Hello folks,
the final 3.3 sources are out and now available at
http://www.sagemath.org/src/
as well as some of the mirrors already (at least Seattle II, Boston,
Germany and France since I personally pushed or pulled the update).
Over 3.3.rc3 there were as expected very few merges:
Merged
On Feb 22, 5:49 am, Vincent Delecroix 20100.delecr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Hi Vincent,
I try to compile the sage-3.3 sources on my :
Linux iml88 2.6.11-6mdk #1 Tue Mar 22 16:04:32 CET 2005 i686 Intel(R)
Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz unknown GNU/Linux
The m4ri tests fails due to Segmentation
On Feb 22, 5:57 am, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Feb 22, 5:49 am, Vincent Delecroix 20100.delecr...@gmail.com
wrote:
SNIP
libm4ri testsuite failed, please report upstream!
sage: An error occurred while installing libm4ri-20090128
We need more context, i.e gzip
On Feb 22, 9:37 am, Vincent Delecroix 20100.delecr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Michael,
Hi Vincent,
It will be hard to have a sane gcc on my Mandriva. I built gcc 3.4.6
without any error but I get an error during tests.
make -k check
[...]
make[3]: Entering directory
On Feb 22, 10:07 am, Vincent Delecroix 20100.delecr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Vincent,
Hmm, something strange is going on here. I am surprised boehmgc runs
make check, but it isn't a good sign.
I launch myself the make check. That's not a part of the compilation
(If it's what your
On Feb 21, 7:58 am, Fredrik Johansson fredrik.johans...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Hi Fredrik,
Looking around, it seems Sage does not yet implement harmonic numbers
(except via SymPy)? If anyone is interested, I benchmarked a few
different algorithms and blogged about it
On Feb 22, 12:18 pm, Bernie brych...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Bernie,
Hi! If not so much problem can anybody tell me how to fix this
problems? I'm trying to add some structures as Vincent did, but all my
problems are still here after some hours of work :-(
I did something similar to
On Feb 22, 2:19 pm, Georg S. Weber georgswe...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hi sage-devel,
Hi,
currently Sage uses, if possible, the system's malloc.
This has a big advantage --- that strategy certainly is the one
supporting portability of Sage best.
I don't know if there is a timeline already
On Feb 22, 2:34 pm, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Feb 22, 2:19 pm, Georg S. Weber georgswe...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hi sage-devel,
Hi,
currently Sage uses, if possible, the system's malloc.
This has a big advantage --- that strategy certainly is the one
supporting
On Feb 22, 10:01 pm, Georg S. Weber georgswe...@googlemail.com
wrote:
C'mon,
Hi Georg,
this does need a very thorough doctesting on as many architectures as
possible! My own overnight run with Sage 3.3 with additionally #5344
and #4181 applied has finished:
{{{
On Feb 22, 11:16 pm, Jan Groenewald j...@aims.ac.za wrote:
Hi
Hi Jan,
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 10:39:52PM -0800, mabshoff wrote:
the final 3.3 sources are out and now available at
http://www.sagemath.org/src/
On a P4 with Ubuntu 8.04.2 with gcc 4.2.3-1ubuntu6 and
texlive-common
On Feb 22, 4:08 pm, Vincent Delecroix 20100.delecr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
hi Vincent,
Even with gcc-3.4.6 the compilation fails exactly at the same point
(with exactly the same errors). I will ask help tomorrow from the
network engineer.
Ok, it appears to me that the overly aggressive
On Feb 23, 12:00 am, Jan Groenewald j...@aims.ac.za wrote:
Hi
Hi Jan,
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 11:39:47PM -0800, mabshoff wrote:
As I did make html for the docs in sage-devel/doc,
I got this error:http://users.aims.ac.za/~jan/make_doc_error.log
My guess would be you need to install
On Feb 23, 12:44 am, Georg S. Weber georgswe...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On 23 Feb., 08:10, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Georg,
We definitely *are* closing in on this devious bunch of bugs. I had
touched four Cython files (the ones noted in that other recent
Singular thread
On Feb 23, 3:31 am, ahmet alper parker aapar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
If you need visual studio 2008, I have one, which is purchased by my
university.
The Sage project has several MSVC 2008 Professional licenses donated
by Microsoft Research for the port, so we are good. The point William
On Feb 23, 3:37 am, Kenny masso.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Rob,
There is no need for a window$ server... don't waste your time in such
a
bad way... it is easy to use the wmplayer and the image that the sage
team
provides from the website.
There are *plenty* of reasons to do a native
Hi Georg,
here is the result of Sage 3.3 + your spkg patch for 64 bit. This is
compiled using --with-malloc=system:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/calculus/calculus.py # 0 doctests failed
sage -t devel/sage/sage/crypto/mq/sr.py # Segfault
sage -t
On Feb 21, 1:54 am, Florent Hivert florent.hiv...@univ-rouen.fr
wrote:
Dear all,
Hi Florent,
It seems that I'm having a pexpect problem on my computation server. Maybe you
already know that but it is not deterministic, ie doctest hangs in some more
or less randomly chosen file. I've
On Feb 23, 5:41 am, Martin Albrecht m...@informatik.uni-bremen.de
wrote:
Simon reported this doctest failure with his custom Singular 3-1-0 and
sage-3.3:
Hi,
File
/home/king/SAGE/devel/sage-3.2.3/devel/sage/sage/interfaces/singular.py
, line 116:
sage: I2
Expected:
On Feb 23, 5:16 am, ahmet alper parker aapar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I think one of the main idea behind developing a real alternative for Magma,
Matlab, Mathematica etc. is their license costs and restrictions on altering
the source code etc. Personally, if I had chance to not to use
On Feb 23, 6:10 am, Thierry Dumont tdum...@math.univ-lyon1.fr wrote:
Hi Thiery,
After many months waiting for computers, I am now ready to start an
installation of Sage for all the undergraduate students of my University.
Nice.
We will have a maximum of about 250 simultaneous
On Feb 23, 7:04 am, Thierry Dumont tdum...@math.univ-lyon1.fr wrote:
mabshoff a écrit :
Hi Thierry,
In general there are a bunch of suggestions like setting timeouts for
the python processes and so on to avoid overloading the server. Do you
have any more info about the setup, i.e
On Feb 23, 7:41 am, ahmet alper parker aapar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The article was:http://thebetaguy.com/exclusives/?postid=1029344029
I am not sure about it's technical correctness..
AAP
Thanks for the link. Note that the article was posted on Thursday,
April 03, 2008 - I thought maybe
On Feb 23, 7:45 am, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Just FYI, there is a miniscule typo
onhttp://wiki.sagemath.org/windows/msvc64-issues
insofar as it refers to the 32-bit port.
This is correct since for now we are doing 32 bits only, at least from
my end which is complementary to
On Feb 23, 7:52 am, Alfredo Portes doyenatc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Alfredo,
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:46 AM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Anyway, that was a little less than a year ago and I have so far heard
zero complaints about Windows 7 breaking the binary API of code
On Feb 23, 9:00 am, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
Kenny wrote:
Is there any good reason for using flotr, protochart or any other
instead of flot??
I don't know. In order to standardize on flot or anything else, though,
someone needs to post a message to sage-devel
On Feb 23, 9:37 am, Tim Lahey tim.la...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 23, 2009, at 12:32 PM, Blair wrote:
My last name is Sutton and my trac id is bsutton.
I don't mind using Mercurial. I hope it has an interface similar to
Tortoise SVN. How long would it take to set up the repository with
On Feb 23, 4:42 am, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Georg,
here is the result of Sage 3.3 + your spkg patch for 64 bit. This is
compiled using --with-malloc=system:
Ok, it turns out the failures I listed here are caused by oMalloc, but
they are not caused by Georg's patch
On Feb 23, 10:42 am, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Upgraded from 3.3.rc2 more or less successfully. But:
Upon restarting, got 3.3 banner but then immediate ImportError
SNIP
Just FYI in case this helps track down something else which you've
been noticing.
I can also reproduce
On Feb 23, 3:07 pm, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
Hi,
is Sage supposed to build with g++ 3.3?
No, it needs gcc 3.4 or higher due to the requirement for C99 support.
There is a ticket to move the check from the FLINT.spkg to the start
of Sage, but no one has done that yet.
And who
On Feb 23, 3:08 pm, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
I was trying to find if it was discussed before, but didn't find
anything -- what is your view on spkg dependencies?
It is not that bad so far, but still I need to remember in which order
to install all my aditional
On Feb 23, 9:25 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 9:22 PM, mark mcclure mcmcc...@unca.edu wrote:
SNIP
My recollection is hazy, but I strongly suspect the very issue you
posted about was a problem in some of the rc* releases caused by
upgrading matplotlib
On Feb 23, 11:22 pm, Stan Schymanski schym...@gmail.com wrote:
I get a similar error message after compiling from scratch on Intel Mac
OSX 10.4.11. Is this related?
I don't think so, the problem might only apply to upgrade.
See full report below.
Cheers
Stan
SNIP
The linker indicate a
On Feb 24, 12:10 am, Georg S. Weber georgswe...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On 23 Feb., 18:53, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Gerog,
Hi Michael,
I could not put that much effort into it yesterday evening, but one
overnight complete build testlong of Sage 3.3 with a
singular
On Feb 24, 12:18 am, Stan Schymanski schym...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Georg and Michael,
Hi Stan,
Thanks for your help. I use Xcode 2.4.1 only. I suppose I should upgrade
then? After upgrading, can I run make again or do I have to delete the
directory and start again? Here is my gcc version
On Feb 24, 4:10 am, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 5:58 AM, gidiko gid...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Are there plans for a fork of the notebook server as a separate python
package not integrated into sage?
Seehttp://www.knoboo.com/
That is a different
On Feb 24, 2:49 am, water waterloo2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I can not emerge =dev-lisp/clisp-2.46.
Does gentoo patch the clisp sources in any way?
below is my install log's last several lines.
Ok, thanks.
gcc -Igllib -O2 -march=pentium-m -pipe -ggdb -W -Wswitch -Wcomment -
On Feb 24, 1:37 am, Stan Schymanski schym...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Michael,
Hi Stan,
Thanks a lot for your help, it works now (./sage -ba did it for me).
Good, I am not surprised. I should really fix that ticket to check for
a minimum amount of space to avoid this happening to other people
On Feb 24, 5:14 am, Kenny masso.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
I've worked with Maurizio and we came out with a working example of a
bode diagram plotted into a popup. It is good looking and we would
like
to shere this code with the community.
Is anybode there that feels like to help us posting
On Feb 23, 2:27 pm, Florent Hivert florent.hiv...@univ-rouen.fr
wrote:
Dear All,
Hi,
Michael suggested on irc to put here some hint about things to look at when
checking ReST doc. Here are some thing that I have seen lost in sage-combinat:
- comparison sign outside maths and
On Feb 24, 6:53 am, water waterloo2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I change to :
CFLAGS=-O0 -march=pentium-m -pipe
CXXFLAGS=-O0 -march=pentium-m -pipe
No, that is not what I wrote. *Unset* them completely since clisp is
miscompiled by gcc 4.x if you look at it from the wrong angle. I am
On Feb 24, 2:25 pm, Mike Hansen mhan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Ralf,
Hi Ralf,
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Ralf Hemmecke r...@hemmecke.de wrote:
--
| Sage Version 3.3, Release Date: 2009-02-21 |
On Feb 24, 3:27 pm, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu
wrote:
On Feb 24, 2009, at 3:07 PM, mabshoff wrote:
Hi Robert,
On Feb 24, 2:51 pm, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu
wrote:
On Feb 24, 2009, at 6:01 AM, mabshoff wrote:
SNIP
How about merging the patches
it will involved
touching code in a lot of places. This will also cause doctest
failures with make check for example
All the bits as usual are in
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.4/
No bdist this time - build from sources!
Other than that nothing but trivial
On Feb 25, 12:30 pm, Amir amirn...@gmail.com wrote:
Got the following error:
Hi Amir,
SNIP
export MAKE=make -j1,
with the same error. Machine is a node of a heterogeneous cluster of
'Rocks' linux opteron and xeon machines.
Ok, any chance you do not have any OpenSSL installed by the
On Feb 25, 11:34 am, Burcin Erocal bur...@erocal.org wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 10:53:48 -0800
William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
I received this question from a potential Sage developer. Any
thoughts?
Hi William. I notice that the package Polybori is included with SAGE
On Feb 25, 11:55 am, Jaap Spies j.sp...@hccnet.nl wrote:
John Cremona wrote:
I get the same two failures as John Palmieri. This is on Suse linux.
John
I join the party with the same two failures on Fedora 9 and 10, 32 bits.
Jaap
Ok, I am in Athens, UGA and ready to work a while
On Feb 24, 9:25 pm, Georg S. Weber georgswe...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hi Michael,
Hi Georg,
this got me a bit high-spirited
:)
, so I assembled another singular.spkg
with some bigger cleanups w.r.t memory allocator usage. I did a
complete build with this spkg dropped into Sage 3.3
On Feb 24, 7:17 pm, M. Yurko myu...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, upon further inspection, I realized that something must have gone
wrong during the upgrade, so I''l just recompile from scratch again.
The terminal when I launch sage says 3.3 and version() gives 3.3, but
the number below the sage
On Feb 25, 3:05 am, water waterloo2...@gmail.com wrote:
if I need to wait sage 3.4 ?
Hi,
Sage 3.4 won't fix the issue since it needs to be out by friday at the
latest and I will need to work on other things until then.
I have thought about this some more and it seems strange that the
On Feb 26, 2:51 am, Georg S. Weber georgswe...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Hi Georg,
is currently someone working on trac #4933 (lots of files in
sage.schemes.elliptic_curves are not included in the reference
manual)?
Or is it intended to get these missing files' documentation in 3.4 (as
On Feb 26, 5:26 am, Ralf Hemmecke r...@hemmecke.de wrote:
Please vote for your favorite names:
- NaturalNumbers
- Naturals
- NaturalIntegers
- NonNegativeIntegers
/
- PositiveNaturals
- PositiveIntegers
If I'd have a say... then I would choose NonNegativeInteger and
On Feb 26, 8:23 am, Jaap Spies j.sp...@hccnet.nl wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
Hello folks,
this is Sage 3.4.alpha0, more or less on time. We merged a massive
number of ReST patches (Mike Hansen) and additionally fixed a number
of long standing libSingular issues (Georg Weber, Carl Witty
)
class 'sage.calculus.calculus.SymbolicArithmetic'
sage: k
4
Ok, now this wouldn't blow up now, wouldn't it?
sage: diff(f,k)
---
TypeError Traceback (most recent call
last)
/home/mabshoff/.sage
On Feb 26, 12:18 pm, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
Jason Grout wrote:
Leslie,
Hi Jason,
I published the minimum rank worksheet at:http://sagenb.org/home/pub/293
The code is in the top block and is hidden by default. Click on the
hide to show it. It is
On Feb 26, 2:52 pm, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
Hi Jason,
I glanced at the code and it seems doctested and documented, so what
is the holdup for submission for inclusion?
I don't have written permission from one of the authors (but I do have
verbal
On Feb 26, 2:57 pm, François Bissey fbis...@slingshot.co.nz wrote:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2009, mabshoff wrote:
SNIP
Hi Michael,
Hi Francois
I haven't time to look into that before the release date of sage-3.4,
but at least with 3.4 he may have binaries.
Ok, AFAIL we (== William me) do
On Feb 26, 3:39 pm, Craig Citro craigci...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't particularly like s.card(), because the abbreviation is too
opaque --
Ah, is it? Hmm, well, maybe. Short poll: who finds card opaque?
I think it's pretty opaque. If I was looking for something like size
already, I
On Feb 27, 4:24 am, mark mcclure mcmcc...@unca.edu wrote:
Hi Mark,
The basic help mechanism doesn't seem to work in the the sage 3.3
notebook. For example, if I type 'plot?' in the Sage 3.2.3 notebook,
I get the description of the plot function. I can also type 'plot?'
into
the command
On Feb 27, 4:44 am, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
mark mcclure wrote:
On Feb 26, 11:35 pm, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
What is the Networkx timing? That seems like the best.
That's just straight up NetworkX run independently of Sage.
Of course, the
On Feb 27, 5:10 am, mark mcclure mcmcc...@unca.edu wrote:
On Feb 27, 7:44 am, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Mark,
On Feb 27, 4:24 am, mark mcclure mcmcc...@unca.edu wrote:
Overall I am tending to disable App bundles for 3.4 per default due to
time constraints and get
On Feb 27, 2:08 am, François Bissey fbis...@slingshot.co.nz wrote:
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, mabshoff wrote:
SNIP
Ok Michael,
I attached a hopefully detailed and thorough snippet.
I will see about the vmware image that you and William
would like but I make no promise. I thought
On Feb 27, 11:53 am, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
I have some C code that uses lapack (http://www.openmx-square.org/)
--- how should I link with it in Sage?
It depends, C code can either use either Fortran code directly or
might rely on a CLapack implementation.
In
On Feb 27, 1:26 pm, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi John,
From my newly built 3.4.alpha0 I made a clone but it will not run,
complaining about things like this:
SyntaxError: Non-ASCII character '\xc3' in file
On Feb 27, 1:24 pm, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
SNIP
One more question: -- I am trying to take sage-3.3.tar and strip it
from unnecessary spkgs that I don't need -- seems to me that I can
just delete them?
Yes
I am learning the dependencies in
spkg/standard/deps, because it's
On Feb 27, 1:16 pm, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 12:12 PM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
SNIP
ATLAS does not depends on CBLAS because it uses the CBLAS interface.
This should read ATLAS does depends ... obviously ;)
But if you need the F77
On Feb 27, 1:40 pm, David M. Monarres dmmonar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
Hi David,
The build of graphviz-2.16.1.p0 with sage 3.3 on Intel Mac fails.
The spkg is quite outdated and likely broken in some other way. The
current graphviz release is 2.21 IIRC with 2.22 about to be
On Feb 27, 1:58 pm, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 1:36 PM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
SNIP
Two points:
* just don't call it Sage
I won't.
I did not expect you to do that :)
* what license do you want to use for the code from the local
On Feb 27, 2:20 pm, mark mcclure mcmcc...@unca.edu wrote:
On Feb 27, 7:44 am, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
SNIP
Hi Mark,
Please keep an eye on this for 3.4
I built Sage 3.4.alpha0 today on my MacPro with OSX 10.5.5.
I get the same problem; the Traceback message looks pretty
On Feb 27, 2:30 pm, François Bissey fbis...@slingshot.co.nz wrote:
On Sat, 28 Feb 2009, mabshoff wrote:
SNIP
Hi Francois,
I.e. not all Gentoo releases fail when building clisp, i.e. at least
one person hanging out in IRC has reported to me that Sage 3.3 just
build for him on a 64 bit
On Feb 28, 3:26 am, Georg S. Weber georgswe...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hi Michael,
it seems that the libgcrypt-1.4.3.p0.spkg in the sage-3.4.alpha0.tar
I had downloaded is gzip'ed, not bz2'ed ...
Yep, we noticed too and corrected it two days ago. Ironically the
problem only happens on OSX
On Feb 28, 11:27 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 3:09 AM, Simon King k...@mathematik.uni-jena.de
wrote:
Hi William,
On 28 Feb., 04:49, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
You should use Sage in such cases. Type
sage: email?
for more details.
On Feb 28, 5:25 pm, Rob Beezer goo...@beezer.cotse.net wrote:
I've had the same problem in a clone of 3.4.alpha0.
Seems to perhaps just be Grobner in singular.py, and Mobius in
sloane_functions.py, since I ran a computation successfully after
editing those two files.
Would a patch
On Feb 28, 5:27 pm, Ronan Paixão ronanpai...@yahoo.com.br wrote:
Personally I'd vote for making all files utf-8 encoded. That would
increase accuracy in names and would also enable easier translations for
all languages under the sky.
Ronan
No, we already agreed on not doing that, i.e. I
On Feb 28, 5:54 pm, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Fidel,
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Fidel fidel.barr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm interested in collaborating to develop sage. I'm mainly interested
in doing things for the graph theoretic component of sage. I know
On Feb 28, 6:07 pm, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Michael,
SNIP
Hi Minh,
A number of the library files under sage/combinat has French texts
scattered around them. Some has English texts, followed by their
French translation.
Yes, I have complained about that a while ago to
On Feb 28, 6:26 pm, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Minh,
SNIP
I would not do that. There is very little of networkX left in Sage -
at least for all performance critical things and Sage's graph code has
been moving further and further away from it. There should be a lot of
On Feb 28, 9:17 pm, Alex Ghitza aghi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Hi Alex,
I was trying to install gap_packages-4.4.10_6 in sage-3.3, but got an error
after the download. It turns out that this optional package hardcodes that
it wants gap-4.4.10, and meanwhile we had upgraded to gap-4.4.12.
the
libpython2.5.a and turn it into a shared library:
mabsh...@sage:/scratch/mabshoff/sage-3.4.alpha0/local/lib/python2.5/
config$ cd foo/
mabsh...@sage:/scratch/mabshoff/sage-3.4.alpha0/local/lib/python2.5/
config/foo$ ar xf ../libpython2.5.a
mabsh...@sage:/scratch/mabshoff/sage-3.4.alpha0/local/lib
On Mar 1, 7:44 am, Fidel fidel.barr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Fidel,
Sorry for explaining so little about myself. During my undergrad I
took 5 courses which involved programming (structured programming,
OOP, data structures, computer graphics, cryptography) and a graph
theory course. I
On Mar 1, 9:40 pm, Phaedon Sinis phaedonsi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Phaedon,
I just upgraded my installation of sage, using sage -upgrade, and
now my sage-finance-test clone won't work. I followed the directions
to run %upgrade, deleted the indicated file manually, and reran it...
and it
On Mar 2, 6:15 am, Stan Schymanski schym...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all,
I get a ZeroDivisionError: float division if I try to plot the
following function:
var('kab')
fun = kab*((2*kab + 1)/(600*kab + 200) - (2*kab + 1)/(400*(kab + 1) +
200*kab))*((400*(kab + 1) + 200*kab)/(2*kab + 1) -
On Mar 2, 6:09 am, Phaedon Sinis phaedonsi...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Carl,
Hi Phaedon,
I am pretty sure I used a relative pathname...
No, you didn't: hg_sage.add('/finance/FinanceDate.py') - i.e. don't
use the '/' at the start.
the only command I
typed was the first line. The cd
handy for the AWS. Note that we
will not do two minor releases between SD 13 and AWS, but get 3.4 out
soon and then do 3.4.1 in time for the AWS.
The bits are in the usual place in
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.4/
Upgrades as well as a sage.math binary is also
On Mar 4, 10:51 am, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
SNIP
Any chance you could build in /tmp instead of /scratch? You could
also try changing the spkg-install for NTL to not have the -p and
see what happens.
Unfortunately it doesn't allow me to do so --- I need to submit all
On Mar 4, 11:27 am, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 2:02 PM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mar 4, 10:51 am, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
SNIP
Any chance you could build in /tmp instead of /scratch? You could
also try changing
On Mar 4, 1:58 pm, Nicolas M. Thiery nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr
wrote:
Hi!
SNIP
I have spkgs glpk-4.28.spkg and 4ti2-1.3.2.spkg at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mhansen/that play nice with the
Sage ecosystem. I guess they just need a bit more widespread testing
(on
On Mar 4, 2:48 pm, Arnaud Bergeron aberge...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Arnaud,
This does not build on Mac OS X 10.5.6 PPC 64-bits. It does build
fine in 32-bit mode though
The first issue is rather trivial. The gmp-mpir-0.9 spkg fails to
build because spkg-install passes the option ABI=64
On Mar 4, 2:59 pm, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
SNIP
Hi Arnaud,
I tried adding -mlongcall to the gcc options without success.
Yeah, I also found this
pagehttp://lists.apple.com/archives/carbon-dev/2007/aug/msg00154.html
- for now you might just want to remove the -g from
On Mar 6, 11:29 am, Georg S. Weber georgswe...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hi,
AFAIK, the patch at trac #5217 (and other paches mentioned there)
should have resolved this long standing OS X libpng annoyance ---
all that went into Sage 3.3rc1. I'd propose to wait until Sage 3.4
binaries are out,
On Mar 10, 11:33 am, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a good reason why cloning should not copy the 'output'
directory in sage/doc? I can think of lots of good reasons why it
*should* be copied...
It is a bug. Please open a ticket.
There was some discussion about this
On Mar 6, 9:52 am, Nicolas M. Thiery nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 05:42:17PM +0100, Florent Hivert wrote:
I've been stuck an entire day on a problem which may hits you. So I'm
putting
it there if someone get against it. The problem is the following:
Some
On Mar 4, 11:13 am, Jonathan Hanke jonha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Hi John,
I'm getting a strange error message in the library that I'm having trouble
reproducing at the prompt for determinants over GF(2). The full commands to
create the message are below, using the sage in
Hello folks,
after more delay than hoped for here goes the final 3.4. Sources are
available from
http://www.sagemath.org/src/
Upgrading Sage via the official channel also works already. There is
also a sage.math only binary in
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles
On Mar 12, 12:35 am, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
#5220: Jason Grout: Weird or non-appearance of default in input_box in
interact [Reviewed by William Stein]
William should get credit for this as well. I think it'd be best to
list us both as authors
fat chat, member, , no email, allowed, 2006, 11, 1, 18, 24, 35 wrote:
Hi,
Build is not working, here are some details:
SNIP
What are you trying to do? Build from sources? Then something went
very wrong since Cython not working is a serious failure earlier and
you should have never gotten
On Mar 12, 3:00 am, Martin Albrecht m...@informatik.uni-bremen.de
wrote:
Hi there,
Hi Martin,
it seems
http://hg.sagemath.org/sage-main/
is out of date.
Yeah, William and I started looking into fixing this last night, but
we didn't get it done before having to take off. I am not
On Mar 12, 2:25 pm, M. Yurko myu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm running 64-bit Ubuntu 8.10 on a Core 2 processor, and Sage 3.4 has
failed to build for me twice on the same error. It appears to occur on
the compilation of PolyBoRi and I get the following error:
Hello folks,
the download section of sagemath.org has over 20 different 3.4
binaries available. So far the only uptodate mirror is
sage.math.washington.edu while the other mirrors are catching up, so
please check your local mirror before hitting the main download site.
I am working on the
On Mar 14, 11:12 am, David Perkinson dav...@reed.edu wrote:
Using Sage 3.4, sage -i 4ti2-20061025 does not work for me. I have
attached the relevant section of install.log.
Dave
Somewhere in 4ti2 you need to
#include limits.h
to work around gcc 4.3 header problems. I guess someone
1901 - 2000 of 2594 matches
Mail list logo
