Re: [Rpm-maint] Planning for rpm 4.13.0 (-rc2)

2016-10-17 Thread Vít Ondruch
Hi Panu, What is the chance to get [1, 2] into the release? I mildly remember, that once I was offered to get this patch into Fedora, but that never materialized and now it is almost a year. I don't think this is controversial change which should make anything break. Thx for considering. Vít

Re: [Rpm-maint] Planning for rpm 4.13.0 (-rc2)

2016-10-17 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 10/16/2016 10:15 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: Hi, On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 04:33:00PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote: Hey folks, Time to get rpm 4.13.0 out of the door. But in order to do that, we'll need to cut -rc2 first, there's just too much change to jump right into final. The idea is to

Re: [Rpm-maint] Planning for rpm 4.13.0 (-rc2)

2016-10-17 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 10/17/2016 10:48 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: Hi Panu, What is the chance to get [1, 2] into the release? I mildly remember, that once I was offered to get this patch into Fedora, but that never materialized and now it is almost a year. I don't think this is controversial change which should make a

Re: [Rpm-maint] Planning for rpm 4.13.0 (-rc2)

2016-10-17 Thread Thierry Vignaud
On 17 October 2016 at 10:10, Panu Matilainen wrote: >> What is the chance to get [1, 2] into the release? I mildly remember, >> that once I was offered to get this patch into Fedora, but that never >> materialized and now it is almost a year. I don't think this is >> controversial change which sho

Re: [Rpm-maint] Planning for rpm 4.13.0 (-rc2)

2016-10-17 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 10/17/2016 12:30 PM, Thierry Vignaud wrote: On 17 October 2016 at 10:10, Panu Matilainen wrote: What is the chance to get [1, 2] into the release? I mildly remember, that once I was offered to get this patch into Fedora, but that never materialized and now it is almost a year. I don't think

Re: [Rpm-maint] Planning for rpm 4.13.0 (-rc2)

2016-10-17 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 17.10.2016 v 11:30 Thierry Vignaud napsal(a): > On 17 October 2016 at 10:10, Panu Matilainen wrote: >>> What is the chance to get [1, 2] into the release? I mildly remember, >>> that once I was offered to get this patch into Fedora, but that never >>> materialized and now it is almost a year

Re: [Rpm-maint] Planning for rpm 4.13.0 (-rc2)

2016-10-17 Thread Thierry Vignaud
On 17 October 2016 at 12:06, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 17.10.2016 v 11:30 Thierry Vignaud napsal(a): >> On 17 October 2016 at 10:10, Panu Matilainen >> wrote: What is the chance to get [1, 2] into the release? I mildly remember, that once I was offered to get this patch into Fedora, but

Re: [Rpm-maint] Planning for rpm 4.13.0 (-rc2)

2016-10-17 Thread Thierry Vignaud
On 17 October 2016 at 11:42, Panu Matilainen wrote: > On 10/17/2016 12:30 PM, Thierry Vignaud wrote: >> >> On 17 October 2016 at 10:10, Panu Matilainen >> wrote: What is the chance to get [1, 2] into the release? I mildly remember, that once I was offered to get this patch into Fed

[Rpm-maint] %setup for RubyGems

2016-10-17 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 17.10.2016 v 15:07 Thierry Vignaud napsal(a): > On 17 October 2016 at 12:06, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Dne 17.10.2016 v 11:30 Thierry Vignaud napsal(a): >>> On 17 October 2016 at 10:10, Panu Matilainen >>> wrote: > What is the chance to get [1, 2] into the release? I mildly remember, >

Re: [Rpm-maint] %setup for RubyGems

2016-10-17 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 17.10.2016 v 15:37 Pascal Terjan napsal(a): > On 17 October 2016 at 14:31, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> >> Dne 17.10.2016 v 15:07 Thierry Vignaud napsal(a): >>> On 17 October 2016 at 12:06, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 17.10.2016 v 11:30 Thierry Vignaud napsal(a): > On 17 October 2016 at 10:10,