Calicrates Policroniades wrote:
Hello,
Does anyone know why the API for the "execute" methods of the XmlRpcClient
(XmlRpcClientLite) does not include a version without the argument parameters?
So how am I supposed to call a method in the server that does not need any
more parameters other than t
On Tuesday, December 3, 2002, at 08:34 PM, Ryan Hoegg wrote:
Daniel Rall wrote:
"Andrew Evers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Well, it depends on whether we will use a branch or a tag. I'd prefer
not to use a branch, bit I don't really mind which. If there is any
debate, let it be now (I think y
+1
On Friday, November 22, 2002, at 03:33 PM, Daniel Rall wrote:
Ryan Hoegg has been contributing to this list for a while now as both
user, documenter, and developer, and is involved (with Andrew Evers)
in refactoring for the next release, and in incorporation of the
Jakarta Commons HTTPClient l
Rogers -
Sorry for the delay in responding. I'm not sure how one could handle a
non-conforming response, I'll have to look at that.
I'd also drop a note to the folks working on the Advogato code..
http://www.advogato.net/proj/mod_virgule/
http://zork.net/mailman/listinfo/virgule-dev
josh
+1
On Friday, September 27, 2002, at 02:40 PM, Daniel Rall wrote:
> Andrew Evers has been providing many excellent and digestable patches
> lately, and backed them up with great discussion on the list. Seeing
> as how I'm not able to keep up with all the patches on my own, I
> propose that he be
On Wednesday, September 11, 2002, at 02:26 PM, josh lucas wrote:
> Ok, now that we have a few people in a discussion, let's talk about
> directions this codebase can go.
>
> Here are some things which I think are important:
>
> 1) Having a very small footprint. Though
On Wednesday, September 11, 2002, at 02:23 PM, Ryan Hoegg wrote:
> John Wilson wrote:
>
>> There is already an excellent Java XML-RPC implementation on
>> Sourceforge
>> http://xmlrpc.sourceforge.net/
>>
> Well it seems Kurt has gotten everyone all riled up. I don't think
> I've seen all three
Ok, now that we have a few people in a discussion, let's talk about
directions this codebase can go.
Here are some things which I think are important:
1) Having a very small footprint. Though I might be inclined to have a
'lite' version which has the necessary compatibility with the xml-rpc
On Wednesday, September 11, 2002, at 12:21 PM, Adam Megacz wrote:
>
> josh lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> wondering why someone doesn't grab it and move it to Sourceforge where
>> I fail to see how moving the code to Sourceforge will help.
>
> I
On Wednesday, September 11, 2002, at 10:37 AM, Kurt Werle wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 11, 2002, at 10:26 AM, josh lucas wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday, September 11, 2002, at 08:02 AM, Kurt Werle wrote:
>>
>>>> Guys, I have to say I am mystified and irritated. M
On Wednesday, September 11, 2002, at 08:02 AM, Kurt Werle wrote:
>> Guys, I have to say I am mystified and irritated. My interceptors
>> patch has
>> been around for over a year.
> ...
>
> I joined this list to skulk about and see what's going on with xmlrpc.
> Mostly because it seems to be s
On Thu, 2002-06-06 at 13:59, Gus Mueller wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone saw any problems with using a Dictionary instead
> of a Hastable in XmlRpc.java for the function writeObject(Object obj)
>
> My problem is, that when using a Hashtable, the order of the objects put
> in are not kept the
On Sun, 2002-06-02 at 05:41, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just updated the Maven project descriptor to version 3 which matches
> what is required for the Maven b4 release that is forthcoming.
>
> At this point I'm comfortable saying that Maven is stable and usable and
> would like to propose
On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 22:39, Michael Guymon wrote:
>
> > IIRC, the spec says that you don't have to include ...
> > If there is no type tag after value, it is assumed that it is a string.
>
>
> Ok that makes sense. I re-read the specification at
> http://www.xmlrpc.com/spec and i
On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 14:55, Michael Guymon wrote:
> hola,
>
>
> I pulled the latest greatest build from CVS for xml-rpc and built the
> example. Using the package org.apache.xmlrpc.WebServer for the server
> and org.apache.xmlrpc.XmlRpcClient for the client, it worked fine. The
> method call to
Daniel Rall wrote:
>
> josh lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Daniel Rall wrote:
> > >
> >> "Rick Johnston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> > I guess this is one of the problems of working with a fro
Daniel Rall wrote:
>
> "Rick Johnston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Very interesting. This would say to me that XMLRPC cannot be used in an
> > applet running in a Netscape browser with an SSL connection, since the
> > browser usually doesn't supply valid content-length header information
Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
>
> I'm going to take a pass over the code and format it so that it is more
> readable as well as look for any hotspots. I also want to get rid of the
> Base64 impl and replace it with a Jakarta one (I was thinking of the one
> from Tomcat)
>
> Can I get commit privs?
>
18 matches
Mail list logo
