On Mar 26, 5:45 am, Justin C. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Hichael,
On Mar 25, 2008, at 19:16 , mabshoff wrote:
On Mar 26, 2:58 am, Justin C. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 22, 2008, at 16:02 , mabshoff wrote:
On Mar 26, 3:25 am, Soroosh Yazdani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should I uninstall atlas if I want to check your patch for the future
version? Atlas is installed system wide on my computer, and linbox seemed to
have found those libraries as it compiled afterward. Is there a way to force
linbox
It started working after I installed atlas system wide. Atlas was not
installed in the first attempt to compile sage. After linbox failed, my
solution was to install atlas through gentoo package manager and try again.
Cheers,
Soroosh
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 3:36 AM, mabshoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 at 07:22PM -0700, mabshoff wrote:
But there are still plenty of patches in trac that deserve to be
looked at and merged.
Might I recommend 2565?
http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/2565
The logging facilities currently are totally broken. The above ticket
has a patch
+1
--Mike
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 7:15 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008, Gary Furnish wrote:
Trac #2436 adds the following algorithms from glib to libcsage:
Multiplatform threads
Thread pools
Asynchronous Queues
Memory Slices
Doubly and Singly linked
On Wednesday 26 March 2008, Gary Furnish wrote:
Trac #2436 adds the following algorithms from glib to libcsage:
Multiplatform threads
Thread pools
Asynchronous Queues
Memory Slices
Doubly and Singly linked lists
Queues
Sequences
Hash Tables
Arrays
Balanced Binary Trees
N-ary Trees
At this link, http://sagemath.org/doc/html/prog/node1.htmlwe have,
Absolutely *everybody* who uses *Sage* should contribute something back to
*Sage* at some point.
I have had my fun with sage, and debated, How can I return something to the
community, however small? I
submitted a couple
On Mar 26, 2008, at 24:27 , mabshoff wrote:
On Mar 26, 5:45 am, Justin C. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 25, 2008, at 19:16 , mabshoff wrote:
[snip]
more GMP trouble. Can you post the output from uname -r | sed s/9\.
[0-9]\.0/9\.0\.0/ and a uname -a.
$ uname -a
Darwin zippo
On Mar 26, 4:43 pm, Justin C. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 26, 2008, at 24:27 , mabshoff wrote:
Ok, this is the culprit. It will need fixes all over the place and
this time we might as well do it right.
Oh, what the heck. Do it wrong for a couple of more times :-}
Poking
Hello all
I had the idea of publishing an online Journal with articles about
Sage - a mixture between blogs and a real journal. This could be an
excellent vehicle to promote Sage and the ideas behind to a bigger
audience.
This could be about:
* how to use Sage, explaining functionalities, ...
*
On Wednesday 26 March 2008 11:34, dean moore wrote:
At this link, http://sagemath.org/doc/html/prog/node1.htmlwe have,
Absolutely *everybody* who uses *Sage* should contribute something back
to *Sage* at some point.
I have had my fun with sage, and debated, How can I return something to
On Mar 26, 2008, at 09:15 , mabshoff wrote:
On Mar 26, 4:43 pm, Justin C. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 26, 2008, at 24:27 , mabshoff wrote:
[snip]
Yeah, the culprit is the above regexp. I will fix those before
2.11.alpha2. Sorry for the mess. I made this #2672 - a blocker for
On Mar 25, 5:12 pm, Gary Furnish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trac #2436 adds the following algorithms from glib to libcsage:
Multiplatform threads
Thread pools
Asynchronous Queues
Memory Slices
Doubly and Singly linked lists
Queues
Sequences
Hash Tables
Arrays
Balanced Binary Trees
N-ary
Is any of the code gpl v3+ only?
How difficult will it be to update our version whenever upstream
changes? Do only you know how to do this?
Why put this in c_lib instead of a separate spkg called glib-min?
Couldn't such a package be useful outside of sage?
Any chance the glib people might see
On Mar 26, 5:53 pm, Justin C. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 26, 2008, at 09:15 , mabshoff wrote:
On Mar 26, 4:43 pm, Justin C. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 26, 2008, at 24:27 , mabshoff wrote:
[snip]
Yeah, the culprit is the above regexp. I will fix those before
Hello,
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:32:36 -0700 (PDT)
Harald Schilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had the idea of publishing an online Journal with articles about
Sage - a mixture between blogs and a real journal. This could be an
excellent vehicle to promote Sage and the ideas behind to a bigger
On Mar 26, 6:02 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is any of the code gpl v3+ only?
No.
How difficult will it be to update our version whenever upstream
changes? Do only you know how to do this?
Not particularly hard.
Why put this in c_lib instead of a separate spkg called
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:08 AM, Burcin Erocal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:32:36 -0700 (PDT)
Harald Schilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had the idea of publishing an online Journal with articles about
Sage - a mixture between blogs and a real journal.
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:09 AM, mabshoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 26, 6:02 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is any of the code gpl v3+ only?
No.
That's good.
How difficult will it be to update our version whenever upstream
changes? Do only you know how to
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 9:15 AM, mabshoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 26, 4:43 pm, Justin C. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 26, 2008, at 24:27 , mabshoff wrote:
Ok, this is the culprit. It will need fixes all over the place and
this time we might as well do it
On Mar 26, 6:43 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:09 AM, mabshoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 26, 6:02 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is any of the code gpl v3+ only?
No.
That's good.
How difficult will it be to update
Mercurial 1.0 is out now and one of the new standard extensions is the
churn command, which apparently gives the numbers of lines of changed
code per person (well, per email address). I thought the output (see
below) was interesting. This is as of 2.10.4 and a few extra patches on
top of
Ryan Hinton brought up a good point at #2651:
Currently, matrix(3,{(1,1): 2}) gives the 3x2 sparse matrix
[0 0]
[0 2]
[0 0]
However, for other cases, if we specify just the number of rows, the
returned matrix is square (except when we are giving all the entries of
the matrix and there
Fantastic idea, Harald!
Along these lines, how about a Sage User Group? We could hold it on
Second Life or use Skype and screen sharing software.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this
On Mar 26, 2008, at 10:37 , William Stein wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 9:15 AM, mabshoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Yeah, but that mean that any Sage release that is supposed to work
will so far only work up to 10.5.1. I didn't know that the tiny
version number of OSX can be unequal
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Jason Grout
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ryan Hinton brought up a good point at #2651:
Currently, matrix(3,{(1,1): 2}) gives the 3x2 sparse matrix
[0 0]
[0 2]
[0 0]
However, for other cases, if we specify just the number of rows, the
returned
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Justin C. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 26, 2008, at 10:37 , William Stein wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 9:15 AM, mabshoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Yeah, but that mean that any Sage release that is supposed to work
will so
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Jason Grout
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ryan Hinton brought up a good point at #2651:
Currently, matrix(3,{(1,1): 2}) gives the 3x2 sparse matrix
[0 0]
[0 2]
[0 0]
However, for other cases, if we specify just the number of rows, the
returned matrix
Hi,
If you are a student and would really like to get paid to work on the
Sage Notebook all summer,
go to this web page and fill out an application
http://groups.google.com/group/google-summer-of-code-announce/web/guide-to-the-gsoc-web-app-for-student-applicants
Apply to the Python
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 1:52 PM, mabshoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 26, 6:43 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:09 AM, mabshoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 26, 6:02 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is any of the
On Mar 26, 6:33 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:08 AM, Burcin Erocal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to call it Sage Monthly or Quarterly, so that it is not
confused with JSage?
Yes, the name should either change as you suggest,...
I've no
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 11:16 AM, didier deshommes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 1:52 PM, mabshoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 26, 6:43 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:09 AM, mabshoff
[EMAIL
Hey all,
(I'm cc'ing this to sage-devel, because I think there are people there
who care about modular forms who might not read sage-support.)
So I've also posted a patch on #2674, which actually fixes both of
these issues, as well as the fact that it currently is the case that
adding an
Hi Jason (or anybody),
Does anybody have a clue if it is possible to take a directory (e.g.,
devel/sage/) with an .hg repo directory
in it, and do the following:
(1) export everything in the .hg repo to something (perhaps a ton of
stuff) in plain text format,
(2) delete .hg
(3) do
Honestly, independent of the spkg vs libcsage issue, which is really an
issue of semantics in my opinion, Sage has no high speed implementations of
C algorithms. Sage can not escape this forever. Either someone will have
to write their own at some point or we can use glib as a starting block.
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Jason Grout
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mercurial 1.0 is out now and one of the new standard extensions is the
churn command, which apparently gives the numbers of lines of changed
code per person (well, per email address). I thought the output (see
below)
On Wednesday 26 March 2008 13:55, Jason Grout wrote:
Mercurial 1.0 is out now and one of the new standard extensions is the
churn command, which apparently gives the numbers of lines of changed
code per person (well, per email address). I thought the output (see
below) was interesting. This
On Mar 26, 7:53 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jason (or anybody),
Does anybody have a clue if it is possible to take a directory (e.g.,
devel/sage/) with an .hg repo directory
in it, and do the following:
(1) export everything in the .hg repo to something (perhaps a ton
William,
git can do this. Since git uses a hash it will always regenerate the
same hash from the same file.
In fact, git uses hashes all the way down the tree so you can just
look at the hash code of the root of the tree to see if anything
changes. Equal hash codes, even across the net, imply
On Mar 26, 10:33 am, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:32:36 -0700 (PDT)
Harald Schilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had the idea of publishing an online Journal with articles about
Sage - a mixture between blogs and a real journal. This could be an
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 1:18 PM, root [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William,
git can do this. Since git uses a hash it will always regenerate the
same hash from the same file.
In fact, git uses hashes all the way down the tree so you can just
look at the hash code of the root of the tree
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Joel B. Mohler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 26 March 2008 13:55, Jason Grout wrote:
Mercurial 1.0 is out now and one of the new standard extensions is the
churn command, which apparently gives the numbers of lines of changed
code per person
Did we check in a big chunk of the ntl wrapper under your name? (That
one would be fair, of course). Or maybe when we moved libcsage into
the sage tree, that went in under your name?
-cc
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Joel B. Mohler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 26 March 2008
It seems like the mercurial mailing list would be the best place to go for this.
Using queues has made me quite a bit more productive, and I'd like to
avoid switching to a version control system without them. Also, the
git documentation leaves something to be desired compared to the
Mercurial
On Mar 26, 8:12 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 1:18 PM, root [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William,
git can do this. Since git uses a hash it will always regenerate the
same hash from the same file.
In fact, git uses hashes all the way down the
Mike,
Using queues has made me quite a bit more productive, and I'd like to
avoid switching to a version control system without them. Also, the
git documentation leaves something to be desired compared to the
Mercurial book.
The queues feature in Mercurial is available independently in the
Dear all,
i made a new version of my wrapper that is based on the most recent
MeatAxe.
You can find it at http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/SimonKing/MeatAxe.tar.gz
The tar'd folder contains:
- a part of the unaltered source files of MeatAxe 2.4,
- additional (very simplistic) C-code in
The queues feature in Mercurial is available independently in the
quilt system. Mercurial makes this point:
http://hgbook.red-bean.com/hgbookch12.html
There are things with queues that you don't get with quilt. Quoting
from the book,
As an example, the integration of patches with
On Wednesday 26 March 2008 15:16, Craig Citro wrote:
Did we check in a big chunk of the ntl wrapper under your name? (That
one would be fair, of course). Or maybe when we moved libcsage into
the sage tree, that went in under your name?
I suspect that both of these things are a big contributor
The queues feature in Mercurial is available independently in the
quilt system. Mercurial makes this point:
http://hgbook.red-bean.com/hgbookch12.html
There are things with queues that you don't get with quilt. Quoting
from the book,
As an example, the integration of patches with
On Mar 26, 11:53 am, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jason (or anybody),
Does anybody have a clue if it is possible to take a directory (e.g.,
devel/sage/) with an .hg repo directory
in it, and do the following:
(1) export everything in the .hg repo to something (perhaps a ton
On Mar 26, 9:27 pm, Robert Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mar 26, 2008, at 11:53 AM, William Stein wrote:
Hi Jason (or anybody),
Does anybody have a clue if it is possible to take a directory (e.g.,
devel/sage/) with an .hg repo directory
in it, and do the following:
(1)
On Mar 26, 2008, at 1:30 PM, mabshoff wrote:
On Mar 26, 9:27 pm, Robert Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mar 26, 2008, at 11:53 AM, William Stein wrote:
Hi Jason (or anybody),
Does anybody have a clue if it is possible to take a directory
(e.g.,
devel/sage/) with an .hg repo
On Mar 26, 9:35 pm, Robert Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I was talking about something more sophisticated than export/import,
which won't work the instant one has multiple branches. One needs to
actually create multiple heads, apply patches, then resolve them. Hg
export doesn't
On Mar 26, 2008, at 1:56 PM, mabshoff wrote:
On Mar 26, 9:35 pm, Robert Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I was talking about something more sophisticated than export/import,
which won't work the instant one has multiple branches. One needs to
actually create multiple heads, apply patches,
On Mar 26, 2008, at 11:57 AM, Gary Furnish wrote:
Honestly, independent of the spkg vs libcsage issue, which is
really an issue of semantics in my opinion, Sage has no high speed
implementations of C algorithms. Sage can not escape this forever.
Either someone will have to write their
mabshoff wrote:
Hi folks,
Sage 2.11.alpha1 is out. It is a collection of various
fixes, nothing particular seems to stand out. We finally
pushed the updated experimental mayavi and vtl.spkg.
[...]
#2493: Jaap Spies: Updated experimental vtk spkg
(vtk-5.0.4.spkg)
#2495: Jaap
On Mar 26, 10:31 pm, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
Hi folks,
Sage 2.11.alpha1 is out. It is a collection of various
fixes, nothing particular seems to stand out. We finally
pushed the updated experimental mayavi and vtl.spkg.
[...]
#2493: Jaap Spies: Updated
mabshoff wrote:
Well, maybe I did accidentally nuke more than the .svn directories. I
cannot imagine a scenario where anything would depend on the content
of a .svn directory to run. But I wouldn't be surprised to be proven
wrong ;)
I did a diff -r on both directories, only .svn files
Hello folks,
home on sage.math did just get filled up to the last byte, so things
tend to work less well than they used to. Various people in IRC did
clean up some of their home directories and now 26 GB are free again.
But of the 705G total the following people use at least a Gigabyte:
1.9G
On Mar 26, 10:53 pm, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
Well, maybe I did accidentally nuke more than the .svn directories. I
cannot imagine a scenario where anything would depend on the content
of a .svn directory to run. But I wouldn't be surprised to be proven
mabshoff wrote:
On Mar 26, 10:53 pm, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
Well, maybe I did accidentally nuke more than the .svn directories. I
cannot imagine a scenario where anything would depend on the content
of a .svn directory to run. But I wouldn't be surprised to
Mike Hansen wrote:
The queues feature in Mercurial is available independently in the
quilt system. Mercurial makes this point:
http://hgbook.red-bean.com/hgbookch12.html
There are things with queues that you don't get with quilt. Quoting
from the book,
As an example, the
No guilt. I feel no personal guilt over ancestors who owned slaves. Just a
feeling it's worthwhile to contribute
something more substantial that a few bug reports -- I guess meaning can get
lost in ASCII.
Some of us relatively new people feel like we're lost in a non-English
megalopolis with no
There are non trivial changes involved in getting compilation without
internationalization, primarily because their error handling system uses
internationalization in many places. Its not just a copy and paste job, but
now that I've figured out exactly what headers we need and set up autoconf
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 14:06:08 -0700, Robert Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 26, 2008, at 11:57 AM, Gary Furnish wrote:
Honestly, independent of the spkg vs libcsage issue, which is
really an issue of semantics in my opinion, Sage has no high speed
implementations of C algorithms.
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 13:59:10 -0700, Robert Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 26, 2008, at 1:56 PM, mabshoff wrote:
On Mar 26, 9:35 pm, Robert Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I was talking about something more sophisticated than export/import,
which won't work the instant one has
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:57:26 -0700, Gary Furnish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Honestly, independent of the spkg vs libcsage issue, which is really an
issue of semantics in my opinion, Sage has no high speed implementations of
C algorithms. Sage can not escape this forever. Either someone will
On Mar 26, 2008, at 4:48 PM, Gary Furnish wrote:
I have not yet benchmarked hash tables (nor actually tried them
out), but one of the big advantages is that they avoid much of the
memory management issues, so I don't expect them to be slower (and
if they are, I may have to fix that).
69 matches
Mail list logo
