On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Rob Beezer goo...@beezer.cotse.net wrote:
In introductory group theory, I like to be sure to expose the students
to every group of order 15 or less. As permutation groups, most of
these are easily available in Sage via cyclic permutation groups,
perhaps
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 8:47 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
...
The word SageMath does not have any entries at all in the trademark
database.
The point of this email is to discuss:
(1) Should we trademark SageMath (pretty obvious yes)?
+1
(2) Should we also
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:12 AM, ma...@mendelu.cz ma...@mendelu.cz wrote:
Hello all
This is for developers interested in Calculus.
Since the patch for #385 is available and seems to work for me, I
finished my work on #6479
You have to use 2 patches from #6479 and one patch from #385
I will try to look at it in the next week or so. Hopefully by this weekend.
Thanks for working on it!
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:12 AM, ma...@mendelu.cz ma...@mendelu.cz wrote:
Hello all
This is for developers interested in Calculus.
Since the patch for #385 is available and seems to
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 1:45 PM, john_perry_usm john.pe...@usm.edu wrote:
Hi,
From what I can tell, Sage lacks an explicit function to compute
implicit derivatives, akin say to Maple's implicit_diff command. See
this (really) old thread:
Robert Miller might be thinking
about this but heard of no progress recently.
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 2:46 AM, Kwankyu ekwan...@gmail.com wrote:
If David Joyner looks at this, I want to ask what is the quick way in
Sage to get code.information_set()?
Kwankyu
Congratulations Mike! Well-deserved and thanks for the great work.
On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 8:14 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I've written the official citation for Mike Hansen who won the 2009
Spies Sage Development prize.
The 2009 Spies Sage Development Prize ($500) is
The abelian group class needs to be rewritten. The basic idea
was to try to use GAP as much as possible and use
Python/Sage to parse input and output. For various
technical reasons, that did not work as nicely as hoped.
The correct solution, may be to rewrite it from scratch completely
separate
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 2:53 PM, David Harvey dmhar...@cims.nyu.edu wrote:
I am confused. I want to release bernmm 1.1 under the (modified) BSD
license. It depends on NTL, which is GPL-licensed. Can I do this? Or
am I forced to release bernmm under GPL?
The modified BSD is probably okay, but
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Harald Schilly
harald.schi...@gmail.com wrote:
hi, i don't want to add this feature to the sagemath website without a
warning. with google translate it would be possible to display a
translate-bar on top of the page if the browser language (you can set
it,
Here is a bug, which is reproducible on my machine.
Machine: intell macbook, 10.6
Browser: Camino
Operation: Go to the below URL, click browser published worksheets
(without logging in), click the bottom one by wstein (a random...).
Bug: Camino crashes.
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:01 AM,
Thanks for working on this.
What more needs to be tested? The install went fine on an intel
macbook running 10.6.
Maybe Robert Bradshaw should comment on it, since he wrote
rubik.py?
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 10:27 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
I found the rubiks package
I found Sage 4.1.2.a4 to compile fine on an intel macbok running 10.6.
he folowing doctests failed:
The following tests failed:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/calculus/calculus.py
sage -t devel/sage/sage/calculus/tests.py
sage -t devel/sage/sage/calculus/wester.py
Many thanks for this.
There is nothing I can do about this in the near future, for
various reasons, so if someone else wants to create a ticket for this,
that won't bother me:-) If not, I'll eventually get around to it though.
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Mariah mariah.le...@gmail.com
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 6:08 AM, Martin Albrecht
m...@informatik.uni-bremen.de wrote:
Hi there,
I am not sure how many readers of [sage-devel] are aware of the fact that
currently there is an internal competition going on to find the next secure
hash function.
Sorry for the late report but sage finally compiles and runs on ubuntu karmic.
sage -testall passes except for
sage -t devel/sage/sage/server/simple/twist.py
However, re-runnig this test, I got an All tests passed!, so
it looks like there are no problems now with ubuntu 9.10.
On Mon, Sep 7,
It's been noticed and the 2 recent spammers banned. It seems some spammers
are able to beat the system, or else google's filters are not working properly.
Sorry for the spam and inconvenience.
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Martin Albrecht
m...@informatik.uni-bremen.de wrote:
Just in case
I don't know about lulu but I do have experience with createspace.com
(which is similar I think but the only vanity press amazon accepts).
Let me know if you want more details.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 7:15 PM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
Hi,
I am curious about anyone's experience
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 4:51 PM, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know about lulu but I do have experience with createspace.com
(which is similar I think but the only vanity press amazon accepts).
Let me
I don't know how this was caused nor if there is anything the
admins can do about it.
Were the bounced emails coming from a particular email
address of yours?
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Simon King simon.k...@nuigalway.ie wrote:
Hi!
The posts that I recently did on sage-devel resulted
This is weird. I don't know the explanation. Hopefully, a fix
will happen soon.
Others are having this problem too.
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Peter peterjer...@acm.org wrote:
Hi,
I was recently forced to change email addresses when, without warning,
my ISP disabled the domain I had
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 8:29 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
...
I'm pretty much by default against adding any new standard packages to
Sage anytime soon.I can't think of anything even on the horizon.
Maybe some sort of linear programming code is being proposed. Can
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 8:56 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 5:50 PM, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
...
I had forgotten about them -- thanks for pointing them out.
Fortunately, those are both mainstream widely mature packages -- note
that both
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 3:11 AM, Minh Nguyennguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
Anyone for Sage and the Digital Signature Algorithm? Here's a post on it at
This seems like a good idea to me.
http://amca01.wordpress.com/2009/09/08/the-digital-signature-algorithm-in-maxima-and-sage/
--
Cool. I'm not familiar with reddit but the posters don't seem to be
aware that Sage includes some Rubik's cube solvers.
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 2:54 PM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
It's a little late, but a few days ago there was a discussion on
reddit about math software
On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 4:14 AM, Balbir Singhbsinghar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, Everyone,
This should probably go to a sage-promotion list, but developers are
usually keen to know as well. I just saw the following text at
http://www.williamstallings.com/Future.html. It will be good to see a
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 6:03 AM, Stan Schymanskischym...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all,
...
I tried different ways of applying a patch with the only success that
I probably made a bit of a
mess in my repository. Is there a way to revert it back to a clean
4.1.1
install?
I'm not sure what you
?
Maybe I should recompile from scratch (?). Or just do sage -ba as
suggested in the error message? Sorry about the mess.
Yes, I would create a new version by compiling from source. It seems like
your upgrade got corrupted somehow maybe?
Cheers,
Stan
David Joyner wrote:
On Tue, Sep 1
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 8:19 PM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Hello,
Does anybody know of an *open source* (so could be included in Sage) AJAX
spreadsheet implementation? I.e., something kind of like Google docs
spreadsheet or http://www.editgrid.com/, but open source. That
The way I do this (which may not be the best way) is
1. cd to the SAGE_ROOT directory
2. ./sage -b main(this assures you are starting from the main
branch and not cloning form a clone)
3. ./sage -clone ABCDx (where ABCD is the trac number you are
applying the patch from and x=a for the first
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 2:56 PM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Grant proposal season is upon us, and things are in the works.
Imagine somebody said to you:
Please send me a list of items you would like us to fund. What I
need is just a sentence or two (at most a
paragraph)
Sage is now building from source on 64bit ubuntu karmic, under the
latest (alpha 4?) release!
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 8:12 PM, J Elaychmicrosc...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm on Ubuntu 9.10 beta with amd64 x2 and the
gcc version 4.4.1 (Ubuntu 4.4.1-1ubuntu1). The
build just stops at base3, for
Did you create a ticket and a patch for it on trac?
If so, what is the trac number?
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 6:40 AM, Henryk
Trappmannbo198...@googlemail.com wrote:
My last post on this topic is now nearly 5 months time ago:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:04 AM, Dr. David
Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
When Sage starts, it gives you the version and license, but not much else.
--
| Sage Version 4.1.1, Release Date: 2009-08-14
. The Developers guide has useful information on creating patches
http://www.sagemath.org/doc/developer/index.html
On 21 Aug., 13:14, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
Did you create a ticket and a patch for it on trac?
If so, what is the trac number
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 1:17 PM, j...@aims.ac.za wrote:
Hi
Here
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/1348
I suggested a bibtex() function.
bibtex(sage)
bibtex(scipy)
etc.
I am not able to implement it due to time and skill.
Whatever happened to that?
There is this comment in
Can these be posted to the wiki somewhere?
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Robert Millerrlmills...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
For those of you not in Seattle today / not at Chris's talk at the
Sage seminar, here is a copy of his slides.
-- Forwarded message --
From:
Thanks Minh!
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Minh Nguyennguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 9:55 AM, David Joynerwdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
Can these be posted to the wiki somewhere?
See this talks wiki page
http://wiki.sagemath.org/Talks
--
Regards
Minh
: #6668, #6531
David Joyner: #6685, #6679, #6680, #6572
I already volunteered for
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6447
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6648
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6750
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6654
http://trac.sagemath.org
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Robert Millerrlmills...@gmail.com wrote:
David,
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 8:06 AM, David Joynerwdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
Are these in addition? I'm not an expert in graph theory anyway,
which most of the ones you listed are about.
I can take #6679, #6680
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 11:06 AM, David Joynerwdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Alex Ghitzaaghi...@gmail.com wrote:
...
David Joyner: #6685, #6679, #6680, #6572
I already volunteered for
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6447
I'm doing http
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 4:58 PM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Sage-devel,
Sage-4.1.1 was just released, so now is a perfect time to review a few
patches. Spend a few minutes soon, skim through
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/report/14
and review 1 ticket.
I gave
This one installed just fine one an intel macbook running 10.4.11!
I will now test the new maxima spkg you created.
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 3:03 AM, Dr. David
Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
Juanjo,
the main ECL developer has made new source release in the last 24 hours.
I've created
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Simon Kingsimon.k...@nuigalway.ie wrote:
Hi Sage-Devels,
apparently my new boss is very good in TeX: He showed me a draft (or
better: proof of concept) of a book in pdf format, and when you click
the examples, a gap session pops up and lets you compute
This is my understanding: the (old) version of cvxopt which we use in
Sage is GPLv2+. The current version is 1.1.1, which is GPLV3+.
Is that incorrect?
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Minh Nguyennguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
We're currently shipping cvxopt 0.9 which is licensed
You're right.
I think sage-2.7.2 had a cvxopt-0.8.2.spkg which might have been GPLv2+,
but I can't find it using google. It has been removed from the cvxopt website.
I wonder if we should just upgrade to 1.1.1 and change the part in
SAGE_ROOT/COPYING.txt which says
Every component of Sage
Of course, you should ask William before doing anything.
Also, I'm not sure how cvxopt interacts with Sage. If only
via pexpect, I think you can distribute such GPLv2 and GPLv3
software together but I'd have to check the FSF FAQ again to
be sure.
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 4:50 PM, David
Hi:
I'd like to suggest that PIL be made standard. This requires a vote.
Though PIL is written in Python, the trac ticket
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6741
adds some functions which make the interface even easier to use in many cases.
Thanks, David Joyner
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 7:41 PM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Minh Nguyennguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Regarding cvxopt, we should definitely upgrade the spkg. It's just a
I agree.
standard Python library, by the way (not pexpect).
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Juan Jose
Garcia-Ripolljuanjose.garciarip...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:31 PM, Juan Jose
Garcia-Ripolljuanjose.garciarip...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Dr. David
Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
maxima
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 4:55 AM, Dr. David
Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
...
It would be good if some people could try
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/Solaris-fixes/ecl-9.8.1/ecl-9.8.1.spkg
and
There are a huge number of errors in sage -testall when applied to
4.1.1.rc2 on an intel macbook 10.4.11.
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 7:46 PM, William Cauchoiswcauch...@gmail.com wrote:
I recently attached a patch to #1918 adding a displayhook to Sage that
should make some output from the Sage
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 9:43 PM, William Cauchoiswcauch...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't believe I forgot to run -testall! The displayhook was using
the wrong output stream in doctesting mode. I've managed to fix this
issue in my branch. However, I realize now that since the displayhook
changes
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 5:33 AM, gswgeorgswe...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 8 Aug., 23:21, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
I had a build failure on my intel macbook running OS 10.4.11.
The install log is at sage.math.washington.edu/home/wdj/patches/install.log
I'm not sure how important
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Ondrej Certikond...@certik.cz wrote:
...
This is a more complicated package than PIL, but I think one should work
with it
(which I plan to do) before proposing what Sage should include.
I see, thanks. Post here how it goes.
I have looked at both VIPS
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Yoav Anery...@gingerlime.com wrote:
This is a follow-up on my previous post on
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/msg/1f851e27f5500712 - which
(for obvious reasons) generated overwhelming response :)
I have now completed the first 'official' draft of
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 9:34 PM, J Elaychmicrosc...@gmail.com wrote:
I went into spkg/build and tried different flags. Surprisingly
with MAKE=make it systematically died at the same place,
base3.c, but with MAKE=make -j2 it continued on until
it reached init.c, and stopped there. Ubuntu is
I tried
export CC=/usr/bin/gcc-3.4
export CXX=/usr/bin/cpp-3.4
then removing the links gcc, cpp and relinking with
sudo ln -s /usr/bin/gcc-3.4 /usr/bin/gcc
sudo ln -s /usr/bin/cpp-3.4 /usr/bin/cpp
The build failed at matplotlib. One error was that c++ was not
installed on the system.
On
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 10:32 PM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/8/6 David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com
I tried
export CC=/usr/bin/gcc-3.4
export CXX=/usr/bin/cpp-3.4
then removing the links gcc, cpp and relinking with
sudo ln -s /usr/bin/gcc-3.4 /usr/bin/gcc
sudo ln -s /usr
+1 I like this idea.
I wonder if another possibility is to simply have a
local link which notebook users could click on?
I also wonder what would happen on command line if you
typed plot?, where the docstring for plot had a picture?
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 7:29 PM, John H
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 7:38 AM, Dr. David Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
I need some guidance on what do about some issues we have. I'll
summarise, since not everyone is going to be aware of them.
1) Sage will not build on Solaris SPARC due to issues in the latest
official ecl. (It is
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 9:21 PM, Minh Nguyennguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
The Sage 4.1.1 release cycle is now in 4.1.1.rc1, which hasn't been
released yet. As this release candidate is for stabilizing Sage and
fixing bugs, I thought I should outline below a number of bug fixes
I think Nathann Cohen has done a very valuable service with the GLPK and
COIN-OR-related packages.
That said, I have a point of order question. Is is true or false that the
process for a package to become standard we
(1) use trac to do nomination, testing, and acceptance as an optional
package,
this no change rule.
However, I think they are stronger, since I think suggestion #1 also
affects how clones can be corrupted by an spkg.
- David Joyner
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Simon Kingsimon.k...@nuigalway.ie wrote:
Dear Sage developers,
I asked the following question in a mail to William Stein and David
Joyner, but William suggested the discussion should be in public.
Yesterday my cohomology package became an optional spkg
If you just recorded the smallest primitive roots I'll bet the database
would get a lot smaller:-) Do you need all the prim roots in the
CrypTool tutorial for a particular purpose, eg discrete logs?
I'd guess a database of the smallest prim roots mod p for all primes
out to a million (for
Maybe I don't understand your question. It seems you are claiming that
if G is a permutation group and H is a normal subgroup then
the quotient G/H embeds into G. Are you sure that is true?
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Robert Schwarzm...@rschwarz.net wrote:
Hi all, I was just playing
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Marshall Hamptonhampto...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for pointing that out. I am somewhat disturbed by the positive
review for that becoming a standard package, which seems inconsistent
I don't know where you got that. I was the reviewer and I clearly said
://www.d.umn.edu/~mham...
in case anyone wants to take a look and fix or improve them.
-Marshall
On Jul 27, 4:30 pm, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm having trouble with 4ti installation. Maybe I'm just too impatient.
Do you have an spkg for it?
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 11:02
and replaced by yours.
(2) the old glpk should be replaced by N Cohen's.
Thanks for trying it out!
Marshall
On Jul 31, 7:06 pm, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for trying this Marshall. Unfortunately, your spkg, and the
older experimental spkg,
for 4ti2, both fail to install
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 12:47 PM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
...
--
As some of you may have noticed, Sage recently had a similar situation, in
that in late May Michael Abshoff went AWOL -- he posted one message in May
that he was taking a break for a month, and has not
That would be very useful. You might want to look at
sage/algebras/group_algebra.py. For example, type GroupAlgebra?
If I were you, I'd try to get in touch with Mike Hansen
to see if he has any suggestions on what you want to implement.
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:04 AM,
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 9:05 PM, Minh Nguyennguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 3:44 AM, David Joynerwdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
Several comments:
I think Minh is doing a great job! It is fascinating to me that when a
structure (like the Sage organization)
This seems interesting.
I teach circuits and networks every semester as an application of
ODEs/systems of ODEs. The EMF is not necessarily constant
and occasionally we might have a variable term (eg, a variable capacitor).
Questions:
1. Does his program allow non-constant terms and symbolic
This work in pure python.
The problem in sage is with the line
s = sin(2*pi*50*t)+sin(2*pi*70*t+pi/4)
However, I don't know how to get Sage to
evaluate the sin of a numpy.ndarray.
For example,
sage: sample_rate=1000.00
sage: import numpy
sage:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Minh Nguyennguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Ethan,
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 12:40 AM, Ethan Van Andelevlu...@gmail.com wrote:
under GPLv2+ or a compatible license. So if I understand you
correctly, your whole project is less than 1000 lines of code and
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 3:33 PM, davidpdav...@reed.edu wrote:
I have been working on a Sage package for doing computations involving
the
Abelian Sandpile Model. In addition, this summer I am the mentor for
a Google
Summer of Code project which is a java application for visualizing and
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 11:35 PM, Rob Beezergoo...@beezer.cotse.net wrote:
William Stein wrote:
Probably I've cc'd this respond to the sage-devel mailing list to see what
the many other sage developers think:
I spent a few minutes looking at this. Most of the examples look like
many Sage
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Nathann Cohennathann.co...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everybody !!!
I finally wrote the two versions of the LP solver for SAGE, the first
using COIN-OR and the second GLPK. It is a very early version of the
solver, with few if any control of errors (
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 5:19 AM, Martin
Albrechtm...@informatik.uni-bremen.de wrote:
On Thursday 16 July 2009, David Joyner wrote:
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Kiran Kedlayaksk...@gmail.com wrote:
One pet complaint that you might bring up with the Singular team: I
Speaking of pet
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 9:13 AM, David Joynerwdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 5:19 AM, Martin
Albrechtm...@informatik.uni-bremen.de wrote:
On Thursday 16 July 2009, David Joyner wrote:
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Kiran Kedlayaksk...@gmail.com wrote:
One pet complaint
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Bjarke Hammersholt
Rounebjarke.ro...@gmail.com wrote:
Frobby is currently an optional component of Sage, which performs
computations related to monomial ideals. In particular, it can compute
* Multigraded Hilbert series
* Alexander dual of monomial ideals
Looks great as usual. I noticed a mis-spelling on page 46 (search for April
in your latex file and you'll find it).
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 7:25 AM, Martin
Albrechtm...@informatik.uni-bremen.de wrote:
Hi there,
next week I'll visit the Singular group in Kaiserslautern. As a part of my
visit
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 7:09 PM, J Elaychmicrosc...@gmail.com wrote:
Interesting, but I'm especially impressed by how well PIL stands up
to VIPS. It looks like vips was primarily designed to have a small
memory
imprint, especially for image files that are larger than physical
memory. PIL
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Kiran Kedlayaksk...@gmail.com wrote:
One pet complaint that you might bring up with the Singular team: I
Speaking of pet complaints, can you ask if they will at some point fix
the bugs in the Riemann-Roch computations in the Brill-Noether routines?
To be
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Ondrej Certikond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 8:30 PM, David Joynerwdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
...
So what are the arguments against PIL and for VIPS?
Here are two reasons (Why use VIPS?)
against this.
Thanks in advance for any feedback.
- David Joyner
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 4:57 AM, Minh Nguyennguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
Knapsack problems and their algorithmic solutions have many
applications in industry, with operation research and cryptography to
name two. As many, if not all, of the operation research software of
COIN-OR
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 2:10 AM, Ondrej Certikond...@certik.cz wrote:
...
On the other hand, the fact that the new format would deviate from the
sage
format would be a clear drawback. Maybe, we should have this
discussion
rather on the sage email list...
Let's discuss this on the
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Ondrej Certikond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 7:05 PM, David Joynerwdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
...
4. Should I interface also with pyglet classes? (Pyglet is included with
sympy, hence with sage, and does some very very basic image
On an amd64 ubuntu 9.04 machine, install built fine and all tests passed.
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 11:21 PM, Robert Millerrlmills...@gmail.com wrote:
Source tarball, sage.math binary, and upgrade URL are, respectively:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/release/sage-4.1.rc0.tar
.) Again, I don't know how this would be done...
Thanks in advance for any feedback.
- David Joyner
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr
I got the same as Marshall (same machine+OS) but with one addition:
The following tests failed:
sage -t devel/sage/doc/en/a_tour_of_sage/index.rst
sage -t devel/sage/doc/fr/tutorial/programming.rst
sage -t devel/sage/sage/misc/darwin_utilities.pyx
sage -t
Note that there was already a Python+Sage talk at a recent SIAM conference
http://fdoperez.blogspot.com/2008/07/python-tools-for-science-go-to-siam.html
http://www.ams.org/ams/siam-2008.html#python
which was apparently very popular. It may be that those who attended the SIAM
conference and who
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 4:21 AM, Jason Groutjason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
Firefox 3.5 is now officially released. Unfortunately, jsmath is broken
in it (under ubuntu 9.04). The fonts are messed up, so commas are
replaced with semicolons, greek letters are accented roman letters, etc.
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 10:58 PM, Jason Groutjason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
David Joyner wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 4:21 AM, Jason Groutjason-s...@creativetrax.com
wrote:
Firefox 3.5 is now officially released. Unfortunately, jsmath is broken
in it (under ubuntu 9.04). The fonts
Thanks for working on this! I agree with the points in your email.
LP solvers are an important topic where I teach so I am happy to
help. I think some of my colleagues would be very interested in
trying out whatever is developed. I'm not an operations
research person myself but would be
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:09 PM, William Cauchoiswcauch...@gmail.com wrote:
At the behest of William I took a stab at implementing this very type
of renderer in Sage. My work, [with patch], is available at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6447 for anyone who might
be interested.
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 7:41 AM, Golam Mortuza
Hossaingmhoss...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
...
A patch is posted as a part of an old ticket
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/2452
Reviews are welcome.
Thanks, I'll look at it. I just posted a comment there.
Cheers,
Golam
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 9:44 AM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The Sage Days 16 pictures I took are here:
http://wstein.org/pics/new/20090627-barcelona_sage_days16/
I loved the shot of the unix fire extinguisher!
Also, video is posted for all the talks that were videod at
401 - 500 of 1114 matches
Mail list logo
