Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15094
**[Test build #65367 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65367/consoleFull)**
for PR 15094 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13513
**[Test build #65368 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65368/consoleFull)**
for PR 13513 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15077
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15077
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65362/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15059
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15077
**[Test build #65362 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65362/consoleFull)**
for PR 15077 at commit
Github user koeninger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14981
Yeah, I don't know of an easier workaround.
My understanding is also that the asf concern is tied to distribution, so
not publishing to maven should be sufficient.
On Sep 14,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15059
**[Test build #65364 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65364/consoleFull)**
for PR 15059 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15059
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65364/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15059
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15060
**[Test build #65370 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65370/consoleFull)**
for PR 15060 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1
I just opened a pull request against your forked repo -
https://github.com/eyalfa/spark/pull/1 :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14961
**[Test build #65361 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65361/consoleFull)**
for PR 14961 at commit
Github user eyalfa commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1
@HyukjinKwon thanks,
looking at it as we speak :-)
can I merge it, or is it still pending for sign-off by @shivaram?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15059
**[Test build #65363 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65363/consoleFull)**
for PR 15059 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15059
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65363/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15090#discussion_r78732371
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/AnalyzeColumnCommand.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,209 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15093
[SPARK-17480][SQL][FOLLOWUP] Fix more instances which calls
List.length/size which is O(n)
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fixes all the instances which
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15093
**[Test build #65366 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65366/consoleFull)**
for PR 15093 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15093
@srowen Could you please review this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15093#discussion_r78746309
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1659,7 +1659,8 @@ class Analyzer(
// child of
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15059#discussion_r78725648
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ExpressionEvalHelper.scala
---
@@ -289,13 +290,32 @@ trait
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15059
**[Test build #65364 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65364/consoleFull)**
for PR 15059 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15090#discussion_r78731826
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/AnalyzeColumnCommand.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,209 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13513
**[Test build #65365 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65365/consoleFull)**
for PR 13513 at commit
GitHub user a-roberts opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15094
[SPARK-17534] [TESTS] Increase timeouts for DirectKafkaStreamSuite tests
**## What changes were proposed in this pull request?**
There are two tests in this suite that are particularly flaky
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15093#discussion_r78746718
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/distributed/RowMatrix.scala
---
@@ -586,7 +586,7 @@ class RowMatrix @Since("1.0.0") (
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14971
Will this change break existing behaviour? The `MetastoreRelation` can have
table statistics if the hive table is already analyzed.
BTW, I'd like to have this behaviour:
1.
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15093
@srowen Please let me check this out again tomorrow.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15090#discussion_r78731287
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/Statistics.scala
---
@@ -32,19 +34,70 @@ package
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15090#discussion_r78734109
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/AnalyzeTableCommand.scala
---
@@ -129,3 +87,51 @@ case class
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15090#discussion_r78740027
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/AnalyzeColumnCommand.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,209 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13513
Thanks a lot @zsxwing and @frreiss for your comments.
For the slow scan problem of compact batch. Originally I planned to to not
merge the latest batch as I did before, also suggested
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15060#discussion_r78749771
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/MultilayerPerceptronClassifier.scala
---
@@ -235,6 +235,7 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15093
**[Test build #65369 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65369/consoleFull)**
for PR 15093 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14961
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14961
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65361/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15093#discussion_r78746161
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/distributed/RowMatrix.scala
---
@@ -586,7 +586,7 @@ class RowMatrix @Since("1.0.0") (
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1
I think it'd be okay to merge it? If there are some more fixes to be done,
I will post another pull request :). I am pretty much always online.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15090#discussion_r78730873
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/AnalyzeTableCommand.scala
---
@@ -129,3 +87,51 @@ case class
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15090#discussion_r78731424
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/AnalyzeColumnCommand.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,209 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15093#discussion_r78746774
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1659,7 +1659,8 @@ class Analyzer(
//
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13513
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15095
[SQL][minor] correct the comment of SortBasedAggregationIterator.safeProj
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This comment went stale long time ago, this PR fixes it
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15004
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14926#discussion_r78772038
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -36,18 +36,15 @@ import com.google.common.collect.MapMaker
import
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13513
**[Test build #65368 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65368/consoleFull)**
for PR 13513 at commit
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14659#discussion_r78773807
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/Task.scala ---
@@ -79,6 +82,13 @@ private[spark] abstract class Task[T](
metrics)
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15093
**[Test build #65369 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65369/consoleFull)**
for PR 15093 at commit
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1
Yeah the R change looks fine.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15095
**[Test build #65372 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65372/consoleFull)**
for PR 15095 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14834
**[Test build #65374 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65374/consoleFull)**
for PR 14834 at commit
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14659#discussion_r78768851
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ApplicationMaster.scala ---
@@ -184,6 +184,9 @@ private[spark] class ApplicationMaster(
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15048
thanks, merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15004
**[Test build #65375 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65375/consoleFull)**
for PR 15004 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15094
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15051
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65373/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15051
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65371/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15051
**[Test build #65371 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65371/consoleFull)**
for PR 15051 at commit
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14659#discussion_r78758857
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/Task.scala ---
@@ -54,7 +54,10 @@ private[spark] abstract class Task[T](
val partitionId:
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14659#discussion_r78758789
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/ShuffleMapTask.scala ---
@@ -51,8 +51,12 @@ private[spark] class ShuffleMapTask(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15051
**[Test build #65373 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65373/consoleFull)**
for PR 15051 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15060
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65370/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14659#discussion_r78769775
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/Task.scala ---
@@ -79,6 +82,13 @@ private[spark] abstract class Task[T](
metrics)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15094
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65367/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15082
After thinking more about it, it seems not a problem and we don't need to
fix it. Currently `MutableProjection` is used in 3 places:
1. hash based aggregate. It's fine because hash
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15060
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15054#discussion_r78766111
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -266,6 +267,12 @@ case class AlterTableUnsetPropertiesCommand(
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15054#discussion_r78765976
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/AnalyzeTableCommand.scala
---
@@ -91,6 +91,9 @@ case class
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14659#discussion_r78767418
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -2418,6 +2418,21 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15051
**[Test build #65373 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65373/consoleFull)**
for PR 15051 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15097
**[Test build #65376 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65376/consoleFull)**
for PR 15097 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15096
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15093
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65366/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13513
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65368/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13513
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15094
**[Test build #65367 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65367/consoleFull)**
for PR 15094 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15051
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13513
**[Test build #65365 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65365/consoleFull)**
for PR 13513 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15051
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14659#discussion_r78758711
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/ResultTask.scala
---
@@ -51,8 +51,12 @@ private[spark] class ResultTask[T, U](
locs:
Github user zhzhan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15080
@srowen Thanks for reviewing this. Any suggestion to improve it are
welcomed. It does bother us a lot without being able to locate the debug log
quickly in production.
---
If your project is set
GitHub user yangw1234 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15096
[SPARK-17537] [SQL] Reading parquet schema from driver directly when there
is only one file to touch
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15093
**[Test build #65366 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65366/consoleFull)**
for PR 15093 at commit
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14926#discussion_r78772541
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -2535,7 +2539,7 @@ object SparkContext extends Logging {
private def
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14834#discussion_r78774078
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -676,39 +936,54 @@ object LogisticRegressionModel extends
Github user junyangq commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14980
@shivaram Yeah sure :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
GitHub user WeichenXu123 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15097
[SPARK-17540][SparkR][Spark Core] fix SparkR array serde type problem when
length == 0
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
fix SparkR array serde type problem when
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15095
cc @yhuai @davies @liancheng @clockfly
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13513
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65365/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15076#discussion_r78764150
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/basicLogicalOperators.scala
---
@@ -484,7 +494,10 @@ case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15093
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15048
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15051
**[Test build #65371 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65371/consoleFull)**
for PR 15051 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15060
**[Test build #65370 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65370/consoleFull)**
for PR 15060 at commit
Github user cloud-fan closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15082
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15082
My understanding of the main concern of closing this PR is that:
1. Although this issue can be potentially dangerous, the current code work
fine without fixing this issue.
1. We still
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14659#discussion_r78767924
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -2418,6 +2418,21 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14659#discussion_r78767856
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -2418,6 +2418,21 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
1 - 100 of 536 matches
Mail list logo
