Anyone?
On Monday, May 2, 2016 at 10:08:12 AM UTC+2, se...@m2mobi.com wrote:
>
> Bump?
>
> On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 3:33:43 PM UTC+2, se...@m2mobi.com wrote:
>>
>> Hello to both,
>>
>> I'm currently giving this a try as we'd really like to get it to connect.
>> But both options are currently
Bump?
On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 3:33:43 PM UTC+2, se...@m2mobi.com wrote:
>
> Hello to both,
>
> I'm currently giving this a try as we'd really like to get it to connect.
> But both options are currently failing for the following reasons:
> * - hosting backend:*
>
> Despite the name suggesting
Hello to both,
I'm currently giving this a try as we'd really like to get it to connect.
But both options are currently failing for the following reasons:
* - hosting backend:*
Despite the name suggesting something along those lines, the API is
actually not at all compatible. (diffs are JSON ob
Hi Heinz,
The proper solution would be to implement a hosting service backend for
this, or augment the existing one if the API is at all compatible.
It should be possible to extend the raw file URL stuff to take in a commit
ID, optionally, but it's a lot more work, as it impacts the SCMTool API.
On Tuesday 02 February 2016 16:30:10 Heinz Wiesinger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> We're currently evaluating bitbucket server (formerly stash, not to be
> confused with the bitbucket cloud hosting) and are having troubles coming up
> with a usable raw file URL mask. What we found so far is this:
>
> http://w
