Re: Customize Webhook's URL to POST comment use JIRA API2 based on ReviewBoard 2.5.7

2017-01-20 Thread Bill Hoo
mmand "rbt post" which has superseded > "post-review". > > Regards, > Barret Rennie > > On Tue, 17 Jan, 2017 at 8:04 PM, Bill Hoo <bil...@126.com > > wrote: > > > Hi Barret, > > Yes it is, the {issuekey} is a bug ID in JIRA, wh

Re: Customize Webhook's URL to POST comment use JIRA API2 based on ReviewBoard 2.5.7

2017-01-17 Thread Bill Hoo
essary payload. Another would be to have a script somewhere > that the webhook POSTs to that then turns around and forwards to that URL > on JIRA. > > Christian > > -- > Christian Hammond > President/CEO of Beanbag <https://www.beanbaginc.com/> > Makers of Review Board <

Re: Customize Webhook's URL to POST comment use JIRA API2 based on ReviewBoard 2.5.7

2017-01-17 Thread Bill Hoo
ension by ourselves, but I still expecting an official one, that's cool. Thanks in advance, Bill. 在 2017年1月18日星期三 UTC+8上午9:43:59,Barret Rennie写道: > > Hi Bill, > > What exactly would {issueKey} be? Is that the bug number on the review > request? > > Regards, > Barret > &

Upgrade to ReviewBoard 2.5.9 failed.

2017-02-27 Thread Bill Hoo
Hi there, We're upgrading RB from 2.5.7 to 2.5.9, but failed, we followed the official steps but failed, below are the messages come from our RB web site after restart apache: > The version of Review Board running does not match the version the site > was last upgraded to. You are

Re: Upgrade to ReviewBoard 2.5.9 failed.

2017-02-27 Thread Bill Hoo
1:19:44,Christian Hammond写道: > > Hi, > > What happens when you run that command? What do you see? > > Make sure you restart Apache after running it. > > Christian > > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 21:03 Bill Hoo <bil...@126.com > > wrote: > >> Hi the

Re: Upgrade to ReviewBoard 2.5.9 failed.

2017-02-28 Thread Bill Hoo
the site. Thanks, Bill. 在 2017年2月28日星期二 UTC+8下午6:19:09,Christian Hammond写道: > > Can you show me the exact rb-site command you ran and the exact output? > > Thanks, > > Christian > > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 22:18 Bill Hoo <bil...@126.com > > wrote: &

Re: Upgrade to ReviewBoard 2.5.9 failed.

2017-02-28 Thread Bill Hoo
is consistent with the versions of Python being used in the command line > and on Apache. > > Christian > > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 02:50 Bill Hoo <bil...@126.com > > wrote: > >> Here's the command we ran: >> >> sudo rb-site upgrade /var/www/c

Re: Upgrade to ReviewBoard 2.5.9 failed.

2017-03-01 Thread Bill Hoo
rd. > > Christian > > -- > Christian Hammond > President/CEO of Beanbag <https://www.beanbaginc.com/> > Makers of Review Board <https://www.reviewboard.org/> > > On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 8:42 PM, Bill Hoo <bil...@126.com > > wrote: > >> Chri

Re: Upgrade to ReviewBoard 2.5.9 failed.

2017-03-01 Thread Bill Hoo
some > investigation on your end, but it does seem like the older version is > taking precedence. > > Was 2.5.7 also installed using easy_install? Can you show me the contents > of your dist-packages directory? > > Christian > > -- > Christian Hammond > President/CE

Customize Webhook's URL to POST comment use JIRA API2 based on ReviewBoard 2.5.7

2017-01-14 Thread Bill Hoo
Hi guys, Thanks for your great job on ReviewBoard! It's nice and easy to use! We use ReviewBoard 2.5.7 for our code review workflow, we need comment on JIRA issues with every review event, and JIRA REST API2 need a URL like this: http://MYJIRAHOST/rest/api/2/issue/{issuekey}/comment Which

Re: Upgrade to ReviewBoard 2.5.9 failed.

2017-03-01 Thread Bill Hoo
an you show me the contents > of your dist-packages directory? > > Christian > > -- > Christian Hammond > President/CEO of Beanbag <https://www.beanbaginc.com/> > Makers of Review Board <https://www.reviewboard.org/> > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 5:42 PM, Bi

Re: Upgrade to ReviewBoard 2.5.9 failed.

2017-03-02 Thread Bill Hoo
nbag <https://www.beanbaginc.com/> > Makers of Review Board <https://www.reviewboard.org/> > > On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 11:49 PM, Bill Hoo <bil...@126.com > > wrote: > >> Hi Christian, >> >> It's good to hear that's the problem. But I'm sure we always