Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6981#issuecomment-122198738
[Test build #37595 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37595/consoleFull)
for PR 6981 at commit
[`e223bc0`](https://gith
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6981#discussion_r34866036
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtils.scala
---
@@ -378,4 +395,183 @@ object DateTimeUtils {
c.set(seg
Github user carsonwang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7399#discussion_r34866034
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/StagePage.scala ---
@@ -672,164 +658,605 @@ private[ui] class StagePage(parent: StagesTab)
extends W
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6981#issuecomment-122198594
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user carsonwang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7399#discussion_r34865990
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/StagePage.scala ---
@@ -672,164 +658,605 @@ private[ui] class StagePage(parent: StagesTab)
extends W
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6981#issuecomment-122198587
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user tarekauel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6981#discussion_r34865980
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtils.scala
---
@@ -378,4 +395,183 @@ object DateTimeUtils {
c.se
Github user carsonwang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7399#discussion_r34865987
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/StagePage.scala ---
@@ -672,164 +658,605 @@ private[ui] class StagePage(parent: StagesTab)
extends W
Github user tarekauel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7208#discussion_r34865919
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringOperations.scala
---
@@ -593,6 +593,33 @@ case class Levenshtein(left
Github user carsonwang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7399#discussion_r34865792
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/PagedTable.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,221 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) un
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7437#issuecomment-122197492
[Test build #37594 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37594/consoleFull)
for PR 7437 at commit
[`dbf538e`](https://gith
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7451#issuecomment-122197144
Jenkins, ok to test.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7115#issuecomment-122197190
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7115#issuecomment-122197129
[Test build #37581 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37581/console)
for PR 7115 at commit
[`a2d6313`](https://github.
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7418#issuecomment-122197117
@chenghao-intel no, if there are less 50 columns, the generated java codes
are as the same as the before.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this ema
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7076#discussion_r34865652
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/GenerateMutableProjection.scala
---
@@ -45,7 +45,32 @@ object
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7458#discussion_r34865653
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -537,6 +541,7 @@ class Analyzer(
def containsAggrega
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7437#issuecomment-122196934
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7451#issuecomment-122196900
Jenkins, add to whitelist.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7437#issuecomment-122196956
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7076#discussion_r34865586
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/GenerateMutableProjection.scala
---
@@ -45,7 +45,32 @@ object
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7456#issuecomment-122195984
The current code looks pretty good to me.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7076#discussion_r34865456
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/CodeGenerationSuite.scala
---
@@ -42,4 +42,8 @@ class CodeGenerationSu
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7437#discussion_r34865356
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/GenerateUnsafeProjection.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
+/*
+ * Lic
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7456#discussion_r34865261
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/Exchange.scala ---
@@ -112,109 +114,71 @@ case class Exchange(newPartitioning: Partitioning,
ch
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7437#issuecomment-122191875
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user adam-mesos commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4960#issuecomment-122191832
Thanks! :tada: :cake: :v:
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7437#issuecomment-122191825
[Test build #37591 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37591/console)
for PR 7437 at commit
[`dc737b2`](https://github.
Github user reachbach commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4960#issuecomment-122191175
@tnachen @andrewor14 thanks for getting this done! Much needed for mesos
deployments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6394#issuecomment-122191181
[Test build #37593 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37593/consoleFull)
for PR 6394 at commit
[`42c0f44`](https://gith
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7418#issuecomment-122191060
@viirya, I mean you at least have a single group (less than 50 fields), it
probably cause performance issues for case like:
`select a+b from src`, as the overh
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6394#issuecomment-122190188
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6394#issuecomment-122190229
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user viirya closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7418
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7418#issuecomment-122189888
ok. no problem.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7456#discussion_r34864886
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/UnsafeRowSerializer.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,130 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7456#discussion_r34864869
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/UnsafeRowSerializer.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,130 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7437#discussion_r34864786
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/GenerateUnsafeProjection.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+/*
+ * Lic
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7457#issuecomment-122189247
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7457#issuecomment-122189138
[Test build #37573 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37573/console)
for PR 7457 at commit
[`739f5bd`](https://github.
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7379#issuecomment-122188991
Sorry, I shouldn't use the word `SMJ`.
I mean if we are planning to improve the performance of RangeJoin, probably
we can think of it in a more general way, no
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7208#issuecomment-122188919
[Test build #37592 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37592/consoleFull)
for PR 7208 at commit
[`05221a9`](https://gith
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7437#discussion_r34864633
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/GenerateUnsafeProjection.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+/*
+ * L
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7437#issuecomment-122188665
[Test build #37591 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37591/consoleFull)
for PR 7437 at commit
[`dc737b2`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7437#issuecomment-122188112
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7208#issuecomment-122188126
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7208#issuecomment-122188201
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7437#issuecomment-122188198
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7446#discussion_r34864521
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -513,18 +513,28 @@ object SimplifyFilters extends Rule[Logi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7453#issuecomment-122187161
[Test build #37588 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37588/console)
for PR 7453 at commit
[`83d65ac`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7453#issuecomment-122187170
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7437#discussion_r34864461
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/UnsafeRowConverter.scala
---
@@ -261,6 +265,13 @@ private class StringUnsafeCo
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7418#issuecomment-122186634
Thanks for understanding. Do you mind closing this one first? If we need to
merge this one, let's reopen it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this e
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7457
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7457#issuecomment-122186121
Merged into master. Thanks for reviewing!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7208#issuecomment-122185720
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7208#issuecomment-122185717
[Test build #37590 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37590/console)
for PR 7208 at commit
[`fcb4f90`](https://github.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7208#issuecomment-122185196
[Test build #37590 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37590/consoleFull)
for PR 7208 at commit
[`fcb4f90`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7457#issuecomment-122184902
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7457#issuecomment-122184739
[Test build #37585 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37585/console)
for PR 7457 at commit
[`4b40faa`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7208#issuecomment-122184731
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7452#issuecomment-122184778
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7208#issuecomment-122184681
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7452#issuecomment-122184575
[Test build #37578 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37578/console)
for PR 7452 at commit
[`2a6e692`](https://github.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7453#issuecomment-122184101
[Test build #37588 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37588/consoleFull)
for PR 7453 at commit
[`83d65ac`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6756#issuecomment-122183530
[Test build #37589 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37589/consoleFull)
for PR 6756 at commit
[`a14939b`](https://gith
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7418#issuecomment-122183508
@rxin sure, no problem.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6756#issuecomment-122183394
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7453#issuecomment-122183375
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6756#issuecomment-122183383
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7453#issuecomment-122183395
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user sarutak commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7440#discussion_r34863617
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/schema.R ---
@@ -69,10 +69,11 @@ structType.structField <- function(x, ...) {
#' @param ... further arguments passed to or from other me
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6756#issuecomment-122182463
[Test build #37587 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37587/consoleFull)
for PR 6756 at commit
[`4c61693`](https://gith
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7379#discussion_r34863539
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/BroadcastRangeJoin.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,411 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7457#issuecomment-122182225
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6756#issuecomment-122182129
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user sarutak commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7440#discussion_r34863449
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/schema.R ---
@@ -69,10 +69,11 @@ structType.structField <- function(x, ...) {
#' @param ... further arguments passed to or from other me
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6756#issuecomment-122182121
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7449#issuecomment-122181790
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7449#issuecomment-122181763
[Test build #37575 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37575/console)
for PR 7449 at commit
[`07385df`](https://github.
Github user HuJiayin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7208#discussion_r34863266
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringOperations.scala
---
@@ -552,6 +552,34 @@ case class Substring(str: Ex
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7457#issuecomment-122180218
LGTM but maybe wait for Patrick to be sure
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proj
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7430#discussion_r34863180
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/stat/_statistics.py ---
@@ -238,6 +242,54 @@ def chiSqTest(observed, expected=None):
jmodel = callMLlibFunc("chi
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7430#issuecomment-122179544
@josepablocam @MechCoder It should be sufficient to support only the
`distName` + `params` API in this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this em
Github user yu-iskw commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6756#discussion_r34863112
--- Diff: python/docs/pyspark.ml.rst ---
@@ -33,6 +33,14 @@ pyspark.ml.classification module
:undoc-members:
:inherited-members:
+p
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7294
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7294#issuecomment-122178963
Merged into master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7449#issuecomment-122178815
[Test build #37586 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37586/consoleFull)
for PR 7449 at commit
[`2bb6637`](https://gith
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7294#issuecomment-122178873
@jkbradley Just thought about how to reduce the review complexity. I think
this PR would be easier to review if you copied the implementation with bins
and kept the 1-1 m
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6394#issuecomment-122178682
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user sarutak commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7440#discussion_r34862903
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/utils.R ---
@@ -440,19 +446,23 @@ processClosure <- function(node, oldEnv, defVars,
checkedFuncs, newEnv) {
# Namespaces other
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6394#issuecomment-122178646
[Test build #31 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SlowSparkPullRequestBuilder/31/console)
for PR 6394 at commit
[`f18dc18`](https://github.co
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7457#issuecomment-122178572
[Test build #37585 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37585/consoleFull)
for PR 7457 at commit
[`4b40faa`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7457#issuecomment-122178454
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7449#issuecomment-122178469
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7449#issuecomment-122178457
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7457#issuecomment-122178465
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user sarutak commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7440#discussion_r34862787
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/schema.R ---
@@ -69,10 +69,11 @@ structType.structField <- function(x, ...) {
#' @param ... further arguments passed to or from other me
Github user yu-iskw commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6756#discussion_r34862779
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/KMeans.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,204 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (A
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6294#issuecomment-122178072
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
1 - 100 of 1114 matches
Mail list logo
