Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9010#issuecomment-147298368
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9067#issuecomment-147298428
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9010#issuecomment-147298371
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9072#issuecomment-147301286
[Test build #43560 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43560/consoleFull)
for PR 9072 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9072#issuecomment-147326801
[Test build #43560 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43560/console)
for PR 9072 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9072#issuecomment-147326864
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9072#issuecomment-147326863
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9072#issuecomment-147301029
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9073#issuecomment-147309315
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9073#issuecomment-147310580
[Test build #43562 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43562/consoleFull)
for PR 9073 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8992#issuecomment-147313013
Sounds good. IIRC it used more Jackson artifacts than Spark does, so
excluding all of them might leave it lacking a library it needs. If so the
solution would be to just
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9070#discussion_r41731525
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/ConstantInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -27,6 +28,9 @@ import scala.reflect.ClassTag
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9070#discussion_r41732138
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/TransformedDStream.scala
---
@@ -39,7 +39,10 @@ class TransformedDStream[U:
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1229#issuecomment-147326922
@pauloangelo sounds like your RDD is not immutable then, in which case many
bets are off. RDDs are generally always the same whenever you compute them.
---
If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9073#issuecomment-147323575
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user Lewuathe commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8884#issuecomment-147323507
@dbtsai I rebased master and updated. Could you check it again? Thank you.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9067#issuecomment-147298737
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9067#issuecomment-147298690
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9067#issuecomment-147298751
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9009#issuecomment-147308172
Yes, please. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9071#issuecomment-147300348
Would you mind closing this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9073#issuecomment-147309298
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user hhbyyh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9073
[SPARK-11029] [ML] Add computeCost to KMeansModel in spark.ml
jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11029
We should add a method analogous to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9073#issuecomment-147323578
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9073#issuecomment-147323392
[Test build #43562 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43562/console)
for PR 9073 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9010#issuecomment-147298906
[Test build #43558 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43558/consoleFull)
for PR 9010 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9067#issuecomment-147298785
[Test build #43559 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43559/consoleFull)
for PR 9067 at commit
Github user tylerprete commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8992#issuecomment-147300513
@srowen I'll exclude jackson from json4s's transitive dependencies and see
if everything plays nice. That seems more tractable than tackling updating
jackson for all
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9010#issuecomment-147306040
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9010#issuecomment-147306039
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8551#issuecomment-147305874
[Test build #43561 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43561/consoleFull)
for PR 8551 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9010#issuecomment-147305902
[Test build #43558 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43558/console)
for PR 9010 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9070#discussion_r41731681
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/TransformedDStream.scala
---
@@ -39,7 +39,10 @@ class TransformedDStream[U: ClassTag] (
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9067#issuecomment-147298429
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9067#issuecomment-147298405
[Test build #43557 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43557/console)
for PR 9067 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8551#issuecomment-147304573
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8551#issuecomment-147304561
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user hhbyyh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8551#issuecomment-147304609
@feynmanliang @jkbradley Sorry for the late update.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9067#issuecomment-147324890
[Test build #43559 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43559/console)
for PR 9067 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9067#issuecomment-147325034
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9067#issuecomment-147325035
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9075#issuecomment-147332103
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9075#issuecomment-147354342
[Test build #43564 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43564/console)
for PR 9075 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9072#discussion_r41734082
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -1521,8 +1521,15 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
}
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9074#issuecomment-147330070
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9074#issuecomment-147330040
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9074#issuecomment-147341954
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9074#issuecomment-147341952
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9070#discussion_r41733627
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/TransformedDStream.scala
---
@@ -39,7 +39,10 @@ class TransformedDStream[U: ClassTag] (
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9075#issuecomment-147335370
[Test build #43564 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43564/consoleFull)
for PR 9075 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9072#issuecomment-147338950
[Test build #43565 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43565/consoleFull)
for PR 9072 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9072#issuecomment-147364367
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9072#issuecomment-147364369
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9072#issuecomment-147364329
[Test build #43565 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43565/console)
for PR 9072 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9072#issuecomment-147365411
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9072#issuecomment-147365490
[Test build #43566 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43566/consoleFull)
for PR 9072 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9072#issuecomment-147365440
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user navis opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9074
[SPARK-11062] Thrift server does not support operationLog
Currently, SparkExecuteStatementOperation is skipping beforeRun/afterRun
method.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9068#issuecomment-147327076
Seems fine to me, because of the pointer to more info. I don't know what
the right breakdown is between info on this page and on the wiki; I suppose all
in one place
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9075#issuecomment-147332022
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9074#issuecomment-147341866
[Test build #43563 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43563/console)
for PR 9074 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9074#issuecomment-147331430
[Test build #43563 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43563/consoleFull)
for PR 9074 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9072#issuecomment-147335906
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9072#issuecomment-147364822
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9075
[SPARK-11063][Streaming]Change preferredLocations of Receiver's RDD to
hosts rather than hostports
The format of RDD's preferredLocations must be hostname but the format of
Streaming Receiver's
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9072#issuecomment-147335883
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9072#discussion_r41736088
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -1521,8 +1521,15 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
}
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9072#issuecomment-147335942
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9075#issuecomment-147354463
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9075#issuecomment-147354464
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user lianhuiwang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9045#issuecomment-147439210
@tgravescs if use --jars hdfs://users/foo.jar, now i can not put foo.jar
into the system classpath without this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9051#issuecomment-147439789
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9058#issuecomment-147458321
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9072#issuecomment-147301019
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9072
[SPARK-11051][Core] Do not allow local checkpointing after the RDD is
materialized and checkpointed
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11051
When a `RDD` is materialized and
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8934#issuecomment-147303344
ping @davies How about this updated version? Or you still think it is not
worth due to the possible performance regressions? As in this version it only
looks for `count`
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8551#issuecomment-147310376
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8551#issuecomment-147310378
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8551#issuecomment-147310348
[Test build #43561 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43561/console)
for PR 8551 at commit
Github user mwws commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8760#issuecomment-147312498
@andrewor14 , could you also help review and comment. Thanks in advance.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9070#discussion_r41731988
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/TransformedDStream.scala
---
@@ -39,7 +39,10 @@ class TransformedDStream[U:
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9059#discussion_r41768301
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/AllJobsPage.scala ---
@@ -289,13 +290,14 @@ private[ui] class AllJobsPage(parent: JobsTab)
extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9065#issuecomment-147440268
[Test build #1876 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1876/consoleFull)
for PR 9065 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9051#issuecomment-147439696
[Test build #43568 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43568/console)
for PR 9051 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9076#issuecomment-147445583
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9011
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9059#issuecomment-147439152
[Test build #1875 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1875/consoleFull)
for PR 9059 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#issuecomment-147441714
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#issuecomment-147443941
[Test build #43569 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43569/consoleFull)
for PR 8880 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8945#discussion_r41775279
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/StandaloneDynamicAllocationSuite.scala
---
@@ -369,6 +369,38 @@ class StandaloneDynamicAllocationSuite
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9058#issuecomment-147458335
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9051#issuecomment-147439788
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9065#discussion_r41768863
--- Diff: make-distribution.sh ---
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ if [ $(command -v git) ]; then
fi
-if [ ! $(command -v "$MVN") ] ; then
+if [ !
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#issuecomment-147441746
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user shellberg opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9076
Update DAGScheduler's "misbehaved ResultHandler"
Restrict tasks (of job) to only 1 to ensure that the causing Exception
asserted for job failure is the deliberately thrown
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9011#discussion_r41773979
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -833,6 +833,33 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
Github user tgravescs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9045#issuecomment-147451561
ah I understand now, thanks. I'll take a look
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9058#issuecomment-147452580
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9058#issuecomment-147452546
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user sarutak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9059#issuecomment-147448778
I applied your patch and I noticed you didn't care the case we watch the
status of incomplete apps through the history server.
Sometimes, apps are marked as
1 - 100 of 657 matches
Mail list logo
