rb/js/reviews.js
Line: 1298
Any ideas on how to fix/debug this?
Thanks,
Will
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"reviewboard" group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
Do I need to install and use memcached? There are only a small number
of users and reviews, so performance hasn't been an issue.
Thanks,
Will
On May 27, 4:04 pm, Christian Hammond wrote:
> Did you run rb-site upgrade on your site directory? It sounds like your
> media symlinks a
3.5b4.
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> Review Board -http://www.review-board.org
> VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
>
> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Will wrote:
>
> > I ran rb-site upgrade after the easy_install upgrade.
We've noticed many of our colleagues don't use our local installation of
ReviewBoard the way we'd like them to, and they have common questions, etc.
We've edited the following files to provide some extra instructions and
advice (such as "Only admins can add new groups, please ask X"):
reviews/fo
nguage.
>
> So it would be something like this:
>
> {% if request.user == review_request.submitter or
> perms.reviews.can_edit_reviewrequest %}
>
> ... <-- your code
>
> {% endif %}
>
>
> This goes in the .html files.
>
>
> Hope that helps.
>
>
Where is it described in the documentation the correct way to make several
diffs and upload them incrementally?
We had a situation where one of our developers only uploaded partial diffs
each time (just the changes since the last time he uploaded a diff),
meaning there was no way to see his com
So... don't any users know how whether it's correct to upload full diffs or
partial diffs?
On Thursday, 22 November 2012 12:44:25 UTC, Will wrote:
>
> Where is it described in the documentation the correct way to make several
> diffs and upload them incrementally?
>
>
reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/users/review-requests/creating/#review-requests-for-diffs
Brian, I'm also attaching a list of the changes I made.
I created the diff manually just to illustrate what was modified.
Thanks
Will
On Tuesday, 4 December 2012 07:29:41 UTC, Christian Hammond wrote:
&
ews/, a
fair few things work, e.g. all the admin functions.
But if you start doing review things (i.e. tickle the "Web API" ?),
things don't go well. One example might be: click to add a comment on
a review -- it will take the comment, but never bring up a
'Pub
(I am also not sure why... if you stick a ReviewBoard server
directly on external.example.com -- still doing HTTP Basic auth
-- and get rid of the reverse-proxying, it all works fine. I
can't quite see what difference the RB server sees.)
Maybe we'll figure it out :-) Thanks for
B than the current one
I'm a little fuzzy about the exact upgrade path I should follow, so far
I've done this:
- Made a full dump of the current DB, and also migrated the current DB
(using AWS DMS to the new DB instance). Not sure if the migration service
method will work, that's w
Ha, my bad, that was the wrong link, I used the 2.5 docs when I configged
the box:
https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/2.5/admin/installation/linux/
Thanks for the advice, I'll give it a shot and report back.
Thanks again!
-Will
On Tuesday, January 10, 2017 at 4:44:20 PM UTC-6, Chri
mething is up with the DB,
but how do I access the logs to see what's happening? I see nothing in the
RB logs, nothing in the Apache logs, and there's nothing logged to the
MySQL error log. Any ideas?
Appreciate the help!
-Will
On Tuesday, January 10, 2017 at 4:44:20 PM UTC-6, C
ack to the original name).
Any ideas what might cause this?
Both the server and the DB are backed up, but it'd be nice to fix this rather
than reverting.
Thanks much!
-Will
--
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Revie
ation: /usr/bin/python
Python version (from 'python --version'): Python 2.7.12
Thanks again!
-Will
On Monday, June 19, 2017 at 4:27:34 PM UTC-5, Will Jacobs wrote:
>
> Hey Guys -
>
> I've seen other posts on this subject, but not specific to this upgrade
> path/OS, s
Well you're welcome! Haha.
Removed the .dist-info file, restarted Apache, it's now loading with the
2.5.12 version.
Thanks so much!
On Monday, June 19, 2017 at 6:25:01 PM UTC-5, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hi Will,
>
> Yep, looks like you have a version that was installe
hanks,
-Will
On Thursday, July 6, 2017 at 6:14:07 AM UTC-5, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Thanks, Peter. There's still bugs here, and I've spent a lot of time
> reworking the algorithms to fix these. I'm not ready to ship any of that
> code yet, though. Needs further t
Awesome, thanks again!
On Tuesday, July 11, 2017 at 11:31:07 AM UTC-5, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hey Will,
>
> It's a bug in 2.5.x and later 2.0.x releases. It wasn't present in 1.6.x
> or 1.7.x.
>
> Christian
>
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Wil
a review CAN be created using a negative value as the
change #, but is hidden, is there a way to see/edit/delete the review
(other than a DB hack)?
I've attached a screenshot showing the user's dashboard for reference.
Thanks much!
-Will
<https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-2-LPv
19 matches
Mail list logo
