Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14841#discussion_r77117090
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/SortOrder.scala
---
@@ -61,6 +61,9 @@ case class SortOrder(child:
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14841#discussion_r77114998
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/SortOrder.scala
---
@@ -61,6 +61,9 @@ case class SortOrder(child:
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14841#discussion_r77113690
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/SortOrder.scala
---
@@ -61,6 +61,9 @@ case class SortOrder(child:
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14841#discussion_r77106801
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/SortOrder.scala
---
@@ -61,6 +61,9 @@ case class SortOrder(child:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14841
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user tejasapatil opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14841
[SPARK-17271] [SQL] Planner adds un-necessary Sort even if child ordering
is semantically same as required ordering
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Jira :
