https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4806
--- Comment #14 from mgans...@online.de ---
I tried to implement your suggestions:
Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/vdr-vaapidevice.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4806
--- Comment #12 from Nicolas Chauvet ---
(In reply to mgans...@online.de from comment #11)
[...]
> Both packages vdr-softhddevice (f28 BR: compat_ffmpeg) and vdr-vaapidevice
> (BR: pkgconfig (libavcodec)) can co-exist under
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4806
--- Comment #13 from Nicolas Chauvet ---
Please consider following if you still want to maintain both:
- Add a conflict between he vdr-vaapidevice and the vdr-softhddevice
To prevent them to be installed along hence to avoid
On 03/13/2018 10:30 AM, David Demelier wrote:
I see kodi is included within the kickstart. Since we now ship
libdvdcss in RPM Fusion it could be nice to enable DVD support in kodi.
I think it's very important and a useful feature.
Raspbian has kodi with disc support by default too.
That would
On Fri, 2018-03-09 at 20:06 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> I had this project to try to build a dedicated Spin targeting media
> center
> Finally got something basically testable with an iso generated within
> koji for x86_64/
I see kodi is included within the kickstart. Since we now ship
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4826
leigh scott changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4669
--- Comment #16 from Matt Prahl ---
Thanks for the approval! I'll try to do a build/release this week.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4535
--- Comment #5 from Dominic Robinson
---
Apologies all, I've been rather preoccupied as of late. The spec file needs
work and rebuilding for F28.
Hopefully I will be able to contribute some time to it
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4827
Mohamed El Morabity changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4535
--- Comment #4 from Mohamed El Morabity ---
Looks like RPM spec and SRPM files are not available anymore :(
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4826
--- Comment #2 from Uwe Klotz ---
We are already working on a new FFmpeg integration for decoding that is not yet
finished:
https://github.com/mixxxdj/mixxx/pull/1356
This hopefully will solve many issues caused by the
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4827
Nicolas Chauvet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Group|Package Reviews |
CC list
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4827
Bug ID: 4827
Summary: Review Request: rpmfusion-nonfree-obsolete-packages -
A package to obsolete retired packages from
rpmfusion-nonfree
Product: Package Reviews
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1156
--- Comment #32 from Nicolas Chauvet ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #31)
> Package approved.
Package created, (you should have requested it using admin.rpmfusion.org/pkgdb
interface). But done anyway
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4826
--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Chauvet ---
(In reply to Uwe Klotz from comment #0)
...
> 2 Remarks:
> - I noticed that Mixxx is currently part of the free repository, although
> with inclusion of the FAAD2 plugin it should
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4806
--- Comment #11 from mgans...@online.de ---
Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/vdr-vaapidevice.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4826
Nicolas Chauvet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Review Request |mixxx
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4826
Bug ID: 4826
Summary: Update build requirements and options for Mixxx 2.1
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Hardware: x86_64
OS: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Hi,
Due to a scheduled migration , an unexpected issue occurred on the ppc64le.
The server will be offline mostly today. Please hold your build if possible.
(and do some review...)
noarch build will be okay along with build that doesn't support ppc64le already.
Thx
--
-
Nicolas (kwizart)
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1455
Nicolas Chauvet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=453
Nicolas Chauvet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1028
Nicolas Chauvet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4700
--- Comment #5 from Nicolas Chauvet ---
The other big issue is that this software is redistributing a Java runtime...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the
23 matches
Mail list logo