Latet IntelliJ added syntax support for DRL.
Mark
On 24 Feb 2013, at 19:48, starfish15 pooja.gh...@accenture.com wrote:
Hello all,
Just want a confirmation of something quite miniscule. Though my teacher at
a very young age had tole me that No Q can ever be a DUMB Q ;)
The last time i
both
generated sub-rules from firing?
The docs differentiate between 'or' CE and || compound expression.
MArk
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Mark Proctor mproc...@codehaus.org wrote:
On 24 Feb 2013, at 18:07, Julian Klein juliankl...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for all the advice once
Do you still want the rules to execute according to the agenda salience, or as
soon as they are matched?
Take a look at the Rule, and the attribute fireDirect. It's set by an
annotation (see release notes):
@activationListener('direct' )
This allows a rule to fire without needing to be added
Typical issues are:
1) Not retracting facts, or setting expiration.
2) Not disposing sessions.
3) Poor discrimination networks that produce too many cross products - put the
strongest descriptors first.
4) Making sure you use constraints that exploit indexing (this makes a huge
difference for
On 24 Feb 2013, at 04:11, Julian Klein juliankl...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, thanks. Here's what I have so far:
1) I am not retracting facts or setting expiration. This is by design since
I am doing the next item. Do I need to retract globals?
2) I have disposed the session when I ran with
You also need to give us some indication of what your rules look like. Are you
using just patterns, what conditional elements are you using, are you using any
temporal operators, scheduling, tms?
Mark
On 24 Feb 2013, at 06:12, Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24/02/2013, Julian
On 20 Feb 2013, at 06:29, Charles Moulliard ch0...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The drools project contains Grid, GridNode interfaces + implementation into 2
different maven modules
- drools-grid-impl
- drools-spring
but interface definitions are different
ignore drools-grid-impl, it was
input propagation, does that mean the JoinLeftNode is not used?
I am running 5.4 .0 on Linux. If I see the same issues with a stateless
approach, I will try the 5.5 approach.
Thanks again,
Julian
On Feb 17, 2013, at 6:19 PM, Mark Proctor mproc...@codehaus.org wrote:
You'll need
On 18 Feb 2013, at 09:07, Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Mark,
On 18/02/2013, Mark Proctor mproc...@codehaus.org wrote:
stateless is just a wrapped stateful session - insert, update and delete
work as normal.
So let's get this straight, this quote from the Expert manual
On 18/02/2013, Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Mark,
On 18/02/2013, Mark Proctor mproc...@codehaus.org wrote:
stateless is just a wrapped stateful session - insert, update and delete
work as normal.
So let's get this straight, this quote from the Expert manual which
does
If we can get a unit test for this, we are just about to put out 5.6 (which has
a lot of important fixes in it already), we'll try and have it fixed for then.
Mark
On 17 Feb 2013, at 08:55, Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.l...@gmail.com wrote:
With Drools 5.4.0.Final and 5.5.0.Final, automatic event
You'll need to help us a bit here, by creating a test of some sort. I have 100
rules with 1B JoinLeftNode doesn't give us much to go on.
The problem mentioned earlier was related to windows, which I don't think you
are using - or you'd have said so.
Also can you tell us what version you are
There is no context here for an answer. We don't know your rules, your data,
the stack trace etc.
Mark
On 18 Feb 2013, at 01:00, ismaximum mnr...@gmail.com wrote:
Any idea???
--
View this message in context:
Looks like an 'or' bug. Which is surprising, as we had 'or' bugs in 4.x, and
fixed a lot of them for 5.x.
Could you build and try 5.5.x here now, this is the branch for the 5.6 release:
https://github.com/droolsjbpm/drools/tree/5.5.x
If it's still not fixed, could you write an isolated test?
Thanks, we'll get this one fixed quickly.
Mark
On 17 Feb 2013, at 16:32, Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Below is a fully self-contained DRL that compiles correctly but runs
into a runtime error when the LHS of rule match is evaluated. The
culprit is the test this != $c, but one
this out ever since 5.1.x. A meagre ...do not support
iterative insertions... is all there is to be read, but what does
this imply? Simply doesn't work in an unspecified way? May crash on
workdays...?? A tut, tut from the Drools Team ??? ;-)
-W
On 18/02/2013, Mark Proctor mproc...@codehaus.org
it ... if for no other reason than to pre-emptively disarm any
potential DROOLs is not standards compliant! FUD rantings.
On 2/13/2013 5:59 PM, Mark Proctor wrote:
I've asked this on the developer list, thought I'd ask it here too.
Is anyone using JSR94, anyone think we should not nuke it?
Mark
bridges to the DROOLs specific
interfaces and implementation capabilities, it might also be worth it to
:just do it ... if for no other reason than to pre-emptively disarm any
potential DROOLs is not standards compliant! FUD rantings.
On 2/13/2013 5:59 PM, Mark Proctor wrote:
I've asked
I've asked this on the developer list, thought I'd ask it here too.
Is anyone using JSR94, anyone think we should not nuke it?
Mark
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Thanks again Woflgang.
http://blog.athico.com/2013/02/design-patterns-in-production-systems.html
Mark
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
On 2 Feb 2013, at 09:27, Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/02/2013, Mark Proctor mproc...@codehaus.org wrote:
On 1 Feb 2013, at 13:59, Grant Rettke gret...@acm.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Mark Proctor mproc...@codehaus.org
wrote:
It was only a POC
On 1 Feb 2013, at 13:59, Grant Rettke gret...@acm.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Mark Proctor mproc...@codehaus.org wrote:
It was only a POC that partially worked, and then stopped working, so I
removed it. No one was using it, or came forward to help develop it, so
figured
It was only a POC that partially worked, and then stopped working, so I removed
it. No one was using it, or came forward to help develop it, so figured it was
kinder to put it out of its misery.
Mark
On 31 Jan 2013, at 15:34, Grant Rettke gret...@acm.org wrote:
Hi,
Anyone using or have
Not sure what you mean by haven't been accepted. There is no moderation for
this list, but you must email with the email address you use to subscribe,
otherwise it gets declined.
You also have plenty of other emails posted in the user mailing list, so I'm
not sure what problems you are having.
Rules support an date-effective attribute. It uses the date fort set by the
system property drools.dateformat
Mark
On 28 Jan 2013, at 08:46, starfish15 pooja.gh...@accenture.com wrote:
Hello,
A project is trying to weigh between BLAZE DROOLS. N am a Drools FAN
personally, since w/o doubt
On the contrary, i think he was more than civil, as you violated several
anti-patterns for this list.
You are on a public mailing list, representing your company, Accenture. I
suggest you think twice before emailing, and always show curtesy.
Please read the anti-patterns before further
are mystified.
(All of which doesn't excuse unnecessary urgent and ASAP and other pushy
noises...)
-W
On 28 January 2013 18:16, Mark Proctor mproc...@codehaus.org wrote:
Not sure what you mean by haven't been accepted. There is no moderation for
this list, but you must email
On 26 Jan 2013, at 12:37, Zhao Yi zhaoyi0...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Frank,
Your proposal will definitely solve my issue. But from drools point of view,
only the rule who got focus is allowed to be fired. Why does drools runtime
check non-focus rule condition? I think this is useless check
anything wrong here.
Thanks,
Jeetendra.
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 7:31 PM, Mark Proctor mproc...@codehaus.org wrote:
5.x supports free form expressions. This means it is not a trivial thing to
analyse.
In a pattern there will be 1..n strings for each expression. You'll need to
build
Unfortunately, I'm afraid your proposal doesn't scale as well as impacting
performance and
expected behaviour negatively
W3C RIF have tried to document refraction and repeatability.
http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/PRD_Refraction_Repeatability
Under that definition drools already has
You can improve your example by using an agenda listener to remove Activations
once they are cancelled, this way you avoid a memory leak.
Further you can use annotations, to control this per rule.
rule xxx @repeatable(true) when
then end
then in your filter you can check rule.getMetaData(
On 21 Jan 2013, at 15:49, kurrent93 kurren...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I'm curious, when will drools 6 be released?
some time in march.
Also, about Guvnor-NG. I understand this will be written in Errai. Will it
be possible to host/embed elements as can be done now with Guvnor?
I also
You have it right.
If any rule is modified, it's effective removed and added. Removal of a rule,
remove's all it's matches, activations and logical inserts.
There is no way to preserve this information for a rule that modified.
It would be very hard to determine what information is or is not
We tracked it down to the range indexing iterator, in not and exist nodes.
Should be fixed next week.
Mark
On 20 Jan 2013, at 08:23, Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Below is another couple of test cases, showing that the problem is not due
a getter that isn't called get* -
We will be releasing 5.6 soon.
Mark
On 20 Jan 2013, at 17:26, Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Isn't this bug hefty enough to render 5.5.0 unusable?
-W
On 20/01/2013, Mark Proctor mproc...@codehaus.org wrote:
We tracked it down to the range indexing iterator, in not and exist
5.x supports free form expressions. This means it is not a trivial thing to
analyse.
In a pattern there will be 1..n strings for each expression. You'll need to
build that string with MVEL and then analyse the MVEL AST tree.
Take a look at drools-compiler PatternBuilder and MVELExprAnalyzer.
It mostly helps to differentiate bindings from fields
Person( name : name )
Person( name == name )
This is generally more readable.
Person( $name : name )
Person( name == $name )
That said I prefer to only bind patterns, and if the class name does not
conflict with any field names, then I
each execute creates a new stateful session. All the listers are added to that
after it's created, see newWorkingMemory:
https://github.com/droolsjbpm/drools/blob/master/drools-core/src/main/java/org/drools/impl/StatelessKnowledgeSessionImpl.java
Mark
On 4 Jan 2013, at 16:20, Wolfgang Laun
our jars are produced with maven. So you can try the pom.properties, which is
in all our jars.
Mark
On 29 Dec 2012, at 22:46, Ansgar Konermann ansgar.konerm...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to determine at runtime which version of Drools is in use/on
the classpath. I cannot use
On 14 Dec 2012, at 21:53, lumi lumini...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it possible to add methods in groovy dynamically (with metaclass) and then
call them from the drls?
I tried a simple test but I got a unable to resolve method error at
runtime.
sorry no. Drools, like java, wouldn't know about
On 14 Dec 2012, at 14:10, m11 mchan...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi ,
I re ran the test using drools 5.4.0 too, same problem. In the majority of
our cases Property Reactive Facts work really well. Not using this feature
is not really an option that we would like to take as we would have to
It will be published soon.
Big thanks to wolfgang for his excellent work.
Mark
On 7 Dec 2012, at 12:52, ben.cot...@ms.com ben.cot...@morganstanley.com wrote:
Did this white paper ever get published at jboss.org?
On 11/5/2012 1:10 PM, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
A White Paper containing a
JPA for working memory is indeed an entire snapshot of the working memory per
transaction. So you want to avoid a transaction per WM insert/update/delete.
Mark
On 26 Nov 2012, at 09:57, magnusv magnus.vojba...@digitalroute.com wrote:
Does this mean that the JPA persistence has to write out the
JPA is just a wrapper to the marshaller adding transactions and persistence.
Mark
On 23 Nov 2012, at 14:18, magnusv magnus.vojba...@digitalroute.com wrote:
Are there any disadvantages to using the Marshaller instead of JPA for
persistence?
We are running Drools as an embedded service, and
you can do this yourself.
-setup 1..n JVMs.
-Each JVM creates a drools instance with the same rules
-Create an facade interface where external application insert/update/retract
are actually operations on an infinispan replication group.
-Each JVM attaches an insert/update/delete listener to the
We have a custom parser, built around an antlr lexer.
see DrlParser
Mark
On 11 Nov 2012, at 16:12, co...@gmx.ch wrote:
Hi
I'm looking for the ANTLR grammar of Drools. The grammar files I find are in
drools-compiler
It sounds like you are putting in facts without allowing them to be expired or
retracted. If you keep inserting events over 24 hours, if there is enough of
them, it will OOM. Try setting an expiration value for the event type, to force
it to expire earlier.
Mark
On 12 Nov 2012, at 05:20, mohan
There is nothing we provide for this.
What you can do is setup 1..n nodes in a group - each with the same rules. Make
sure all inserts are replicated to each node in the group, let each group run
with redundancy.
Mark
On 10 Nov 2012, at 12:34, Miguel Paraz mpa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On
he's talking about the flexible processes, where rules can control the
execution of processes. It's a feature we have, that not many people are aware
of - it's not ready for prime time use, still incubator. Krisv will respond in
a bit, with some pointers.
Mark
On 9 Nov 2012, at 14:26, Esteban
Use the drools-camel extension:
http://docs.jboss.org/drools/release/5.4.0.Final/droolsjbpm-integration-docs/html/ch.server.html
Mark
On 8 Nov 2012, at 11:43, amit amit.aggar...@pb.com wrote:
HI,
Does Drools 5.4.0 supports PipelineFactory.
Any sample application regarding the same.
Anu
What you are talking about is an experimental feature that allows the rules to
control the process execution.
http://docs.jboss.org/jbpm/v5.1/userguide/ch17.html
How to do this is still not documented that well there are some aspects we have
to work on to make it simpler - hence why it's really
If you are ever worried about a project, best place to look is the source.
Plenty of commits going on there:
https://github.com/droolsjbpm/jbpm/commits/master
https://github.com/droolsjbpm/jbpm-console-ng/commits/master
https://github.com/droolsjbpm/jbpm-designer/commits/master
Plus there is a
You were not subscribed to the mailing list at the time, so this post did not
make it through to the main list. If you could make a self contained unit
test, we'll fix it asap. Follow details here:
He didn't say it was semantically incorrect, just that that they are different.
'or' between patterns results sub rule generation, in your case two rules.
Where as '||' in a pattern is a standard expression evaluation. Have you tried
running the rules, and ignoring the IDE? Some times the IDE
single equal sign, must be double:
attrA = foo
On 22 Oct 2012, at 20:44, Cotton.Ben ben.d.cotton@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I am a DROOLS newbie. I apologize if this has been asked before. This
rule (R1) is not syntactically correct in the Eclipse .DRL view.
rule R1
when
Click the Node and look at the Property viewer.
Looking at this:
-Green is the entry point
-Red is the ObjectTypeNode
-Blue is the AlphaNode
-Yellow is the LeftInputAdapter
-Green is the BetaNode
-Black the TerminalNode
also chase us up with emails, so we can do follow ups if we
miss you.
Mark
On 17 Oct 2012, at 15:40, Mark Proctor mproc...@codehaus.org wrote:
If anyone wants to get involved in a fun task, we would like to get two
existing components ported from SWT to SVG/GWT. So that those components can
, instead of our XStream dump, for seamless
client and server marshalling.
Rete Viewer
The ReteViewer should be ported to svg/gwt, again using ErraiJSon to provide
the tree format.
Grid/Tile layout manager for panels.
Mark
On 17 Oct 2012, at 20:28, Mark Proctor mproc...@codehaus.org wrote:
[17
Do you have a JIRA to reference for this? Without that it's hard to check.
Mark
On 12 Oct 2012, at 23:24, lhorton lhor...@abclegal.com wrote:
Has this issue been fixed, or is it still necessary to remove any event
listeners so that the session is freed?
--
View this message in context:
Btw JVM JIT won't unroll the loop. It can only do this when the same instance
is used repeatedly in the same method. If the instance used in the method
changes on each invocation, as ours does, it's not possible for JIT to unroll
the loop.
Mark
On 8 Oct 2012, at 15:21, Mario Fusco
There is a class called BitSet, which grows the number of bits.http://grepcode.com/file/repository.grepcode.com/java/root/jdk/openjdk/6-b14/java/util/BitSet.javaThis uses an array of longs instead. But i'm really reluctant to use this, because it adds overhead to our currently very lightweight
Applied the change. Will take a while for snapshots to build, let me know if it
fixes the issue.
Mark
On 3 Oct 2012, at 23:20, Cristiano Gavião cvgav...@gmail.com wrote:
yep, I identify this too in a osgi env.
I've opened this today: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-3647
regards,
*/DynamicImport-Package
should I open a ticket on jira ?
Please do. You can try fixing this by updating the bundle generation
configuration here:
https://github.com/mdproctor/drools/blob/unlinking/drools-compiler/pom.xml
Mark
thanks,
Cristiano
On 02/10/12 23:58, Mark Proctor wrote
On 2 Oct 2012, at 07:29, Ioannis Canellos ioca...@gmail.com wrote:
Our OSGi stuff is best effort - working on OSGi was like sticking needles
directly into the back of my eyeball, not fun. tbh I find OSGi a real PITA.
Too many of our dependencies do not have real OSGi bundles available, so
On 3 Oct 2012, at 03:49, Cristiano Gavião cvgav...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to use JBPM 5.4-SNAPSHOT and Drools 5.5-SNAPSHOT in a OSGi env.
drools-compiler's generated manifest has a import package to
org.jboss.weld.environment.se.discovery.url.
Could someone explain me what
Our OSGi stuff is best effort - working on OSGi was like sticking needles
directly into the back of my eyeball, not fun. tbh I find OSGi a real PITA. Too
many of our dependencies do not have real OSGi bundles available, so we have to
resort to the spring repository - where the versions almost
http://docs.jboss.org/drools/release/5.5.0.Beta1/droolsjbpm-integration-docs/html/ch.OSGI.html
https://github.com/droolsjbpm/droolsjbpm-build-distribution/tree/master/drools-osgi-bundles
Mark
On 29 Sep 2012, at 20:54, Dan Seaver dan.sea...@ge.com wrote:
I'd like to use Drools as OSGi services
Mario will answer more in full.
The MVEL JIT is new to 5.4, and has had some teething problems. Mario did add
the ability to turn JIT off, but Im not sure if that's in 5.4 or not.
The best thing to do is provide test cases, and we'll make sure all JIT issues
are fixed for 5.5
Mark
On 28 Sep
There is no magic want to wave here. Someone needs to run a profiler while your
packages are being added, to try and figure out where the bottlenecks are.
Mark
On 26 Sep 2012, at 21:14, subba mysavingde...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Did anyone get a chance to look at this query ? please let me
We'll be announcing it officially in a few weeks time, once enough features are
there, and we have something we can demo.
UberFire the new workbench framework we are building, for our 6.x series. It
provides an Eclipse like workbench experience for the web, built on CDI, Errai
and GWT. The
are interested in building your own web apps on top of this workbench, and
want to start getting involved now, then email us. A larger variety of apps
built on top of UberFire, at an early stage, will help ensure we don't have any
designs that are too stunted.
Mark
On 9 Sep 2012, at 16:48, Mark
On 9 Sep 2012, at 20:18, kurrent93 kurren...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Mark
So Uberfire will be the framework that GuvnorNG will be built on?
yes, and I also hope it's the framework others will build their apps on too. At
some point in the future I want to add self service application
On 3 Sep 2012, at 00:56, Phani Saripalli saripalli.ph...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
I tried to identify relevant ways for some container specific operations
like exists, forall (or foreach). Basically I have started using for
software product line research, and specifically model checking over
Look t the script element and the set-global command:
https://github.com/droolsjbpm/droolsjbpm-integration/blob/master/drools-container/drools-spring/src/main/resources/org/drools/container/spring/drools-spring.xsd
Mark
On 31 Aug 2012, at 20:09, dunnlow dunn...@yahoo.com wrote:
I am using the
Check the MANIFEST.MF the version is there.
Specification-Title: Knowledge API
Specification-Version: 5.4.0.Final
Specification-Vendor: JBoss by Red Hat
Implementation-Title: Knowledge API
Implementation-Version: 5.4.0.Final
Implementation-Vendor-Id: org.drools
Implementation-Vendor: JBoss by Red
We don't publicise the internal javadocs, just the public ones. But just
checkout the code and look over it, I don't think the internal javadocs will
help much.
You lose type discrimination and type safety, but you can already do:
Map( this['key'] == xxx )
What I think would be more
stays as it is. It's purpose is well known, and we don't'
have high volume yet.
Mark
Op 14-08-12 23:48, Mark Proctor schreef:
As the user list is now high volume, i'm contemplating an invite only
expert list. I'm not sure who this would work, or if it's practical. But the
idea is to have
On 14 Aug 2012, at 09:44, Michal Bali michalb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
anybody knows when is Drools version 6 going to be released? In a year? Year
and a half? More?
At this stage it's hard to tell. I would hope within a year from now. There
will be a a lot of dramatic changes, so
On 14 Aug 2012, at 19:29, dme1 meh...@hotmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the detailed response. With the 5.4 plugin I do not see the
Guided Rule option, just the Rule Resource, so the screeshot seems to be
from an earlier version.
ok, thanks. we'll fix docs for next release.
Mark
dme.
As the user list is now high volume, i'm contemplating an invite only expert
list. I'm not sure who this would work, or if it's practical. But the idea is
to have a lower volume list, with a higher quality of technical questions and
discussions. This might make it easier for people to be
It's a little out of date now (2011), as jBPM5 is now supported in
BRMS5.3. But the essence of the article is the same.
http://blog.athico.com/2011/04/drools-jbpm-community-versus-product.html
Mark
On 25/07/2012 22:35, wbohrer wrote:
I couldn't find a FAQ, so please don't hate on me if this is
eval is only slower because it does not allow for indexing of data.
I don't believe your use case, which looks at nested data structures,
would allow indexing of data either.
So you'll probably gain in performance from a hard coded java method.
Mark
On 22/07/2012 03:40, lhorton wrote:
do not
You could also look at the declarative agenda stuff, which is
experimental at the moment. With this you can track if there are any
activations that need to fire for a rule. When there are no activations
still to fire, you can iterate and retract facts.
You could probably even correlate
The bean builder factory is here:
https://github.com/droolsjbpm/droolsjbpm-integration/blob/master/drools-container/drools-spring/src/main/java/org/drools/container/spring/beans/KnowledgeBaseBeanFactory.java
Mark
On 15/07/2012 03:43, lhorton wrote:
I think this one is going to be hard to repro
If you think it's a bug, you'll have to submit a jira with self
contained minimal unit test:
http://docs.jboss.org/drools/release/5.4.0.Final/droolsjbpm-introduction-docs/html/gettingstarted.html
Mark
On 14/07/2012 19:43, lhorton wrote:
The spring configuration we use does include all the rules
in fireUntilHalt for salience to take effect the rules must be in
conflict; i.e. on the agenda at the same time, normally due to
activation being created from the same working memory action.
If you insert message and later insert person, the message will react
straight away and fire; as there
There is a difference. If you use incremental mode if effectively
diffs the current kbase with the new kbase, and applies the diff. In
this situation you need the changeset to always include all drls of what
you want the kbase to look like; as it'll build the changeset as a kbase
and then diff
From one of the modeshape authors, who I forwarded this email to:
The correct way to use ModeShape within Tomcat is to just copy the JARs
and include it in your deployment, just as you've been doing. In this
way, you're embedding ModeShape into your web application. The three
modeshape-* files
On 05/07/2012 14:41, Tom Eugelink wrote:
This question probably is asked before, but google does not seem to want to
help me find it.
In a decision table excel I want to compare a condition with today (in fact
today + 30 days), but new Date() is not accepted. How would I go about
that?
We generate a lot more bytecode now, for improved performance execution.
constraints start of being evaluated dynamically, as they were in 4.0.x,
after they are executed a certain number of times we emit bytecode to
allow JIT to provide improved execution times.
Mark
On 29/06/2012 08:19,
On 02/07/2012 14:11, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
This is from Expert (5.4.0):
Using a delegate is another way of global resolution. Assigning a
value to a global (with setGlobal(String, Object)) results in the
value being stored in an internal collection mapping identifiers to
values. Identifiers
On 30/06/2012 00:08, al so wrote:
looks like one can't activate a ruleflow-group inside a drl file? Only
available via UI?
I was thinking there'll be some kind of setFocus way to control rule
execution using this ruleflow-group.
For the 6.0 development cycle we are looking into alternative
It was never exposed.
Mark
On 29/06/2012 19:07, gd007 wrote:
I can make spring bean with drools:decisiontable-conf as shown below. How do
I put the rule template in the bean defn?
drools:kbase id=kbase1
drools:resources
drools:resource source=classpath:SkuType.xls
=d3d6d783acbc4c7382b30a46edde5906
Speakers:
Jim Tyrrell
http://app.engage.redhat.com/e/er?s=1795lid=5483elq=d3d6d783acbc4c7382b30a46edde5906,
Principle JBoss Solution Architect, Red Hat
Mark Proctor
http://app.engage.redhat.com/e/er?s=1795lid=5483elq=d3d6d783acbc4c7382b30a46edde5906,
Drools
(Government focus) in Washington DC
http://app.engage.redhat.com/e/er?s=1795lid=5482elq=d3d6d783acbc4c7382b30a46edde5906
Speakers:
Jim Tyrrell
http://app.engage.redhat.com/e/er?s=1795lid=5483elq=d3d6d783acbc4c7382b30a46edde5906,
Principle JBoss Solution Architect, Red Hat
Mark Proctor
http
=d3d6d783acbc4c7382b30a46edde5906
Speakers:
Jim Tyrrell
http://app.engage.redhat.com/e/er?s=1795lid=5483elq=d3d6d783acbc4c7382b30a46edde5906,
Principle JBoss Solution Architect, Red Hat
Mark Proctor
http://app.engage.redhat.com/e/er?s=1795lid=5483elq=d3d6d783acbc4c7382b30a46edde5906,
Drools
On 06/06/2012 18:39, Vincent LEGENDRE wrote:
try with a negative number ?
I would ommit the number all together. I suspect what 0 does is schedule
with intervals of 0s, thus it fires straight away.
timer(int: 5s)
Mark
- Original Message -
From: Paul R.reverselo...@gmail.com
To:
, Mark Proctor mproc...@codehaus.org
mailto:mproc...@codehaus.org wrote:
On 28/05/2012 22:21, Jackson Cunha wrote:
Anyone knows about academic papers involving drools verifier? I'm
working in a project where will be produced a paper and I need to
cite some caracteristics
On 01/06/2012 19:16, Matteo Cusmai wrote:
Can i send you an zipped eclipse project?
Please don't do that. follow the instructions in getting involved on
how to submit unit tests:
http://docs.jboss.org/drools/release/5.4.0.Final/droolsjbpm-introduction-docs/html/gettingstarted.html
Mark
On
Looks like you have some classpath issues and using the incorrect jar
versions.
On 29/05/2012 14:30, Per Sterner wrote:
[ERROR] [System] - Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
org.drools.concurrent.ExecutorProviderImpl
___
rules-users
401 - 500 of 1761 matches
Mail list logo
