Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10427#issuecomment-167037362
**[Test build #48277 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48277/consoleFull)**
for PR 10427 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167038607
**[Test build #48283 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48283/consoleFull)**
for PR 10368 at commit
Github user guoxu1231 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10464#issuecomment-167038464
Not sure why 2 commits in this PR? Do I need t re-submit this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10427#issuecomment-167040023
And you are right I think the comments I said is not related with this PR.
Let's wait for their comments!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
GitHub user hhbyyh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10466
[SPARK-12375] [ML] add handleinvalid for vectorindexer
jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12375
>"Add option for allowing unknown categories, probably via a parameter like
Github user sarutak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167041948
LGTM as well. Could you add testcases for this change?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10461#issuecomment-167010169
/cc @pwendell @srowen @brennonyork @nchammas
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10454#discussion_r48388578
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -858,6 +859,30 @@ object PushPredicateThroughJoin
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167013142
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167013085
**[Test build #48261 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48261/consoleFull)**
for PR 10451 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167013143
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-167013686
**[Test build #48268 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48268/consoleFull)**
for PR 10459 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10454#issuecomment-167014215
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10454#issuecomment-167014216
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10438#discussion_r48389634
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -1709,6 +1709,28 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
}
Github user tribbloid commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8785#issuecomment-167015238
Of course Dr. I'll finish reading in a few hours.
Yours Peng
On 15-12-23 05:10 AM, Sean Owen wrote:
>
> @tribbloid
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-167016412
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#discussion_r48391800
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -153,6 +153,15 @@ object SetOperationPushDown
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10454#discussion_r48392176
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -858,6 +859,30 @@ object PushPredicateThroughJoin
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167025357
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167025330
**[Test build #48275 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48275/consoleFull)**
for PR 10368 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167025356
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167028329
**[Test build #48278 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48278/consoleFull)**
for PR 10368 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10377#issuecomment-167031314
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10377#issuecomment-167031310
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10454#discussion_r48393687
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -858,6 +859,30 @@ object PushPredicateThroughJoin
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167033459
**[Test build #48279 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48279/consoleFull)**
for PR 10368 at commit
GitHub user guoxu1231 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10464
[SPARK-12513] [Streaming] SocketReceiver hang in Netcat example
Close client side socket connection before restart socket receiver.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10465#issuecomment-167038901
**[Test build #48282 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48282/consoleFull)**
for PR 10465 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10466#issuecomment-167041784
**[Test build #48284 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48284/consoleFull)**
for PR 10466 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10448#issuecomment-167011370
I've merged this into `master` and `branch-1.6`. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10461#issuecomment-167011829
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10461#issuecomment-167011828
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10454#discussion_r48388871
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -858,6 +859,30 @@ object PushPredicateThroughJoin
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10454#issuecomment-167014161
**[Test build #48263 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48263/consoleFull)**
for PR 10454 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#discussion_r48389313
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskResult.scala
---
@@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ class DirectTaskResult[T](var valueBytes: ByteBuffer, var
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#discussion_r48389325
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/HeartbeatReceiverSuite.scala
---
@@ -220,7 +222,7 @@ class HeartbeatReceiverSuite
} else {
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167014071
LGTM except some nits. Thanks a lot for fixing this @tedyu
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167014373
**[Test build #48269 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48269/consoleFull)**
for PR 10368 at commit
Github user tedyu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#discussion_r48389541
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskResult.scala
---
@@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ class DirectTaskResult[T](var valueBytes: ByteBuffer, var
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-167016380
**[Test build #48265 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48265/consoleFull)**
for PR 10459 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-167016413
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10377#discussion_r48390319
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/orc/OrcFilters.scala ---
@@ -26,15 +26,47 @@ import org.apache.spark.Logging
import
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10377#discussion_r48390328
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/orc/OrcSourceSuite.scala ---
@@ -174,4 +175,33 @@ class OrcSourceSuite extends OrcSuite {
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10377#discussion_r48390324
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/orc/OrcHadoopFsRelationSuite.scala
---
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ import
Github user dbtsai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10384#issuecomment-167017269
LGTM except minor issues. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user tedyu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167018650
Here was why I implemented equals for Map (from #48257):
{code}
[info] - Bug: SPARK-12415 *** FAILED *** (3 milliseconds)
[info]
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#discussion_r48392104
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -153,6 +153,15 @@ object SetOperationPushDown
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-167024785
**[Test build #48268 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48268/consoleFull)**
for PR 10459 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-167024834
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-167024832
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167030489
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167030479
**[Test build #48278 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48278/consoleFull)**
for PR 10368 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167030488
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167033978
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167033952
**[Test build #48274 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48274/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167033976
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10391#issuecomment-167033940
@cloud-fan @marmbrus Are you ok for latest updates?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10427#issuecomment-167039644
@maropu I believe it is a Parquet stuff. AFAIK, the columns in filters
should be set to `requestedSchema` for Parquet. But
Github user maropu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10427#issuecomment-167042101
Adding a special handing for Parquet is better? I think that required
columns for push-down filters should be passed to each data sources, and this
is a more natural
GitHub user wyaron opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456
add default RDD name for one created via sc.textFile
The feature was first added at commit:
7b877b27053bfb7092e250e01a3b887e1b50a109 but was later removed (probably by
mistake) at commit:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10457#issuecomment-166997004
**[Test build #48256 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48256/consoleFull)**
for PR 10457 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10457#issuecomment-166997026
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-167004663
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-167004641
**[Test build #48259 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48259/consoleFull)**
for PR 10459 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-167004661
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-167006863
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-167008339
**[Test build #48265 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48265/consoleFull)**
for PR 10459 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10453#issuecomment-166978434
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10377#discussion_r48374725
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/orc/OrcFilters.scala ---
@@ -50,37 +82,18 @@ private[orc] object OrcFilters extends Logging {
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10377#discussion_r48374780
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/orc/OrcHadoopFsRelationSuite.scala
---
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ import
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-166980946
@marmbrus @rxin Could you check if this is an appropriate improvement for
Spark too?
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10455#issuecomment-166983395
**[Test build #48253 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48253/consoleFull)**
for PR 10455 at commit
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10457
[SPARK-12510][Streaming]Refactor ActorReceiver to support Java
This PR includes the following changes:
1. Rename `ActorReceiver` to `ActorReceiverSupervisor`
2. Remove `ActorHelper`
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10458#issuecomment-166989463
**[Test build #48255 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48255/consoleFull)**
for PR 10458 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10449#issuecomment-166992625
Ah OK - we can revert if there is a problem. Sorry about that.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-166999771
**[Test build #48257 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48257/consoleFull)**
for PR 10368 at commit
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459
[SPARK-7995][SPARK-6280][Core]Remove AkkaRpcEnv and remove systemName from
setupEndpointRef
Keep `SparkEnv.actorSystem` because Streaming still uses it. Will remove it
and AkkaUtils after
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10454#issuecomment-167005833
**[Test build #48263 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48263/consoleFull)**
for PR 10454 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10454#discussion_r48385881
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -858,6 +859,30 @@ object PushPredicateThroughJoin
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10454#discussion_r48386444
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -858,6 +859,30 @@ object PushPredicateThroughJoin
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8531#discussion_r48386999
--- Diff: .rat-excludes ---
@@ -83,3 +83,5 @@ gen-java.*
.*avpr
org.apache.spark.sql.sources.DataSourceRegister
.*parquet
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10377#discussion_r48374926
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/orc/OrcSourceSuite.scala ---
@@ -174,4 +175,33 @@ class OrcSourceSuite extends OrcSuite {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-166980561
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-166980563
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10446#issuecomment-166982259
**[Test build #2253 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2253/consoleFull)**
for PR 10446 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8744#issuecomment-166987958
**[Test build #48250 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48250/consoleFull)**
for PR 8744 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8744#issuecomment-166988047
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8744#issuecomment-166988048
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10458#issuecomment-166989628
**[Test build #48255 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48255/consoleFull)**
for PR 10458 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10457#issuecomment-166989549
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10458#issuecomment-166989629
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10458#issuecomment-166989630
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10457#issuecomment-166989550
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10457#issuecomment-166989544
**[Test build #48254 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48254/consoleFull)**
for PR 10457 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10457#issuecomment-166993023
**[Test build #48256 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48256/consoleFull)**
for PR 10457 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10457#issuecomment-167004009
**[Test build #48260 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48260/consoleFull)**
for PR 10457 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167005403
**[Test build #48261 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48261/consoleFull)**
for PR 10451 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10454#discussion_r48386195
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -858,6 +859,30 @@ object PushPredicateThroughJoin
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10454#discussion_r48386235
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -858,6 +859,30 @@ object PushPredicateThroughJoin
201 - 300 of 437 matches
Mail list logo
