ket. (I'm
not sure if users can resolve tickets or if that's limited to Splat/project
admins.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"reviewboard-issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send a
w/o waiting for central admins to upgrade central infra
first.
I may be able to allocate cycles to contribute patches for this.
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"reviewboar
low.
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"reviewboard-issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@goo
sk.
# Please provide any additional information below.
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"reviewboard-issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receivi
happy to dive in if
there's somewhere I can help out :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"reviewboard-issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegro
ing: svn --non-interactive info
>>> Running: diff --version
>>> Running: svn --non-interactive --version -q
>>> Repository info: Path: http://visualsvn.{company}.co.uk/svn/280, Base path:
>>> /t
runk, Supports changesets: False
>>> Making HTTP GET request t
.
# What operating system are you using? What browser?
Server on ubuntu 14.04. Web browser Chrome 59 + macOS
# Please provide any additional information below.
The issue appears to be the `.split(',')` calls on these fields here:
https://github.com/reviewboard/reviewboard/blob/master/reviewboa
Comment #1 on issue 3198 by prog...@gmail.com: Downloaded patch files
contain hash values that don't match content
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3198
Probably a duplicate of Issue 2916
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
Comment #23 on issue 2916 by prog...@gmail.com: Review Board does not
respect line endings
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2916
I think issue 3198 is another duplicate of this issue
This issue issue affect me too- i need the patch to preserve the original
CRLFs
Comment #24 on issue 2916 by chip...@gmail.com: Review Board does not
respect line endings
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2916
This bug has moved to https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/2916/.
Please post any updates there. You can use your existing Google login
Comment #8 on issue 3299 by farid.m@gmail.com: 500 Internal Server Error
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3299
I had to do 'pip install mod_wsgi '
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You
Comment #5 on issue 3446 by ke...@keithmoyer.com: ReviewRequestFieldsHook
and email notfications
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3446
Any chance this will make it into Review Board 2.5?
Not trying to rush it; just making sure it wasn't forgotten since you
mentioned
Comment #6 on issue 3446 by chip...@gmail.com: ReviewRequestFieldsHook and
email notfications
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3446
Hi Keith,
This bug has moved over to https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/3446/
--
You received this message because this project
Comment #2 on issue 2777 by vlad.rom...@gmail.com: rbssh is very slow
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2777
Replace the contents of /usr/bin/rbssh with the following:
#!/bin/sh
EXTRA_OPTS="-o UserKnownHostsFile=$HOME/.ssh/known_hosts -o ForwardX11=no
-o LogLevel=
Comment #2 on issue 3965 by boris.bo...@gmail.com: View diff fails for
C/C++ files from unified CVS diff
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3965
Further investigation shows that the issue with C/C++ code only appears if
the diff is created based on two CVS revisions
Comment #3 on issue 3965 by chip...@gmail.com: View diff fails for C/C++
files from unified CVS diff
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3965
Hi Boris,
This bug has moved to https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/3965/. You
can log in with your Google account
Comment #7 on issue 3252 by akashseo...@gmail.com:
http://downloads.reviewboard.org/nightlies/ does not exist
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3252
Thanks for all your information, Website is very nice and informative
content.
Packers and Movers in Faridabad @
http
Comment #9 on issue 3252 by akashseo...@gmail.com:
http://downloads.reviewboard.org/nightlies/ does not exist
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3252
Thanks for post this helpful post - Please visit for More information about
-
Packers and Movers in Chennai @
http
Comment #6 on issue 3252 by akashseo...@gmail.com:
http://downloads.reviewboard.org/nightlies/ does not exist
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3252
This article is really fantastic and thanks for sharing the valuable post.
Packers and Movers in Gurgaon @
http
Comment #4 on issue 3252 by akashseo...@gmail.com:
http://downloads.reviewboard.org/nightlies/ does not exist
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3252
Thanks for post this helpful post - Please visit for More information about
-
Packers and Movers in Chennai @
http
Comment #10 on issue 3252 by akashseo...@gmail.com:
http://downloads.reviewboard.org/nightlies/ does not exist
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3252
Thanks for all your information, Website is very nice and informative
content.
Packers and Movers in Faridabad
Comment #8 on issue 3252 by akashseo...@gmail.com:
http://downloads.reviewboard.org/nightlies/ does not exist
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3252
Thanks for post this helpful post - Please visit for More information about
-
Packers and movers in Gurgaon @
http
Comment #5 on issue 3252 by akashseo...@gmail.com:
http://downloads.reviewboard.org/nightlies/ does not exist
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3252
Thanks for post this helpful post - Please visit for More information about
-
Packers and Movers in Chennai @
http
Comment #11 on issue 3252 by akashseo...@gmail.com:
http://downloads.reviewboard.org/nightlies/ does not exist
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3252
Thanks for post this helpful post - Please visit for More information about
-
Packers and movers in Gurgaon @
http
Comment #12 on issue 1125 by konrad.m...@motorolasolutions.com: server port
number is missing in review request email
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1125
ReviewBoard 2.0.20 - same issue.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
Comment #8 on issue 3184 by aniru...@sdrc.co.in: rbt status fails with
perforce repository
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3184
I have same problem having rbt tools 0.7.4 and review Board 1.7.20
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send
Comment #9 on issue 3184 by chip...@gmail.com: rbt status fails with
perforce repository
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3184
This bug has been moved to https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/3184/
--
You received this message because this project is configured
Comment #9 on issue 180 by busuparm...@gmail.com: "replying" to previous
comments in the diff viewer is confusing
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=180
using windows xp easier than with Windows 8
http://www.goapindulgelaran.com
--
You received this messa
Comment #10 on issue 180 by busuparm...@gmail.com: "replying" to previous
comments in the diff viewer is confusing
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=180
using windows xp easier than with Windows 8 from me href="http://www.goapindulgelaran.com;>Wis
Comment #11 on issue 180 by busuparm...@gmail.com: "replying" to previous
comments in the diff viewer is confusing
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=180
using windows xp easier than with Windows 8
http://www.goapindulgelaran.com
--
You received this messa
Comment #3 on issue 3145 by khairula...@gmail.com: Cannot add review
comments to attached text files
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3145
thank you information sir
http://www.taspriaonline.com/
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send
Comment #9 on issue 773 by khairula...@gmail.com: Add Bazaar (bzr) support
to post-review
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=773
Bzr support is one of the strongest incentives for using reviewboard.
http://www.taspriaonline.com/
--
You received this message because
Comment #6 on issue 3966 by griffin@gmail.com: Uploading a revision to
a CR twice before publishing creates bad partial diffs
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3966
I observed the same behavior this morning with 2.0.19 and Firefox (I don't
have the FF version
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3967 by shirph...@126.com: upgrade from 2.0.18 to 2.0.20 get error
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3967
*** READ THIS BEFORE POSTING!
***
*** You must complete this form in its entirety, or your bug
Comment #3 on issue 3967 by shirph...@126.com: upgrade from 2.0.18 to
2.0.20 get error
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3967
yihuihu@shreview02:/var/www$ sudo rb-site manage /var/www/reviewboard
list-evolutions
[sudo] password for yihuihu:
Applied evolutions
Comment #5 on issue 3967 by shirph...@126.com: upgrade from 2.0.18 to
2.0.20 get error
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3967
OK , I got the result from command line:
from django_evolution.models import Version
for version in Version.objects.all(): print version
Updates:
Status: NeedInfo
Comment #2 on issue 3967 by chip...@gmail.com: upgrade from 2.0.18 to
2.0.20 get error
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3967
Sounds like your database is in a bad state. It needs to be repaired, or
this will just continue to happen
Comment #1 on issue 3967 by shirph...@126.com: upgrade from 2.0.18 to
2.0.20 get error
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3967
admin --- database ---DJANGO_EVOLUTION --- versions:
Stored version, updated on 2015-02-12 02:23:19+00:00
Hinted version, updated on 2015
Comment #6 on issue 3967 by chip...@gmail.com: upgrade from 2.0.18 to
2.0.20 get error
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3967
Okay, something to try:
First, back up your database. We will be doing something that might require
re-loading it back in.
Second, go back
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #8 on issue 3967 by chip...@gmail.com: upgrade from 2.0.18 to
2.0.20 get error
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3967
Glad to hear it! :)
We've seen this in a couple of cases, but it's very unclear why it's
happening.
--
You
Comment #7 on issue 3967 by shirph...@126.com: upgrade from 2.0.18 to
2.0.20 get error
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3967
Thanks you very very very much, It works now.
from django_evolution.models import Version
v = Version.objects.all()[0]
print v
Hinted version
Comment #6 on issue 3841 by anthonyh...@gmail.com: rbtools.api.request
hardcodes http return codes
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3841
I'll pick this up as an easy-fix bug.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue
Comment #7 on issue 3841 by anthonyh...@gmail.com: rbtools.api.request
hardcodes http return codes
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3841
Review Request #7625 created for this issue.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue
Comment #5 on issue 3966 by physicss...@gmail.com: Uploading a revision to
a CR twice before publishing creates bad partial diffs
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3966
It looks like once I've looked at diff/2 and diff/1-2, they get cached in a
cookie.
When I update
Comment #6 on issue 3963 by paul.man...@alcatel-lucent.com: markdown in the
field Note to Reviewers gets quoted with backslashes after editing
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3963
I re-read what you wrote and changed browser URL as required and downloaded
the payload
Comment #5 on issue 3963 by paul.man...@alcatel-lucent.com: markdown in the
field Note to Reviewers gets quoted with backslashes after editing
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3963
I don't have any admin rights on our server running reviewboard so I can
only tell you
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3965 by boris.bo...@gmail.com: View diff fails for C/C++ files
from unified CVS diff
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3965
What version are you running?
Review Board 2.0.18
What's the URL of the page
Comment #3 on issue 3963 by paul.man...@alcatel-lucent.com: markdown in the
field Note to Reviewers gets quoted with backslashes after editing
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3963
Hi,
yes, I did publish the review with some notes-for-reviewers set, and then
modified
Comment #4 on issue 3966 by physicss...@gmail.com: Uploading a revision to
a CR twice before publishing creates bad partial diffs
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3966
Some new info.
This appears to be a Chrome- or at least browser-related issue.
I cleared Chrome's
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3966 by physicss...@gmail.com: Uploading a revision to a CR twice
before publishing creates bad partial diffs
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3966
What version are you running?
Reviewboard 2.0.19
Comment #3 on issue 3966 by physicss...@gmail.com: Uploading a revision to
a CR twice before publishing creates bad partial diffs
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3966
I looked up how to flush memcached and ended up running
echo 'flush_all' | nc localhost 11211
Updates:
Status: NeedInfo
Comment #2 on issue 3966 by chip...@gmail.com: Uploading a revision to a CR
twice before publishing creates bad partial diffs
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3966
As a test, what happens if you clear the server cache? Does the problem
Comment #1 on issue 3966 by chip...@gmail.com: Uploading a revision to a CR
twice before publishing creates bad partial diffs
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3966
Thanks for the detailed reproduction steps!
We generate the changes between diffs on-the-fly by patching
Comment #4 on issue 3963 by chip...@gmail.com: markdown in the field Note
to Reviewers gets quoted with backslashes after editing
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3963
Would you be able to get the API payloads for me at each stage? That'll
tell me more.
--
You
Comment #3 on issue 3747 by nano...@gmail.com: Review images is broken
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3747
@david,
Is there a chance this issue also affect document (a .docx)?
on our side we've got a 500 error when displaying review request containing
an attachement
Comment #2 on issue 3935 by anthonyh...@gmail.com: Auto populate branch
name when creating new Review Request
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3935
Will be working on this as my first easy fix bug.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send
Comment #4 on issue 3747 by nano...@gmail.com: Review images is broken
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3747
I confirm it is the same issue, and David's fix works on any kind of file
attachment. It has solved our issue with .docx
--
You received this message because
Comment #1 on issue 3809 by justin.h...@gmail.com: Broken .kt style in
rb/css/syntax.css
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3809
Was able to replicate the problem and looking into it now.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3962 by phil...@gmail.com: Mercurial repositories not usable on
Windows Reviewboard install when hg is installed with 'pip'
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3962
What version are you running?
2.0.19
Comment #4 on issue 3954 by alder...@gmail.com: Error 500 to some tickets
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3954
I,ve been hitting the same bug with CSV files attachments (pure csv from
php csv writter) as well as doc and docx.
it blocks the whole review when it happens
Comment #5 on issue 3954 by alder...@gmail.com: Error 500 to some tickets
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3954
(FYI 2.0.19 as well, and everything was working before)
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3963 by paul.man...@alcatel-lucent.com: markdown in the field
Note to Reviewers gets quoted with backslashes after editing
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3963
What version are you running?
2.0.15
Comment #2 on issue 3963 by chip...@gmail.com: markdown in the field Note
to Reviewers gets quoted with backslashes after editing
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3963
Also, did you publish between steps 1 and 2? If so, I'd be interested in
seeing API data from both
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3964 by zach...@gmail.com: Text Overflow in Search Auto-Complete
for Long Usernames / Long Review Titles
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3964
What version are you running?
2.0.18
What's the URL
Updates:
Status: NeedInfo
Labels: Project-ReviewBoard Component-Markdown
Comment #1 on issue 3963 by chip...@gmail.com: markdown in the field Note
to Reviewers gets quoted with backslashes after editing
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3963
Interesting
Comment #6 on issue 3954 by chip...@gmail.com: Error 500 to some tickets
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3954
We'll have 2.0.20 out in just a couple days with this fix.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3961 by adilcash...@gmail.com: Cannot publish the reply to
comments
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3961
*** READ THIS BEFORE POSTING!
***
*** You must complete this form in its entirety, or your bug
Comment #10 on issue 3891 by justin.h...@gmail.com: Error adding new
mercurial repository
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3891
Was able to reproduce the error. Will look into fixing now for an
easy-bug-fix.
--
You received this message because this project
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3960 by adilcash...@gmail.com: Not able to publish the comments
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3960
*** READ THIS BEFORE POSTING!
***
*** You must complete this form in its entirety, or your bug report
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3959 by vzeit...@gmail.com: Bogus "file was not found" error when
moving files and changing their mode in a Git repository
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3959
Using RBTools 0.7.4 under C
Updates:
Status: Invalid
Comment #1 on issue 3960 by trowb...@gmail.com: Not able to publish the
comments
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3960
We need you to fill out the form in as much detail as possible or we can't
do anything to help.
--
You received
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3958 by damien.d...@bt-ground.com: Unicode in user names
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3958
What version are you running?
2.0.19
What's the URL of the page containing the problem?
There's no URL, its
Comment #2 on issue 3956 by chip...@gmail.com: review requests with file
attachments get 500 errors after upgrade to 2.0.19
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3956
We're planning to release 2.0.20 this weekend, which will fix this.
--
You received this message because
Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Mergedinto: 3954
Comment #3 on issue 3956 by chip...@gmail.com: review requests with file
attachments get 500 errors after upgrade to 2.0.19
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3956
(No comment was entered for this change
Comment #3 on issue 3954 by chip...@gmail.com: Error 500 to some tickets
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3954
Issue 3956 has been merged into this issue.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3957 by ramia...@gmail.com: Issue updating reviews with RB tools
0.7.4, ReviewBoard 2.5 RC1 and Perforce
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3957
*** READ THIS BEFORE POSTING!
***
*** You must complete
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3955 by christop...@delphix.com: circular dependency between
reviews makes review request un-updatable (500 errors)
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3955
*** READ THIS BEFORE POSTING!
***
*** You must
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3956 by christop...@delphix.com: review requests with file
attachments get 500 errors after upgrade to 2.0.19
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3956
*** READ THIS BEFORE POSTING!
***
*** You must
Comment #1 on issue 3956 by christop...@delphix.com: review requests with
file attachments get 500 errors after upgrade to 2.0.19
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3956
I forgot to mention that I am unable to reproduce the issue after the
upgrade (i.e. creating a new
Comment #16 on issue 3915 by aklitz...@gmail.com: Add support for SCM
Manager as a HostingService
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3915
You can see that in "rbtools/hooks/mercurial.py" with "class
MercurialDiffer" at that review request [1] fr
Updates:
Status: NeedInfo
Comment #2 on issue 3954 by chip...@gmail.com: Error 500 to some tickets
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3954
What kind of files are attached to that review request?
We have a fix coming out in 2.0.20 (probably this week), but were under
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3954 by atrubits...@eisgroup.com: Error 500 to some tickets
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3954
Here is the output from admin email
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site
Comment #1 on issue 3954 by atrubits...@eisgroup.com: Error 500 to some
tickets
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3954
Please let me know what is the error reason and what is the way to fix it
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
Comment #2 on issue 3953 by bar...@beanbaginc.com: no Email on ship it
action
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3953
Can you try this on the latest release-2.0.x? I believe this was fixed in
commit a22600574e26571f0ee31eba46322e73995531cd.
--
You received
Comment #1 on issue 3953 by shul...@gmail.com: no Email on ship it action
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3953
Same problem here. Not just for ship it emails, but any emails that
contain Chinese characters.
--
You received this message because this project
Comment #13 on issue 3915 by aklitz...@gmail.com: Add support for SCM
Manager as a HostingService
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3915
update diffviewer_diffset set base_commit_id=NULL where base_commit_id
like '%^1%';
--
You received this message because
Comment #15 on issue 3915 by bar...@beanbaginc.com: Add support for SCM
Manager as a HostingService
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3915
How exactly are you generating the diff with MercurialClient? You may be
generating it in an incorrect way. If you generate
Comment #12 on issue 3915 by aklitz...@gmail.com: Add support for SCM
Manager as a HostingService
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3915
This introduces it:
https://github.com/reviewboard/reviewboard/commit/6b34af11397d92ae5c396ed911840ae6b0392cfd
If in table
Comment #14 on issue 3915 by aklitz...@gmail.com: Add support for SCM
Manager as a HostingService
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3915
update diffviewer_diffset set base_commit_id=NULL where base_commit_id
like '%^1';
--
You received this message because
Comment #11 on issue 3915 by aklitz...@gmail.com: Add support for SCM
Manager as a HostingService
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3915
Work-around:
diff --git a/rbtools/clients/mercurial.py b/rbtools/clients/mercurial.py
index ad0d1f9..2f6edc9 100644
--- a/rbtools
Comment #10 on issue 3915 by aklitz...@gmail.com: Add support for SCM
Manager as a HostingService
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3915
Ok, I found the problem.
I'm using a script on server side [1] to create the diff, parent diff and
the base commit id using
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3953 by guillaum...@gmail.com: no Email on ship it action
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3953
What version are you running?
Review Board 2.0.19
What's the URL of the page containing the problem?
http
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3952 by adilicio...@gmail.com: The file was not found in the
repository. (HTTP 400, API Error 207)
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3952
What version are you running?
RBTools 0.7.2
What's the URL
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Component-Docs
New issue 3951 by coronari...@gmail.com: [Active Directory LDAP ]
Misleading info for Anonymous User Mask
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3951
What's the URL of the page containing the problem?
I'm using
Comment #4 on issue 3949 by alextfish: Diffs: Distinguish between light
yellow nothing changed/whitespace changes and light yellow completely
different lines
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3949
Another example of the current confusing behaviour to demonstrate my
Comment by rayt...@gmail.com:
*[http://bundaku.net Jual Jilbab Instan Online]*
For more information:
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/wiki/IdeasFor2_0
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard-issues group.
To unsubscribe from this group
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium
New issue 3949 by alextfish: Diffs: Distinguish between light
yellow nothing changed/whitespace changes and light yellow completely
different lines
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3949
What version
Comment #1 on issue 3949 by alextfish: Diffs: Distinguish between light
yellow nothing changed/whitespace changes and light yellow completely
different lines
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3949
Second attachment (my mocked-up example of how this might look
Comment #2 on issue 3949 by alextfish: Diffs: Distinguish between light
yellow nothing changed/whitespace changes and light yellow completely
different lines
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3949
Second screenshot (my mocked-up example of what this might look like
Comment #3 on issue 3949 by alextfish: Diffs: Distinguish between light
yellow nothing changed/whitespace changes and light yellow completely
different lines
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3949
Second screenshot (my mocked-up example of what this might look like
1 - 100 of 8899 matches
Mail list logo
