On Friday 27 April 2007 16:39:04 Werner Schuster (murphee) wrote:
When you do the Rename in the Ruby perspective, does your
refactoringParticipant get notified?
No, unfortunately not..
Hang on a second... when you say Java Perspective: do you mean you do
the rename in the Package explorer?
On Tuesday 13 March 2007 18:52:46 Christopher Williams wrote:
We have no ability to employ full-time developers, nor do
we really have any donations coming in to support augmentation of our work.
Have you considered contacting Aptana? Now that they took over RadRails, they
might be interested
Hi!
On Monday 26 February 2007 18:01:52 Kévin REDON wrote:
It 2 spaces a standard ? from emacs perhaps ? because
Afaik, 2 spaces is standard in Ruby..
it's not a standard for Eclipse/Java users.
- the colour syntax has a problem with the characters / and % :
see attachement
Yeah, that's a
On Tuesday 13 February 2007 18:38:35 Christopher Williams wrote:
Mirko,
Can you look into this? I'm not sure if the version of JRuby you checked
in is an un-modified version from their trunk or not. Here's an example
stack trace. I'll try and look into finding a particular file that it
Hi!
I'm very happy to announce that I imported the refactoring plug-in into our
repository.
There are still some things that need to be addressed:
- Cruisecontrol: The plug-ins aren't built and integrated into the automated
build yet and I'm not sure what needs to be done. Markus?
- Some
On Tuesday 06 February 2007 16:01:22 Christopher Williams wrote:
I'll try and write something up on the page tonight.
That would be very nice, thanks :)
Personally, I'd like to see the bugs all filed in one place. It'd make it
easier for end users and for us to manage tickets in terms of
On Monday 15 January 2007 15:34, Markus Barchfeld wrote:
As version number I would suggest the base version of JRuby (0.9.2) plus
maybe the revision number of JRuby's subversion as qualifier (2742). So,
if you create a jar from the current trunk of JRuby, the version could
be 0.9.2.2742. This
Hi!
I'm currently updating our refactorings to work with the latest JRuby. They
changed some things in the AST structure, added new nodes and removed one
(ScopeNode, replaced with StaticScope). So to port the refactorings, I also
need to update the version we have in RDT.
So my question is,
On Monday 15 January 2007 14:32, Christopher Williams wrote:
Mirko,
Feel free to update jruby. I just generate a jar and stick it into our
org.jruby plugin. Be sure to increment the plugin.xml version number so it
will override any previous versions.
About the version.. I'm going to need a
On Monday 15 January 2007 15:34, Markus Barchfeld wrote:
If the JRuby source is patched the patch should be included in the JRuby
plug-in, too.
I think I'm going to update to the official JRuby and when they included our
patches, update again.
Furthermore I would suggest to add the sources
On Monday 11 December 2006 00:58, zdennis wrote:
Here's an xcf file. Let me know if this works for you. It doesn't
include any text
That's exactly what I needed :) Thanks!
pgpsKzfVywJ8t.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
Hi!
At the end of our diploma thesis, we have to create a poster do present our
work to the visitors. I'd like to include the RDT logo (the one from the trac
site) somewhere, but I can't find it in a higher resolution.. does anyone
have it?
Thanks
pgpvx68KRCCYn.pgp
Description: PGP
Hi Chris
On Wednesday 06 December 2006 16:35, Christopher Williams wrote:
I took your patch and ran with it - it now resembles the JDT's version
quite a bit (like most everything). The syntax coloring is now done as
well. I just checked it into the SVN head.
I saw your commit, thanks a
On Wednesday 06 December 2006 17:59, Christopher Williams wrote:
I vote strongly for migrating the refactoring and other work you've done to
RDT
Ok :) I think I'd prefer that too. If the migration to the latest JRuby isn't
too complicated, we can probably merge in the christmas holidays or
On Wednesday 06 December 2006 22:26, Werner Schuster (murphee) wrote:
Don't know which JRuby you're using at the moment, but some Tom's fixes
caused changes in NodeVisitor (a new visitRootNode method was added, but
the visitScopeNode method was removed). There was also some reshuffling
in the
On Wednesday 06 December 2006 22:54, Werner Schuster (murphee) wrote:
Yes, they added specific names instead of indexes for ... something
(some arguments, can't remember details).
I'm finishing up a JRuby port of ParseTree
(http://www.zenspider.com/ZSS/Products/ParseTree/ ),
and moving to
Hi!
We have some refactorings (mainly rename) we'd like to present in the context
menu of the outline view, but I haven't found an extension point for that..
could someone give me a hint?
Thanks
Mirko
pgpixi1CucI5M.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 00:17, Werner Schuster (murphee) wrote:
Hmm... I guess you'd like to add Rename... to all RubyElement objects.
You could try adding a objectContribution to IRubyElement or RubyElement
objects.
That's exactly what I needed :) Thanks Murphee!
pgp0coNpM0YYW.pgp
Hi Chris!
On Friday 03 November 2006 15:25, Christopher Williams wrote:
Specifically, we may need to associate comments with nodes in a new manner
I'm aware of that.. and it's on my private todo-list and I hope I can do it in
the next few weeks :-) . At the moment we have to concentrate on our
On Wednesday 20 September 2006 20:58, zdennis wrote:
Trac is working on anti-spam measures for 0.10 release, but right now
it's in beta. I will update when it gets a full release though.
The new version has been released last week. We haven't had any spam in our
refactring-Trac since I updated
On Monday 19 June 2006 23:48, Christopher Williams wrote:
We do the selection handling in RubyAbstractEditor for the outline:
org.rubypeople.rdt.internal.ui.rubyeditor.RubyAbstractEditor.setSelectio
n()
We create the positions in RubyScriptSturctureBuilder:
21 matches
Mail list logo
