Re: [Rosegarden-user] [Rosegarden-devel] Fwd: Rosegarden's Future

2012-05-16 Thread Luis Garrido
On 05/17/2012 02:26 AM, David Tisdell wrote: > I hear you but as a music teacher and music software evangelist, it is > huge when I can push an app that runs on multiple platforms to an > education audience. I do all of my most important audio work in Linux There's always the option of using one

Re: [Rosegarden-user] [Rosegarden-devel] Fwd: Rosegarden's Future

2012-05-16 Thread David Tisdell
Lorenzo and Chris, I hear you but as a music teacher and music software evangelist, it is huge when I can push an app that runs on multiple platforms to an education audience. I do all of my most important audio work in Linux because of Rosegarden and I don't see that changing after Windows and Ma

[Rosegarden-user] Busted Examples

2012-05-16 Thread steve conrad
I'd like to point out that my examples are broken again. Track 9 should in all cases be a second drum track. But it comes up as a non-percussion track in the wrong key instead. I do this to make the notation more manageable since cymbals and hi-hat are all notated as sharp notes whereas kick, sna

Re: [Rosegarden-user] [Rosegarden-devel] Fwd: Rosegarden's Future

2012-05-16 Thread Lorenzo Sutton
On 14/05/12 23:03, Chris Cannam wrote: > On 13 May 2012 23:56, Cláudio Pinheiro wrote: >> Rosegarden needs broad visibility by potential users, so it can generate a >> critical mass that would attract developers that would maintain a sustained >> growth and (even) better codebase and documentation

Re: [Rosegarden-user] One Further Thought on RGD

2012-05-16 Thread jimmy
> Gary G. wrote: > > Actually I just checked and that script is still included in > the current > rosegarden source code tarball, you can find it under > /scripts/. > > Here are some instructions on how to use it: > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.audio.rosegarden.user/5102 > > If the rgd

Re: [Rosegarden-user] One Further Thought on RGD Files

2012-05-16 Thread Gary G .
Andy writes: > > >david wrote: > You should do a bug report on the bug reporting system of your distro (Ubuntu > / Debian) asking the distro packagers to include this script in the next > package update. > > The script is quite hidden as all other scripts in the /scripts/ directory in > the sou

Re: [Rosegarden-user] One Further Thought on RGD Files

2012-05-16 Thread Andy
>david wrote: >> On 05/15/2012 09:31 PM, Gary G. wrote: >> The thing is, that most of us don't install Rosegarden from Tarballs. >> 99% of us use whatever package manager comes with our distros. I can >> state categorically that there is no such script included with the >> *buntu distros out there

Re: [Rosegarden-user] One Further Thought on RGD Files

2012-05-16 Thread david
On 05/15/2012 09:31 PM, Gary G. wrote: > Andy writes: > >> >> Gary G. wrote: >>> >>> It looks like 7 years ago the developers of Rosegarden had indeed been >>> developing such a script. >>> >>> A fellow by the name of Pedro Lopez-Cabanillos was working on exactly this >>> problem with a perl scrip

Re: [Rosegarden-user] One Further Thought on RGD Files

2012-05-16 Thread Gary G .
Andy writes: > > Gary G. wrote: > > > > It looks like 7 years ago the developers of Rosegarden had indeed been > > developing such a script. > > > > A fellow by the name of Pedro Lopez-Cabanillos was working on exactly this > > problem with a perl script called ins2rgd.pl Somehow it seems the