Re: rb-site upgrade fails with whoosh 2.5.7 on RHEL7/OL7

[Vlad S.]

Tested OK. Added +1 Karma. Thanx!

понедельник, 2 мая 2016 г., 16:34:38 UTC+3 пользователь Stephen Gallagher 
написал:
>
> I've just submitted a corrected version of Review Board to the 
> epel-testing repository:
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-2bab5ad96d
>
> Please test it and provide it with positive or negative feedback (karma). 
> That will get it into the stable release faster. (note: the reason this 
> happened is that I made a mistake rebasing the patch for the dependencies 
> and no one ever tested the update, so it went stable after the timeout 
> period. Please help test this one!
>

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: rb-site upgrade fails with whoosh 2.5.7 on RHEL7/OL7

[Vlad S.]

Sorry, haven't had chance to test it today. Hope to do it later this week.

вторник, 3 мая 2016 г., 1:47:25 UTC+3 пользователь Vlad S. написал:
>
> Thanx! I will be able to test and report on May 4.
>
> /v
>
>>
>>

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: rb-site upgrade fails with whoosh 2.5.7 on RHEL7/OL7

[Vlad]

Thanx! I will be able to test and report on May 4.

/v
2 мая 2016 г. 16:34 пользователь "Stephen Gallagher" <
step...@gallagherhome.com> написал:

> I've just submitted a corrected version of Review Board to the
> epel-testing repository:
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-2bab5ad96d
>
> Please test it and provide it with positive or negative feedback (karma).
> That will get it into the stable release faster. (note: the reason this
> happened is that I made a mistake rebasing the patch for the dependencies
> and no one ever tested the update, so it went stable after the timeout
> period. Please help test this one!)
>
>
> On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 7:14 PM Stephen Gallagher <
> step...@gallagherhome.com> wrote:
>
>> I thought I had fixed the mime parse thing already. I'll correct that
>> when I fix up the whoosh thing tomorrow.
>>
>> I'm a comaintainer of Whoosh on the other branches, so I can push the
>> updated version. I just wanted to check with the other maintainers in case
>> there was a compatibility break I need to be aware of.
>>
>> On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 7:11 PM Vlad  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Stephen,
>>>
>>> Thank you for the reply. Also there is another issue with
>>> "mimeparse>=0.1.3" requirement. Somehow it works only once changed to
>>> "python-mimeparse>=0.1.3". RHEL has proper 0.1.4 version though another
>>> package name.
>>>
>>> I tried to contact python-whoosh rpm maintainer and got email error:
>>>
>>>  - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
>>> rku...@mail.corp.redhat.com
>>> (reason: 554 5.4.6 Too many hops)
>>> (expanded from: )
>>> ..
>>>
>>> It might be he left Redhat and does not maintain the rpm anymore. I
>>> tried to build newer rpm just by replacing Version to 2.7.4 in .spec file
>>> and new sources. It builds ok. Not sure how to promote the spec file change.
>>>
>>> /v
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 1:58 AM, Stephen Gallagher <
>>> step...@gallagherhome.com> wrote:
>>>
 Sorry Vlad, that's my fault. I didn't notice the upgraded requirement.
 I'm going to try to get Whoosh updates in EPEL7 on Monday (once I talk to
 the maintainer of that package to figure out if they held it to the older
 version intentionally).

 On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 7:01 PM Vlad  wrote:

> Hi Christian,
>
> Would this hack affect only Search (Indexed search) function of
> ReviewBoard? Search is not configured by default, so this
> is not a strict dependency as I understand. Am I correct?
>
> I am not sure why RHEL7 has no whoosh update, so I did not install
> whoosh with pip.
>
> /v
>
> On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 12:48 AM, Christian Hammond <
> christ...@beanbaginc.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Vlad,
>>
>> I can't speak for the RPMs, but Review Board itself requires Whoosh
>> 2.6+. There are bugs in prior versions that impact Review Board, so while
>> you may be able to change the dependencies, I can't guarantee it'll fully
>> work as expected.
>>
>> Christian
>>
>> --
>> Christian Hammond
>> President/CEO of Beanbag 
>> Makers of Review Board 
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Vlad S.  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, upgrading 2.5.3 -> 2.5.4 on RHEL7 fails:
>>>
>>> # rb-site upgrade /var/www/rb.site.internal
>>>
>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>
>>> File "/usr/bin/rb-site", line 5, in 
>>>
>>> from pkg_resources import load_entry_point
>>>
>>> File
>>> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/distribute-0.6.19-py2.7.egg/pkg_resources.py",
>>> line 2713, in 
>>>
>>> parse_requirements(__requires__), Environment()
>>>
>>> File
>>> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/distribute-0.6.19-py2.7.egg/pkg_resources.py",
>>> line 584, in resolve
>>>
>>> raise DistributionNotFound(req)
>>>
>>> pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: Whoosh>=2.6
>>>
>>> # rpm -qa|grep -i whoosh
>>>
>>> python-whoosh-2.5.7-4.el7.noarch
>>>
>>> # rpm -qa|grep -i reviewboard
>>>
>>> ReviewBoard-2.5.4-1.el7.noarch
>>>
>>> RHEL7 (epel) has no whoosh 2.6+ and ReviewBoard does not requires
>>> exactly this version.. Shall I just fix ReviewBoard
>>> /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.4-py2.7.egg-info/requires.txt
>>>  to
>>> pass the rb-site upgrade?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
>>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
>>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
>>> https://rbcommons.com/
>>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "reviewboard" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from 

Re: rb-site upgrade fails with whoosh 2.5.7 on RHEL7/OL7

[Stephen Gallagher]

I've just submitted a corrected version of Review Board to the epel-testing
repository:

https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-2bab5ad96d

Please test it and provide it with positive or negative feedback (karma).
That will get it into the stable release faster. (note: the reason this
happened is that I made a mistake rebasing the patch for the dependencies
and no one ever tested the update, so it went stable after the timeout
period. Please help test this one!)


On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 7:14 PM Stephen Gallagher 
wrote:

> I thought I had fixed the mime parse thing already. I'll correct that when
> I fix up the whoosh thing tomorrow.
>
> I'm a comaintainer of Whoosh on the other branches, so I can push the
> updated version. I just wanted to check with the other maintainers in case
> there was a compatibility break I need to be aware of.
>
> On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 7:11 PM Vlad  wrote:
>
>> Hi Stephen,
>>
>> Thank you for the reply. Also there is another issue with
>> "mimeparse>=0.1.3" requirement. Somehow it works only once changed to
>> "python-mimeparse>=0.1.3". RHEL has proper 0.1.4 version though another
>> package name.
>>
>> I tried to contact python-whoosh rpm maintainer and got email error:
>>
>>  - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
>> rku...@mail.corp.redhat.com
>> (reason: 554 5.4.6 Too many hops)
>> (expanded from: )
>> ..
>>
>> It might be he left Redhat and does not maintain the rpm anymore. I tried
>> to build newer rpm just by replacing Version to 2.7.4 in .spec file and new
>> sources. It builds ok. Not sure how to promote the spec file change.
>>
>> /v
>>
>> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 1:58 AM, Stephen Gallagher <
>> step...@gallagherhome.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Sorry Vlad, that's my fault. I didn't notice the upgraded requirement.
>>> I'm going to try to get Whoosh updates in EPEL7 on Monday (once I talk to
>>> the maintainer of that package to figure out if they held it to the older
>>> version intentionally).
>>>
>>> On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 7:01 PM Vlad  wrote:
>>>
 Hi Christian,

 Would this hack affect only Search (Indexed search) function of
 ReviewBoard? Search is not configured by default, so this
 is not a strict dependency as I understand. Am I correct?

 I am not sure why RHEL7 has no whoosh update, so I did not install
 whoosh with pip.

 /v

 On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 12:48 AM, Christian Hammond <
 christ...@beanbaginc.com> wrote:

> Hi Vlad,
>
> I can't speak for the RPMs, but Review Board itself requires Whoosh
> 2.6+. There are bugs in prior versions that impact Review Board, so while
> you may be able to change the dependencies, I can't guarantee it'll fully
> work as expected.
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Hammond
> President/CEO of Beanbag 
> Makers of Review Board 
>
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Vlad S.  wrote:
>
>> Hi, upgrading 2.5.3 -> 2.5.4 on RHEL7 fails:
>>
>> # rb-site upgrade /var/www/rb.site.internal
>>
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>
>> File "/usr/bin/rb-site", line 5, in 
>>
>> from pkg_resources import load_entry_point
>>
>> File
>> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/distribute-0.6.19-py2.7.egg/pkg_resources.py",
>> line 2713, in 
>>
>> parse_requirements(__requires__), Environment()
>>
>> File
>> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/distribute-0.6.19-py2.7.egg/pkg_resources.py",
>> line 584, in resolve
>>
>> raise DistributionNotFound(req)
>>
>> pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: Whoosh>=2.6
>>
>> # rpm -qa|grep -i whoosh
>>
>> python-whoosh-2.5.7-4.el7.noarch
>>
>> # rpm -qa|grep -i reviewboard
>>
>> ReviewBoard-2.5.4-1.el7.noarch
>>
>> RHEL7 (epel) has no whoosh 2.6+ and ReviewBoard does not requires
>> exactly this version.. Shall I just fix ReviewBoard
>> /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.4-py2.7.egg-info/requires.txt
>>  to
>> pass the rb-site upgrade?
>>
>> --
>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
>> https://rbcommons.com/
>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "reviewboard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>> send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
> --
> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
> 

Re: rb-site upgrade fails with whoosh 2.5.7 on RHEL7/OL7

[Stephen Gallagher]

I thought I had fixed the mime parse thing already. I'll correct that when
I fix up the whoosh thing tomorrow.

I'm a comaintainer of Whoosh on the other branches, so I can push the
updated version. I just wanted to check with the other maintainers in case
there was a compatibility break I need to be aware of.

On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 7:11 PM Vlad  wrote:

> Hi Stephen,
>
> Thank you for the reply. Also there is another issue with
> "mimeparse>=0.1.3" requirement. Somehow it works only once changed to
> "python-mimeparse>=0.1.3". RHEL has proper 0.1.4 version though another
> package name.
>
> I tried to contact python-whoosh rpm maintainer and got email error:
>
>  - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
> rku...@mail.corp.redhat.com
> (reason: 554 5.4.6 Too many hops)
> (expanded from: )
> ..
>
> It might be he left Redhat and does not maintain the rpm anymore. I tried
> to build newer rpm just by replacing Version to 2.7.4 in .spec file and new
> sources. It builds ok. Not sure how to promote the spec file change.
>
> /v
>
> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 1:58 AM, Stephen Gallagher <
> step...@gallagherhome.com> wrote:
>
>> Sorry Vlad, that's my fault. I didn't notice the upgraded requirement.
>> I'm going to try to get Whoosh updates in EPEL7 on Monday (once I talk to
>> the maintainer of that package to figure out if they held it to the older
>> version intentionally).
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 7:01 PM Vlad  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Christian,
>>>
>>> Would this hack affect only Search (Indexed search) function of
>>> ReviewBoard? Search is not configured by default, so this
>>> is not a strict dependency as I understand. Am I correct?
>>>
>>> I am not sure why RHEL7 has no whoosh update, so I did not install
>>> whoosh with pip.
>>>
>>> /v
>>>
>>> On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 12:48 AM, Christian Hammond <
>>> christ...@beanbaginc.com> wrote:
>>>
 Hi Vlad,

 I can't speak for the RPMs, but Review Board itself requires Whoosh
 2.6+. There are bugs in prior versions that impact Review Board, so while
 you may be able to change the dependencies, I can't guarantee it'll fully
 work as expected.

 Christian

 --
 Christian Hammond
 President/CEO of Beanbag 
 Makers of Review Board 

 On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Vlad S.  wrote:

> Hi, upgrading 2.5.3 -> 2.5.4 on RHEL7 fails:
>
> # rb-site upgrade /var/www/rb.site.internal
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>
> File "/usr/bin/rb-site", line 5, in 
>
> from pkg_resources import load_entry_point
>
> File
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/distribute-0.6.19-py2.7.egg/pkg_resources.py",
> line 2713, in 
>
> parse_requirements(__requires__), Environment()
>
> File
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/distribute-0.6.19-py2.7.egg/pkg_resources.py",
> line 584, in resolve
>
> raise DistributionNotFound(req)
>
> pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: Whoosh>=2.6
>
> # rpm -qa|grep -i whoosh
>
> python-whoosh-2.5.7-4.el7.noarch
>
> # rpm -qa|grep -i reviewboard
>
> ReviewBoard-2.5.4-1.el7.noarch
>
> RHEL7 (epel) has no whoosh 2.6+ and ReviewBoard does not requires
> exactly this version.. Shall I just fix ReviewBoard
> /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.4-py2.7.egg-info/requires.txt
>  to
> pass the rb-site upgrade?
>
> --
> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
> https://rbcommons.com/
> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "reviewboard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

 --
 Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
 https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
 Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
 https://rbcommons.com/
 Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 ---

>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
 Google Groups "reviewboard" group.
 To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
 https://groups.google.com/d/topic/reviewboard/5KEM-bcOAMk/unsubscribe.
 To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
 reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

>>>
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

>>> --
>>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
>>> 

Re: rb-site upgrade fails with whoosh 2.5.7 on RHEL7/OL7

[Vlad]

Hi Stephen,

Thank you for the reply. Also there is another issue with
"mimeparse>=0.1.3" requirement. Somehow it works only once changed to
"python-mimeparse>=0.1.3". RHEL has proper 0.1.4 version though another
package name.

I tried to contact python-whoosh rpm maintainer and got email error:

 - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
rku...@mail.corp.redhat.com
(reason: 554 5.4.6 Too many hops)
(expanded from: )
..

It might be he left Redhat and does not maintain the rpm anymore. I tried
to build newer rpm just by replacing Version to 2.7.4 in .spec file and new
sources. It builds ok. Not sure how to promote the spec file change.

/v

On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 1:58 AM, Stephen Gallagher  wrote:

> Sorry Vlad, that's my fault. I didn't notice the upgraded requirement. I'm
> going to try to get Whoosh updates in EPEL7 on Monday (once I talk to the
> maintainer of that package to figure out if they held it to the older
> version intentionally).
>
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 7:01 PM Vlad  wrote:
>
>> Hi Christian,
>>
>> Would this hack affect only Search (Indexed search) function of
>> ReviewBoard? Search is not configured by default, so this
>> is not a strict dependency as I understand. Am I correct?
>>
>> I am not sure why RHEL7 has no whoosh update, so I did not install whoosh
>> with pip.
>>
>> /v
>>
>> On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 12:48 AM, Christian Hammond <
>> christ...@beanbaginc.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Vlad,
>>>
>>> I can't speak for the RPMs, but Review Board itself requires Whoosh
>>> 2.6+. There are bugs in prior versions that impact Review Board, so while
>>> you may be able to change the dependencies, I can't guarantee it'll fully
>>> work as expected.
>>>
>>> Christian
>>>
>>> --
>>> Christian Hammond
>>> President/CEO of Beanbag 
>>> Makers of Review Board 
>>>
>>> On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Vlad S.  wrote:
>>>
 Hi, upgrading 2.5.3 -> 2.5.4 on RHEL7 fails:

 # rb-site upgrade /var/www/rb.site.internal

 Traceback (most recent call last):

 File "/usr/bin/rb-site", line 5, in 

 from pkg_resources import load_entry_point

 File
 "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/distribute-0.6.19-py2.7.egg/pkg_resources.py",
 line 2713, in 

 parse_requirements(__requires__), Environment()

 File
 "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/distribute-0.6.19-py2.7.egg/pkg_resources.py",
 line 584, in resolve

 raise DistributionNotFound(req)

 pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: Whoosh>=2.6

 # rpm -qa|grep -i whoosh

 python-whoosh-2.5.7-4.el7.noarch

 # rpm -qa|grep -i reviewboard

 ReviewBoard-2.5.4-1.el7.noarch

 RHEL7 (epel) has no whoosh 2.6+ and ReviewBoard does not requires
 exactly this version.. Shall I just fix ReviewBoard
 /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.4-py2.7.egg-info/requires.txt
  to
 pass the rb-site upgrade?

 --
 Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
 https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
 Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
 https://rbcommons.com/
 Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups "reviewboard" group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

>>>
>>> --
>>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
>>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
>>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
>>> https://rbcommons.com/
>>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>>> ---
>>>
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
>>> Google Groups "reviewboard" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/reviewboard/5KEM-bcOAMk/unsubscribe.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
>>> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>
>>
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>> --
>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
>> https://rbcommons.com/
>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "reviewboard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
> --
> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
> 

Re: rb-site upgrade fails with whoosh 2.5.7 on RHEL7/OL7

[Vlad]

Hi Christian,

Would this hack affect only Search (Indexed search) function of
ReviewBoard? Search is not configured by default, so this
is not a strict dependency as I understand. Am I correct?

I am not sure why RHEL7 has no whoosh update, so I did not install whoosh
with pip.

/v

On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 12:48 AM, Christian Hammond  wrote:

> Hi Vlad,
>
> I can't speak for the RPMs, but Review Board itself requires Whoosh 2.6+.
> There are bugs in prior versions that impact Review Board, so while you may
> be able to change the dependencies, I can't guarantee it'll fully work as
> expected.
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Hammond
> President/CEO of Beanbag 
> Makers of Review Board 
>
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Vlad S.  wrote:
>
>> Hi, upgrading 2.5.3 -> 2.5.4 on RHEL7 fails:
>>
>> # rb-site upgrade /var/www/rb.site.internal
>>
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>
>> File "/usr/bin/rb-site", line 5, in 
>>
>> from pkg_resources import load_entry_point
>>
>> File
>> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/distribute-0.6.19-py2.7.egg/pkg_resources.py",
>> line 2713, in 
>>
>> parse_requirements(__requires__), Environment()
>>
>> File
>> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/distribute-0.6.19-py2.7.egg/pkg_resources.py",
>> line 584, in resolve
>>
>> raise DistributionNotFound(req)
>>
>> pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: Whoosh>=2.6
>>
>> # rpm -qa|grep -i whoosh
>>
>> python-whoosh-2.5.7-4.el7.noarch
>>
>> # rpm -qa|grep -i reviewboard
>>
>> ReviewBoard-2.5.4-1.el7.noarch
>>
>> RHEL7 (epel) has no whoosh 2.6+ and ReviewBoard does not requires exactly
>> this version.. Shall I just fix ReviewBoard
>> /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.4-py2.7.egg-info/requires.txt
>>  to
>> pass the rb-site upgrade?
>>
>> --
>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
>> https://rbcommons.com/
>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "reviewboard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
> --
> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
> https://rbcommons.com/
> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups "reviewboard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/reviewboard/5KEM-bcOAMk/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: rb-site upgrade fails with whoosh 2.5.7 on RHEL7/OL7

[Christian Hammond]

Hi Vlad,

I can't speak for the RPMs, but Review Board itself requires Whoosh 2.6+.
There are bugs in prior versions that impact Review Board, so while you may
be able to change the dependencies, I can't guarantee it'll fully work as
expected.

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond
President/CEO of Beanbag 
Makers of Review Board 

On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Vlad S.  wrote:

> Hi, upgrading 2.5.3 -> 2.5.4 on RHEL7 fails:
>
> # rb-site upgrade /var/www/rb.site.internal
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>
> File "/usr/bin/rb-site", line 5, in 
>
> from pkg_resources import load_entry_point
>
> File
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/distribute-0.6.19-py2.7.egg/pkg_resources.py",
> line 2713, in 
>
> parse_requirements(__requires__), Environment()
>
> File
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/distribute-0.6.19-py2.7.egg/pkg_resources.py",
> line 584, in resolve
>
> raise DistributionNotFound(req)
>
> pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: Whoosh>=2.6
>
> # rpm -qa|grep -i whoosh
>
> python-whoosh-2.5.7-4.el7.noarch
>
> # rpm -qa|grep -i reviewboard
>
> ReviewBoard-2.5.4-1.el7.noarch
>
> RHEL7 (epel) has no whoosh 2.6+ and ReviewBoard does not requires exactly
> this version.. Shall I just fix ReviewBoard
> /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.4-py2.7.egg-info/requires.txt
>  to
> pass the rb-site upgrade?
>
> --
> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
> https://rbcommons.com/
> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "reviewboard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.