Hello folks,
if you have been reading this list and have not heard about the fact
that the ReST transition is coming in Sage 3.3 you must have been not
paying attention :)
Mike Hansen has been working tirelessly for a while on a giant patch
set (as below noted 282 thousand lines of diff, about
On 3 Jan., 08:32, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello folks,
Sage 3.2.3.final is out, 3.2.3.rc0 was never announced on the list.
Hi Michael,
I had found, downloaded, build and (long-)tested the 3.2.3.rc0 when it
was still named final.
Already rock-stable on MacBook Intel Core2Duo
Hi,
What is a reviewer of the sphinxification tickets #4902 - #4927
to do?
Read only for textual correctness, or do I have to sphinxify it and
check the result?
I could the former, but do not yet know how to do the latter --- did I
miss something in the wiki, e.g. on
Hi,
sorry for the Off-Topic BTW question, I moved it to the correct
thread.
Cheers,
gsw
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Hello,
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 1:00 AM, Georg S. Weber
georgswe...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
What is a reviewer of the sphinxification tickets #4902 - #4927
to do?
Read only for textual correctness, or do I have to sphinxify it and
check the result?
It's the former rather than the latter.
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 1:12 AM, Mike Hansen mhan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 1:00 AM, Georg S. Weber
georgswe...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
What is a reviewer of the sphinxification tickets #4902 - #4927
to do?
Read only for textual correctness, or do I have to
Drop-dead gorgeous!
OK, I think I got the idea. I do have other things to do, but I have
the feeling that I just can't resist reading that output and give a
review or two.
;-))
Cheers,
gsw
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to
Thanks very much for this info.
This is very interesting. At first, I was wondering how this could be
possible, as surely reduce would have lots of contributors. The history
suggests that Hearn kept the copyright and allowed others the source code
if they contributed (basically giving them
Hi, I've got a crash report, which might be a blocker for 3.2.3:
In the course of building and installing 3.2.3.final, an empty file /
Users/georgweber/.sage/init.sage was created (I remember having seen
the corresponding output line).
Now trying to start (the older version) Sage 3.2.2, IPython
mabshoff wrote:
Hello folks,
Sage 3.2.3.final is out, 3.2.3.rc0 was never announced on the list.
[...]
You can download the sources from
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.2.3/
or upgrade to this release via
./sage -upgrade
To clarify the answer to Georg's question, to you want reviewers to
read the output html and report on anything which looks wrong, or to
read the patch (where the markup used is something which would need a
reference to be provided).
I am happier to do the former (say for sage,schemes.* in
We have previously discussed (about 1 year ago) the possibility of
implementing a Sage interface for reduce and providing it as an
optional package like FriCAS, but this did not seem to generate much
interest at the time.
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/msg/faa5479477132cab
Reduce is
I'm not sure why it didn't occur to me earlier, but it would be nice
to have a portable projector at the joint meetings if anyone can bring
one. Alternatively, if anyone who is driving to the meetings can
bring a decent sized flatscreen (i.e. bigger than a typical laptop
screen) that would be
On Jan 3, 2009, at 11:29 AM, Bill Page wrote:
We have previously discussed (about 1 year ago) the possibility of
implementing a Sage interface for reduce and providing it as an
optional package like FriCAS, but this did not seem to generate much
interest at the time.
On Jan 3, 8:48 am, Tim Lahey tim.la...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
I'm certainly interested in trying things out, but my knowledge of
Reduce
is only what I've glimpsed in the documentation yesterday (so basically
none) and it has been a long time since I've written any Lisp (nearly
20
On Jan 3, 5:47 am, Georg S. Weber georgswe...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Hi, I've got a crash report, which might be a blocker for 3.2.3:
Nope, this is not an issue with 3.2.3, but 3.2.2. And this was done on
purpose to catch exactly this issue since it has slipped by us in
releases twice
On Jan 3, 6:14 am, Jaap Spies j.sp...@hccnet.nl wrote:
SNIP
On Fedora 9, 32 bits:
--
All tests passed!
Jaap
Thanks Jaap, this is pretty much what was expected.
Cheers,
Michael
On Jan 3, 6:44 am, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
HI,
To clarify the answer to Georg's question, to you want reviewers to
read the output html and report on anything which looks wrong, or to
read the patch (where the markup used is something which would need a
reference to be
2009/1/3 mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com:
On Jan 3, 6:44 am, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
HI,
To clarify the answer to Georg's question, to you want reviewers to
read the output html and report on anything which looks wrong, or to
read the patch (where the markup used is
On Jan 3, 9:11 am, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/1/3 mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com:
Hi John,
On Jan 3, 6:44 am, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
HI,
To clarify the answer to Georg's question, to you want reviewers to
read the output html and report
Built fine and all tests pass on my 32-bit ubuntu laptop. In
particular, Atlas built fine and quickly for the first time ever on
this machine (at least, once I realized that setting SAGE_ATLAS_LIB to
the empty string was not the same as unsetting it).
John
2009/1/3 mabshoff
A different but related point: where is it decided which source files
are converted into documentation and which are not? For example, in
the hyperelliptic curves section there are several files with almost
nothing in them; while in the elliptic curves section there's nothing
from files
On Jan 3, 9:34 am, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi John,
A different but related point: where is it decided which source files
are converted into documentation and which are not? For example, in
the hyperelliptic curves section there are several files with almost
nothing
Bill Page wrote:
We have previously discussed (about 1 year ago) the possibility of
implementing a Sage interface for reduce and providing it as an
optional package like FriCAS, but this did not seem to generate much
interest at the time.
On Jan 3, 2009, at 12:48 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
Bill,
It seems that you have more experience with Reduce than most of us
here.
How would you generally compare Maxima and Reduce in calculus
functionality, specifically integration? Can you interface with
Reduce
on a library level,
Tim Lahey wrote:
On Jan 3, 2009, at 12:48 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
Bill,
It seems that you have more experience with Reduce than most of us
here.
How would you generally compare Maxima and Reduce in calculus
functionality, specifically integration? Can you interface with
Reduce
Jason Grout wrote:
Bill Page wrote:
We have previously discussed (about 1 year ago) the possibility of
implementing a Sage interface for reduce and providing it as an
optional package like FriCAS, but this did not seem to generate much
interest at the time.
2009/1/3 mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com:
On Jan 3, 9:34 am, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi John,
A different but related point: where is it decided which source files
are converted into documentation and which are not? For example, in
the hyperelliptic curves section
On Jan 3, 2009, at 12:58 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
I found at least one answer. CCL apparently was designed with
interfacing with C in mind. That's a great thing.
I wonder if CCL can compile Maxima and if so, how well Maxima
runs on it.
Cheers,
Tim.
On Jan 3, 10:00 am, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/1/3 mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com:
On Jan 3, 9:34 am, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi John,
A different but related point: where is it decided which source files
are converted into
On Jan 3, 10:05 am, Tim Lahey tim.la...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 3, 2009, at 12:58 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
Hi,
I found at least one answer. CCL apparently was designed with
interfacing with C in mind. That's a great thing.
Yes, but you can run Maxima on top of ecl, but the issue with
2009/1/3 mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com:
On Jan 3, 10:00 am, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/1/3 mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com:
On Jan 3, 9:34 am, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi John,
A different but related point: where is it decided which
On Jan 3, 10:32 am, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/1/3 mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com:
SNIP
Well, so far only the files in the documentation have been converted,
but I am sure those additional files will also be converted by Mike
once the big rush for 3.3 is over. He
Hello,
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 10:51 AM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
+1
Mike: How does next Thursday sound for you? That way we could announce
it in the next 24 hours so that people can start planning things if
they want to attend.
That sounds good.
--Mike
Hello folks,
after a little quiet time since November the first Bug Day of 2009
will take place on
January 8th, 2009
All the usual rules apply - see http://wiki.sagemath.org/bug17 for
details.
The main goal of that bug day will be to convert still unconverted
files in the Sage library to
mabshoff wrote:
Yes, but you can run Maxima on top of ecl, but the issue with asksign
for example does not go away. I asked Robert Dodier about it at Dev1
and he seemed reluctant about this possibility.
Hmm, what is this possibility ? I don't understand.
Robert Dodier
On Jan 3, 11:27 am, Robert Dodier robert.dod...@gmail.com wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
Hi Robert,
Yes, but you can run Maxima on top of ecl, but the issue with asksign
for example does not go away. I asked Robert Dodier about it at Dev1
and he seemed reluctant about this possibility.
Hmm,
On Jan 3, 2009, at 2:31 PM, mabshoff wrote:
On Jan 3, 11:27 am, Robert Dodier robert.dod...@gmail.com wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
Hi Robert,
Yes, but you can run Maxima on top of ecl, but the issue with
asksign
for example does not go away. I asked Robert Dodier about it at Dev1
and he
On Jan 3, 11:35 am, Tim Lahey tim.la...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 3, 2009, at 2:31 PM, mabshoff wrote:
SNIP
I meant embedding Maxima into a library extensions via ecl. You stated
to the best of my recollection that this would be troublesome due to
asksign since there would be the need on
On Jan 3, 2009, at 2:43 PM, mabshoff wrote:
Given a choice between Pan-Axiom, Maxima and Reduce for the role of
symbolic calculus in Sage these days I personally would pick FriCAS
over the other choices. But since all of the above do not solve the
fundamental problem of using pexpect I
On Jan 3, 11:48 am, Tim Lahey tim.la...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 3, 2009, at 2:43 PM, mabshoff wrote:
Hi Tim,
Given a choice between Pan-Axiom, Maxima and Reduce for the role of
symbolic calculus in Sage these days I personally would pick FriCAS
over the other choices. But since all of
On Jan 3, 2009, at 2:55 PM, mabshoff wrote:
On Jan 3, 11:48 am, Tim Lahey tim.la...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 3, 2009, at 2:43 PM, mabshoff wrote:
Hi Tim,
Given a choice between Pan-Axiom, Maxima and Reduce for the role of
symbolic calculus in Sage these days I personally would pick
Mike Hansen wrote:
Hello,
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 10:51 AM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
+1
Mike: How does next Thursday sound for you? That way we could announce
it in the next 24 hours so that people can start planning things if
they want to attend.
That sounds good.
On Jan 3, 12:09 pm, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
Mike Hansen wrote:
Hello,
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 10:51 AM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
+1
Mike: How does next Thursday sound for you? That way we could announce
it in the next 24 hours so that people can
I wonder if the AMS will let us use a projector from one of the rooms?
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 11:36 AM, mhampton hampto...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure why it didn't occur to me earlier, but it would be nice
to have a portable projector at the joint meetings if anyone can bring
one.
Arthur,
Thank you very much for replying and thanks also to Tony Hearn for
releasing REDUCE as open source. I believe this is a very positive
development for all people interested in computer algebra and I fully
expect it also to be a significant benefit to the REDUCE project. At
the very least,
On 3 Jan., 17:56, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Jan 3, 5:47 am, Georg S. Weber georgswe...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Hi, I've got a crash report, which might be a blocker for 3.2.3:
Nope, this is not an issue with 3.2.3, but 3.2.2. And this was done on
purpose to catch
Probably not, especially for the entire meeting. It looks like I
won't be able to obtain one before leaving, unfortunately.
-Marshall
On Jan 3, 2:33 pm, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
I wonder if the AMS will let us use a projector from one of the rooms?
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 11:36
Hi,
I have been cleaning up the wiki of Spam and unfortunately on occasion
I am removing content that isn't spam, i.e. I removed the art page.
But fortunately none of the content is lost, so please let me know if
anything is missing and I will restore it. The deactivated content
isn't deleted,
mabshoff wrote:
I would do all the work, but before I go off and do things I figured
it would be worth it to request feedback. When those two pages are
done I would then delete the other five pages and as things are
incorporated into the to be written spkgs I would then also delete
most of
On Jan 3, 3:26 pm, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
I would do all the work, but before I go off and do things I figured
it would be worth it to request feedback. When those two pages are
done I would then delete the other five pages and as things are
So who is planning on be at the Joint Meetings? There are lots of names
listed on the AMS Joint Meetings wiki pages at
http://wiki.sagemath.org/ams-sage
http://wiki.sagemath.org/maa-sage
http://wiki.sagemath.org/amsbooth09
but we know that at least some of these names are out of date (i.e.,
52 matches
Mail list logo
