Oh sorry I thought you meant total repositories on the server. This user
only has access to 1 group and 6 repositories under that.
Ian
On Wednesday, December 16, 2015 at 11:58:45 PM UTC-8, Christian Hammond
wrote:
>
> Okay, this is likely the issue. The repositories can't be found because we
Hmm, okay. In that case, logged in as the user, can you try accessing:
http:///api/v3/groups/
See what that payload looks like, and if the repository you expect is in
there anywhere.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, I
Hi,
Im on the RB 2.5.2.
I am writing an extension to inject CSS into a review (/r/[xx]) but only
for a particular user. So when the review page loads, if user is xyz,
inject the CSS, if not, do nothing.
I tried using a TemplateHook to inject the CSS onto specific pages. It
worked, however I c
Well, I got something. I went to the Hosting Account in Review Board's
admin UI and copied the private_token out of the Data box. Then I did this
one.
curl --header "PRIVATE-TOKEN: "
"https:///api/v3/groups/"
That said
{"message":"401 Unauthorized"}
Then I logged into the GitLab web page, we
We store the token in an encrypted form, which is why you're getting that
error.
You can figure out the value to insert into there by doing:
$ rb-site manage /path/to/site shell
>>> from reviewboard.scmtools.crypto_utils import encrypt_password
>>> print encrypt_password('')
That should give you
So close. That gave me a different token value from the original one, but
now I'm back to "A repository with this name was not found on this group,
or your user may not have access to it."
Ian
On Thursday, December 17, 2015 at 1:37:01 AM UTC-8, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> We store the token i
We're decrypting the value before plugging it into any requests. Running
that same script but with decrypt_password (and specifying the stored
token) will give you what we're passing on to the server in a request.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - https://w
Finally I figured it out. Looking a little closer at the JSON, I noticed
that the name and path differ by case, i.e. "name": "MyProject" and "path":
"myproject". Review Board apparently wants the name and not the path. (I
swear RB 2.0 wanted the path...) Which is kind of weird because now it
Glad it works!
RB 2.0 definitely needed the name and not the path, as our hosting services
construct the URLs based on that data. As far as casing goes, though,
that's entirely up to the GitLab API, and it's possible they've made a
change in what it considers valid for lookups, breaking your repos
Hi.
In a project we're using subversion as our SCM. Since I like the GitHub
review style very much, I would like to do the same with reviewboard.
For this the planned process would look like the following:
- The "master" branch is trunk
- All code changes are done within separate feature branche
Just for you, Veit: https://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/7812/
I know this isn't a full answer to everything in your e-mail (it's nearly
3AM and I'm about to crash), but this should let you at least use api-get
without a local checkout by passing --server=.
To answer your last question, the old-styl
Wow, thanks Christian - that was quick :)!
I'll take a look at the github hook. Thanks!
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 17. Dezember 2015 um 11:47 Uhr
Von: "Christian Hammond"
An: "reviewboard@googlegroups.com"
Betreff: Re: GitHub-style review flow
Just for you, Veit: https://reviews.reviewboard
On 16 December 2015 at 20:02, Christian Hammond
wrote:
> That certainly shouldn't be necessary. Sounds like maybe there was a bad
> package?
>
> If it ever happens again, please let me know. I want to be sure we figure
> out what's causing that.
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Hammond - christ..
Hi Christian.
I've applied your patch to my rbt and it seems to work, thanks for that :)!
But looking at /review-requests/ shows the requests, but the attributes
"branch" and "bugs" are always
empty, although these attributes are set on the request. I also changed
to values through the UI, but wi
Hi Veit,
That definitely seems wrong. These are published review requests, not
drafts?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Veit Guna wrote:
> Hi Christ
15 matches
Mail list logo
