Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12752#issuecomment-215498291
**[Test build #57262 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57262/consoleFull)**
for PR 12752 at commit
[`93d9c62`](https://gi
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12757#issuecomment-215495384
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12758#issuecomment-215494778
**[Test build #2900 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2900/consoleFull)**
for PR 12758 at commit
[`7355387`](https://g
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12738#issuecomment-215496215
So this still leaves the difference between the two, but just doesn't
impact model persistence. If we do end up doing this fix - might it make sense
to leave open anoth
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12753#issuecomment-215495717
I think this is a good idea in general, but I'm less sure about @. Is @
used in windows? Any other places?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this em
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12673#discussion_r61464196
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/streaming.py ---
@@ -51,22 +51,22 @@ def isActive(self):
return self._jcq.isActive()
@since(2.0)
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12758#issuecomment-215495292
**[Test build #2901 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2901/consoleFull)**
for PR 12758 at commit
[`7355387`](https://g
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12755#issuecomment-215495090
@zhengruifeng Thanks. While the double space isn't ideal, it isn't wrong
either. Merging this right before the code freeze can cause a lot of merge
conflicts with other pu
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12758#issuecomment-215494655
LGTM pending Jenkins.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
Github user mwws commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12752#discussion_r61463812
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/FileInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -195,10 +195,13 @@ class FileInputDStream[K, V, F <: NewInp
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12756#issuecomment-215494155
**[Test build #57261 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57261/consoleFull)**
for PR 12756 at commit
[`61546b8`](https://gi
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12756#issuecomment-215493848
Jenkins retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12720#issuecomment-215492506
**[Test build #57260 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57260/consoleFull)**
for PR 12720 at commit
[`7cf58ef`](https://gi
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12752#discussion_r61462767
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/FileInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -195,10 +195,13 @@ class FileInputDStream[K, V, F <: NewI
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11192#issuecomment-215492111
Thanks for taking on this issue & fixing it across multiple languages.
A super minor thing is generally we try and have separate JIRAs for
separate PRs - so in
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12756#issuecomment-215491931
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12756#issuecomment-215491928
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12756#issuecomment-215491698
**[Test build #57255 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57255/consoleFull)**
for PR 12756 at commit
[`61546b8`](https://g
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12419#discussion_r61462095
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/distributed/RowMatrix.scala
---
@@ -379,15 +379,21 @@ class RowMatrix @Since("1.0.0") (
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11192#discussion_r61461958
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/mllib/NaiveBayesExample.scala
---
@@ -46,10 +59,18 @@ object NaiveBayesExample {
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11192#discussion_r61461835
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/mllib/NaiveBayesExample.scala
---
@@ -23,6 +33,9 @@ import org.apache.spark.{SparkConf, SparkCon
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11192#discussion_r61461459
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/mllib/NaiveBayesExample.scala
---
@@ -15,6 +15,16 @@
* limitations under the License.
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12085#issuecomment-215488874
This is interesting, there are some minor formatting things that might make
sense to fix while waiting for review - but since this is designed to improve
performance it
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10220
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10220#issuecomment-215487241
LGTM. Thanks @sun-rui - Merging this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10220#discussion_r61459532
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -1451,17 +1451,54 @@ setMethod("mutate",
function(.data, ...) {
x <- .data
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12755#issuecomment-215486837
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12755#issuecomment-215486833
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12755#issuecomment-215486575
**[Test build #57254 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57254/consoleFull)**
for PR 12755 at commit
[`5167b97`](https://g
Github user mwws commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12752#discussion_r61457451
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/FileInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -195,10 +195,13 @@ class FileInputDStream[K, V, F <: NewInp
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12758#issuecomment-215481926
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
GitHub user freastro opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12758
[SPARK-14965] [SQL] Indicate an exception is thrown for a missing struct
field
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix to ScalaDoc for StructType.
## How was
Github user psuszyns commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12419#discussion_r61456369
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/distributed/RowMatrix.scala
---
@@ -379,15 +379,21 @@ class RowMatrix @Since("1.0.0") (
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11601#discussion_r61455519
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/Imputer.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,220 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11601#discussion_r61455460
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/Imputer.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,220 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12698#issuecomment-215476737
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12698#issuecomment-215476740
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12698#issuecomment-215476580
**[Test build #57256 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57256/consoleFull)**
for PR 12698 at commit
[`8f279a8`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12416#issuecomment-215476234
**[Test build #57259 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57259/consoleFull)**
for PR 12416 at commit
[`cc220fc`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#issuecomment-215473555
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12755#issuecomment-215471995
Jenkins test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#issuecomment-215473565
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12755#issuecomment-215473222
**[Test build #57258 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57258/consoleFull)**
for PR 12755 at commit
[`5167b97`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#issuecomment-215473255
**[Test build #57253 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57253/consoleFull)**
for PR 12640 at commit
[`c6c3584`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12757#issuecomment-215469182
**[Test build #57257 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57257/consoleFull)**
for PR 12757 at commit
[`14aa401`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12757#issuecomment-215469306
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12757#issuecomment-215469308
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12755#issuecomment-215465792
**[Test build #57252 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57252/consoleFull)**
for PR 12755 at commit
[`95b7ca6`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12757#issuecomment-215466500
**[Test build #57257 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57257/consoleFull)**
for PR 12757 at commit
[`14aa401`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12755#issuecomment-215466200
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12755#issuecomment-215466204
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12757
[SPARK-14882] [DOCS] Clarify that Spark can be cross-built for other Scala
versions
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add simple clarification that Spark can be cross-buil
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12698#issuecomment-215463941
**[Test build #57256 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57256/consoleFull)**
for PR 12698 at commit
[`8f279a8`](https://gi
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12698#issuecomment-215463160
Jenkins retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646#issuecomment-215462428
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12341
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12756#issuecomment-215461379
**[Test build #57255 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57255/consoleFull)**
for PR 12756 at commit
[`61546b8`](https://gi
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12341#issuecomment-215461027
Merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featu
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12416#issuecomment-215459923
We are close on this, thank you @pravingadakh . I think we need a rebase,
and to undo the Python changes to "test_tags" since it actually wasn't the same
"test tags" bei
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12756
[SPARK-14886] [MLLIB] RankingMetrics.ndcgAt throw
java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Handle case where number of predictions is les
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12755#issuecomment-215458848
**[Test build #57254 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57254/consoleFull)**
for PR 12755 at commit
[`5167b97`](https://gi
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12739#issuecomment-215452604
I don't feel qualified to evaluate the logic change, but the code style
itself looks OK
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user bomeng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12739#issuecomment-215450711
@srowen Please review again. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user yanboliang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12066#issuecomment-215450008
@jkbradley This is ready for another pass. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12066#issuecomment-215448778
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12066#issuecomment-215448783
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12066#issuecomment-215448622
**[Test build #57251 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57251/consoleFull)**
for PR 12066 at commit
[`486d5ab`](https://g
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12683#discussion_r61437879
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_mllib.R ---
@@ -71,7 +71,25 @@ test_that("glm and predict", {
data = iris, family = poisson(link =
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12683#discussion_r61437435
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_mllib.R ---
@@ -71,7 +71,25 @@ test_that("glm and predict", {
data = iris, family = poisson(link =
Github user kevinyu98 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646#issuecomment-215444282
retest it please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#issuecomment-215441061
**[Test build #57253 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57253/consoleFull)**
for PR 12640 at commit
[`c6c3584`](https://gi
Github user yanboliang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12754#issuecomment-215440275
cc @mengxr @jkbradley
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user yanboliang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12723#issuecomment-215439643
I saw you put ```save/load``` tests at tests.py rather than in doctest. I
think the doctest is not only unit tests but also used for illustrating how to
use this ```
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12755#issuecomment-215439210
OK, that's pretty trivial. Can you take a pass over other related files for
typos and formatting problems?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this e
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12718#issuecomment-215437825
@jkbradley @mengxr @jaceklaskowski The new `Dataset.as` API is appled to ML
in this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and hav
Github user yanboliang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12624#issuecomment-215436444
LGTM except the last minor issue. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12755#issuecomment-215436193
**[Test build #57252 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57252/consoleFull)**
for PR 12755 at commit
[`95b7ca6`](https://gi
Github user tgravescs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12735#issuecomment-215436163
Actually after looking a bit more, Spark does fail fast if the shuffle
service isn't there because very soon after start up the BlockManager registers
with the shuffl
GitHub user zhengruifeng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12755
[Minor][DOC] Minor typo fixes in Dataset.scala
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Minor typo fixes
## How was this patch tested?
local build
You can merge thi
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12624#discussion_r61433313
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegression.scala
---
@@ -834,36 +836,55 @@ object GeneralizedLinearRegress
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12066#issuecomment-215434643
**[Test build #57251 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57251/consoleFull)**
for PR 12066 at commit
[`486d5ab`](https://gi
Github user tgravescs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12735#issuecomment-215431514
If the disk is bad or missing there is nothing else you can do then create
a new db since as you say deleting wouldn't work.
Note I think all it does is log
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12695#issuecomment-215425968
Yes, I'm assuming all of the inputs need to be parseable as a URI in order
to keep this sensible. At least, that seems less problematic than trying to
accept inputs like
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12718#issuecomment-215425031
@viirya Thanks. I updated this PR following your example.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12754#issuecomment-215414469
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12754#issuecomment-215414472
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12754#issuecomment-215414343
**[Test build #57250 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57250/consoleFull)**
for PR 12754 at commit
[`0b0d969`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12754#issuecomment-215412571
**[Test build #57250 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57250/consoleFull)**
for PR 12754 at commit
[`0b0d969`](https://gi
GitHub user yanboliang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12754
[SPARK-14979] [ML] [PySpark] Add examples for GeneralizedLinearRegression
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add Scala/Java/Python examples for ```GeneralizedLinearRegression
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12612#discussion_r61419435
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/NewAccumulator.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,391 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) u
Github user lw-lin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12725#issuecomment-215405018
Sure, I'll add a manual timed executor and some dedicated tests as well.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user vruusmann commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9207#issuecomment-215404038
I've been experimenting with a standalone Spark ML Pipelines to PMML
converter in recent days. The goal is to cover basic transformers (eg.
`StringIndexer`, `OneHotEnc
Github user taoli91 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12695#issuecomment-215403420
@srowen `new FIle("D:\test").toURI.toString` can return `file://D/test` but
`new URI("D:\test")` won't. But we should make sure that it is a local file
before convertin
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12720#discussion_r61415652
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -866,71 +867,189 @@ class Analyzer(
* Note: CT
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12464#issuecomment-215401350
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12464#issuecomment-215401347
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12464#issuecomment-215401253
**[Test build #57249 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57249/consoleFull)**
for PR 12464 at commit
[`51b412f`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12718#issuecomment-215400799
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12718#issuecomment-215400798
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12718#issuecomment-215400722
**[Test build #57247 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57247/consoleFull)**
for PR 12718 at commit
[`9ef9a51`](https://g
601 - 700 of 850 matches
Mail list logo
