

Re: Review Board 1.7 RC 1 is released!

2012-12-08 Thread Christian Hammond
If you upgrade Djblets to what's in Git, this will go away. I'll see about 
doing another Djblets release tonight, though, to fix it.

As soon as we finish docs, 1.7 will be released.

Christian


On Dec 7, 2012, at 21:21, Vishal Gautam gautamvis...@gmail.com wrote:

 Turned Debug=True, now i see this  ... any pointers?
 
 Traceback:
 File 
 /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.2-py2.6.egg/django/core/handlers/base.py
  in get_response
   89. response = middleware_method(request)
 File 
 /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7rc1-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/admin/middleware.py
  in process_request
   44. load_site_config()
 File 
 /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7rc1-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/admin/siteconfig.py
  in load_site_config
   215. apply_django_settings(siteconfig, settings_map)
 File 
 /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.7.5-py2.6.egg/djblets/siteconfig/django_settings.py
  in apply_django_settings
   210. setter(settings, setting_key, value)
 File 
 /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.7.5-py2.6.egg/djblets/siteconfig/django_settings.py
  in _set_cache_backend
   48. engine, host, params = parse_backend_uri(value)
 File 
 /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.2-py2.6.egg/django/core/cache/__init__.py
  in parse_backend_uri
   58. if backend_uri.find(':') == -1:
 
 Exception Type: AttributeError at /
 Exception Value: 'dict' object has no attribute 'find'
 
 
 On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 12:16 AM, Christian Hammond chip...@gmail.com wrote:
 We're definitely compatible with Python 2.6. All the entries in the log you 
 provided are just harmless warnings, so it must be something else causing 
 the HTTP 500 error. Is there nothing else after that in the log file?
 
 Christian
 
 
 On Dec 7, 2012, at 5:56, Vishal Gautam gautamvis...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Ahh ... that python upgrade caused a lot of damage (being a newbie), spent 
 entire day battling it ... since it was a new install, I recreated the site 
 with new db, got plethora of errors. Thinking Python 2.7 could be an issue 
 I have now downgraded to Python 2.6 and re-installed RB 1.7 and recreated 
 the site. Now i get a 500 with following errors in error_log. Is RB 1.7 not 
 compatible with Python 2.6?
 
 [Fri Dec 07 13:39:43 2012] [error] 
 /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.7.5-py2.6.egg/djblets/gravatars/__init__.py:26:
  DeprecationWarning: the md5 module is deprecated; use hashlib instead
 [Fri Dec 07 13:39:43 2012] [error]   from md5 import md5
 [Fri Dec 07 13:39:43 2012] [error] 
 /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.2-py2.6.egg/django/views/generic/list_detail.py:10:
  DeprecationWarning: Function-based generic views have been deprecated; use 
 class-based views instead.
 [Fri Dec 07 13:39:43 2012] [error]   DeprecationWarning
 
 
 On Friday, December 7, 2012 12:13:16 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 First, do you have a backup of the database?
 
 What actions did you take on the database prior to this attempt? For 
 example, did you ever run evolve yourself? Or attempt a downgrade after an 
 upgrade?
 
 Christian
 
 -- 
 Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
 
 
 
 On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Vishal Gautam gautam...@gmail.com wrote:
 Thanks for the response Chris!
 
 I upgrade CentOS to 5.8, manually installed Python 2.7, upgraded 
 setuptools for 2.7, then upgraded RB to 1.7rc1. All this made it fine 
 (after getting bunch of issues those I could look up in Google). Now I am 
 stuck at upgrading the site  and my RB instance is down ... Please 
 help!
 
 [root@jira ~]# /usr/local/bin/rb-site upgrade 
 /var/www/reviews.xxx..com
 Rebuilding directory structure
 Updating database. This may take a while.
 /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Djblets-0.7.5-py2.7.egg/djblets/gravatars/__init__.py:26:
  DeprecationWarning: the md5 module is deprecated; use hashlib instead
   from md5 import md5
 /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pycrypto-2.6-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/Crypto/Util/number.py:57:
  PowmInsecureWarning: Not using mpz_powm_sec.  You should rebuild using 
 libgmp = 5 to avoid timing attack vulnerability.
 Creating tables ...
 Project signature has changed - an evolution is required
 Installing custom SQL ...
 Installing indexes ...
 Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s)
 The stored evolutions do not completely resolve all model changes.
 Run `./manage.py evolve --hint` to see a suggestion for the changes 
 required.
 
 The following are the changes that could not be resolved:
 In model reviews.FileAttachmentComment:
 Field 'extra_data' has been added
 In model reviews.ReviewRequest:
 Field 'last_review_activity_timestamp' has been added
 Field 'last_review_timestamp' has been deleted
 In model accounts.Profile:
 Field 'timezone' has been added
 

Re: Review Board 1.7 RC 1 is released!

2012-12-07 Thread Christian Hammond
We're definitely compatible with Python 2.6. All the entries in the log you 
provided are just harmless warnings, so it must be something else causing the 
HTTP 500 error. Is there nothing else after that in the log file?

Christian


On Dec 7, 2012, at 5:56, Vishal Gautam gautamvis...@gmail.com wrote:

 Ahh ... that python upgrade caused a lot of damage (being a newbie), spent 
 entire day battling it ... since it was a new install, I recreated the site 
 with new db, got plethora of errors. Thinking Python 2.7 could be an issue I 
 have now downgraded to Python 2.6 and re-installed RB 1.7 and recreated the 
 site. Now i get a 500 with following errors in error_log. Is RB 1.7 not 
 compatible with Python 2.6?
 
 [Fri Dec 07 13:39:43 2012] [error] 
 /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.7.5-py2.6.egg/djblets/gravatars/__init__.py:26:
  DeprecationWarning: the md5 module is deprecated; use hashlib instead
 [Fri Dec 07 13:39:43 2012] [error]   from md5 import md5
 [Fri Dec 07 13:39:43 2012] [error] 
 /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.2-py2.6.egg/django/views/generic/list_detail.py:10:
  DeprecationWarning: Function-based generic views have been deprecated; use 
 class-based views instead.
 [Fri Dec 07 13:39:43 2012] [error]   DeprecationWarning
 
 
 On Friday, December 7, 2012 12:13:16 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 First, do you have a backup of the database?
 
 What actions did you take on the database prior to this attempt? For 
 example, did you ever run evolve yourself? Or attempt a downgrade after an 
 upgrade?
 
 Christian
 
 -- 
 Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
 
 
 
 On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Vishal Gautam gautam...@gmail.com wrote:
 Thanks for the response Chris!
 
 I upgrade CentOS to 5.8, manually installed Python 2.7, upgraded setuptools 
 for 2.7, then upgraded RB to 1.7rc1. All this made it fine (after getting 
 bunch of issues those I could look up in Google). Now I am stuck at 
 upgrading the site  and my RB instance is down ... Please help!
 
 [root@jira ~]# /usr/local/bin/rb-site upgrade /var/www/reviews.xxx..com
 Rebuilding directory structure
 Updating database. This may take a while.
 /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Djblets-0.7.5-py2.7.egg/djblets/gravatars/__init__.py:26:
  DeprecationWarning: the md5 module is deprecated; use hashlib instead
   from md5 import md5
 /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pycrypto-2.6-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/Crypto/Util/number.py:57:
  PowmInsecureWarning: Not using mpz_powm_sec.  You should rebuild using 
 libgmp = 5 to avoid timing attack vulnerability.
 Creating tables ...
 Project signature has changed - an evolution is required
 Installing custom SQL ...
 Installing indexes ...
 Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s)
 The stored evolutions do not completely resolve all model changes.
 Run `./manage.py evolve --hint` to see a suggestion for the changes 
 required.
 
 The following are the changes that could not be resolved:
 In model reviews.FileAttachmentComment:
 Field 'extra_data' has been added
 In model reviews.ReviewRequest:
 Field 'last_review_activity_timestamp' has been added
 Field 'last_review_timestamp' has been deleted
 In model accounts.Profile:
 Field 'timezone' has been added
 Field 'open_an_issue' has been added
 In model diffviewer.DiffSetHistory:
 Field 'last_diff_updated' has been added
 In model diffviewer.FileDiff:
 Field 'diff_hash' has been added
 Field 'parent_diff_hash' has been added
 Field 'diff64' has been added
 Field 'parent_diff64' has been added
 Field 'parent_diff' has been deleted
 Field 'diff' has been deleted
 The model auth.Message has been deleted
 Error: Your models contain changes that Django Evolution cannot resolve 
 automatically.
 
 
 On Wednesday, December 5, 2012 8:36:42 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
 Review Board 1.7 requires Python 2.5 or higher. You'll have to upgrade in 
 order for it to work.
 
 What I'd recommend is a newer CentOS install, since some of our 
 dependencies will also need to be updated, and you won't hit as many 
 issues with the upgrade. Your best bet is to upgrade to something with 
 Python 2.7.
 
 Christian
 
 -- 
 Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
 
 
 
 On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Vishal Gautam gautam...@gmail.com wrote:
 We are trying out RB, we have 1.6.14 installed and running on CentOS 5.5. 
 Tried to upgrade it to 1.7 using following cmd but its failing  ... 
 
   easy_install -f 
 http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.7 -U ReviewBoard
 
 Here is the stracktrace, any help will be much appreciated
 
 Best match: ReviewBoard 1.7rc1
 Downloading 
 http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.7/ReviewBoard-1.7rc1.tar.gz
 Processing 

Re: Review Board 1.7 RC 1 is released!

2012-12-07 Thread Vishal Gautam
Turned Debug=True, now i see this  ... any pointers?

Traceback:
File
/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.2-py2.6.egg/django/core/handlers/base.py
in get_response
  89. response = middleware_method(request)
File
/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7rc1-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/admin/middleware.py
in process_request
  44. load_site_config()
File
/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7rc1-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/admin/siteconfig.py
in load_site_config
  215. apply_django_settings(siteconfig, settings_map)
File
/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.7.5-py2.6.egg/djblets/siteconfig/django_settings.py
in apply_django_settings
  210. setter(settings, setting_key, value)
File
/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.7.5-py2.6.egg/djblets/siteconfig/django_settings.py
in _set_cache_backend
  48. engine, host, params = parse_backend_uri(value)
File
/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.2-py2.6.egg/django/core/cache/__init__.py
in parse_backend_uri
  58. if backend_uri.find(':') == -1:

Exception Type: AttributeError at /
Exception Value: 'dict' object has no attribute 'find'


On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 12:16 AM, Christian Hammond chip...@gmail.comwrote:

 We're definitely compatible with Python 2.6. All the entries in the log
 you provided are just harmless warnings, so it must be something else
 causing the HTTP 500 error. Is there nothing else after that in the log
 file?

 Christian


 On Dec 7, 2012, at 5:56, Vishal Gautam gautamvis...@gmail.com wrote:

 Ahh ... that python upgrade caused a lot of damage (being a newbie), spent
 entire day battling it ... since it was a new install, I recreated the site
 with new db, got plethora of errors. Thinking Python 2.7 could be an issue
 I have now downgraded to Python 2.6 and re-installed RB 1.7 and recreated
 the site. Now i get a 500 with following errors in error_log. Is RB 1.7 not
 compatible with Python 2.6?

 [Fri Dec 07 13:39:43 2012] [error]
 /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.7.5-py2.6.egg/djblets/gravatars/__init__.py:26:
 DeprecationWarning: the md5 module is deprecated; use hashlib instead
 [Fri Dec 07 13:39:43 2012] [error]   from md5 import md5
 [Fri Dec 07 13:39:43 2012] [error]
 /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.2-py2.6.egg/django/views/generic/list_detail.py:10:
 DeprecationWarning: Function-based generic views have been deprecated; use
 class-based views instead.
 [Fri Dec 07 13:39:43 2012] [error]   DeprecationWarning


 On Friday, December 7, 2012 12:13:16 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:

 Hi,

 First, do you have a backup of the database?

 What actions did you take on the database prior to this attempt? For
 example, did you ever run evolve yourself? Or attempt a downgrade after an
 upgrade?

 Christian

 --
 Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com



 On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Vishal Gautam gautam...@gmail.comwrote:

 Thanks for the response Chris!

 I upgrade CentOS to 5.8, manually installed Python 2.7, upgraded
 setuptools for 2.7, then upgraded RB to 1.7rc1. All this made it fine
 (after getting bunch of issues those I could look up in Google). Now I am
 stuck at upgrading the site  and my RB instance is down ... Please help!

 [root@jira ~]# /usr/local/bin/rb-site upgrade /var/www/
 reviews.xxx..com
 Rebuilding directory structure
 Updating database. This may take a while.
 /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-**packages/Djblets-0.7.5-py2.7.**
 egg/djblets/gravatars/__init__**.py:26: DeprecationWarning: the md5
 module is deprecated; use hashlib instead
   from md5 import md5
 /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-**packages/pycrypto-2.6-py2.7-**
 linux-x86_64.egg/Crypto/Util/**number.py:57: PowmInsecureWarning: Not
 using mpz_powm_sec.  You should rebuild using libgmp = 5 to avoid timing
 attack vulnerability.
 Creating tables ...
 Project signature has changed - an evolution is required
 Installing custom SQL ...
 Installing indexes ...
 Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s)
 The stored evolutions do not completely resolve all model changes.
 Run `./manage.py evolve --hint` to see a suggestion for the changes
 required.

 The following are the changes that could not be resolved:
 In model reviews.FileAttachmentComment:
 Field 'extra_data' has been added
 In model reviews.ReviewRequest:
 Field 'last_review_activity_**timestamp' has been added
 Field 'last_review_timestamp' has been deleted
 In model accounts.Profile:
 Field 'timezone' has been added
 Field 'open_an_issue' has been added
 In model diffviewer.DiffSetHistory:
 Field 'last_diff_updated' has been added
 In model diffviewer.FileDiff:
 Field 'diff_hash' has been added
 Field 'parent_diff_hash' has been added
 Field 'diff64' has been added
 Field 'parent_diff64' has been added
 Field 'parent_diff' 

Re: Review Board 1.7 RC 1 is released!

2012-12-06 Thread Vishal Gautam
Thanks for the response Chris!

I upgrade CentOS to 5.8, manually installed Python 2.7, upgraded setuptools 
for 2.7, then upgraded RB to 1.7rc1. All this made it fine (after getting 
bunch of issues those I could look up in Google). Now I am stuck at 
upgrading the site  and my RB instance is down ... Please help!

[root@jira ~]# /usr/local/bin/rb-site upgrade /var/www/reviews.xxx..com
Rebuilding directory structure
Updating database. This may take a while.
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Djblets-0.7.5-py2.7.egg/djblets/gravatars/__init__.py:26:
 
DeprecationWarning: the md5 module is deprecated; use hashlib instead
  from md5 import md5
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pycrypto-2.6-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/Crypto/Util/number.py:57:
 
PowmInsecureWarning: Not using mpz_powm_sec.  You should rebuild using 
libgmp = 5 to avoid timing attack vulnerability.
Creating tables ...
Project signature has changed - an evolution is required
Installing custom SQL ...
Installing indexes ...
Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s)
The stored evolutions do not completely resolve all model changes.
Run `./manage.py evolve --hint` to see a suggestion for the changes 
required.

The following are the changes that could not be resolved:
In model reviews.FileAttachmentComment:
Field 'extra_data' has been added
In model reviews.ReviewRequest:
Field 'last_review_activity_timestamp' has been added
Field 'last_review_timestamp' has been deleted
In model accounts.Profile:
Field 'timezone' has been added
Field 'open_an_issue' has been added
In model diffviewer.DiffSetHistory:
Field 'last_diff_updated' has been added
In model diffviewer.FileDiff:
Field 'diff_hash' has been added
Field 'parent_diff_hash' has been added
Field 'diff64' has been added
Field 'parent_diff64' has been added
Field 'parent_diff' has been deleted
Field 'diff' has been deleted
The model auth.Message has been deleted
Error: Your models contain changes that Django Evolution cannot resolve 
automatically.


On Wednesday, December 5, 2012 8:36:42 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:

 Review Board 1.7 requires Python 2.5 or higher. You'll have to upgrade in 
 order for it to work.

 What I'd recommend is a newer CentOS install, since some of our 
 dependencies will also need to be updated, and you won't hit as many issues 
 with the upgrade. Your best bet is to upgrade to something with Python 2.7.

 Christian

 -- 
 Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript:
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com



 On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Vishal Gautam 
 gautam...@gmail.comjavascript:
  wrote:

 We are trying out RB, we have 1.6.14 installed and running on CentOS 5.5. 
 Tried to upgrade it to 1.7 using following cmd but its failing  ... 

   easy_install -f 
 http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.7 -U ReviewBoard

 Here is the stracktrace, any help will be much appreciated

 Best match: ReviewBoard 1.7rc1
 Downloading 
 http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.7/ReviewBoard-1.7rc1.tar.gz
 Processing ReviewBoard-1.7rc1.tar.gz
 Running ReviewBoard-1.7rc1/setup.py -q bdist_egg --dist-dir 
 /tmp/easy_install-vW-lSE/ReviewBoard-1.7rc1/egg-dist-tmp-DrI1Td
 Traceback (most recent call last):
   File ./contrib/internal/build-media.py, line 19, in ?
 ret = call_command('collectstatic', interactive=False, verbosity=2)
   File 
 /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Django-1.3.4-py2.4.egg/django/core/management/__init__.py,
  
 line 153, in call_command
 klass = load_command_class(app_name, name)
   File 
 /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Django-1.3.4-py2.4.egg/django/core/management/__init__.py,
  
 line 68, in load_command_class
 return module.Command()
   File 
 /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Django-1.3.4-py2.4.egg/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py,
  
 line 41, in __init__
 self.storage = get_storage_class(settings.STATICFILES_STORAGE)()
   File 
 /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Django-1.3.4-py2.4.egg/django/core/files/storage.py,
  
 line 265, in get_storage_class
 raise ImproperlyConfigured('Error importing storage module %s: %s' 
 % (module, e))
 django.core.exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured: Error importing storage 
 module pipeline.storage: cannot import name CachedFilesMixin
 Traceback (most recent call last):
   File /usr/bin/easy_install, line 7, in ?
 sys.exit(
   File 
 /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/setuptools-0.6c12dev_r88846-py2.4.egg/setuptools/command/easy_install.py,
  
 line 1712, in main
 ..
 snipped
 ...
 self.distribution.run_command(command)
   File /usr/lib64/python2.4/distutils/dist.py, line 966, in run_command
 cmd_obj.run()
   File setup.py, line 63, in run
   File /usr/lib64/python2.4/distutils/cmd.py, line 333, in run_command
 self.distribution.run_command(command)
   File /usr/lib64/python2.4/distutils/dist.py, line 966, 

Re: Review Board 1.7 RC 1 is released!

2012-12-06 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi,

First, do you have a backup of the database?

What actions did you take on the database prior to this attempt? For
example, did you ever run evolve yourself? Or attempt a downgrade after an
upgrade?

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com



On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Vishal Gautam gautamvis...@gmail.comwrote:

 Thanks for the response Chris!

 I upgrade CentOS to 5.8, manually installed Python 2.7, upgraded
 setuptools for 2.7, then upgraded RB to 1.7rc1. All this made it fine
 (after getting bunch of issues those I could look up in Google). Now I am
 stuck at upgrading the site  and my RB instance is down ... Please help!

 [root@jira ~]# /usr/local/bin/rb-site upgrade /var/www/
 reviews.xxx..com
 Rebuilding directory structure
 Updating database. This may take a while.
 /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Djblets-0.7.5-py2.7.egg/djblets/gravatars/__init__.py:26:
 DeprecationWarning: the md5 module is deprecated; use hashlib instead
   from md5 import md5
 /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pycrypto-2.6-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/Crypto/Util/number.py:57:
 PowmInsecureWarning: Not using mpz_powm_sec.  You should rebuild using
 libgmp = 5 to avoid timing attack vulnerability.
 Creating tables ...
 Project signature has changed - an evolution is required
 Installing custom SQL ...
 Installing indexes ...
 Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s)
 The stored evolutions do not completely resolve all model changes.
 Run `./manage.py evolve --hint` to see a suggestion for the changes
 required.

 The following are the changes that could not be resolved:
 In model reviews.FileAttachmentComment:
 Field 'extra_data' has been added
 In model reviews.ReviewRequest:
 Field 'last_review_activity_timestamp' has been added
 Field 'last_review_timestamp' has been deleted
 In model accounts.Profile:
 Field 'timezone' has been added
 Field 'open_an_issue' has been added
 In model diffviewer.DiffSetHistory:
 Field 'last_diff_updated' has been added
 In model diffviewer.FileDiff:
 Field 'diff_hash' has been added
 Field 'parent_diff_hash' has been added
 Field 'diff64' has been added
 Field 'parent_diff64' has been added
 Field 'parent_diff' has been deleted
 Field 'diff' has been deleted
 The model auth.Message has been deleted
 Error: Your models contain changes that Django Evolution cannot resolve
 automatically.


 On Wednesday, December 5, 2012 8:36:42 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond
 wrote:

 Review Board 1.7 requires Python 2.5 or higher. You'll have to upgrade in
 order for it to work.

 What I'd recommend is a newer CentOS install, since some of our
 dependencies will also need to be updated, and you won't hit as many issues
 with the upgrade. Your best bet is to upgrade to something with Python 2.7.

 Christian

 --
 Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com



 On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Vishal Gautam gautam...@gmail.comwrote:

 We are trying out RB, we have 1.6.14 installed and running on CentOS
 5.5. Tried to upgrade it to 1.7 using following cmd but its failing  ...

   easy_install -f http://downloads.reviewboard.**
 org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.7http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.7-U
  ReviewBoard

 Here is the stracktrace, any help will be much appreciated

 Best match: ReviewBoard 1.7rc1
 Downloading http://downloads.reviewboard.**org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.7/
 **ReviewBoard-1.7rc1.tar.gzhttp://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.7/ReviewBoard-1.7rc1.tar.gz
 Processing ReviewBoard-1.7rc1.tar.gz
 Running ReviewBoard-1.7rc1/setup.py -q bdist_egg --dist-dir
 /tmp/easy_install-vW-lSE/**ReviewBoard-1.7rc1/egg-dist-**tmp-DrI1Td
 Traceback (most recent call last):
   File ./contrib/internal/build-**media.py, line 19, in ?
 ret = call_command('collectstatic', interactive=False, verbosity=2)
   File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-**packages/Django-1.3.4-py2.4.**
 egg/django/core/management/__**init__.py, line 153, in call_command
 klass = load_command_class(app_name, name)
   File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-**packages/Django-1.3.4-py2.4.**
 egg/django/core/management/__**init__.py, line 68, in
 load_command_class
 return module.Command()
   File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-**packages/Django-1.3.4-py2.4.**
 egg/django/contrib/**staticfiles/management/**commands/collectstatic.py,
 line 41, in __init__
 self.storage = get_storage_class(settings.**STATICFILES_STORAGE)()
   File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-**packages/Django-1.3.4-py2.4.**
 egg/django/core/files/storage.**py, line 265, in get_storage_class
 raise ImproperlyConfigured('Error importing storage module %s: %s'
 % (module, e))
 django.core.exceptions.**ImproperlyConfigured: Error importing storage
 module pipeline.storage: cannot import name CachedFilesMixin
 Traceback (most recent 

Re: Review Board 1.7 RC 1 is released!

2012-12-05 Thread Christian Hammond
Review Board 1.7 requires Python 2.5 or higher. You'll have to upgrade in
order for it to work.

What I'd recommend is a newer CentOS install, since some of our
dependencies will also need to be updated, and you won't hit as many issues
with the upgrade. Your best bet is to upgrade to something with Python 2.7.

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com



On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Vishal Gautam gautamvis...@gmail.comwrote:

 We are trying out RB, we have 1.6.14 installed and running on CentOS 5.5.
 Tried to upgrade it to 1.7 using following cmd but its failing  ...

   easy_install -f
 http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.7 -U ReviewBoard

 Here is the stracktrace, any help will be much appreciated

 Best match: ReviewBoard 1.7rc1
 Downloading
 http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.7/ReviewBoard-1.7rc1.tar.gz
 Processing ReviewBoard-1.7rc1.tar.gz
 Running ReviewBoard-1.7rc1/setup.py -q bdist_egg --dist-dir
 /tmp/easy_install-vW-lSE/ReviewBoard-1.7rc1/egg-dist-tmp-DrI1Td
 Traceback (most recent call last):
   File ./contrib/internal/build-media.py, line 19, in ?
 ret = call_command('collectstatic', interactive=False, verbosity=2)
   File
 /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Django-1.3.4-py2.4.egg/django/core/management/__init__.py,
 line 153, in call_command
 klass = load_command_class(app_name, name)
   File
 /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Django-1.3.4-py2.4.egg/django/core/management/__init__.py,
 line 68, in load_command_class
 return module.Command()
   File
 /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Django-1.3.4-py2.4.egg/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py,
 line 41, in __init__
 self.storage = get_storage_class(settings.STATICFILES_STORAGE)()
   File
 /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Django-1.3.4-py2.4.egg/django/core/files/storage.py,
 line 265, in get_storage_class
 raise ImproperlyConfigured('Error importing storage module %s: %s' %
 (module, e))
 django.core.exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured: Error importing storage
 module pipeline.storage: cannot import name CachedFilesMixin
 Traceback (most recent call last):
   File /usr/bin/easy_install, line 7, in ?
 sys.exit(
   File
 /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/setuptools-0.6c12dev_r88846-py2.4.egg/setuptools/command/easy_install.py,
 line 1712, in main
 ..
 snipped
 ...
 self.distribution.run_command(command)
   File /usr/lib64/python2.4/distutils/dist.py, line 966, in run_command
 cmd_obj.run()
   File setup.py, line 63, in run
   File /usr/lib64/python2.4/distutils/cmd.py, line 333, in run_command
 self.distribution.run_command(command)
   File /usr/lib64/python2.4/distutils/dist.py, line 966, in run_command
 cmd_obj.run()
   File setup.py, line 81, in run
 RuntimeError: Failed to build media files


 On Friday, November 30, 2012 3:38:07 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:

 Review Board Better Late Than Never 1.7 RC 1 is out. We had hoped to
 get this out earlier, but hit some problems and annoyances during some
 production use that we felt should be fixed first. So trust me, it was
 worth the wait :)

 There's a lot of fixes, enhancements, and some small extension interface
 changes in this release.

 See the news and release notes for more information.

 http://www.reviewboard.org/**news/2012/11/29/review-board-**
 1-7-rc-1-released/http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/11/29/review-board-1-7-rc-1-released/

 We'd like to ask those who plan to upgrade to 1.7 to please give it a
 try. Aside from major fixes, we are hoping there won't be many changes made
 until the final 1.7, so now's the time to report any regressions you hit.

 Christian

 --
 Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com

 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com



-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en




Re: Review Board 1.7 RC 1 is released!

2012-11-30 Thread Daniel Laird
Very exciting - I look forward to getting this installed.
One question I have is about RBTools?

I am using ReviewBot and that depends on the API branch of RBtools.
Do you know if the API branch is going to be merged / released at the same 
time?

Also I understand there was a plan for a Python API for 1.7 (as well as the 
RESTful API) - is that still planned or has that slipped to 1.8 (or later)

Cheers
Dan

On Thursday, November 29, 2012 10:08:07 PM UTC, Christian Hammond wrote:

 Review Board Better Late Than Never 1.7 RC 1 is out. We had hoped to get 
 this out earlier, but hit some problems and annoyances during some 
 production use that we felt should be fixed first. So trust me, it was 
 worth the wait :)

 There's a lot of fixes, enhancements, and some small extension interface 
 changes in this release.

 See the news and release notes for more information.

 http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/11/29/review-board-1-7-rc-1-released/

 We'd like to ask those who plan to upgrade to 1.7 to please give it a try. 
 Aside from major fixes, we are hoping there won't be many changes made 
 until the final 1.7, so now's the time to report any regressions you hit.

 Christian

 -- 
 Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript:
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en




Re: Review Board 1.7 RC 1 is released!

2012-11-30 Thread kvr
Hi,

Tried to install development version of 1.7RC, hit some errors.
Debug info shows below.
NameError at /

global name 'InvalidCacheBackendError' is not defined


Request Method:GETRequest URL:http://107.108.50.12:8085/Django 
Version:1.4.2Exception 
Type:NameErrorException Value:

global name 'InvalidCacheBackendError' is not defined

Exception 
Location:C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\djblets-0.7.4-py2.7.egg\djblets\siteconfig\django_settings.py
 
in _set_cache_backend, line 47Python Executable:C:\Python27\python.exePython 
Version:2.7.3
 
Any clue to fix this?


On Friday, November 30, 2012 4:25:52 PM UTC+5:30, Daniel Laird wrote:

 Very exciting - I look forward to getting this installed.
 One question I have is about RBTools?

 I am using ReviewBot and that depends on the API branch of RBtools.
 Do you know if the API branch is going to be merged / released at the same 
 time?

 Also I understand there was a plan for a Python API for 1.7 (as well as 
 the RESTful API) - is that still planned or has that slipped to 1.8 (or 
 later)

 Cheers
 Dan

 On Thursday, November 29, 2012 10:08:07 PM UTC, Christian Hammond wrote:

 Review Board Better Late Than Never 1.7 RC 1 is out. We had hoped to 
 get this out earlier, but hit some problems and annoyances during some 
 production use that we felt should be fixed first. So trust me, it was 
 worth the wait :)

 There's a lot of fixes, enhancements, and some small extension interface 
 changes in this release.

 See the news and release notes for more information.

 http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/11/29/review-board-1-7-rc-1-released/

 We'd like to ask those who plan to upgrade to 1.7 to please give it a 
 try. Aside from major fixes, we are hoping there won't be many changes made 
 until the final 1.7, so now's the time to report any regressions you hit.

 Christian

 -- 
 Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com



-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en




Re: Review Board 1.7 RC 1 is released!

2012-11-30 Thread Christian Hammond
If you upgrade your Djblets, this will now be fixed.

Separately from this, though, I must strongly encourage you to move off of
Windows as a host, as 1.6.x will be the last release where we officially
support it. Going forward, it may break, and we won't be testing it.

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 3:20 AM, kvr kvr@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,

 Tried to install development version of 1.7RC, hit some errors.
 Debug info shows below.
 NameError at /


 global name 'InvalidCacheBackendError' is not defined


 Request Method:GET Request URL:http://107.108.50.12:8085/ Django 
 Version:1.4.2Exception
 Type: NameError Exception Value:

 global name 'InvalidCacheBackendError' is not defined

 Exception 
 Location:C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\djblets-0.7.4-py2.7.egg\djblets\siteconfig\django_settings.py
 in _set_cache_backend, line 47 Python Executable: 
 C:\Python27\python.exePython Version:
 2.7.3

 Any clue to fix this?


 On Friday, November 30, 2012 4:25:52 PM UTC+5:30, Daniel Laird wrote:

 Very exciting - I look forward to getting this installed.
 One question I have is about RBTools?

 I am using ReviewBot and that depends on the API branch of RBtools.
 Do you know if the API branch is going to be merged / released at the
 same time?

 Also I understand there was a plan for a Python API for 1.7 (as well as
 the RESTful API) - is that still planned or has that slipped to 1.8 (or
 later)

 Cheers
 Dan

 On Thursday, November 29, 2012 10:08:07 PM UTC, Christian Hammond wrote:

 Review Board Better Late Than Never 1.7 RC 1 is out. We had hoped to
 get this out earlier, but hit some problems and annoyances during some
 production use that we felt should be fixed first. So trust me, it was
 worth the wait :)

 There's a lot of fixes, enhancements, and some small extension interface
 changes in this release.

 See the news and release notes for more information.

 http://www.reviewboard.org/**news/2012/11/29/review-board-**
 1-7-rc-1-released/http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/11/29/review-board-1-7-rc-1-released/

 We'd like to ask those who plan to upgrade to 1.7 to please give it a
 try. Aside from major fixes, we are hoping there won't be many changes made
 until the final 1.7, so now's the time to report any regressions you hit.

 Christian

 --
 Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com

  --
 Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
 http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en




-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en