Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18057
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77333/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18057
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18057
**[Test build #77333 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77333/testReport)**
for PR 18057 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18067#discussion_r118425359
--- Diff: R/pkg/vignettes/sparkr-vignettes.Rmd ---
@@ -776,6 +778,20 @@ newDF <- createDataFrame(data.frame(x = c(1.5, 3.2)))
Github user sameeragarwal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18103
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17113
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user guoxiaolongzte commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18015
@HyukjinKwon
Help to merge to master and modify the status about
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-20785.Thank you.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18103
**[Test build #77345 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77345/testReport)**
for PR 18103 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18083#discussion_r118431897
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/LiveListenerBus.scala ---
@@ -226,3 +240,34 @@ private[spark] object LiveListenerBus {
Github user liu-zhaokun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18102
@sameeragarwal
Thanks for your reply. I will make changes based on your opinion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user 10110346 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18059
@cloud-fan Hive use Floatï¼
select if(true, 123456789, cast(1.23 as float));
++--+
| (IF(true, CAST(123456789 AS FLOAT),
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18059
Then I don't think we can change this behavior, or users from hive will be
confused.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18025
**[Test build #77343 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77343/testReport)**
for PR 18025 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770
**[Test build #77331 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77331/testReport)**
for PR 17770 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18079
It sounds like PostgresSQL supports it. See the docs in
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/sql-select.html
Actually, we also need to support the other alias in the from clauses:
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18103
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18083#discussion_r118432570
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/LiveListenerBus.scala ---
@@ -124,11 +136,13 @@ private[spark] class LiveListenerBus(val
Github user guoxiaolongzte commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18015
@HyukjinKwon Thanks.
@srowen Help to merge to master and modify the status about
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-20785.Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18067
**[Test build #77349 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77349/testReport)**
for PR 18067 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18083#discussion_r118434907
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/LiveListenerBus.scala ---
@@ -226,3 +240,34 @@ private[spark] object LiveListenerBus {
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18090
thanks, merging to master/2.2/2.1/2.0!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18084
**[Test build #77353 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77353/testReport)**
for PR 18084 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18092
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77355/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18094#discussion_r118439975
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -3072,6 +3072,22 @@ object functions {
* @since 2.1.0
*/
Github user ScrapCodes commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17308
Build is failing due to "Our attempt to download sbt locally to
build/sbt-launch-0.13.13.jar failed. Please install sbt manually from
http://www.scala-sbt.org/;
---
If your project is set up
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18090
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77329/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18090
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17181
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77335/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17181
**[Test build #77335 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77335/testReport)**
for PR 17181 at commit
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17343#discussion_r118428707
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/shuffle/sort/UnsafeShuffleWriter.java ---
@@ -321,11 +334,14 @@ void forceSorterToSpill() throws
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17343#discussion_r118428101
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/shuffle/sort/UnsafeShuffleWriter.java ---
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
import java.nio.channels.FileChannel;
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17113
**[Test build #77344 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77344/testReport)**
for PR 17113 at commit
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17343#discussion_r118428639
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/shuffle/sort/UnsafeShuffleWriter.java ---
@@ -339,23 +355,26 @@ void forceSorterToSpill() throws
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17343#discussion_r118428258
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/shuffle/sort/UnsafeShuffleWriter.java ---
@@ -98,6 +99,18 @@
*/
private boolean stopping
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17343#discussion_r118429093
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/shuffle/sort/UnsafeShuffleWriter.java ---
@@ -339,23 +355,26 @@ void forceSorterToSpill() throws
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17113
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77344/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18025
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77343/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16578
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77342/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17113
**[Test build #77346 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77346/testReport)**
for PR 17113 at commit
Github user sameeragarwal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17471
@sitalkedia any updates here?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18015#discussion_r118432984
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ui/AllExecutionsPage.scala
---
@@ -38,19 +38,19 @@ private[ui] class
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18102
Looks like it will only print out the path of directory, not file, is that
on purpose?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user 10110346 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18059
okï¼I will close it,thanks @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user zero323 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18051
To be honest I thought mostly about online docs here. Duplicate links in
the bundled documentation never bothered me before (in SparkR, or any other
package for that matter) and don't I think these
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18091
**[Test build #77350 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77350/testReport)**
for PR 18091 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18067
**[Test build #77351 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77351/testReport)**
for PR 18067 at commit
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18074#discussion_r118436041
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/RelationalGroupedDataset.scala ---
@@ -35,12 +35,13 @@ import
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18090
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989#discussion_r118437769
--- Diff:
common/network-common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/server/OneForOneStreamManager.java
---
@@ -95,6 +97,25 @@ public ManagedBuffer
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18092
**[Test build #77355 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77355/testReport)**
for PR 18092 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18092
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user heary-cao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18057
the patch by #18103 merge together.
close pr.
thanks.
@10110346
@hvanhovell
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user ScrapCodes commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17308
Jenkins, retest this please !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18025
**[Test build #77341 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77341/testReport)**
for PR 18025 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16578
**[Test build #77342 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77342/testReport)**
for PR 16578 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18025
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user sameeragarwal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18102
Agree -- logging at INFO level is an overkill. At the very least it should
be at the TRACE level.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14269#discussion_r118432313
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/config/package.scala ---
@@ -103,4 +103,9 @@ package object config {
.stringConf
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18074
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18074
**[Test build #77347 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77347/testReport)**
for PR 18074 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18074
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77347/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18074
**[Test build #77348 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77348/testReport)**
for PR 18074 at commit
Github user 10110346 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18059
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user liu-zhaokun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18102
@jerryshao
Yes, I only want to provided a method to judge whether the spark.work.dir
is removing or has been cleaned.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18016
@heary-cao Hi, I found `Ceil` and `Floor` modified by this pr produce
different results between interpret and codegen.
We also need to modify `doGenCode()` to handle `LongType` correctly.
Can
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18091
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18074
**[Test build #77352 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77352/testReport)**
for PR 18074 at commit
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18079
yea, I think so. I mean, in the name conflict case you described above,
postgresql throws an error;
```
postgres=# select * from testTable;
col1 | col2
--+--
(0 rows)
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989#discussion_r118438313
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/ShuffleBlockFetcherIteratorSuite.scala
---
@@ -401,4 +413,64 @@ class
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989
good job! merging to master/2.2!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18067
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77349/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18067
**[Test build #77349 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77349/testReport)**
for PR 18067 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18064#discussion_r118443224
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/DataSource.scala
---
@@ -426,36 +418,35 @@ case class DataSource(
//
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17308
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77358/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17308
**[Test build #77358 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77358/testReport)**
for PR 17308 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17308
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user jinxing64 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989#discussion_r118424377
--- Diff: docs/configuration.md ---
@@ -520,6 +520,14 @@ Apart from these, the following properties are also
available, and may be useful
Github user jinxing64 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989#discussion_r118424375
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/ShuffleBlockFetcherIteratorSuite.scala
---
@@ -401,4 +411,61 @@ class
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770
@cloud-fan @gatorsmile Please let me know if you have more comments on this
change. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18102
I would doubt it will be too verbose to print out the path.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18091
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17113
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18091
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77338/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18025
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16578
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18097
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18097
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77340/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18083#discussion_r118431688
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/LiveListenerBus.scala ---
@@ -124,11 +136,13 @@ private[spark] class LiveListenerBus(val
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18083#discussion_r118431597
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/LiveListenerBus.scala ---
@@ -33,25 +37,24 @@ import org.apache.spark.util.Utils
* has
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18074
**[Test build #77347 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77347/testReport)**
for PR 18074 at commit
Github user liu-zhaokun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18102
@jerryshao
Hi, I think change the log level also can make the logfile more
concise.would this change eliminate your concerns?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user liyichao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18084#discussion_r118436939
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/master/MasterSuite.scala ---
@@ -499,4 +500,103 @@ class MasterSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18064
**[Test build #77354 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77354/testReport)**
for PR 18064 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18092
**[Test build #77355 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77355/testReport)**
for PR 18092 at commit
Github user liyichao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18092
Sorry, I thought it not necessary to duplicate message in JIRA, thanks for
the suggestion.
PR is updated. As to the test plan, the modification seems straightforward,
and I can not think of
Github user wselwood commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18088
Good catch @HyukjinKwon Sorry about that.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17308
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17308
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77357/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17308
**[Test build #77357 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77357/testReport)**
for PR 17308 at commit
1 - 100 of 591 matches
Mail list logo
