Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10307
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73569/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16929
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73572/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10307
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16929
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16929
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73574/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16929
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17052
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73571/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16929
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73573/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17090#discussion_r103397271
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALS.scala
---
@@ -285,6 +288,57 @@ class ALSModel private[ml] (
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16998
@hvanhovell Do you have time to review this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16954#discussion_r103406494
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1398,42 +1399,46 @@ class Analyzer(
}
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17097
[SPARK-19765][SQL] UNCACHE TABLE should re-cache all cached plans that
refer to this table
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When un-cache a table, we should not only
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16954#discussion_r103411993
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/subquery.scala
---
@@ -40,19 +42,179 @@ abstract class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17097
**[Test build #73581 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73581/testReport)**
for PR 17097 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73578/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73575/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16929
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17052
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16929
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73570/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16929
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17059
Ok, let me take a look at this. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user dgingrich commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16845#discussion_r103400340
--- Diff: python/pyspark/broadcast.py ---
@@ -82,7 +83,8 @@ def dump(self, value, f):
except pickle.PickleError:
raise
Github user GavinGavinNo1 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16855
@kayousterhout OK, I have updated it
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user lw-lin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987#discussion_r103405331
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/FileStreamSourceSuite.scala
---
@@ -52,10 +52,7 @@ abstract class FileStreamSourceTest
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17096
**[Test build #73579 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73579/testReport)**
for PR 17096 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16954#discussion_r103412751
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1110,31 +1184,24 @@ class Analyzer(
}
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16954#discussion_r103415750
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1398,42 +1399,46 @@ class Analyzer(
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17052
**[Test build #73576 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73576/testReport)**
for PR 17052 at commit
Github user AnthonyTruchet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14299#discussion_r103421239
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/Word2Vec.scala ---
@@ -314,6 +315,20 @@ class Word2Vec extends Serializable with
Github user datumbox commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17059#discussion_r103427764
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALS.scala
---
@@ -82,12 +82,20 @@ private[recommendation] trait ALSModelParams extends
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17090
I'd been following the long discussions about a transform-based solution,
but those had not seemed to have converged to a clear design. If you feel they
have in your PR, then I'll spend some
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16954#discussion_r103398818
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -707,13 +709,85 @@ class Analyzer(
}
Github user dgingrich commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16845#discussion_r103401522
--- Diff: python/pyspark/util.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987
**[Test build #73578 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73578/testReport)**
for PR 16987 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16910#discussion_r103416573
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveDDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -1494,4 +1495,151 @@ class HiveDDLSuite
}
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16910#discussion_r103416510
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveDDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -1494,4 +1495,151 @@ class HiveDDLSuite
}
Github user uncleGen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17052
cc @zsxwing
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10307
**[Test build #73577 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73577/testReport)**
for PR 10307 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17052
**[Test build #73576 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73576/testReport)**
for PR 17052 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17079
thanks, merging to master/2.1!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user lw-lin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987#discussion_r103404962
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/FileStreamSource.scala
---
@@ -159,28 +161,64 @@ class FileStreamSource(
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17096
cc @sethah, @holdenk, @viirya and @k-yokoshi
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17052
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17052
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73576/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AnthonyTruchet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14299
@vanzin The ticket was filled a long time ago, I updated the PR to make it
clearer. Is any manual linking in some other forge needed ?
@thunterdb I have updated the review following
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14299#discussion_r103420891
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/Word2Vec.scala ---
@@ -314,6 +315,20 @@ class Word2Vec extends Serializable with Logging {
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16954#discussion_r103426702
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1110,31 +1184,24 @@ class Analyzer(
}
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17090#discussion_r103396443
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALS.scala
---
@@ -248,18 +248,18 @@ class ALSModel private[ml] (
@Since("1.3.0")
Github user lw-lin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987#discussion_r103403986
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/FileStreamSource.scala
---
@@ -159,28 +161,64 @@ class FileStreamSource(
Github user windpiger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17097#discussion_r103411010
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/CacheManager.scala ---
@@ -88,46 +90,93 @@ class CacheManager extends Logging {
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17064
@cloud-fan I noticed you open #17097, so I should close this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17015
**[Test build #73584 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73584/testReport)**
for PR 17015 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16938#discussion_r103419011
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/createDataSourceTables.scala
---
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ case class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17001#discussion_r103419380
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/ExternalCatalog.scala
---
@@ -74,7 +77,19 @@ abstract class ExternalCatalog
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17090
@hhbyyh This is different from https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12574
since it sidesteps the ongoing design discussions about input and output
schema. Eventually, I'd like us to proceed
Github user datumbox commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17059
@MLnick Yeap! I have run into problems with the original implementation
when dealing with several billions records. This is when removing casting
starts paying off. :)
---
If your project is set
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17090
#12574 is a comprehensive solution that also intends to support
cross-validation as well as recommending for a subset (or any arbitrary set) of
users/items. So it solves
Github user lw-lin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987#discussion_r103404486
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/FileStreamSource.scala
---
@@ -159,28 +161,64 @@ class FileStreamSource(
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17097
cc @sameeragarwal @gatorsmile @windpiger
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17096
**[Test build #73579 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73579/testReport)**
for PR 17096 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17096
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73579/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17096
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16910#discussion_r103416399
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveDDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -1494,4 +1495,151 @@ class HiveDDLSuite
}
Github user robbinspg commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17039
I think that the current "order if not currently ordered" in the test suite
is good for checking the set of results for unordered queries.
If ordered at all then the results should be
Github user uncleGen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17052
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17090
For performance tests, I've been using the MovieLens `ml-latest` dataset
[here](https://grouplens.org/datasets/movielens/). It has `24,404,096` ratings
with `259,137` users and `39,443` movies.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867
**[Test build #73580 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73580/testReport)**
for PR 16867 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17097
**[Test build #73581 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73581/testReport)**
for PR 17097 at commit
Github user skonto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17045#discussion_r103411216
--- Diff:
resource-managers/mesos/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosCoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -256,7 +259,7 @@
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17097
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73581/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17097
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17059#discussion_r103422515
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALS.scala
---
@@ -82,12 +82,20 @@ private[recommendation] trait ALSModelParams extends
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17079
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17096
[SPARK-15243][ML][SQL][PYSPARK] Add missing support for unicode in Param
methods/functions in dataframe/types
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16954#discussion_r103406735
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -2512,3 +2522,67 @@ object ResolveCreateNamedStruct
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17095
**[Test build #73582 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73582/testReport)**
for PR 17095 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17093
**[Test build #73583 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73583/testReport)**
for PR 17093 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17015#discussion_r103414883
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/MetastoreRelation.scala ---
@@ -1,179 +0,0 @@
-/*
- * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17097
great job~
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10307
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73577/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17059#discussion_r103421071
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALS.scala
---
@@ -82,12 +82,20 @@ private[recommendation] trait ALSModelParams extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10307
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17059
**[Test build #73585 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73585/testReport)**
for PR 17059 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17001#discussion_r103420821
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/ExternalCatalog.scala
---
@@ -74,7 +77,19 @@ abstract class ExternalCatalog
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10307
**[Test build #73577 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73577/testReport)**
for PR 10307 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987
**[Test build #73578 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73578/testReport)**
for PR 16987 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17100
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17099#discussion_r103457544
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/expressions.scala
---
@@ -452,14 +452,6 @@ object FoldablePropagation
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12896
Merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17099
**[Test build #73592 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73592/testReport)**
for PR 17099 at commit
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715#discussion_r103468765
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/feature.py ---
@@ -120,6 +122,196 @@ def getThreshold(self):
return self.getOrDefault(self.threshold)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17099
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17099
**[Test build #73588 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73588/testReport)**
for PR 17099 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17099
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73588/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17095
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17095
**[Test build #73582 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73582/testReport)**
for PR 17095 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73580/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
1 - 100 of 781 matches
Mail list logo
