Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4193#issuecomment-72318533
[Test build #26463 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26463/consoleFull)
for PR 4193 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4193#issuecomment-72318539
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3976#issuecomment-72319231
[Test build #26464 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26464/consoleFull)
for PR 3976 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4298#issuecomment-72319354
I think we can relax the constraint of `toDataFrame`. So we can directly
create a DataFrame with partial columns of a RDD of tuples. No need to call an
extra `select`.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4298#issuecomment-72319380
[Test build #26465 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26465/consoleFull)
for PR 4298 at commit
Github user dibbhatt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3798#discussion_r23889636
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/KafkaRDD.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,220 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user lianhuiwang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4292#discussion_r2348
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -820,7 +822,10 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends Logging
with
Github user dibbhatt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3798#discussion_r23889938
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/KafkaRDD.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,220 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user lianhuiwang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4155#discussion_r23888903
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -808,6 +810,7 @@ class DAGScheduler(
// will be posted, which
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3976#issuecomment-72321243
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3976#issuecomment-72321234
[Test build #26464 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26464/consoleFull)
for PR 3976 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4298#issuecomment-72321964
[Test build #26465 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26465/consoleFull)
for PR 4298 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4298#issuecomment-72321965
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3798#discussion_r23889820
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/KafkaRDD.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,220 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user lianhuiwang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3976#issuecomment-72323941
@JoshRosen can you help me? now i add a unit test for python applicaiton on
yarn cluster mode. but now there is a failed. i think its reason is environment
of
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4298#issuecomment-72317547
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4298#issuecomment-72317545
[Test build #26461 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26461/consoleFull)
for PR 4298 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3976#issuecomment-72317452
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3976#issuecomment-72317446
[Test build #26462 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26462/consoleFull)
for PR 3976 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3519
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4274#issuecomment-72309957
LGTM. Merged into master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4274
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4193#discussion_r23887726
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/distributed/RowMatrix.scala
---
@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ class RowMatrix(
* storing the right
Github user jacek-lewandowski commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4220#issuecomment-72309821
Agreed, I'll make the changes and add the clarifying comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4294#discussion_r23887546
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/json/JSONRelation.scala ---
@@ -28,10 +32,10 @@ private[sql] class DefaultSource extends
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1484#discussion_r23887545
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/ChiSqSelector.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4297
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4297#issuecomment-72309051
cc @pwendell we can add this to the release notes. If the debugger
malfunctions, it can be turned off with this flag.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3519#issuecomment-72309076
[Test build #26458 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26458/consoleFull)
for PR 3519 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3519#issuecomment-72309078
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3519#issuecomment-72309894
LGTM. Merged into master. Thanks!!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4233#discussion_r23887814
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -68,6 +79,65 @@ class LogisticRegressionModel (
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4233#discussion_r23887815
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -68,6 +79,65 @@ class LogisticRegressionModel (
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4233#discussion_r23887813
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -68,6 +79,65 @@ class LogisticRegressionModel (
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4233#discussion_r23887816
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -68,6 +79,65 @@ class LogisticRegressionModel (
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3798#discussion_r23890348
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/KafkaRDD.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,220 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user dibbhatt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3798#discussion_r23890423
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/KafkaRDD.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,220 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4193
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3798#discussion_r23890594
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/KafkaRDD.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,220 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3976#issuecomment-72324906
[Test build #26466 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26466/consoleFull)
for PR 3976 at commit
Github user brkyvz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4215#issuecomment-72326441
Interesting... The tests are successful on my local computer but fails in
Jenkins... The end to end test that downloads spark-avro and spark-csv succeeds
which is nice.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3976#issuecomment-72327242
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4193#issuecomment-72328501
@srowen The changes look good to me. Are you going to push more changes?
I'm thinking of merging this in to avoid merge conflicts with other PRs.
---
If your project is
Github user GenTang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3986#discussion_r23890734
--- Diff: ec2/spark_ec2.py ---
@@ -569,6 +569,8 @@ def launch_cluster(conn, opts, cluster_name):
master_nodes = master_res.instances
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4193#issuecomment-72328806
@mengxr That's all I've got for now. It fixes javadoc 8 errors due to the
code, but not due to the output of unidoc.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4193#issuecomment-72330127
Merged into master. Thanks! I left the JIRA as open.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user nchammas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3986#discussion_r23891135
--- Diff: ec2/spark_ec2.py ---
@@ -569,6 +569,8 @@ def launch_cluster(conn, opts, cluster_name):
master_nodes = master_res.instances
Github user MechCoder commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4231#issuecomment-72331831
Thanks :) Looking forward to your reviews. I will work on other stuff till
then.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3637#discussion_r23891545
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/ml/DeveloperApiExample.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,181 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3637#discussion_r23891546
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/Regressor.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4299#issuecomment-72333480
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3637#discussion_r23891575
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -80,69 +50,157 @@ class LogisticRegression extends
Github user MartinWeindel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4299#issuecomment-72333732
Yes, it's a regression. It worked with 1.2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
GitHub user MartinWeindel opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4299
Disabling Utils.chmod700 for Windows
This patch makes Spark 1.2.1rc2 work again on Windows.
Without it you get following log output on creating a Spark context:
INFO
Github user tomerk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3637#discussion_r23891560
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/Regressor.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3637#issuecomment-72333635
@shivaram Thanks for the comments! As far as adding a strongly typed
protected API later on, we might be able to, but I don't see it as a high
priority, especially
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4299#issuecomment-72333666
(This needs a JIRA) Did this work in 1.2.0? the question will be whether
it's a regression or not.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3637#discussion_r23891605
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/Regressor.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3637#issuecomment-72335560
I guess the more usable DataFrame does make it better. Agree that we can
revisit this after we write a few more estimators and see how they look.
---
If your project
Github user zhzhan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4299#issuecomment-72335760
I didn't try 1.2.1, but in 1.2.0, I didn't met such problems in windows.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4294#issuecomment-72335894
[Test build #26467 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26467/consoleFull)
for PR 4294 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4294#issuecomment-72337568
[Test build #26467 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26467/consoleFull)
for PR 4294 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4294#issuecomment-72337572
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4294#issuecomment-72337823
[Test build #26468 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26468/consoleFull)
for PR 4294 at commit
Github user markhamstra commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4299#discussion_r23892404
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -255,12 +255,17 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
* @return
Github user hammer commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4218#issuecomment-72352426
@pwendell @rxin we'd love to get this patch into 1.3 to improve the
scalability of metrics collection. it's a pretty straightforward patch. Could
you guys give it some
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4298#discussion_r23895621
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrame.scala ---
@@ -139,12 +139,13 @@ class DataFrame protected[sql](
* val rdd: RDD[(Int,
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4294#discussion_r23892984
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/interfaces.scala ---
@@ -145,6 +145,11 @@ abstract class PrunedFilteredScan extends
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4218
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4209#issuecomment-72355239
Actually I merged https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4218 which contains
this patch.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4218#issuecomment-72355227
Merging in master. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4294#issuecomment-72340638
[Test build #26468 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26468/consoleFull)
for PR 4294 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4294#issuecomment-72346268
[Test build #26469 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26469/consoleFull)
for PR 4294 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3976#issuecomment-72349756
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3976#issuecomment-72349753
[Test build #26470 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26470/consoleFull)
for PR 3976 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4294#issuecomment-72340640
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user harishreedharan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4292#discussion_r23893987
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -820,7 +822,10 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends Logging
with
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4294#issuecomment-72348214
[Test build #26469 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26469/consoleFull)
for PR 4294 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4294#issuecomment-72348215
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3246#issuecomment-72351744
@srowen Does @tdas have time to look at this? If no, maybe others can?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4209#issuecomment-72355173
@andrewor14 are you going to merge this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3976#issuecomment-72348373
[Test build #26470 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26470/consoleFull)
for PR 3976 at commit
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4047#issuecomment-72348800
*Update on tests*
Summary:
* On a small dataset (20 newsgroups), it seems to work fine (on my laptop).
* On a big dataset (Wikipedia dump with close to
Github user lianhuiwang closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3976
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user lianhuiwang reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3976
[SPARK-5173]support python application running on yarn cluster mode
now when we run python application on yarn cluster mode through
spark-submit, spark-submit does not support python
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4233#discussion_r23888056
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -68,6 +79,65 @@ class LogisticRegressionModel (
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4233#issuecomment-72313229
[Test build #26459 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26459/consoleFull)
for PR 4233 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4233#issuecomment-72313232
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4233#issuecomment-72311863
[Test build #26459 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26459/consoleFull)
for PR 4233 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4193#issuecomment-72313729
[Test build #26460 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26460/consoleFull)
for PR 4193 at commit
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4298
[Minor][SQL] Refactor DataFrame related codes
Simplify some codes related to DataFrame.
* Calling `toAttributes` instead of a `map`.
* Original `createDataFrame` creates the
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4193#issuecomment-72315407
[Test build #26460 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26460/consoleFull)
for PR 4193 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4193#issuecomment-72315410
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4298#issuecomment-72315508
[Test build #26461 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26461/consoleFull)
for PR 4298 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4014#issuecomment-72315535
@rxin I have added the explanation for this feature. Would you have time to
review this pr and see if it is ok to merge? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3976#issuecomment-72315747
[Test build #26462 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26462/consoleFull)
for PR 3976 at commit
Github user lianhuiwang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3976#discussion_r23888565
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ApplicationMaster.scala ---
@@ -430,6 +430,10 @@ private[spark] class ApplicationMaster(args:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4193#issuecomment-72316297
[Test build #26463 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26463/consoleFull)
for PR 4193 at commit
98 matches
Mail list logo
