GitHub user zhengruifeng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5591
[SPARK-7008] An implement of Factorization Machines based on Scala and
Spark MLlib.
An implementation of Factorization Machines based on Scala and Spark MLlib.
Factorization Machine
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5591#issuecomment-98899177
OK, please close it.
On May 1, 2015, at 5:35 AM, Xiangrui Meng notificati...@github.com
wrote:
@zhengruifeng https://github.com/zhengruifeng
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13511
**[Test build #59997 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59997/consoleFull)**
for PR 13511 at commit
[`652b9ef`](https://github.com/apache/spark
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13511
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59997/
Test PASSed
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13511
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user zhengruifeng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13514
[SPARK-15770][ML] 'Experimental' annotation audit
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1, remove comments `:: Experimental ::` for non-experimental API
2, add comments
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13514
**[Test build #60002 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60002/consoleFull)**
for PR 13514 at commit
[`42adf3f`](https://github.com/apache/spark
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13515
**[Test build #60005 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60005/consoleFull)**
for PR 13515 at commit
[`77d3486`](https://github.com/apache/spark
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13514
**[Test build #60001 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60001/consoleFull)**
for PR 13514 at commit
[`546987f`](https://github.com/apache/spark
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13514
**[Test build #60001 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60001/consoleFull)**
for PR 13514 at commit
[`546987f`](https://github.com/apache/spark
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13514
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60001/
Test PASSed
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13514
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user zhengruifeng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13515
[MINOR] Fix Typos 'an -> a'
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`an -> a`
Use cmds like `grep -in ' an [^aeiou]'
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13515#discussion_r65814235
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmit.scala ---
@@ -366,7 +366,7 @@ object SparkSubmit
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13514
**[Test build #60002 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60002/consoleFull)**
for PR 13514 at commit
[`42adf3f`](https://github.com/apache/spark
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13514
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13514
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60002/
Test PASSed
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13511
```
>>> from pyspark.mllib.evaluation import *
>>> predictionAndLabels = sc.parallelize([(0.0, 0.0), (0.0, 1.0), (0.0,
0.0), (1.0, 0.0), (1.0, 1.0), (1.0, 1.0), (1.
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13511
cc @srowen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
GitHub user zhengruifeng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13511
[SPARK-14900][ML][PySpark] Add accuracy and deprecate precison,recall,f1
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1, add accuracy for MulticlassMetrics
2, deprecate overall
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13515
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13515
**[Test build #60003 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60003/consoleFull)**
for PR 13515 at commit
[`2531a5f`](https://github.com/apache/spark
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13515
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60003/
Test FAILed
GitHub user zhengruifeng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13521
[SPARK-15770][CORE][SQL][ML] Annotation audit for Experimental and
DeveloperApi 2
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1, remove comments `:: Experimental ::` for non
GitHub user zhengruifeng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13560
[SPARK-15823][PySpark][ML] Add @property for 'property' in MulticlassMetrics
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`accuracy` should be decorated with `@property` to keep
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13560#discussion_r66569553
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/evaluation.py ---
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ class MulticlassMetrics(JavaModelWrapper):
0.66
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13390#discussion_r65692163
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/evaluation/MulticlassClassificationEvaluator.scala
---
@@ -39,16 +39,16 @@ class
GitHub user zhengruifeng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13376
[DO_NOT_MERGE][ML] Enable java save/load tests for ML
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Because `SPARK-6725` is already Resolved, the `TODO` save/load tests
depending
GitHub user zhengruifeng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13657
[SPARK-15939][ML][PySpark] Clarify ml.linalg usage
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1, update comments in `pyspark.ml` that it use `ml.linalg` not
`mllib.linalg`
2
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13519
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13511
**[Test build #59997 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59997/consoleFull)**
for PR 13511 at commit
[`652b9ef`](https://github.com/apache/spark
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13511
@srowen It is just the local test code, please ignore it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13511
Looks correct, what are you pointing out?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13515
**[Test build #60003 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60003/consoleFull)**
for PR 13515 at commit
[`2531a5f`](https://github.com/apache/spark
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13515#discussion_r6583
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveComparisonTest.scala
---
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ import
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13390
Merged to master/2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13390#discussion_r65030639
--- Diff: docs/mllib-evaluation-metrics.md ---
@@ -182,17 +183,22 @@ $$\hat{\delta}(x) = \begin{cases}1 & \text{if $x =
0$}, \\ 0 & \text{o
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13398#discussion_r65046391
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/evaluation/MulticlassClassificationEvaluatorSuite.scala
---
@@ -40,4 +41,51 @@ class
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13398#issuecomment-222445158
cc @yanboliang
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user zhengruifeng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13398
[SPARK-15650][ML] Add correctness test for MulticlassClassification
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add tests to verify the correctness
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13390#discussion_r65027076
--- Diff: docs/mllib-evaluation-metrics.md ---
@@ -182,17 +183,22 @@ $$\hat{\delta}(x) = \begin{cases}1 & \text{if $x =
0$}, \\ 0 & \text{o
GitHub user zhengruifeng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13390
[SPARK-15617][ML][DOC] Clarify that fMeasure in MulticlassMetrics is
"micro" f1_score
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
clarify that fMeasure in Multicl
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13398#discussion_r65048853
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/evaluation/MulticlassClassificationEvaluatorSuite.scala
---
@@ -40,4 +41,51 @@ class
Github user zhengruifeng closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13354
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user zhengruifeng closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13075
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13356#issuecomment-77181
So I will just change the error message.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user zhengruifeng closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13398
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13398#discussion_r65077584
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/evaluation/MulticlassClassificationEvaluatorSuite.scala
---
@@ -40,4 +41,51 @@ class
GitHub user zhengruifeng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13354
[SPARK-15607][ML] Remove redundant toArray in ml.linalg
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`sliceInds, sliceVals` are already of type `Array`, so remove `toArray
GitHub user zhengruifeng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13356
[SPARK-15610][ML] PCA should not support k == numFeatures
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix the wrong bound of `k` in `PCA`
`require(k <= sources.first().s
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13356#issuecomment-222109494
cc @jkbradley @mengxr
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12394#issuecomment-221764870
cc @mengxr
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13317#issuecomment-221795573
@holdenk Yes. I use cmd like this `grep -in ' a [aeiou]'
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/*/*scala`
to generate potential wrong lines.
---
If your
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13317#issuecomment-221803163
@holdenk Thanks. Good night.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
GitHub user zhengruifeng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13317
[MINOR] Fix Typos
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`a` -> `an`
## How was this patch tested?
local build
You can me
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13317#issuecomment-221792040
@holdenk Thanks. I think you are right. I will revert `an one-xxx` to `a
one-xxx`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13317#issuecomment-221801013
@holdenk Excuse me, How to deal with MiMa test failures? It seems caused
by change in `core`
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13317#issuecomment-221790963
@holdenk Thanks. I have fixed this. and run `lint-java` to check java file.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13390
cc @srowen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13390#issuecomment-222364467
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13390#discussion_r65005147
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/evaluation/MulticlassMetrics.scala
---
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ class MulticlassMetrics @Since("
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11263#issuecomment-187644623
@mengxr Ok, I have fixed it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
GitHub user zhengruifeng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11303
[SPARK-13435] [MLlib] Add Weighted Cohen's kappa to MulticlassMetrics
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13435
## What changes were proposed in this pull request
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11303#issuecomment-187687258
@srowen yes, the style problem was caused by that the IJ's default
'reformating' style for scala dont match spark's.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11303#discussion_r53776227
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/evaluation/MulticlassMetrics.scala
---
@@ -211,4 +211,119 @@ class MulticlassMetrics @Since
GitHub user zhengruifeng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11387
[SPARK-13435] [MLlib] Fix the wrong parameter in R code comment in
AssociationRulesSuite
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
just chang R Snippet Comment
GitHub user zhengruifeng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11419
[SPARK-13538][ML] Add GaussianMixture to ML
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13538
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add GaussianMixture
GitHub user zhengruifeng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11429
[SPARK-13551] [MLLib] Fix wrong comment and remove meanless lines in
mllib.JavaBisectingKMeansExample
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13551
## What changes were
GitHub user zhengruifeng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11428
[SPARK-13550] [ML] Add java example for ml.clustering.BisectingKMeans
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13550
## What changes were proposed in this pull request
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11429#issuecomment-190117144
@srowen Sorry, but can I make a PR without JIRA?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11419#issuecomment-190159614
Jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
GitHub user zhengruifeng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11411
[SPARK-13385][MLlib] Enable AssociationRules to generate consequents with
user-defined lengths
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13385
## What changes were proposed
Github user zhengruifeng closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11263
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11263#issuecomment-189584541
There is something wrong with my git operation. I will close this PR, and
send another PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11303#discussion_r53736779
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/evaluation/MulticlassMetrics.scala
---
@@ -129,86 +135,199 @@ class MulticlassMetrics @Since
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11303#discussion_r53736887
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/evaluation/MulticlassMetricsSuite.scala
---
@@ -51,6 +51,9 @@ class MulticlassMetricsSuite
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11303#discussion_r53726515
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/evaluation/MulticlassMetrics.scala
---
@@ -25,18 +25,19 @@ import org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11303#discussion_r53727121
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/evaluation/MulticlassMetrics.scala
---
@@ -129,86 +135,199 @@ class MulticlassMetrics @Since
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11303#discussion_r53740489
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/evaluation/MulticlassMetrics.scala
---
@@ -129,86 +135,199 @@ class MulticlassMetrics @Since
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11303#discussion_r53740507
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/evaluation/MulticlassMetrics.scala
---
@@ -129,86 +135,199 @@ class MulticlassMetrics @Since
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11303#discussion_r53741198
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/evaluation/MulticlassMetrics.scala
---
@@ -25,18 +25,19 @@ import org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD
GitHub user zhengruifeng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11263
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13385
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Enable AssociationRules to generate consequents with user-defined lengths
GitHub user zhengruifeng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11268
[SPARK-13386][Graphx] ConnectedComponents should support maxIteration option
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
add maxIteration option for ConnectedComponents
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11268#discussion_r53542779
--- Diff: graphx/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/graphx/GraphOps.scala ---
@@ -411,8 +411,8 @@ class GraphOps[VD: ClassTag, ED: ClassTag](graph:
Graph
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11268#discussion_r53544885
--- Diff:
graphx/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/graphx/lib/ConnectedComponents.scala ---
@@ -29,13 +29,14 @@ object ConnectedComponents
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11268#discussion_r53549798
--- Diff:
graphx/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/graphx/lib/ConnectedComponents.scala ---
@@ -29,13 +29,14 @@ object ConnectedComponents
GitHub user zhengruifeng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11284
[SPARK-13416][GraphX] Add positive check for option 'numIter' in
StronglyConnectedComponents
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13416
## What changes were proposed
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11284#discussion_r53562433
--- Diff:
graphx/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/graphx/lib/StronglyConnectedComponents.scala
---
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ object StronglyConnectedComponents
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11419#issuecomment-190486901
@sethah GaussianMixture is a kind of clustering algorithm, not
classification.
And ProbabilisticClassifier extend Predictor, so it has a "setLab
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11428#issuecomment-190484554
@srowen this is the first java example for ml.clustering.BisectingKMeans
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11411#issuecomment-190507307
Jenkins test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11419#issuecomment-190507332
Jenkins test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user zhengruifeng closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11556
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user zhengruifeng closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11823
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11651#issuecomment-195254744
Jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
GitHub user zhengruifeng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11651
[Spark-13814][PySpark] Delete unnecessary imports in python examples files
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13814
## What changes were proposed in this pull request
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11651#issuecomment-195238849
Jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
GitHub user zhengruifeng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11655
[SPARK-13816][Graphx] Add parameter checks for algorithms in Graphx
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13816
## What changes were proposed in this pull request
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11651#issuecomment-195252149
it sames something wrong in JavaMaxAbsScalerExample...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11651#issuecomment-195265628
@srowen I think so, I have reviewed all python examples.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
1 - 100 of 877 matches
Mail list logo
