Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3543#issuecomment-126166935
streaming only pr is at https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7772
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
GitHub user koeninger opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7772
[SPARK-4229][Streaming] consistent hadoop configuration, streaming only
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/koeninger/spark-1
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3543#issuecomment-126161394
Changing this jira to be streaming only and making another for thread
safety issues still leaves all the inconsistent calls to new Configuration in
SQL, and probably
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3543#issuecomment-125977592
If we're talking about this issue
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11209 unless there's something
arcade about hadoop's jira, it looks lik
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7467#issuecomment-122551255
I thought the idea for this ticket was to have separate examples for
accessing offset ranges.
The complexity of offsets doesn't really have anything
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3543#issuecomment-122076899
Except that those streaming changes call into SparkHadoopUtil, which was
changed in that PR for thread safety reasons. HadoopRDD was changed so there
was only 1 lock
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3543#issuecomment-122010820
Just to be clear, are we talking about removing just the one-line changes
to SQLContext and JavaSQLContext?
Everything else in the PR I think is necessary in
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7254#issuecomment-120150880
In case it wasn't clear, LGTM
I don't think it needs a test case, because it would be testing behavior
that spark doesn't care about (we don&#x
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7254#issuecomment-120150575
"zookeeper.connect" and "group.id" aren't necessary for anything in the
kafka direct stream.
But they're expected to be pres
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7185#issuecomment-119735193
Yes, you're understanding things correctly. Yes, scala works that way as
well.
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 4:20 PM, amit-ramesh
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7185#issuecomment-118987704
In general, I feel like this is solving the problem of too many wrappers by
adding more wrappers. I don't know that it's worth it just to get an instan
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7185#discussion_r33977640
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/KafkaUtils.scala
---
@@ -670,4 +670,17 @@ private class KafkaUtilsPythonHelper
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7235#issuecomment-118871369
@guowei2 do you want to open a separate jira / pull request for that
containsKey fix?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7235#issuecomment-118864216
The containsKey thing is a good catch.
But this basic idea has been discussed before and rejected:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-6249
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7185#issuecomment-118188461
I don't have a problem with the static method, especially if it prevents
yet more wrapper classes.
My concern was more about the difference in sema
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7185#discussion_r33779900
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/KafkaUtils.scala
---
@@ -670,4 +670,9 @@ private class KafkaUtilsPythonHelper
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6632#issuecomment-114982933
Cheers :)
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Tathagata Das
wrote:
> I forgot to say, thanks Cody! :)
>
> â
> Reply t
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6632#issuecomment-113690742
fixed title
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6846#issuecomment-113685902
My original pr was against master
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Tathagata Das
wrote:
> Was this committed to branch-1.4?
>
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6863#issuecomment-113663382
Title should be right now
On Jun 19, 2015 4:26 PM, "Tathagata Das" wrote:
> Could you update title to get the ordering right?
>
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6632#discussion_r32872490
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/KafkaRDDSuite.scala
---
@@ -68,6 +68,21 @@ class KafkaRDDSuite extends
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6863#issuecomment-113632591
The word count examples don't have any need of accessing offsets.
Wouldn't it be better to have separate examples? I don't want someone
thi
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6632#discussion_r32859841
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/KafkaUtils.scala
---
@@ -399,7 +418,7 @@ object KafkaUtils {
val kc
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6632#discussion_r32859740
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/KafkaUtils.scala
---
@@ -158,15 +158,30 @@ object KafkaUtils
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6632#issuecomment-113562935
@tdas is there anything else you feel needs to be done on this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6846#issuecomment-113526956
Thanks. Not sure if the python side of things is going to continue on
SPARK-8389 or on SPARK-8337, but I think this takes care of the java side for
now.
---
If
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3543#issuecomment-113335277
As far as I know, its still an issue - by default, any checkpoint that
relies on hdfs config (e.g. s3 password) won't recover
On Jun 18, 2015 6:
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6862#issuecomment-113184801
I'm not a python programmer, but isn't the direct translation of that
kafkaStreams = map(lambda _:KafkaUtils.createStream(...), range(0,
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6863#issuecomment-113022865
Yeah, the spacing in that document in general is a mess (mix of tabs and
spaces, some 2 spaces between sentences, etc). I cleaned it up somewhat. Also
further fixed
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6863#issuecomment-112978856
I don't think a doc change caused a python test failure.
On Jun 17, 2015 5:27 PM, "UCB AMPLab" wrote:
> Merged build finished. Test FAI
GitHub user koeninger opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6863
[Streaming][Kafka][SPARK-8390] fix docs related to HasOffsetRanges
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/koeninger/spark-1 SPARK
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6846#discussion_r32620989
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/JavaDirectKafkaStreamSuite.java
---
@@ -89,6 +90,16 @@ public void testKafkaStream
GitHub user koeninger opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6846
[Streaming][Kafka][SPARK-8389] Example of getting offset ranges out oâ¦
â¦f the existing java direct stream api
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6632#discussion_r31868393
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/KafkaRDD.scala
---
@@ -60,6 +62,49 @@ class KafkaRDD[
}.toArray
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5921#issuecomment-109378718
I sort of doubt that wait timeout was related to the merge, the only
conflict was the single line of MimaExcludes
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5921#issuecomment-108903935
The only thing I can think of mima complaining about is that this patch is
removing a method... even though it's a method in a private class that is only
use
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5921#issuecomment-108709503
Another ping on this, even if it misses 1.4
Seeing waitUntilLeaderOffset all over the place in test code I'm working on
right now made me sad :(
---
If
GitHub user koeninger opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6632
[Streaming][Kafka] Take advantage of offset range info for size-relatâ¦
â¦ed KafkaRDD methods. Possible fix for [SPARK-7122], but probably a
worthwhile optimization regardless.
You can merge
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5921#issuecomment-101802768
@tdas just pinging on this to make sure it doesn't get lost in the shuffle,
lmk if there's more explanation needed.
---
If your project is set up for i
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4805#issuecomment-100741752
Is there anything you need to do that couldn't be accomplished by reading
from / writing to ZK yourself?
Is this just a question of convenient ap
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5927#issuecomment-100237401
I think if you're going to decide you really don't like
withContext/withIndex etc they should be marked as deprecated, in addition to
having a scaladoc re
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5936#issuecomment-99482055
FWIW I ran the new version, and it works as well, I'm just concerned about
how that exception was caused.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5936#issuecomment-99478975
Not that there's necessarily anything wrong with updating the producer api
being used...
.. but I don't see how that exception has anything to do with t
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5927#issuecomment-99271021
@tdas yeah, Kafka transactional output was why I originally wanted to add
it.
Although that usage of taskcontext shown above is better than my
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5921#issuecomment-99229134
Pretty sure this error
[error] oro#oro;2.0.8!oro.jar origin location must be absolute:
isn't related to the commit
---
If your project is set u
GitHub user koeninger opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5921
[Streaming][Kafka] cleanup tests from SPARK-2808
see if requiring producer acks eliminates the need for
waitUntilLeaderOffset calls in tests
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4805#issuecomment-99081192
I just want to re-iterate from the jira discussion that I am thumbs-down to
the idea of overloading the meaning of group.id, and thumbs-down to adding
options that
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4537#issuecomment-98228003
At any rate, I tested it out locally against 0.8.1.1 server install, with
the IdempotentExample job from my blogpost. Seemed to work ok.
---
If your project is set
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4537#issuecomment-98212160
scalastyle passes locally for me...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4537#discussion_r29523447
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/KafkaRDDSuite.scala
---
@@ -53,14 +53,16 @@ class KafkaRDDSuite extends FunSuite
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5808#issuecomment-97930903
I think the code, the name of the conf, and the default setting are all
correct.
1 retry means try initially, retry once, then give up, for a total of 2
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5808#issuecomment-97907134
Yknow, I just looked at the code for other reasons, and it is the number of
retries, not tries (so the default setting of 1 means a max of 2 consecutive
attempts
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5808#issuecomment-97883079
Somewhat nitpicky, but I'd say something like "maximum number of
consecutive trials", just to make it clear it's not a limit for the
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4537#issuecomment-97580085
No, it works fine locally:
Running PySpark tests. Output is in python/unit-tests.log.
Testing with Python version:
Python 2.6.6
Run
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2994#issuecomment-97578847
I have a branch of the directStream api that caches consumers.
It had no noticeable impact on processing time. Even at 100 partitions /
200ms batches on a
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4537#issuecomment-97547514
At this point, it looks like the java and scala tests are passing, but the
python tests are timing out. Console output looks like
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4537#issuecomment-97453300
I can do some basic testing against a non-embedded 0.8.1 kafka install.
We're not likely to upgrade for our production jobs, so if some of the
peopl
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4537#discussion_r29342107
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/KafkaRDDSuite.scala
---
@@ -53,14 +53,16 @@ class KafkaRDDSuite extends FunSuite
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4537#discussion_r29341062
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/KafkaCluster.scala
---
@@ -220,12 +220,22 @@ class KafkaCluster(val kafkaParams
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4537#issuecomment-97123137
@srowen I imagine things are pretty busy, but can you verify this to test
on jenkins?
@luisobo you could build and test it out
---
If your project is set up for
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4537#issuecomment-97085929
@zzcclp the 1.4.0 deadline is Friday, I believe. I fixed the merge
conflicts and resolved the MiMa issue (as far as I know), it still passes local
tests for me
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4537#issuecomment-95180356
Glad to hear it works for you. Fixing the default arguments for mima was
straightforward, but there's a lot that has changed in the test code. Work's
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4537#issuecomment-93478250
That maybe makes a certain amount of sense... I'll try replacing the
default arguments with multiple overloaded methods, see if that passes mima.
---
If your pr
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4537#issuecomment-93472230
As far as I can tell from jenkins output, it failed during MiMa checks.
But if I run
sbt '; project streaming-kafka; mima-report-binary-i
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4537#issuecomment-89301901
@zzcclp if you want to help try and figure out how reproduce this test
failure outside of Jenkins, go for it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4537#issuecomment-83021357
Those tests have passed locally for me 3 times in a row... if I get time
later I'll try to dig in
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3543#issuecomment-82923505
I think its mostly a question of whether committers are comfortable with a
PR that changes all of the uses of new Configuration.
At this point it'd pro
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4805#discussion_r26150162
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/DirectKafkaInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -118,6 +123,7 @@ class
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4805#issuecomment-78053440
I am now confused about what the purpose of this PR is. The jira seemed to
indicate that the problem was "several third-party offset monitoring tools fail
to mo
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4805#discussion_r26120607
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/DirectKafkaInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -84,6 +83,11 @@ class
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4805#discussion_r26120488
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/DirectKafkaInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -118,6 +123,7 @@ class
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4805#discussion_r26048624
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/DirectKafkaInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -118,6 +123,7 @@ class
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4805#discussion_r26048829
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/DirectKafkaInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -84,6 +83,11 @@ class
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4805#issuecomment-77882744
As it stands now, no offsets are stored by spark unless you're
checkpointing. Does it really make sense to have an option to
automatically store offse
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4805#discussion_r26012160
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/DirectKafkaInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -158,4 +166,37 @@ class
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4805#discussion_r25991083
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/DirectKafkaInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -158,4 +166,37 @@ class
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4805#discussion_r25990950
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/DirectKafkaInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -158,4 +166,37 @@ class
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4805#discussion_r25990850
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/SparkKafkaUtils.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4805#discussion_r25990774
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/ReliableKafkaReceiver.scala
---
@@ -239,21 +239,7 @@ class ReliableKafkaReceiver
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4805#discussion_r25990749
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/DirectKafkaInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -158,4 +166,37 @@ class
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4805#discussion_r25990695
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/DirectKafkaInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -158,4 +166,37 @@ class
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4805#discussion_r25990683
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/DirectKafkaInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -158,4 +166,37 @@ class
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4805#discussion_r25990568
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/DirectKafkaInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -82,8 +83,12 @@ class
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4537#issuecomment-75187343
Spark 1.3.0 was already supposed to be frozen a while back as far as I know.
My personal gut feeling is that it'd be better to wait for kafka 0.
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4597#issuecomment-74341376
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4537#issuecomment-74199642
I believe that it will not be merged into 1.3
On Feb 12, 2015 8:13 PM, "zzcclp" wrote:
> Will this RP be merged into 1.3.0?
>
>
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3631#issuecomment-73959340
@helena I updated it, pr is at https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4537
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
GitHub user koeninger opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4537
[SPARK-2808][Streaming][Kafka] update kafka to 0.8.2
i don't think this should be merged until after 1.3.0 is final
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4511#discussion_r24472248
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/KafkaRDDSuite.scala
---
@@ -40,43 +41,70 @@ class KafkaRDDSuite extends
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4511#discussion_r24459792
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/KafkaUtils.scala
---
@@ -154,6 +154,19 @@ object KafkaUtils {
jssc.ssc
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4511#discussion_r24459700
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/KafkaUtils.scala
---
@@ -211,12 +220,17 @@ object KafkaUtils {
sc
GitHub user koeninger opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4511
[SPARK-4964] [Streaming] refactor createRDD to take leaders via map instead
of array
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3631#issuecomment-73728226
This will need some changes to KafkaCluster and possibly other things
related to the new api... let me know if you want a hand.
---
If your project is set up for it
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4384#discussion_r24268035
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/KafkaUtils.scala
---
@@ -179,121 +182,190 @@ object KafkaUtils {
errs
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4384#discussion_r24253794
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/OffsetRange.scala
---
@@ -19,16 +19,35 @@ package
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4384#issuecomment-73269084
Thanks for adding the java friendly kafka uitls methods.
Your original reason for wanting Array[Leader] rather than
Map[TopicAndPartition, Broker] was for java
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4384#discussion_r24252952
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/KafkaUtils.scala
---
@@ -179,121 +182,190 @@ object KafkaUtils {
errs
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4384#discussion_r24252680
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/KafkaUtils.scala
---
@@ -179,121 +182,190 @@ object KafkaUtils {
errs
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4384#discussion_r24251761
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/KafkaRDD.scala
---
@@ -36,14 +36,12 @@ import kafka.utils.VerifiableProperties
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4384#discussion_r24142354
--- Diff:
examples/scala-2.10/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/streaming/DirectKafkaWordCount.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
501 - 600 of 696 matches
Mail list logo
