[Savannah-register-public] [task #14959] Submission of emacs-doc-emacs-ja

Follow-up Comment #3, task #14959 (project administration): If there is no further interest, I'll cancel this submission. ___ Reply to this item at: ___

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14945] Submission of Extendable Read-Only File System

Follow-up Comment #15, task #14945 (project administration): Hello, Gao Xiang; > many projects are licensed on "GNU General Public License v2 or later" hosted on Savannah. You evidently miss the point here: we _do_ allow GPLv2+ packages; but your package is effectively GPLv2-only, that's what

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14955] Submission of synodl

Follow-up Comment #3, task #14955 (project administration): How does DownloadStation work? Who are its providers? ___ Reply to this item at: ___

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14954] Submission of Alette

Update of task #14954 (project administration): Status:None => In Progress Assigned to:None => ineiev ___ Follow-up Comment #1: Cou

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14951] Submission of hcj-js

Update of task #14951 (project administration): Status:None => In Progress Assigned to:None => ineiev ___ Follow-up Comment #1: I'm

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14945] Submission of Extendable Read-Only File System

Follow-up Comment #19, task #14945 (project administration): We don't need reasons to convince _you_. We need reasons to convince Savannah admins. In your latest comment (comment #18) you just repeat arguments I don't find really good. ___

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14945] Submission of Extendable Read-Only File System

Follow-up Comment #20, task #14945 (project administration): > I think "Real Time Application Interface"... produces ko module. I don't think so. ___ Reply to this item at:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14941] Submission of Micro Database Manager Library

Update of task #14941 (project administration): Status:None => Done Assigned to:None => ineiev Open/Closed:Open =&g

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14975] Submission of Oges test

Update of task #14975 (project administration): Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Reply to this item at:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14975] Submission of Oges test

Update of task #14975 (project administration): Status:None => Cancelled Assigned to:None => ineiev ___ Follow-up Comment #1: Canc

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14974] [SPAM] Submission of 3DEXPAUTOMA3

Update of task #14974 (project administration): Status:None => Cancelled Assigned to:None => ineiev Open/Closed:Open =&g

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14968] Submission of Gentooza's Sudokus Resolver

Follow-up Comment #9, task #14968 (project administration): Hello, Joa! README.md still lacks any copyright notice, please check https://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/Copyright-Notices.html The recommended form of the license notice is longer: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.html

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14952] Submission of bitfield

Update of task #14952 (project administration): Status: In Progress => Cancelled Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Follow-up Comment #3:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14954] Submission of Alette

Update of task #14954 (project administration): Status: In Progress => Cancelled Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Follow-up Comment #3:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14972] Submission of Unidatab

Follow-up Comment #7, task #14972 (project administration): If you weren't aware of the difference between free software and open source, that's yet another (but different) reason why you shouldn't host your packages on Savannah. I'm afraid there is no way you can follow our hosting requirements.

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14832] Submission of Megatest

Update of task #14832 (project administration): Status: In Progress => Cancelled Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Follow-up Comment #41:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14968] Submission of Gentooza's Sudokus Resolver

Follow-up Comment #6, task #14968 (project administration): > some files in my tarball lacking copyright notices are? > because I see no one README.md, for example. > many files have a wrong form of copyright notice are..? > because they all have the same copyright notices All are many.

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14972] Submission of Unidatab

Update of task #14972 (project administration): Status:None => Cancelled Assigned to:None => ineiev Open/Closed:Open =&g

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14972] Submission of Unidatab

Follow-up Comment #2, task #14972 (project administration): LibreSSL is as GPL-incompatible as OpenSSL. ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message sent via

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14949] Submission of ctbankix-continuation

Follow-up Comment #5, task #14949 (project administration): No, not in its current form. ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message sent via Savannah

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14954] Submission of Alette

Follow-up Comment #2, task #14954 (project administration): If there are no further interest, I'll cancel this submission. ___ Reply to this item at: ___

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14968] Submission of Gentooza's Sudokus Resolver

Follow-up Comment #3, task #14968 (project administration): Please remove backup files created by your editor from your tarball, this looks impolite. ___ Reply to this item at:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14959] Submission of emacs-doc-emacs-ja

Update of task #14959 (project administration): Status: In Progress => Cancelled Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Follow-up Comment #4: No

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14971] Submission of EmacsConf

Follow-up Comment #3, task #14971 (project administration): > What are the alternatives, if I'd like to have those features? Change the group type to "non-GNU software and documentation". > Another question: for the web repositories, is using CVS mandatory, or can git be used as well?

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14966] Submission of useful-wiki

Follow-up Comment #3, task #14966 (project administration): There is a problem. We don't host websites on Savannah. We host software, documentation, user groups. ___ Reply to this item at:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14949] Submission of ctbankix-continuation

Follow-up Comment #3, task #14949 (project administration): We discourage simplistic one-file projects: they don't need a full-fledged Savannah group and can instead be "hosted" on a single web page; besides that, it is based on a distro that isn't fully free, that's an issue as well.

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14951] Submission of hcj-js

Update of task #14951 (project administration): Status: In Progress => Cancelled Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Reply to this item at:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14952] Submission of bitfield

Follow-up Comment #2, task #14952 (project administration): If there is no further interest, I'll cancel this submission. ___ Reply to this item at: ___

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14971] Submission of EmacsConf

Follow-up Comment #5, task #14971 (project administration): > 1. Would that mean the mailing list etc would be on the nongnu.org Savannah instead of gnu.org? I think that'd be a bit unfortunate, since e.g. our irc channel is already "official", and ideally we'd be able to have that throughout.

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14528] Submission of relax

Follow-up Comment #33, task #14528 (project administration): >> ...but anyway, when the user looks at these PDB files... > There is a README file in the same directory that lists the files as being in the public domain. These are text files (as well as AUTHORS), they should include the notices.

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14971] Submission of EmacsConf

Follow-up Comment #7, task #14971 (project administration): > Aside from a mailing list, we need infra to host a wiki on emacsconf.org (not sure if it can be handled using regular cvs web repos), Savannah generally doesn't provide wiki, all people get is cvs web. > ability to create git

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14778] Submission of TutoTerm

Update of task #14778 (project administration): Status: In Progress => Cancelled Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Follow-up Comment #29: No

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14966] Submission of useful-wiki

Update of task #14966 (project administration): Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Reply to this item at:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14966] Submission of useful-wiki

Update of task #14966 (project administration): Status:None => Cancelled Assigned to:None => ineiev ___ Follow-up Comm

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14945] Submission of Extendable Read-Only File System

Update of task #14945 (project administration): Status: In Progress => Cancelled Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Reply to this item at:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14972] Submission of Unidatab

Follow-up Comment #5, task #14972 (project administration): Your original submission showed that you didn't care of license compatibility, that's what the real issue was. On Savannah, we generally rely on developers to maintain the legal status of their free software package.

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14968] Submission of Gentooza's Sudokus Resolver

Follow-up Comment #4, task #14968 (project administration): Some files in your tarball lack copyright notices; many files have a wrong form of copyright notice; please check our documentation on how they should look like. ___ Reply to this

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14968] Submission of Gentooza's Sudokus Resolver

Follow-up Comment #11, task #14968 (project administration): > What I don't understand is why the license notice should be longer... but I see noting more. The full notice contains additionally * the disclaimer; and * the instructions on where to get the text of the license. It's important

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14921] [SPAM] Submission of proxy

Cancelled Assigned to: None => ineiev Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Reply to this item at: <http://savannah.g

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14667] Submission of Advanced Gtk+ Sequencer Library

Update of task #14667 (project administration): Should Start On: Thu 28 Sep 2017 10:00:00 PM UTC => Should be Finished on: Sun 08 Oct 2017 10:00:00 PM UTC => ___ Follow-up Comment

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14528] Submission of relax

Update of task #14528 (project administration): Should Start On: Sun 28 May 2017 02:00:00 PM UTC => Should be Finished on: Wed 07 Jun 2017 02:00:00 PM UTC => ___ Follow-up Comment

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14667] Submission of Advanced Gtk+ Sequencer Library

Update of task #14667 (project administration): Should Start On: => Fri 29 Sep 2017 12:00:00 AM UTC Should be Finished on: => Wed 01 May 2019 12:00:00 AM UTC ___ Reply to this

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14528] Submission of relax

Update of task #14528 (project administration): Should Start On: => Sun 28 May 2017 12:00:00 AM UTC Should be Finished on: => Wed 01 May 2019 12:00:00 AM UTC ___ Reply to this

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #27, task #14578 (project administration): I'm afraid they don't follow our recommendations quite strictly. All copyrightable files should have licensing notices; PNG files in doc/html/ have none. Did you check _all_ your files? This is what you should have done to make sure

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14705] Submission of FableTech Server Status for Apache

Follow-up Comment #7, task #14705 (project administration): I'm afraid it's too late, renaming groups is not supported. ___ Reply to this item at: ___

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14705] Submission of FableTech Server Status for Apache

Update of task #14705 (project administration): Status: In Progress => Done Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Follow-up Comment #5: I've

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14717] Submission of xges-create

Follow-up Comment #1, task #14717 (project administration): Thank you for submitting your package! I'd recommend always putting complete license notice, not just "this is GPLv3 or later" like you write in TODO or tests/README; also, manual pages like xges-create.1 should have copyright and

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14717] Submission of xges-create

Update of task #14717 (project administration): Status:None => Done Assigned to:None => ineiev Open/Closed:Open =&g

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14705] Submission of FableTech Server Status for Apache

Follow-up Comment #3, task #14705 (project administration): > I've added the copyright notices to the "README" and "configure.ac" files. The new revision is attached. Thank you! > The project is eight years old, so I would like to keep the name of the binary, if possible. Yes, it's possible,

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14706] Submission of Netclip

Update of task #14706 (project administration): Status:None => Done Assigned to:None => ineiev Open/Closed:Open =&g

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14705] Submission of FableTech Server Status for Apache

Update of task #14705 (project administration): Status:None => In Progress Assigned to:None => ineiev ___ Follow-up Comment #1: Tha

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14778] Submission of TutoTerm

Follow-up Comment #11, task #14778 (project administration): Have you checked all files? configure.ac still has no notices; why did you miss it? ___ Reply to this item at:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14778] Submission of TutoTerm

Follow-up Comment #16, task #14778 (project administration): > I checked each single manually created file in my archive, I used the > "gnueval" program to double check [0] and I reread the files listed by > Svetlana (thank you for your help). Thank you both! > This led to these

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14795] Submission of c++ OCRLib

Update of task #14795 (project administration): Status:None => In Progress Assigned to:None => ineiev ___ Follow-up Comment #1:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #55, task #14578 (project administration): That's good (I assume that the rules are quite clear); but then, it's a responsibility of package maintainers rather than Savannah admins to make sure that the rules are enforced. In particular, you should check whether every file has

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14778] Submission of TutoTerm

Follow-up Comment #5, task #14778 (project administration): Thank you! Files like data/command-descriptions.en.txt have a text format, the notices should be embedded in them. README is only for those that don't allow such comments internally.

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14778] Submission of TutoTerm

Follow-up Comment #7, task #14778 (project administration): > My program, for the moment, does not allow to insert comments in these files I don't really think it's hard to make it allow comments (which could be generally useful, by the way). > (which are, from my point of view, trivial anyway:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14783] Submission of Manual de referencia de Bash

Update of task #14783 (project administration): Status:None => Cancelled Assigned to:None => ineiev Open/Closed:Open =&g

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14783] Submission of Manual de referencia de Bash

Follow-up Comment #3, task #14783 (project administration): > I asked the Bash developers Thank you! > I have a Git repository, but there is little to evaluate When a package has nothing to distribute, usually it doesn't need hosting resources (like a group registered on Savannah) very

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14793] Submission of fltkal

Update of task #14793 (project administration): Status:None => In Progress Assigned to:None => ineiev ___ Follow-up Comment #1:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14812] Submission of Virtuelle Linux User Group Hessen

Update of task #14812 (project administration): Status:None => Cancelled Assigned to:None => ineiev ___ Follow-up Comment #1:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14793] Submission of fltkal

Follow-up Comment #3, task #14793 (project administration): I'm also not sure if the license notice in your files is acceptable: it only refers to the file and ignores the recommendations of the license itself. What would definitely do is putting the canonical LGPL notice with the exceptions in

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14812] Submission of Virtuelle Linux User Group Hessen

Update of task #14812 (project administration): Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Reply to this item at:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14778] Submission of TutoTerm

Follow-up Comment #20, task #14778 (project administration): I see two possibilities: * removing the file; * finding out its copyright and license notices and adding them. ___ Reply to this item at:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14778] Submission of TutoTerm

Follow-up Comment #18, task #14778 (project administration): Oh, I beg your pardon, but I'm sure ABOUT-NLS isn't copyrighted by Félicien Pillot. Copyright notices should be valid. ___ Reply to this item at:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14793] Submission of fltkal

Follow-up Comment #8, task #14793 (project administration): Thank you! png/cmakelis.txt still has no copyright notice. > Let me know if there is anything else. Thanks. Please let _me_ know if there is anything else: it's your responsibility to follow Savannah policies :)

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14795] Submission of c++ OCRLib

Update of task #14795 (project administration): Status: In Progress => Cancelled Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Follow-up Comment #3: No

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14793] Submission of fltkal

Follow-up Comment #6, task #14793 (project administration): Files like test/tpixmap.cxx still carry the old notice; also, you didn't seem to take into account the note on Linux vs. GNU/Linux usage. ___ Reply to this item at:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14778] Submission of TutoTerm

Follow-up Comment #22, task #14778 (project administration): I think I misunderstand something. Fortunately, there are no many files in your tarball. Could you write down every file name with a note about its legal status and about the way it is indicated?

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14793] Submission of fltkal

Follow-up Comment #10, task #14793 (project administration): Perhaps you attached a wrong file. What about the rest? Are there any similar issues? ___ Reply to this item at:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14793] Submission of fltkal

Follow-up Comment #16, task #14793 (project administration): Could you attach the latest tarball (corresponding to comment #15)? ___ Reply to this item at:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14528] Submission of relax

Follow-up Comment #21, task #14528 (project administration): If there is no further interest, I'll cancel this submission. ___ Reply to this item at: ___

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14793] Submission of fltkal

Follow-up Comment #13, task #14793 (project administration): > Do you folks have a tool that scans files? We do, but it isn't very reliable; I check the files manually. > Free Software Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. While at it: FSF's address changed twice since

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14806] Submission of CConf

Update of task #14806 (project administration): Status:None => Done Assigned to:None => ineiev Open/Closed:Open =&g

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14795] Submission of c++ OCRLib

Follow-up Comment #2, task #14795 (project administration): If there is no further interest, I'll cancel this submission. ___ Reply to this item at: ___

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14793] Submission of fltkal

Follow-up Comment #20, task #14793 (project administration): > I used the text your put in comment #13. Why, you replaced 'Foobar' with 'FLTK', didn't you? > What is it supposed to say? It's supposed to state what license is used. > Is it missing the 'Library' word? Should it say: > GNU

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14793] Submission of fltkal

Follow-up Comment #26, task #14793 (project administration): > Changed text to read: > > You should have received a copy of the GNU Library General Public License > along with Foobar. If not, see . I'm awfully sorry, what has Foobar to do with your library?

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14667] Submission of Advanced Gtk+ Sequencer Library

Follow-up Comment #25, task #14667 (project administration): lv2.lib/mda/EPiano-presets.ttl has no notices. Please make sure every file in your tarball has valid copyright and license notices. ___ Reply to this item at:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14793] Submission of fltkal

Follow-up Comment #18, task #14793 (project administration): The latest tarball still has some issues. First, the license notices refer to the wrong license: "You should have received a copy of the GNU *General Public* License along with FLTK. If not, see ." Then,

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14831] [SPAM] Submission of 合箏網路設計行銷媒體

Update of task #14831 (project administration): Status:None => Cancelled Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Reply to this item at:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14793] Submission of fltkal

Follow-up Comment #24, task #14793 (project administration): Yes, that would be fine. ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message sent via/by Savannah

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14837] Submission of openjardin

Update of task #14837 (project administration): Status:None => Cancelled Assigned to:None => ineiev Open/Closed:Open =&g

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14793] Submission of fltkal

Update of task #14793 (project administration): Status: In Progress => Cancelled Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Follow-up Comment #28: All

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14832] Submission of Megatest

Follow-up Comment #2, task #14832 (project administration): If there is no further interest, I'll cancel your submission. ___ Reply to this item at: ___

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14793] Submission of fltkal

Follow-up Comment #22, task #14793 (project administration): Thank you! The text of readme files now lists the files with their copyright statements and cites FLTK license, but it doesn't state clearly that the license applies to those files.

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14832] Submission of Megatest

Follow-up Comment #1, task #14832 (project administration): Hello, Matthew! There is some concern about nanomsg: its license text says its name is trademarked, without stating a trademark policy. Trademarks may render software proprietary. Then, your license messages are not quite unambiguous,

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14832] Submission of Megatest

Update of task #14832 (project administration): Status:None => In Progress Assigned to:None => ineiev ___ Reply to this item at:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14667] Submission of Advanced Gtk+ Sequencer Library

Follow-up Comment #24, task #14667 (project administration): gsequencer.1 lacks a license notice. Please make sure every file in your tarball has valid copyright and license notices. ___ Reply to this item at:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14837] Submission of openjardin

Follow-up Comment #3, task #14837 (project administration): I'm sorry, this doesn't convince me. 2/ You admitted this error as early as in admission (in several places: in the description you submitted, in your tarball, in the homepage you referred to, https://openjardin.eu). I don't believe

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14793] Submission of fltkal

Follow-up Comment #30, task #14793 (project administration): I understand that the job isn't easy, however, it isn't sufficient just to follow my suggestions, you should be willing to follow Savannah policies, and you didn't want to comprehend them.

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14832] Submission of Megatest

Update of task #14832 (project administration): Status: In Progress => Cancelled Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Follow-up Comment #3: No

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14847] Submission of dou4cc.test

Update of task #14847 (project administration): Status:None => Cancelled Assigned to:None => ineiev Open/Closed:Open =&g

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14848] Submission of Clive

Follow-up Comment #1, task #14848 (project administration): Hello, Stewart! Please make sure that all copyrightable files in your tarball have valid copyright and license notices, this includes images like clive.jpg (if the format doesn't allow comments, the notices should be written in a README

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14848] Submission of Clive

Update of task #14848 (project administration): Status:None => In Progress Assigned to:None => ineiev ___ Reply to this item at:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14848] Submission of Clive

Follow-up Comment #3, task #14848 (project administration): Thank you! Please make sure that all copyrightable files have valid copyright and license notices. Some files in your latest tarball lack at least a valid license notice. ___

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14793] Submission of fltkal

Follow-up Comment #32, task #14793 (project administration): A boilerplate is a boilerplate: it is to be applied rather than just copied, and applying means carefully reading it and replacing certain texts to fit your situation. For info on how to apply GNU licenses to your package, see the

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14848] Submission of Clive

Update of task #14848 (project administration): Status: In Progress => Done Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Follow-up Comment #7: Thank you,

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14667] Submission of Advanced Gtk+ Sequencer Library

Follow-up Comment #30, task #14667 (project administration): > Either they have a valid copyright and license notice or otherwise stated here: > > http://git.savannah.nongnu.org/cgit/gsequencer.git/tree/README?h=2.0.x#n50 Notes like "licensed under the terms of GNU GPLv3+" are not clear enough,

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14832] Submission of Megatest

Follow-up Comment #21, task #14832 (project administration): Thank you, URLs like http://www.kiatoa.com/fossils/megatest/tarball?r=v1.65 will do. Now, please make sure your tarball complies with Savannah hosting requirements; in particular, all files should have valid copyright and license

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14832] Submission of Megatest

Follow-up Comment #19, task #14832 (project administration): Is this really what you are going to distribute? What are "extraneous files"? ___ Reply to this item at:

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >