Christian,
Yes, that was the output from the network tab for the failing new review
request, and the tab was open the whole time. When I create new review
request for that repository with one of the diffs that works, I get these
requests (I may not have caught them all... not familiar with
Hi, David,
Sorry for my poor knowledge for python... I'm a java programmer indeed.
I'm wondering if Nginx +uWSGI will work to provide the better performance?
or any other candidate?
在 2014年9月10日星期三UTC+8上午5时40分20秒，David Trowbridge写道：
I think a lot of the performance issues you're seeing are
If you want to salvage the database, it's entirely possible to do so. I can
help on here by having you e-mail information that I need, but depending, it
could take time, and would need to be done over this list.
If you were interested in a support contract or one-time support incident, it
Ah right, sorry, upgrade does require some state these days.
Try instead doing:
rb-site manage /path/to/site syncdb
Hopefully that works better. Then you can do an upgrade from there.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
Ok, that worked. Now what is the admin password? During the install I
remember it asking for this information. but now that all the users are
gone, the admin password is gone as well. But I have to enter something in
the password field. So, now what?
How do I create a admin password?
Thanks
Hi Jason,
It's asking you to create a new one. You can provide whatever you like for the
admin username and password.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com
On September 10, 2014 at
This is stored in Django's Sites tables. It does require a restart right now,
as there's no state tracking to know from other threads that the table has
changed. If you want to file a bug report, we can look into improving this.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review
When you say, it's, are you talking about the rb-site manage script I
ran or the /var/www/reviewboard site?
When I ran rb-site manage it did propose this question to me which I
didn't link to the admin user of the site.
I also had this issue and restarting the server fixed it. ReviewBoard
2.0.6. It's a little disconcerting to have to restart the server for this
change. Where is the setting stored? I didn't see it in the site-config via
rb-site manage anywhere.
On Tuesday, July 8, 2014 2:24:55 PM UTC-5,
Django's the underlying framework used for the whole web application layer.
This includes things like interfacing with the database, handling
authentication, and more.
Since you answered 'no', you'll want to create a new superuser. You can do this
with:
rb-site manage /path/to/site
Thanks for the help. That worked.
BTW, rb-site -help displays no help information for manage. I guess
this is on purpose because it is a back door.
No offense, but I hope I don't need your help any more. (:{)
Jason
On Wednesday, September 10, 2014 4:03:05 PM UTC-4, Christian Hammond wrote:
No offense taken! I hope everything works from here on out.
The 'manage' command should probably be there. I'll look into it, since there's
a few useful things in there. Thanks!
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag,
The deployment we've tested most is using apache + mod_wsgi (and sometimes
also using nginx for the static media serving). I personally haven't tested
it, but nginx+uWSGI should be a fairy big step up over fastcgi.
-David
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 7:18 AM, Magic Chen magic4w...@gmail.com wrote:
This looks like the credentials that are configured in the review board
admin for that repository aren't correct.
-David
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 3:31 AM, Magic Chen magic4w...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all,
We got another problem. when we using RBTools 0.62 , the review request
could be
Done: https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3563
A short term fix would be to have the form prompt the editor that this
change will require a restart of the server to prevent confusion.
On Wednesday, September 10, 2014 2:50:10 PM UTC-5, Christian Hammond wrote:
This is stored
Sara,
Can you look in the server log and see if there are any tracebacks in there?
-David
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 5:50 AM, Sara Rayburn sararayb...@gmail.com wrote:
Christian,
Yes, that was the output from the network tab for the failing new review
request, and the tab was open the whole
Note also that for brand new review requests, '-g yes' is implied.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com
On September 5, 2014 at 12:01:38 AM, David Trowbridge (trowb...@gmail.com)
Hi,
The Mylyn Reviews Connector is a third-party project. You'll need to contact
the author for support.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com
On September 2, 2014 at 3:25:26 AM, nidhi
In my experience, nginx+uwsgi gives a significant performance improvement over
Apache+mod_wsgi, but I didn’t investigate to find out how much of that comes
from better static file service.
On Sep 10, 2014, at 4:12 PM, David Trowbridge
trowb...@gmail.commailto:trowb...@gmail.com wrote:
The
I'm pretty sure my problem is already out there I just haven't been able to
find a solution that works yet. Currently our SVN directory is set not to
store any information and RBTools doesn't seem to get along with it.
I'm using CentOS 6.4 with RBTools 0.6.2. I'm trying to post a post review
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium
New issue 3562 by ods5...@gmail.com: Add waiting for action mode/button
on review
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3562
What version are you running?
1.7.11
What's the URL of the page this enhancement
Updates:
Status: New
Labels: EasyFix Component-SCMTools
Comment #3 on issue 3558 by trowb...@gmail.com: RB doesn't handle paths
containing spaces correctly
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3558
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received
22 matches
Mail list logo
