Github user navneetrastogi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17738
This is a minor change which will help in configuring registration retries.
It can be merged.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17999#discussion_r117278957
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -1991,6 +1991,22 @@ object functions {
def tan(columnName: String):
Github user MechCoder commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13959
I don't understand. If you don't have time to review that is fine (I've
been there too), but there is no need to close a PR due to unavailability of
comitters.
One of the reasons, that I
Github user ptkool commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17899#discussion_r117238414
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -609,6 +610,19 @@ object CollapseWindow extends
GitHub user yssharma opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
[SPARK-20168][WIP][DStream] Add changes to use kinesis fetches from
specified timestamp
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Kinesis client can resume from a specified
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18012
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18027
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user ptkool commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17899#discussion_r117240910
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/TransposeWindowSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18019#discussion_r117250008
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala
---
@@ -1268,6 +1268,59 @@ case class
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17996
@MLnick We have separate SparkR guide at
http://spark.apache.org/docs/latest/sparkr.html . Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user davideis commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18022#discussion_r117260197
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALSSuite.scala ---
@@ -78,7 +79,7 @@ class ALSSuite
val k = 2
val ne0
Github user davideis commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18022#discussion_r117264333
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALS.scala
---
@@ -795,8 +799,8 @@ object ALS extends DefaultParamsReadable[ALS] with
Github user davideis commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18022#discussion_r117262532
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALS.scala
---
@@ -763,11 +763,15 @@ object ALS extends DefaultParamsReadable[ALS] with
Github user davideis commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18022#discussion_r117261995
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALSSuite.scala ---
@@ -348,6 +349,37 @@ class ALSSuite
}
/**
+
Github user davideis commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18022#discussion_r117265969
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALS.scala
---
@@ -1624,15 +1628,15 @@ object ALS extends DefaultParamsReadable[ALS] with
Github user liu-zhaokun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18027
@srowen
I will try my best to slove this type of problem.But I only found one this
time.Please help me to merge it.Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
**[Test build #77043 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77043/testReport)**
for PR 18029 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77043/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user ptkool commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17899#discussion_r117240492
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWindowFunctionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -423,4 +423,25 @@ class DataFrameWindowFunctionsSuite
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18030
LGTM - pending jenkins
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18030
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17996
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17996
**[Test build #77052 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77052/testReport)**
for PR 17996 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17996
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77052/
Test PASSed.
---
GitHub user ala opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18030
[SPARK-20798] GenerateUnsafeProjection should check if a value is null
before calling the getter
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Github user ala commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18030
@hvanhovell
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17400
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18012
**[Test build #77049 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77049/testReport)**
for PR 18012 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18000
**[Test build #77051 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77051/testReport)**
for PR 18000 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17996
**[Test build #77052 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77052/testReport)**
for PR 17996 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18025
**[Test build #77046 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77046/testReport)**
for PR 18025 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18019
**[Test build #77048 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77048/testReport)**
for PR 18019 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18028
**[Test build #77044 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77044/testReport)**
for PR 18028 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18026
**[Test build #77045 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77045/testReport)**
for PR 18026 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18025
**[Test build #77046 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77046/testReport)**
for PR 18025 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
**[Test build #77043 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77043/testReport)**
for PR 18029 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18030
**[Test build #77042 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77042/testReport)**
for PR 18030 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18024
**[Test build #77047 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77047/testReport)**
for PR 18024 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18002
**[Test build #77050 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77050/testReport)**
for PR 18002 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17400
**[Test build #77053 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77053/testReport)**
for PR 17400 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646
**[Test build #77055 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77055/testReport)**
for PR 12646 at commit
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13959
The lack of bandwidth in MLlib means that sometimes good code that would
make an impact just gets ignored. This is kind of the reality of things.
However, if we are going to close the PR simply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18012
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77049/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user ptkool commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17899#discussion_r117241321
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/TransposeWindowSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17997
The current impl is still missing the special handling of that miracle
period. See the outputs of Oracle:
```
Result Set 34
TO_CHAR(TO_DATE('1582-10-04','-MM-DD'),'DDD')
277
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18028
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16478
The JIRA has 37 watchers (ranked 17 across all Spark JIRAs) and 22 votes
(ranked 8 overall across all JIRAs). I'd have thought that's some indication of
user interest.
---
If your project is set
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18011
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18011
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77060/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18023
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18023
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77062/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18023
**[Test build #77062 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77062/testReport)**
for PR 18023 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18023
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77063/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18023
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17723
**[Test build #77064 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77064/testReport)**
for PR 17723 at commit
Github user brkyvz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18028
merging to master and branch-2.2
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18011
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18016
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18023
**[Test build #77062 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77062/testReport)**
for PR 18023 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18023
Please update the PR title to `[SPARK-12139] [SQL] REGEX Column
Specification`
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18023
**[Test build #77063 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77063/testReport)**
for PR 18023 at commit
Github user mgummelt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17723#discussion_r117340556
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/security/HadoopAccessManager.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user mgummelt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17723#discussion_r117341550
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/security/ConfigurableCredentialManager.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user mgummelt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17723#discussion_r117343524
--- Diff:
resource-managers/yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/security/YARNConfigurableCredentialManager.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770#discussion_r117343489
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -187,6 +187,9 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
}
}
Github user mgummelt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17723#discussion_r117344321
--- Diff:
resource-managers/yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/security/YARNHadoopAccessManager.scala
---
@@ -21,66 +21,47 @@ import
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770#discussion_r117344138
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1545,7 +1551,9 @@ class Analyzer(
*
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770#discussion_r117344241
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1605,6 +1613,8 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user shubhamchopra commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17673
Code-review comments/suggestions so far have been incorporated. Thanks for
looking into the code. Happy to incorporate more suggestions and feedback.
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user brkyvz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18028
LGTM. I have no idea where it got dropped :@
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18023#discussion_r117326089
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/AstBuilder.scala
---
@@ -1229,25 +1228,56 @@ class AstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user lossyrob commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16478
Using geospatial data types with Spark SQL require UDTs, and solutions are
hacking around the fact that they are private to the package. e.g.:
-
Github user mgummelt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17723#discussion_r117343724
--- Diff:
resource-managers/yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/security/YARNConfigurableCredentialManager.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
Github user mgummelt commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17723
I have:
* Made ServiceCredentialProvider private
* Made ConfigurableCredentialManager load a hardcoded list of (HDFS, Hive,
HBase) providers, rather than service loading
* Renamed
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17698
LGTM except one comment:
Please add the test cases to the end of file `cast.sql`
```
DESC FUNCTION boolean;
DESC FUNCTION EXTENDED boolean;
```
You can generate
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18023
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18023#discussion_r117326828
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/AstBuilder.scala
---
@@ -1229,25 +1228,56 @@ class AstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user rdblue commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17680
@gatorsmile, sorry for not responding, I was on vacation for a few days.
Should I still review this even though it is merged?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user mgummelt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17723#discussion_r117342796
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/security/ServiceCredentialProvider.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17094
Thanks @MLnick! I am happy to discuss splitting this into smaller bits as
well, if it can make things easier.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18016
**[Test build #77061 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77061/testReport)**
for PR 18016 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18016
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77061/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18016
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18016
**[Test build #77061 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77061/testReport)**
for PR 18016 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18023
**[Test build #77063 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77063/testReport)**
for PR 18023 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17723
**[Test build #77065 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77065/testReport)**
for PR 17723 at commit
Github user janewangfb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18023#discussion_r117374353
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/AstBuilder.scala
---
@@ -1229,25 +1228,56 @@ class AstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18023
**[Test build #77068 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77068/testReport)**
for PR 18023 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18023#discussion_r117367232
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/unresolved.scala
---
@@ -84,6 +84,33 @@ case class
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18023#discussion_r117379878
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/AstBuilder.scala
---
@@ -1230,24 +1230,49 @@ class AstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18031#discussion_r117385321
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/MapStatus.scala ---
@@ -121,48 +126,69 @@ private[spark] class CompressedMapStatus(
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18031
**[Test build #77072 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77072/testReport)**
for PR 18031 at commit
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17985
@BartekH Yes, I think we can add that to exception message. Please also add
a test case for checking supported join types.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17999
**[Test build #77067 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77067/testReport)**
for PR 17999 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17999
**[Test build #77067 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77067/testReport)**
for PR 17999 at commit
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13959
Yes, this is a tough issue. Let's wait and see if @jkbradley has thoughts
on this issue. If we don't hear anything, then I'd leave it up to @MechCoder on
whether to reopen. Thanks, btw, for taking
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13959
@MechCoder, I apologize that, probably, it sounds the reason for my
suggestion was not clear initially and if it looks without a respect.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18019#discussion_r117378356
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala
---
@@ -1268,6 +1268,59 @@ case class
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18019#discussion_r117378811
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/StringFunctionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -117,6 +117,41 @@ class StringFunctionsSuite extends QueryTest
201 - 300 of 441 matches
Mail list logo
