++
Fedora13 offers libstdc++-4.4.4.2.f13.xyz, where xyz is your system -
32bit or 64 bit, to my knowlege fedora will find the correct version
automatically.
Regards BB
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support
On 21.06.2010 12:59, bb wrote:
On 21.06.2010 11:08, Harald Schilly wrote:
On Jun 20, 10:53 pm, SteveDunbarsdun...@maa.org wrote:
$ rpm -qa | grep libstdc++
libstdc++-4.4.3-4.fc12.x86_64
libstdc++-4.4.3-4.fc12.i686
So it appears that the g++ is missing at least..
I nearly don't know
fedora13. You know
that lasts a couple of hours.
Regards BB
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
it is any? And can make this bublic?
Regards bb
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URL
BB
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
guide:
http://www.sagemath.org/doc/installation/binary.html. The title
Pre-built Binary Install is something misleading, because you can also
use that procedure with sage build from source as well.
Reagrds BB
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
Santanu Sarkar schrieb:
Suppose A=[0,0,1,1,0,1]. How one can reverse this array using commend
only?
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group
table
sage: (3==3)+1
2
sage: a=3==3; b=a+1
sage: a,b
(True, 2)
sage:
sage:
The Operator == has higher precedence than =, but the later is missing
as well in the sage table.
Regards BB
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group
Mike Hansen schrieb:
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:52 AM, bb bblo...@arcor.de wrote:
I get a runtime error, but just would expect infinity! Is there something
wrong or any explanation?
This is because when you do 2^3^4^5 you are computing that number
exactly as an integer
I did some changes in the format.
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URL:
Minh Nguyen schrieb:
Hi Bernhard,
2010/4/22 bb bblo...@arcor.de
I did some changes in the format.
Could you please attach the relevant html file?
--
Regards
Minh Van Nguyen
I attached the corrected file tour-de.html hat is placed at
http://www.sagemath.org/tour.html
putting his contribution to
any Sage site.
Anyway, I am not going to feed that troll any further.
Beside that revange for some of Simon Kings postings I think the text is
quite nice!
Regards BB
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from
way is to use restore with a list of the variable namens in the
parenthesis, exapmlöe restore('a,b').
You can check the active variables wikt who or whose.
Reagrds BB
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support
I have some problem with reset():
sage: reset()
sage: x
x
sage: a
---
NameError Traceback (most recent call last)
/home/bb/sage-4.3.5/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sage/all_cmdline.pyc
Harald Schilly schrieb:
On Apr 19, 11:36 am, bb bblo...@arcor.de wrote:
There is magically declared a variable x, even after each reset()?
Is this a feature or a bug?
Short answer: feature ;)
(and there are also other magically declared variables, like RDF ...)
H
Tnx
Alex Ghitza schrieb:
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:09:34 +0200, bb bblo...@arcor.de wrote:
Tnx!
Is there any explanation why the magic ends with del ?
sage: del x
sage: x
---
NameError
]
File ipython console, line 1
x=[a=Integer(5), b+=Integer(5), c-=Integer(3), d*=Integer(5),
e/=Integer(8)]
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
sage:
Obviously is it in Sage not possible to calculate list elements with an
allocation??
Reagrds BB
--
To post to this group, send email to sage
bb schrieb:
sage: x=[a=5, a+=5, a-=3, a*=5, a/=8]
File ipython console, line 1
x=[a=Integer(5), a+=Integer(5), a-=Integer(3), a*=Integer(5),
a/=Integer(8)]
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
sage: x=[1,2+5,3]
sage: x
[1, 7
sage: 2^3^4^5
---
RuntimeError Traceback (most recent call last)
/home/bb/sage-4.3.5/ipython console in module()
/home/bb/sage-4.3.5/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sage/rings/integer.so
bb schrieb:
sage: 2^3^4^5
---
RuntimeError Traceback (most recent call
last)
/home/bb/sage-4.3.5/ipython console in module()
/home/bb/sage-4.3.5/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sage/rings
bb schrieb:
Minh Nguyen schrieb:
Hi Bernhard,
I have converted your ODT document to Sphinx. You can view the patch
at ticket #8660 [1]. My knowledge of the German language is
non-existent so someone apart from me needs to review that patch. In
the meantime, you can browse the German version
Simon King schrieb:
Hi Bernhard,
On Apr 18, 1:57 pm, bb bblo...@arcor.de wrote:
Sorry, I found aTypo:
polybori: Stellt High-Level-Datentypen für boolsche Polynome und Monome,
Exponentialvektoren sowie für die zugrunde liegenden polynomialen Ringe
und Untermengen der Potentialmenge der
Simon King schrieb:
Hi Bernhard,
On Apr 18, 4:29 pm, bb bblo...@arcor.de wrote:
May be the original translator had not so much fun with this boring list.
I agree it is boring, and I hope my patch is putting it right.
But let me add that many (naturally not all!) of the changes
Simon King schrieb:
Hi Bernhard,
On Apr 18, 4:29 pm, bb bblo...@arcor.de wrote:
May be the original translator had not so much fun with this boring list.
I agree it is boring, and I hope my patch is putting it right.
But let me add that many (naturally not all!) of the changes
Minh Nguyen schrieb:
Hi Bernhard,
2010/4/16 bb bblo...@arcor.de:
Attached please find my german translation of A Tour of Sage with some
minor changes.
Again, allow me to thank you for your initiative in translating Sage
documentation to German and making that translation available
Attached please find my german translation of A Tour of Sage with some
minor changes.
I hope that you find it useful and I hope that Minh Van Nguyen again
lends a helping hand to compile it and check it.
Reagrds BB
===
Ein Rundgang durch Sage
bb schrieb:
Attached please find my german translation of A Tour of Sage with
some minor changes.
I hope that you find it useful and I hope that Minh Van Nguyen again
lends a helping hand to compile it and check it.
Reagrds BB
I found the german Umlaute are not presented correctly
to, please study urchin.js if you really think that not
every keystroke you do will be registrated!
Fourth, think first and post then.
Reagards BB
PS. Den gebratenen Storch und den Butterfisch würde ich empfehlen, an
einem delikaten Ort unterzubringen, den ich hier nicht benennen werde!
Sacklzement
.
Cheers,
Martin
PS: I think the tone of this debate is unjustified both by Georg and BB.
Please consider reducing the heat.
Ok, understand. Sorry. Let me add: A bavarian (if Georg is one, because
some locutions come from the german north) knows that to handle! (In
their own folklore bavarians were
to ReST very time
consuming. To my knowlege (I do not use ReST) the ReST text will be
compiled from a normal text file? One might modify such a text file very
easily for instance in OpenOffice or some other editor else and the
compilation to ReST schould be very easy and painless.
Regards BB
David Joyner schrieb:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 8:08 AM, bb bblo...@arcor.de wrote:
Is it possible to get the raw format of the documentation texts?
Just now one may get
1st a copy from the text presentet in the browser window
2nd a copy of the HTML-source
I don't know if I understand
Mike Hansen schrieb:
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 3:37 AM, bb bblo...@arcor.de wrote:
sage: n(sqrt(2.), digits=40)
1.414213562373095145474621858738828450441
sage: n(sqrt(2), digits=40)
1.414213562373095048801688724209698078570
sage:
If you wanted this to be more like Maxima
Mike Hansen schrieb:
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 10:01 AM, bb bblo...@arcor.de wrote:
Tnx for helping. I did some more experimentation. I dont want to bother you,
but if you have some time and some pation I would be thankfull for one more
explanation. Your tip works as expected, but if I use
?
Regards BB
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
To unsubscribe
Mike Hansen schrieb:
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 1:02 AM, bb bblo...@arcor.de wrote:
Is there any explanation?
Could you be more specific in your question? Everything there looks
normal to me. n(pi, 20) means to compute using 20 bits of precision.
--Mike
Ok, I see - the argument
'],
['emil', 'adam', 'eva', 'otto'], ['emil', 'adam', 'otto', 'eva'],
['emil', 'eva', 'adam', 'otto'], ['emil', 'eva', 'otto', 'adam'],
['emil', 'otto', 'adam', 'eva'], ['emil', 'otto', 'eva', 'adam']]
sage:
How can I get such a nicer list as in the reference?
Regards and Tnx
BB
--
To post
() and primes() gives some strange
output:
sage: prange(1,100)
---
NameError Traceback (most recent call last)
/home/bb/sage-4.3.3-linux-64bit-arch_linux-x86_64-Linux/ipython
console in module
I screened all of the offered documents from the sgaemath-page to find a
list of the offered standard-functions - no success! May be there is a
table or list about that but I just could not find it? Screening the
index is one possibility, but does not make me really happy.
Tnx BB
--
To post
Why does Sage not solve the equation? (The quadratic equation is just a
test.)
sage: x,y,a,b = var('x, y, a, b')
sage: solve([x - 2*y == a, x + 3*y == b],[x,y]);
sage: solve([x^2 + a*x + b == 0],x)
[x == -1/2*a - 1/2*sqrt(a^2 - 4*b), x == -1/2*a + 1/2*sqrt(a^2 - 4*b)]
sage: solve([x - 2*y -
William Stein schrieb:
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 10:11 AM, bb bblo...@arcor.de wrote:
Why does Sage not solve the equation? (The quadratic equation is just a
test.)
sage: x,y,a,b = var('x, y, a, b')
sage: solve([x - 2*y == a, x + 3*y == b],[x,y]);
sage: solve([x^2 + a*x + b == 0],x)
[x == -1
cannot
deliver in Sphinx-format. May be you have a secretary or a student for
to copy/paste if you desire a Sphinx-version?
If you indicate interest, please tell me where to send it (e-mail
attachement) and in which format.
Regards BB
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support
emil schrieb:
On Mar 20, 10:52 pm, Alec Mihailovs alec.mihail...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 19, 4:51 am, bb bblo...@arcor.de wrote:
I tried to compile sage from source on slitaz, a very small and
ultrafast starting linux and slitaz might be installed to a bootable USB.
No success
emil schrieb:
On Mar 22, 10:44 am, bb bblo...@arcor.de wrote:
emil schrieb:
On Mar 20, 10:52 pm, Alec Mihailovs alec.mihail...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 19, 4:51 am, bb bblo...@arcor.de wrote:
I tried to compile sage from source on slitaz, a very small and
ultrafast
Carlo Hamalainen schrieb:
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 7:18 AM, bb bblo...@arcor.de wrote:
The text lines I sent were the last lines of config.log.
And what's the output of
gcc -v
and
g++ -v
?
Cheers,
Beside the usual list of options I get gcc -version 4.2.3 for both
rvaug...@gmail.com schrieb:
Thanks, Mike.
$ gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-46)
Is there a 64-bit version of the SAGE 4.3.3 source?
-Richard
On Mar 19, 2:39 pm, Mike Hansen mhan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 11:15 AM, rvaug...@gmail.com
and then a message
appears:
env: bash: No such file or directory
The the process will finish.
Is there any skilled linux user that can interpret this and lend a
helping hand?
Tnx BB
PS. I tried to install sage in another small linux: tinyCore on USB and
had some other problems. To keep things
Robert Bradshaw schrieb:
On Mar 19, 2010, at 1:51 AM, bb wrote:
I tried to compile sage from source on slitaz, a very small and
ultrafast starting linux and slitaz might be installed to a bootable
USB.
No success.
The line from the makefile will be echoed:
cd spkg ./install all 21 | tee
David Joyner schrieb:
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 5:53 PM, bb bblo...@arcor.de wrote:
If I try to write a math-tutorial ...
Sage code and its documentation are licensed under open-source
licenses, so feel free to copy+paste. In fact, it is encouraged.
Just please license your
://docs.cython.org/src/userguide/tutorial.html
That is the most extended cython-text I found so far. May be that can
meet your needs?
Regards BB
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
David Joyner schrieb:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:20 PM, bb bblo...@arcor.de wrote:
David Joyner schrieb:
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 5:53 PM, bb bblo...@arcor.de wrote:
If I try to write a math-tutorial ...
Sage code and its documentation are licensed under open-source
As I mentioned in another posting I tried a simple install from source
(on slitaz linux).
1. I got he message that prereq-0.7 is missing.
prereq-0.7 and prereq-0.7-install.tar is present. On
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8052 I found the remark that
prereq-0.7-install.tar will be
32-bit-sage-version-4.3.3 - may be that is
also true for compiling simple 4.3.3 on 64-bit machines?
Leave the solution to the skilled experts and use 64-bit source code!
Regards BB
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email
Carlo Hamalainen schrieb:
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 6:23 AM, bb bblo...@arcor.de wrote:
checking for gcc... gcc
checking for C compiler default output file name...
configure: error: in `/home/tux/sage-4.3.3/spkg/build/prereq-0.7':
configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
See
I could not find any clear statement to the copyright or license oft he
sage logo(s)?
There is
1. the pentagon-dodekaeder-like-logo ( I know it is'nt) and
2. the sage-lettering.
Regards BB
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group
is just to avoid
trouble and to hear your attitude regarding this point.
Regards BB
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http
live with this. I thougt the author collects such oddities for the
next, corrected version :-)
Regards BB
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit
Erik Lane schrieb:
Installed Sage Version 4.3.3, Release Date: 2010-02-21 from source - needed
some time.
Pi and E still end up with an error. I does not, Infinit and True and False
are ok as well.
Did you try them lower case? Pi and E show up as errors, but pi and e
do not, at
- Bin Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Bin Zhang wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
On Jun 25, 1:09 pm, Bin Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Hi Bin,
I want to know what is the status of support for Linux powerpc.
It usually
58 matches
Mail list logo
