Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16870
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16870
**[Test build #72639 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72639/testReport)**
for PR 16870 at commit
[`de28fd4`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16871#discussion_r100287048
--- Diff: build/mvn ---
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ _DIR="$( cd "$( dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}" )" && pwd )"
# Preserve the calling directory
_CALLING_DIR="$(pw
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16871#discussion_r100287082
--- Diff: core/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/Java8RDDAPISuite.java ---
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
* limitations under the License.
*/
-package tes
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16871#discussion_r100285417
--- Diff: core/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/Java8RDDAPISuite.java ---
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
* limitations under the License.
*/
-package t
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16871
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72640/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16871#discussion_r100284865
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -1910,31 +1908,7 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
* @return whe
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16871
**[Test build #72640 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72640/testReport)**
for PR 16871 at commit
[`56864a8`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16871
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16871
You would immediately get an "unsupported major/minor version" error,
because all of the byte code would specify 52.0 (= Java 8) and JDK 7 would
reject it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16871#discussion_r100284451
--- Diff: core/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/Java8RDDAPISuite.java ---
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
* limitations under the License.
*/
-package tes
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16830
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16871#discussion_r100284371
--- Diff: build/mvn ---
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ _DIR="$( cd "$( dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}" )" && pwd )"
# Preserve the calling directory
_CALLING_DIR="$(
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16871#discussion_r100284373
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -1910,31 +1908,7 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
* @return wheth
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16871
With this, what's the behavior if users use a Java 7 runtime to run Spark?
What kind of errors do we generate?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply app
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16830
Merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or i
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16871#discussion_r100284098
--- Diff: build/mvn ---
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ _DIR="$( cd "$( dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}" )" && pwd )"
# Preserve the calling directory
_CALLING_DIR="$(pw
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16871
**[Test build #72640 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72640/testReport)**
for PR 16871 at commit
[`56864a8`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/56
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16871
[SPARK-19493][BUILD][CORE][WIP] Remove Java 7 support
- Move external/java8-tests tests into core, streaming, sql and remove
- Remove MaxPermGen and related options
- Fix some reflection / TO
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16866
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72635/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16866
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16866
**[Test build #72635 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72635/testReport)**
for PR 16866 at commit
[`c1c4553`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16858
This particular URL pattern won't exist anymore, so seems fine to not test
it at this point.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16856#discussion_r100277353
--- Diff: docs/programming-guide.md ---
@@ -76,10 +75,10 @@ In addition, if you wish to access an HDFS cluster, you
need to add a dependency
Final
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16865
Jenkins seems inaccessible now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16870
**[Test build #72639 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72639/testReport)**
for PR 16870 at commit
[`de28fd4`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/de
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16870
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16870
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16870
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72638/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user titicaca commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16689
Yes, collect on timestamp was getting `c("POSIXct", "POSIXt")`. But when NA
exists at the top of the timetamp column, it was getting `numeric` as I
described in the PR description.
---
If your pr
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16870
**[Test build #72637 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72637/testReport)**
for PR 16870 at commit
[`8db6253`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8d
GitHub user windpiger opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16870
[SPARK-19496][SQL]to_date udf to return null when input date is invalid
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently the udf `to_date` has different return value with an
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16854
Cc @cloud-fan, do you mind if I ask you think it is worth adding this API?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16869
**[Test build #72636 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72636/testReport)**
for PR 16869 at commit
[`52b4a5e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/52
GitHub user jiangxb1987 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16869
[SPARK-19025][SQL] Remove SQL builder for operators
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
With the new approach of view resolution, we can get rid of SQL generation
on vi
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16864
cc @mengxr / @tjhunter / @jkbradley is this good to have?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16864#discussion_r100261227
--- Diff:
common/sketch/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/util/sketch/BloomFilter.java ---
@@ -81,6 +81,11 @@ int getVersionNumber() {
public abstract long
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16864#discussion_r100261151
--- Diff:
common/sketch/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/util/sketch/BloomFilter.java ---
@@ -148,6 +153,20 @@ int getVersionNumber() {
public abstract bo
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16864#discussion_r100261088
--- Diff:
common/sketch/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/util/sketch/IncompatibleUnionException.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user ouyangxiaochen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16868#discussion_r100257474
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveDDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -833,54 +833,107 @@ class HiveDDLSuite
}
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16868#discussion_r100255988
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveDDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -833,54 +833,107 @@ class HiveDDLSuite
}
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16826
@kunalkhamar you should create a JIRA ticket for this.
In addition, I'm not a big fan of the design to pass a base session in.
It'd be simpler if there is just a clone method on sessionstate an
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16826#discussion_r100255729
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SparkSession.scala
---
@@ -213,6 +218,24 @@ class SparkSession private(
new SparkSession(sparkC
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16856
I think the issue is that the programming guide should probably switch over
to the DataFrame one as the primary one, and then the RDD one as a RDD
programming guide.
cc @matei for his input.
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16868
OK to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if t
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16677
@waterman But we need to know the number of output in each partition.
`resultSize` is actually updated at driver with the size of data transmitted
back to the driver.
It is doable if we use
Github user ouyangxiaochen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16638
I have created a PR at [https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16868](url),
please review it, Thanks! @gatorsmile @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16868
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user ouyangxiaochen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16868
I have created a new PR. Please review it, Thanks! @gatorsmile @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If y
GitHub user ouyangxiaochen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16868
[SPARK-19115] [SQL] Supporting Create External Table Like Location
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Support CREATE [EXTERNAL] TABLE LIKE LOCATION... syntax for Hive t
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16866
**[Test build #72635 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72635/testReport)**
for PR 16866 at commit
[`c1c4553`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c1
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16866
jenkins retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16803
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16803
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72629/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72631/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16776
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16776
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72634/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16865
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16866
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16865
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72632/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16866
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72633/
Test FAILed.
---
501 - 562 of 562 matches
Mail list logo
