Re: [Sisuite-devel] si_mkclientnetboot: list images?

On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 09:35:34AM -0400, Chris Pepper wrote: > Andrea, > > The man page for si_mkclientnetboot says it lists available images, > which sounds handy, but I don't see a way to get it to actually *list* > available images. If there's a way I'm not seeing, it needs to be > exp

Re: [Sisuite-devel] Suggested patches for systemimager/trunk/doc/manual_source/intro.sgml

On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 04:02:13PM -0400, Chris Pepper wrote: > Hello, > > Below please find some suggested language cleanups for the SI > introduction. > > Thanks for SI! > > Chris Pepper > Chris, the content of the patch looks good for me, but the patch is broken, probably you've t

[Sisuite-devel] systemimager server is back!

The SystemImager website is back again with all the hosted services working as expected: - wiki (http://www.systemimager.org) - trac (http://trac.systemimager.org) - cluster map (http://wiki.systemimager.org/cluster-register) - package mirror (http://download.systemimager.org/pub/) - svn server (a

[Sisuite-devel] [Fwd: systemimager.ci.uchicago.edu down]

Dear supp...@uchicago, sorry to bug you again, but the server never came back again and it's still down. News? Any chance to manually reboot it? Thanks, -Andrea Original Message Subject: systemimager.ci.uchicago.edu down Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 09:54:13 +0100 From: Andrea

Re: [Sisuite-devel] systemimager.ci.uchicago.edu down

his capability. -Andrea > > -Brian > > > --Original Message-- > From: Andrea Righi > To: supp...@ci.uchicago.edu > Cc: Sisuite-devel > Cc: Brian Finley > Subject: [Sisuite-devel] systemimager.ci.uchicago.edu down > Sent: Jan 22, 2009 2:54 AM > > Dear

[Sisuite-devel] systemimager.ci.uchicago.edu down

een?) and try to manually reboot it? Many thanks, -Andrea -- Andrea Righi, PhD student Department of Information Engineering Universita' degli Studi di Siena Via Roma, 56 - 53100 Siena (Italy) -- This SF.net ema

Re: [Sisuite-devel] systemimager.org down

On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 8:08 PM, Brian Elliott Finley wrote: > Thanks, Ti, > > Will do. > > -Brian > > > Ti Leggett wrote: >> The machine's been rebooted. Please email supp...@ci.uchicago.edu in the >> future instead of Greg or I individually. Thanks.

[Sisuite-devel] systemimager.org down

Greg, systemimager.ci.uchicago.edu seem down, responding to ping and telnet, but nothing else. When you have a minute could you try to reset the server? Many thanks for your time, -Andrea -- Check out the new SourceForg

Re: [Sisuite-devel] Regarding Ticket #10

Gaurav Chaudhary wrote: > Hi, > > For '''Ticket #10''' we can implement the following line which can fetch > us the mac address of the machine: > > Command :- > > $ /sbin/ifconfig -a| awk ' ($0~/Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr > /){print $1"\t" $5}' > > Output :- > eth0

[Sisuite-devel] SystemImager 4.1.6 (unstable) released

The new version 4.1.6 of the unstable branch is available here: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=259&package_id=37046&release_id=586676 Official announcement: https://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=802278 If you want to support this project please register your clus

[Sisuite-devel] SystemImager 4.1.4 (unstable) released

The new version 4.1.4 of the unstable branch is available here: https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=259&package_id=37046&release_id=579248 Official announcement: https://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=789891 If you want to support this project please register your clu

Re: [Sisuite-devel] systemconfigurator and device.map (r711)

Erich Focht wrote: > Hi Andrea, > > as far as I understand, you suggest that if a device.map file is present, > you copy it to /a/boot/grub/device.map.image . Moving would be bad, > but copying is fine, so that we have under control whether we provide > a file or not. Guess your're aiming at pre-i

[Sisuite-devel] systemconfigurator and device.map (r711)

Hi Erich, about this: http://svn.systemimager.org/comp.php?repname=systemconfigurator&path=&[EMAIL PROTECTED]&[EMAIL PROTECTED]&manualorder=1 if we don't always force the re-creation of device.map for grub the imaging will fail with clients that have different disk types respect to the golden cl

[Sisuite-devel] [RFC] raw disk cloning with SystemImager

Someone said we'll never support Win*? ;-) http://wiki.systemimager.org/index.php/HOWTO_raw-disk_cloning_with_SystemImager This is more similar to a quick hack for now, but if you're interested we can better integrate it in SystemImager. -Andrea -

Re: [Sisuite-devel] [sisuite-users] SystemImager cluster map

Bas van der Vlies wrote: > On Feb 16, 2008, at 4:27 PM, Andrea Righi wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I'd like to point to our new Google Maps like tool to keep track who's >> using SystemImager around the world: >> >> http://wiki.systemimager.org

[Sisuite-devel] SystemImager cluster map

Hi all, I'd like to point to our new Google Maps like tool to keep track who's using SystemImager around the world: http://wiki.systemimager.org/cluster-register/cluster-map.php We're really interested in this kind of feedback and user experiences in general, so if you're using SystemImager in y

Re: [Sisuite-devel] Patch for si_updateclient

Philippe Poilbarbe wrote: > Hello, > > Here is a patch to update si_updateclient for version 4.0.2 of SystemImager. > > As delivered, si_updateclient was updating every file on the harddisk of > the client even if these files have not been modified in the image. > It comes from the '-I' option o

[Sisuite-devel] SystemImager 4.1.2 (unstable) released

The new version 4.1.2 of the unstable branch is available here: https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=259&package_id=37046&release_id=575343 Official announcement: https://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=783361 NOTE: at the moment we don't have a x86_64 build server, so

Re: [Sisuite-devel] si_pushupdate --ssh-user

Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 03:39:05PM -0800, Bernard Li wrote: >> Hi Roberto: >> >> On 1/30/08, Roberto C. Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Additionally, I recommend an option to allow the user to specify the >>> command to invoke on the remote side. That is, I ra

[Sisuite-devel] Installing more than 1000 nodes in 15min with SystemImager

FYI: https://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=781077 -Andrea - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01

Re: [Sisuite-devel] si_pushupdate --ssh-user

Bernard Li wrote: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=398214 > > This issue seems to be brought on by argument shift -- i.e. --ssh-user > apparently is a required argument and when not provided causes failure > in the command. > > To rectify the problem, I suggest that we: > > 1)

Re: [Sisuite-devel] systemimager 4.02 with raidtools-1.00.3

Thierry Iceta wrote: > Hi > > I am working with > Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.1 (Tikanga) > Linux version 2.6.18-53.el5 > Hw arch arch=x86_64 > using systemimager.spec > %define ver 4.0.2 > %define rel 1 > %define packager Bernard Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > And I got this err

Re: [Sisuite-devel] systemimager 4.02 with raidtools-1.00.3

Thierry Iceta wrote: > Hi > > This problem could be solved using kexec-tools-testing-20070330.tar.bz2 > instead of kexec-tools-testing-20061214.tar.bz2 as requested in > systemimager ver 4.0.2 > > Finaly systemimager-4.0.2 rpm production has succeded on RedHat 5.1 Well.. just for curiosity, why

Re: [Sisuite-devel] using UYOK

Mark Seger wrote: > now the bad news - after my system rebooted it started to reimage again > and si_netbootmond IS running. I then took a look in /var/log/messages > and saw the following: > > Dec 19 11:12:09 cag-dl380-01 kernel: application bug: rsync(17523) has > SIGCHLD set to SIG_IGN but

Re: [Sisuite-devel] systemimager 4.02 with raidtools-1.00.3

Thierry Iceta wrote: > Hi > > OK with your answer, raidtools is no necessary with systemimager 4.02 > But due to problem using RHel5 and systemimager 4.02 Which kind of problem? (bugs reporting is always welcome) > I had seen in /systemimager-4.0.2/patches > > -rw-r--r-- 1 1000 1000 451 Mar

Re: [Sisuite-devel] systemimager 4.02 with raidtools-1.00.3

Thierry Iceta wrote: > Hi > > when I want to rebuild raidtools-1.00.3.tar.gz using Rhel5 environnment > from http://download.systemimager.org/pub/ used by systemimager 4.02 > I got this error > > Could you help me and tell me if raidtools-1.00.3.tar.gz is the right one > has to be used or if patc

Re: [Sisuite-devel] using UYOK

Mark Seger wrote: > I should probably know better but I don't, even though I've been using > SystemImager for a very long time and now I'm faced with a kernel that > can't see my hard drive and so need to get UYOK working. The > documentation implied that it just worked yet SI insists on loadin

Re: [Sisuite-devel] wrong localboot file generated

Erich Focht wrote: > Hmm, this seems to be correct according to the logic of the code. I am > attempting > a deployment over an ssh tunnel, therefore the address where the request comes > from is 127.0.0.1 (through the tunnel). > > E. Good catch Erich! A fix could be to just append the real IP o

[Sisuite-devel] SystemImager 4.0.2 (stable) released

The new version 4.0.2 of the stable branch is available here: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=259&package_id=278&release_id=560199 Official announcement: https://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=762727 I would like to say a big thank to all the SystemImager users for

Re: [Sisuite-devel] Any plan to relase SystemImager-4.0.2

DongInn Kim wrote: > Hi, > > Do we have a plan to release SystemImager-4.0.2 soonish? > I hope to import the new version to OSCAR ASAP. > > Regards, > I will do that later (or max tomorrow). SystemImager-4.0.2 packages are already available here: http://download.systemimager.org/~arighi/system

Re: [Sisuite-devel] question about "rsync: failed to set times"

Jing CDL Sun wrote: > Hi Bernard, > > Thank you for your reply. > > Sorry I did not find the original thread before, bother you again. > > I will try this 4.0.1 branch now, thank you. > > By the way, when using 4.0.0, I also find other 2 problem, please help > me to confirm if it is my usage er

Re: [Sisuite-devel] Building SystemImager on PS3 -- dtc needed?

Bernard Li wrote: > Hi Andrea: > > On 12/2/07, Andrea Righi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Yes, the only drawback is that it's only needed to build PS3 packages, and it >> wouldn't be good to introduce a new dependency for all the other >> archi

Re: [Sisuite-devel] Building SystemImager on PS3 -- dtc needed?

Bernard Li wrote: > Hi Andrea: > > On 12/2/07, Andrea Righi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I don't know if this is shipped with RH distributions too, otherwise you >> should >> download and build it from source. In any case we should add a >> bui

Re: [Sisuite-devel] [Oscar-devel] New systemimager-4.0.1.svn4352.kexecfix+rsync3pre6.bli version

Bernard Li wrote: > Hi Andrea: > > On 12/2/07, Andrea Righi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> don't use the current SI trunk, it needs more testing and debugging >> activities, >> because a lot of core-packages have been updated. >> >> The nex

Re: [Sisuite-devel] Building SystemImager on PS3 -- dtc needed?

Bernard Li wrote: > DongInn was trying to build SystemImager on PS3 with my latest SRPM > and got the following errors: > > strip -s -R .comment vmlinux -o vmlinux.strip > WRAParch/powerpc/boot/zImage.ps3 > /usr/src/yellowdog/BUILD/systemimager-4.0.1.svn4352.kexecfix+rsync3pre6.bli/src/linux

Re: [Sisuite-devel] IA.pm to support PS3

DongInn Kim wrote: > Hi, > > I am sorry for the wrong syntax. What a shame! > > I just checked that there was a syntax error on my previous patch file. > It should be like this. > > /usr/lib/systeminstaller/SystemInstaller/Partition/IA.pm > > @@ -266,6 +266,8 @@ > # - detect architectur

Re: [Sisuite-devel] [ RFC ] SystemImager 4.0.2 or not? (was: client netboot fails (rsync: failed to set times))

Andrea Righi wrote: > 1) use the pre-release of rsync that seems to fix the problem and tag > SystemImager 4.0.2, leaving the 4.0.0 packages as they are, let me say that I > would just proceed like the kernel guys do if there's a bug in the kernel > (just > leave all the previ

Re: [Sisuite-devel] [ RFC ] SystemImager 4.0.2 or not? (was: client netboot fails (rsync: failed to set times))

Erich Focht wrote: > On Friday 09 November 2007 10:38, Andrea Righi wrote: >>> The '~' operator in debs is pretty useful for doing pre-releases, >>> since it sorts < 0. >>> >>> 4.0.0~svn1234 is < 4.0.0. >>> 4.0.1~rc1-1 < 4.0.0-

Re: [Sisuite-devel] wrong rewrite of systemconfig.conf

Erich Focht wrote: > Hi Andrea, > > both patches look good. I applied the one for systemconfigurator and > will tag a new version. > > I'm not sure the rewrite in systemimager is needed at all, but if you > thinks so... I'd rather try getting the autoinstallscript generated correctly. Thanks Eri

Re: [Sisuite-devel] wrong rewrite of systemconfig.conf

Andrea Righi wrote: > What do you think about the following patch (untested)? the meaningful > part is in lib/SystemImager/Server.pm that creates the piece of code in > the auto-install script that change disk names in systemconfig.conf. [snip] Moreover, in part correlated to thi

Re: [Sisuite-devel] wrong rewrite of systemconfig.conf

Erich Focht wrote: > Hi Andrea, > > some time ago you introduced the rewriting of the image's systemconfig.conf. > This is what is does for my client: > > /etc/fstab (of client) will be: > /dev/sda1 /boot ext3 ... > /dev/sda3 / ext3 ... > > The originally created systemconfig.conf: > [

Re: [Sisuite-devel] [ RFC ] SystemImager 4.0.2 or not? (was: client netboot fails (rsync: failed to set times))

dann frazier wrote: > On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 07:29:35PM +0100, Andrea Righi wrote: >> Bernard Li wrote: >>> Hi Andrea: >>> >>> On 11/8/07, Andrea Righi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>>> Yes and no. Nothing changed in the second d

Re: [Sisuite-devel] [ RFC ] SystemImager 4.0.2 or not? (was: client netboot fails (rsync: failed to set times))

Bernard Li wrote: > Hi Andrea: > > On 11/8/07, Andrea Righi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Yes and no. Nothing changed in the second digit: odd numbers always mean >> "unstable/development", even numers "stable". The third digit meaning has >

Re: [Sisuite-devel] [ RFC ] SystemImager 4.0.2 or not? (was: client netboot fails (rsync: failed to set times))

Erich Focht wrote: > Hi, > > I'm for 1), too. If Brian's right and there was a decision on having the > second > digit as sign for stability, then I'd rather make it 4.0.1. As I said in the previous email, the next "official" version should be 4.0.2, according to the new versioning rules (4.0.1

Re: [Sisuite-devel] [ RFC ] SystemImager 4.0.2 or not? (was: client netboot fails (rsync: failed to set times))

Brian Elliott Finley wrote: > Did we settle on a new numbering scheme? Where can I find it documented? http://wiki.systemimager.org/index.php/Developer_Guidelines#Versioning > > I'm thinking that 4.0.0 as stable, 4.0.1 as devel, and 4.0.2 as stable > again seems just a bit confusing. Sorry Bri

[Sisuite-devel] [ RFC ] SystemImager 4.0.2 or not? (was: client netboot fails (rsync: failed to set times))

Hi all, it seems that someone is agree with me and someone is not about the solution to add the pre-release of rsync (3.0.0pre4) into the stable branch of SystemImager and tag the new 4.0.2 stable ASAP (4.0.1, since ".1" is odd, is reserved for development pre-releases). So, probably this is the

Re: [Sisuite-devel] Automating Xen Virtual Machine Deployment

Brian Elliott Finley wrote: > Here's a nice document we might want to link to: > > http://howto.krisbuytaert.be/AutomatingVirtualMachineDeployment/ Sure! added to the articles section on the homepage: http://wiki.systemimager.org/index.php/Main_Page#Articles -Andrea ---

[Sisuite-devel] SystemImager 4.0.0 (stable) released

Hi folks! The new version 4.0.0 of the stable branch is available here: https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=259&package_id=278&release_id=551739 Official announcement: https://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=751127 Cheers, -Andrea PS reminder OSCAR developers: the de

Re: [Sisuite-devel] Small patch to debian/control file

dann frazier wrote: > The Debian packages have always included all external source; I don't > think that's necessarily the right solution for upstream (in fact, I > was the one who wrote 'getsource' et al, as I recall). But when > distributions ship binaries they must also be able to ship the exact

Re: [Sisuite-devel] Small patch to debian/control file

dann frazier wrote: > On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 09:34:59AM +0100, Andrea Capriotti wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I find that some dependencies are missing and this patch adds python-dev >> and wget to Build-Depends and docbook-utils to Build-Depends-Indep to >> fix the problems. > > fwiw, wget isn't a build-

Re: [Sisuite-devel] Small patch to debian/control file

Andrea Capriotti wrote: > I find that some dependencies are missing and this patch adds python-dev > and wget to Build-Depends and docbook-utils to Build-Depends-Indep to > fix the problems. A small patch for a man, a giant leap for systemimager! :-) Any kind of help in dep packaging is strongly a

Re: [Sisuite-devel] systemimager on PS3

Erich Focht wrote: > On Sunday 28 October 2007 22:25, Andrea Righi wrote: >>> The otheros.bld referenced in the 'correct' page is still based on the >>> 'older' kernel/kboot which will read PS3's HD as 'sda' as opposed to >>> &#

Re: [Sisuite-devel] systemimager on PS3

Bernard Li wrote: > Hi Andrea: > > On 10/28/07, Andrea Righi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I successfully installed my PS3 with SystemImager using the YDL5 image! I did >> some small fixes to the howto on wiki and I've reported the full screen >> ses

[Sisuite-devel] systemimager on PS3

Bernard, I successfully installed my PS3 with SystemImager using the YDL5 image! I did some small fixes to the howto on wiki and I've reported the full screen session (copy & paste from the SI virtual console). Now I'm trying to install a Kubuntu 7.10, I'd like to create a fresh ubuntu image to t

Re: [Sisuite-devel] [systemimager-commits] r4278 - in trunk: etc lib/SystemImager

Erich Focht wrote: > Hi Andrea, > > On Friday 19 October 2007 17:40, Andrea Righi wrote: >> Erich Focht wrote: >>> On Monday 10 September 2007 19:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> This one is evil and unneeded. SC is reloading the >>> /etc/systemconfig/s

Re: [Sisuite-devel] [SystemConfigurator] Problem with the Debian package

Geoffroy VALLEE wrote: > Hi all, > > I saw a problem with SystemConfigurator: the Debian changelog > (debian/changelog) for SystemConfigurator-2.2.10 (tags/sc_2.2.10) is not > up-to-date. As a result the generated Debian packages from the tag has a > wrong version (2.2.9) which may be confusing

Re: [Sisuite-devel] [systemimager-commits] r4278 - in trunk: etc lib/SystemImager

Erich Focht wrote: > Hi Andrea, > > On Monday 10 September 2007 19:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Author: arighi >> Date: 2007-09-10 12:23:47 -0500 (Mon, 10 Sep 2007) >> New Revision: 4278 >> >> Modified: >>trunk/etc/autoinstallscript.template >>trunk/lib/SystemImager/Server.pm >> Log: >>

Re: [Sisuite-devel] Debian support in trunk - init scripts

Geoffroy Vallée wrote: > Le mardi 16 octobre 2007 16:12, Andrea Righi a écrit : >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> In trunk all the init scripts are included into Debian packages with the >>> --no-start option. I agree that it fixes

Re: [Sisuite-devel] Debian support in trunk

Geoffroy Vallée wrote: > Le mardi 16 octobre 2007 16:39, Andrea Righi a écrit : >> Andrea Righi wrote: >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> The patch is in attachment. Note that i think i have write access to >>>>

Re: [Sisuite-devel] Debian support in trunk - init scripts

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi all, > > In trunk all the init scripts are included into Debian packages with the > --no-start option. I agree that it fixes few issues but do we really want > users > to manually start the daemons (because i guess that at the end they will have > to > do so)? > >

Re: [Sisuite-devel] Freshmeat Entry

Brian Elliott Finley wrote: > Done! > > Let me know if you have any issues. > > -Brian It seems to work fine, I've just updated stable and unstable versions and I'm waiting for verification by the freshmeat.net moderators. Thanks, -Andrea ---

Re: [Sisuite-devel] Debian support in trunk

Geoffroy VALLEE wrote: > On Saturday 13 October 2007, Andrea Righi wrote: >> Geoffroy VALLEE wrote: >>> On Friday 12 October 2007, dann frazier wrote: >>>> On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 05:23:35PM -0400, Geoffroy Vall?e wrote: >>>>> Hi Dann, >>>

Re: [Sisuite-devel] Freshmeat Entry

Brian Elliott Finley wrote: > All, > > I have been negligent in keeping this entry up. I'd like to ask one of > you to volunteer to update this whenever we do a release. If you're > interested, send me an email with your Freshmeat username and I'll give > you ownership of this entry on Freshmeat

Re: [Sisuite-devel] Debian support in trunk

Geoffroy VALLEE wrote: > On Friday 12 October 2007, dann frazier wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 05:23:35PM -0400, Geoffroy Vall?e wrote: >>> Hi Dann, >>> >>> The problem is that initrd-template is a arch independent package but >>> does include ELF binaries. The package must be (i think) arch in

Re: [Sisuite-devel] Debian support in trunk

Geoffroy VALLEE wrote: > On Friday 12 October 2007, dann frazier wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 06:45:37PM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote: >>> Geoffroy Valle'e wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>> Hi Geoffroy, >>> >>>> I had a quick look at the

Re: [Sisuite-devel] Debian support in trunk

Geoffroy Valle'e wrote: > Hi all, Hi Geoffroy, > > I had a quick look at the Debian packages using trunk, on x86_64. It looks > pretty good. The only issues i saw are: > - it does not use the Debian kernel, i think this is not compliant with the > Debian policies, This statement sounds to me a

Re: [Sisuite-devel] sisuite

dann frazier wrote: > On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 04:56:38PM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote: >> Dann, regarding sisuite-devel and sisuite-users if you want or don't have >> time >> to moderate the list probably you can just set a new admin. If none wants to >> do >>

Re: [Sisuite-devel] sisuite

dann frazier wrote: > On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 02:25:42PM -0700, Bernard Li wrote: >> Hi Brian: >> >> On 10/3/07, Brian Elliott Finley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> We migrated all of the systemimager lists over to sisuite one time -- >>> I'm sure we could do it the other way too. >> When you sa

[Sisuite-devel] SystemImager 3.9.6 (-unstable) released

The new version 3.9.6 of the "-unstable" branch is available here: https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=259&package_id=37046&release_id=539089 Official announcement: https://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=735116 Best regards, -Andrea --

Re: [Sisuite-devel] VERSION in trunk

Bernard Li wrote: > Now that we have tagged 3.9.4, shouldn't we increment trunk's VERSION to > 3.9.5? > Done. -Andrea - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Sto

[Sisuite-devel] SystemImager 3.9.4 (-unstable) released

The new version 3.9.4 of the "-unstable" branch is available here: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=259&package_id=37046&release_id=536468 Official announcement: http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=731448 Best regards, -Andrea PS [for OSCAR developers]: read care

Re: [Sisuite-devel] [Fwd: udev detection in si_updateclient]

Anthony Menasse wrote: > I think this original message got lost in moderator land as I sent it > without being on the list, apologies if this was already received: > > Original Message > Subject: udev detection in si_updateclient > Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 09:54:21 +10

Re: [Sisuite-devel] /etc/modprobe.conf in image (or overrides)

Bernard Li wrote: > Hi all: > > I have seen this issue crop up frequently on the oscar-users mailing-list: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg06583.html > > Basically, the user deployed the image fine to the clients, however > when the clients boot up they kernel panic. > > Th

Re: [Sisuite-devel] bug in Systemimager/System.pm

Dustin Kamper wrote: > In the below, I made a reference to $overrides. This should have been > $default_override_dir. The variable for $default_override_dir is not in > Server.pm and perhaps should be yanked in with the > same method that si_getimage uses as per below: > my $de

Re: [Sisuite-devel] tracker on SF.net: deprecated

Brian Elliott Finley wrote: > Andrea, > > I totally agree. Trac is partially set up on the systemimager.org > box. Joey Hurst is helping us with that. > > Joey, can you work with Andrea to do the next bits in getting Trac > configured? > > Andrea, if you don't have "s

Re: [Sisuite-devel] Regarding version numbers for development

Bernard Li wrote: > Hi Andrea: > > Thanks for the clarification. > > Currently trunk is 3.9.3, and and branch-3.9.x is 3.9.2 so if I want > to make a development release for either I would just append > .svn_bli and that's it? Correct. Your development release (based on trunk) will be 3.9.3.

Re: [Sisuite-devel] tracker on SF.net: deprecated

Andrea Righi wrote: > Probably trac is *the* solution, but at the moment I think that even nothing > (or > better emails) is a better way to keep track of bugs, respect to the SF bug > tracking system. In particular I'd really love this feature ;-) http://svn.oscar.openclus

Re: [Sisuite-devel] tracker on SF.net: deprecated

Bernard Li wrote: > Hey Andrea: > > Any particular reason why we deprecate the SourceForge bug tracker? > If bugs are simply sent via the mailing-lists, they could easily get > lost in your 1000 emails a day mailbox? :-) They get lost for sure! :-) Anyway, IMHO the SF bug tracking system is horr

Re: [Sisuite-devel] Regarding version numbers for development

Bernard Li wrote: > Dear all: Hi Bernard, > > I would like to propose the following change to the versioning scheme: > > Currently, the minor version number denotes whether the software is > "stable" or "unstable". For example 3.8.0 is considered stable > whereas 3.9.3 is considered unstable.

[Sisuite-devel] tracker on SF.net: deprecated

Hi all, except for few issues the tickets in the SF.net tracker are mostly deprecated. So, to avoid confusion in the users I decided to hide the tracker (bugs, feature requests, support requests, patches). The entries are still there, but they're visible only by the project members. At the momen

Re: [Sisuite-devel] [RFC] [PATCH] hostgroup-aware autoinstall, pre-install and post-install scripts

Andrea Righi wrote: [snip] > > To summarize, we have 2 different approaches: > > 1) the "diff" approach: the most local scripts must be written "on top" of the > effects made by the most global scripts (problem: irreversible effects) > > 2) the "

Re: [Sisuite-devel] [RFC] [PATCH] hostgroup-aware autoinstall, pre-install and post-install scripts

Thomas Krause wrote: > Hey, > >> [...] >> - pre/post install scripts are executed in the following order: >> - [0-9][0-9]all.* >> - [0-9][0-9]IMAGENAME.* >> - [0-9][0-9]BASE_HOSTNAME.* >> - [0-9][0-9]GROUPNAME.* >> - [0-9][0-9]HOSTNAME.* >> [...] > > I'm not sure how it is currently imp

[Sisuite-devel] [RFC] [PATCH] hostgroup-aware autoinstall, pre-install and post-install scripts

ing unexpected... groups or hosts were not defined!\n"; } @@ -497,17 +499,6 @@ } -# Usage: create_links_group($grouplist, $script, $autoinstall_script_dir); -sub create_links_group { - -my ($grouplist, $script, $autoinstall_script_dir) = @_; - -foreach my $node (SystemImager::HostRange::expa

Re: [Sisuite-devel] PATCH: Allow hostname-ranges with hosts that contain a '-' (HostRange.pm) [FIXED VERSION]

Thomas Krause wrote: > Hey, > > You should take a look at the thread "Calling si_addclients without > '--ip-range'" in sisuite-users, where I proposed different solutions to the > problem. > > Andrea preferred the escape character solution because its more backward > compatible. True. > > Whil

[Sisuite-devel] SystemImager 3.9.2 (-unstable) released

The new version 3.9.2 of the "-unstable" branch is available here: https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=259&package_id=37046&release_id=530768 Official announcement: https://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=722888 Best regards, -Andrea --

Re: [Sisuite-devel] mkrecoveryISO in 3.8.X

Christopher Maestas wrote: > Hello, > > I was curious of the mkrecoveryISO feature will be available in 3.8? It > says it should be here: > > http://download.systemimager.org/pub/unofficial/mkrecoveryISO_by_Rocky_Craig/README.html > > > I see it as number 9 in the TODO file in the repos

Re: [Sisuite-devel] systemimager 3.8.1-1: boel and binary loader comment

David Mathog wrote: > >> Brian Elliott Finley wrote: >>> >>> On 7/27/07, *David Mathog* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> > wrote: >>> >> [snip] >> >>> There really isn't anything wrong with the current boel, but in >>> order to avoid biting more and more users, which will h

Re: [Sisuite-devel] [sisuite-users] Yet another SDA/HDA problem

Thomas Krause wrote: > Thanks for the reply. > > I guess I should have RTFM about --autodetect-disk. I will test that the > next time I make an image... > > As for UUIDs I'm already using disk labels now, they are like UUIDs but with > human readable names and easier to remember (e.g. LABEL=boot

Re: [Sisuite-devel] /var/lib/systemimager/clients.xml

Bernard Li wrote: > Dear all: > > I just noticed that the file /var/lib/systemimager/clients.xml's > timestamp is updated constantly if systemimager-server-monitord is > running even though there are no new data (i.e. no image process going > on). > > I think it would be better to not update this

[Sisuite-devel] SystemImager 3.8.2 (stable) released

New stable release 3.8.2 is available here: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=259&package_id=278&release_id=530188 Official announcement: http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=722512 Enjoy! -Andrea

Re: [Sisuite-devel] systemimager deb packages

Geoffroy Vallée wrote: > Hi Andrea, > > I agree with what you say but because of a lack of free time, if you do not > mind, i prefer to focus on the current systemimager-debian code in order to > create a new set of packages for debian unstable. I will be happy to work > with you on the "integr

Re: [Sisuite-devel] systemimager deb packages

dann frazier wrote: > On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 03:09:07PM -0400, Geoffroy Vall?e wrote: >> Dann, i did not have a lot of time to spend on systemimager-debian lately >> but >> be sure that i will do my best help to create a new version for unstable. >> Actually i had some weird behaviors in some v

Re: [Sisuite-devel] systemimager deb packages

Here are the latest debs made from the systemimager trunk: http://download.systemimager.org/~arighi/systemimager/Debian/ I've built & successfully tested them in my laptop with Kubuntu 7.04 installing a suse10 image using the BitTorrent transport. I'll perform additional tests in the weekend usin

Re: [Sisuite-devel] systemimager deb packages

Geoffroy Vallée wrote: > Hi Andrea, > > I will try to have a look but Dann is definitively THE expert. I also had to > do some minor modifications for the version i have for OSCAR, for instance to > fix an installation issue in some very specific cases. > BTW if you see any problem installing/us

Re: [Sisuite-devel] systemimager deb packages

dann frazier wrote: > On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 10:37:08PM -0400, Geoffroy Vall?e wrote: >> Hi Andrea, >> >> I will try to have a look but Dann is definitively THE expert. I also had to >> do some minor modifications for the version i have for OSCAR, for instance >> to >> fix an installation issue

[Sisuite-devel] systemimager deb packages

Hi all (but in particular Dann and Geoffroy), since I moved to Ubuntu (more exactly Kubuntu 7.04) in my laptop, I have a perfect environment to test the Debian support and the nice work you've done. Honestly, I've only a limited experience with deb packaging and Debian rules, but I tried to merge

Re: [Sisuite-devel] si_monitor gmtime()

Bernard Li wrote: > Dear all: > > In si_monitor, the gmtime() function is used to print timestamp for log > entries. > > I was wondering if localtime() is better suited for this purpose, > since it takes into account the local time (as opposed to simply using > the standard Greenwich time zone).

Re: [Sisuite-devel] systemimager.org pages

Done. -Andrea Brian Elliott Finley wrote: > Yes, I think that's a great idea. > > -Brian > > > On 7/26/07, *Bernard Li* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > Should we re-direct pages like http://systemimager.org/support > and >

Re: [Sisuite-devel] systemimager 3.8.1-1: boel and binary loader comment

Brian Elliott Finley wrote: > > > On 7/27/07, *David Mathog* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > [snip] > > There really isn't anything wrong with the current boel, but in > order to avoid biting more and more users, which will happen > as they upgrade to newe

Re: [Sisuite-devel] Latest imaging problem - attached storage woes...

Mark Seger wrote: > I have a machine with attached storage which is about 2TB that I imaged, > but I umounted it before preparing the image and using --my-modules. > When I tried to image another machine, the install script blew up > because it tried to build an lvm volume set out of the attach

  1   2   3   4   5   >