Create new review remote API

I am doing a check of reviewboard, and so far it is really nice. I was wondering if there is a SOAP or AJAX or REST API for creating new review requests. Basically what I want to do is create an extension for mercurial that works like this: hg requestreview -m "Made some great new changes to co

Adding New Field to Review Board (on Windows)

ender JS bundle..." Not sure what I'm doing wrong. I am also not sure if extending Review Board is possible on Windows (or if there's a limitation of some kind). Please advise. Thanks, Christopher Nostrand -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewb

Re: Adding New Field to Review Board (on Windows)

Hello David, Sorry for not responding earlier. The conversation wasn't appearing for me after I posted it initially. Yes, I can provide what I have. However, I'm having trouble sending a zipped file of extension code. Is there a way another way to send it to you? Thank you, C

Re: Adding New Field to Review Board (on Windows)

File structure: sample_extension js extension.js __init__.py extension.py setup.py I had to change the extension.js file extension to ".txt" so google would send it. Thanks, Christopher Nostrand -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pa

Re: Adding New Field to Review Board (on Windows)

Hello, I haven't heard from anyone in a while. Checking back to get any feedback on why it's not working. Any help would be appreciated. Perhaps if someone could provide a basic working extension for adding new fields. That would be great! Thanks, Christopher Nostrand On Friday

review-board.org unavailable

Hi there, Things may well be fixed by the time Christian sees this, but I just wanted to note that review-board.org currently appears to be unavailable. easy_install appeared to be hanging when doing an upgrade, so I checked out the site but something must be awry behind the scenes, as port 80

Miscellaneous notes

Hi all, Just a few minor notes: Firstly, I discovered today that you'll probably need to clear your cache to fully support the new AJAXified loading of diffs. Revision 1726 introduced some new JavaScript to the bottom of the diff_file_fragment.html template. I found that this affected some

Re: View Diff is broken: Diff currently unavailable.

Sounds like the Perforce SCM backend is saying it can't find the Perforce program. Do you have the "p4" binary available in the server's PATH? Regards, Chris On 3 Feb 2009, at 23:38, Cong Do wrote: > Hi Christian, > We are still trying to use post-review for P4. After running post- > revie

Re: ReviewBoard integration with Apache

If you're using "reviews.example.com" rather than using a hostname you can reach, then you appear to have a typo in your hosts file. >> 172.0.0.1reviews.example.com The 172 should be 127. Chris On 28 Feb 2009, at 21:17, Gary M. Josack wrote: > reviews.example.com is just an example...

Google Summer of Code

Hi all, I just saw that Review Board got accepted for Google Summer of Code this year. Great news! The ideas page is looking good: http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/wiki/Summer_of_Code_Ideas Just in case any potential students are reading, Eclipse integration would be an excellent choic

Fwd: Google Summer of Code

Begin forwarded message: > From: Alejandro Cadavid > Date: 20 March 2009 02:34:24 GMT > To: Christopher Orr > Subject: Re: Google Summer of Code > X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=3.9 tests=BAYES_00,X_IP > autolearn=no version=3.2.5 > > I never heard about thi

Re: Error uploading new diff: fatal: Not a git repository: 'None'

I just reproduced this while trying to use RB 1.5.2 with a custom remote repository (git+ssh://). By trial-and-error, it seems the 'None' error occurs if the "Raw file URL mask" field is empty. Is it correct to say there's no way to set up a git repository in Review Board, if the git server is rem

Re: Error uploading new diff: fatal: Not a git repository: 'None'

mware.com > > On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Stephen Gallagher < > > > > > > > > step...@gallagherhome.com> wrote: > > On 02/02/2011 08:12 AM, Christopher Orr wrote: > > > I just reproduced this while trying to use RB 1.5.2 with a custom > > >

Re: Error uploading new diff: fatal: Not a git repository: 'None'

On Feb 2, 10:47 pm, Christopher Orr wrote: > Is there any chance of an option that just allows the full local clone > to be done over git (if the user says that's fine)? > Or would that be too strenuous on Review Board, as it would > (presumably) have to call "git clone&

Re: IntegrityError

ts appreciated. > > Chris -- Realisant mon espoir, je me lance vers la gloire. Christopher Hahn == xrz1...@gmail.com -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~

Re: IntegrityError

d you run 'rb-site upgrade' on the site? > > Christian > > -- > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com > Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org > VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com > > > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Christopher Hahn wrote: >> &g

Re: IntegrityError

Please let me know if this was not what you wanted to know. ...and I will try to analyze the dump as you suggest. Thank you very much for the kind attention, Christopher On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Christian Hammond wrote: > The mcm errors shouldn't actually be related (though it m

Re: IntegrityError

, Christopher Hahn wrote: > Christian, > > I am seeing MySQL as our backend: > = > DATABASE_ENGINE = 'mysql' > DATABASE_NAME = 'reviewboard' > DATABASE_USER = 'reviewboard' > = >

Re: Enabling Searching on RB 1.5.5

help the Review Board project? Donate today at > http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > reviewboard+unsubscr...@goog

Re: Enabling Searching on RB 1.5.5

Hey, It occurs to me to ask whether there is a variable that corresponds to the "Enable Search" checkbox, one that can be set in settings_local.py I will poke about for it, but let me know if this is something obvious... Thank you, Chris On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Christ

Re: Enabling Searching on RB 1.5.5

CACHE_BACKEND = 'memcached://localhost:11211/' # Extra site information. SITE_ID = 1 SITE_ROOT = '/reviews/' FORCE_SCRIPT_NAME = '' DEBUG = True Can anyone tell me the parameter that I need to add above to enable the RB

Perforce -> SVN

. Christopher Hahn == xrz1...@gmail.com -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

Re: Perforce -> SVN

ository for the SVN server. > > -David > > > On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Christopher Hahn wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> My team is moving from Perforce to SVN  and I must prepare for keeping >> RB up and running. >> >> Can anyone poin

changing to SVN

Hello, I am having to redirect a running instance of RB from a perforce server to a new SVN server. Can anyone direct me to the relevant docs? I confirmed that python-svn is installed. Any pointers appreciated, Chris -- Realisant mon espoir, je me lance vers la gloire. Christopher Hahn

Re: Perforce -> SVN

No, that was all I needed. Thank you for taking the time! Chris On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Christopher Hahn wrote: > Right on! > > Can you point me to where in the docs this is described? > > I am hopeful, and will look for this. > > Thank you, > > Chris > &g