Joerg Reisenweber wrote:
Am Sa 4. April 2009 schrieb Stefan Schmidt:
OpenBmap likes to have more fields
for quality informations about GPS and GSM.
I strongly suggest to include fields for TimeAdvance values for each BTS.
TA is a much better and more reliable value for distance to Base
Please excuse the late reply...
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 21:53 +0200, Onen wrote:
Hallo Jan,
I have seen the last commits from you about adding GSM based localisation.
First this is great, that it reaches the framework!
This brings me some questions:
1. This has been especially a
On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 23:49 +0100, Joerg Reisenweber wrote:
Am Sa 4. April 2009 schrieb Stefan Schmidt:
OpenBmap likes to have more fields
for quality informations about GPS and GSM.
I strongly suggest to include fields for TimeAdvance values for each BTS.
TA is a much better and more
Hello.
On Sat, 2009-04-04 at 02:42, Thomas Landspurg wrote:
The good news is that we are communicating and discussing while
progressing slowly. With Sebastian of CellHunter, we basically agree that
Cell Hunter would upload is cells to OpenCellID while maintaining their own
database for
Hello.
On Sat, 2009-04-04 at 12:02, Sebastian Hammerl wrote:
like Thomas said I will submit the data of cellhunter to opencellid
while keeping my own db for more game data. So opencellid will be the
main source for cell information and I think this is the best solution
because it is
Hello.
On Sat, 2009-04-04 at 15:24, Onen wrote:
Sebastian Hammerl wrote:
I will talk from my part the client code. I know you have little time
right now for a collaborating project. But I think we have much better
to do than duplicating this aspect. If you would agree on coding on the
Hello.
On Sat, 2009-04-04 at 15:03, Onen wrote:
Another point is the other signals than GSM. Our initial vision was to
build a database of communicating objects, WiFi, Bluetooth, etc...
Can anybody give me some ideas how BT should be useful here? From what I know
there are very little
Hi,
Stefan Schmidt wrote:
On Sat, 2009-04-04 at 15:03, Onen wrote:
Another point is the other signals than GSM. Our initial vision was to
build a database of communicating objects, WiFi, Bluetooth, etc...
Can anybody give me some ideas how BT should be useful here? From what I
Onen onen...@free.fr writes:
A reason why BT may still last over WiFi may be the power needed to
have BT on in comparison of WiFi, don't you think?
What about digital radio broadcasting stations or RDS information from
regular radios?
-Timo
___
Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
Onen onen...@free.fr writes:
A reason why BT may still last over WiFi may be the power needed to
have BT on in comparison of WiFi, don't you think?
What about digital radio broadcasting stations or RDS information from
regular radios?
These are very interesting
Hi,
Thomas Landspurg wrote:
The good news is that we are communicating and discussing while
progressing slowly. With Sebastian of CellHunter, we basically agree
that Cell Hunter would upload is cells to OpenCellID while maintaining
their own database for the purpose of the game.
With Onen
Hi,
Sebastian Hammerl wrote:
At this time I do note have the time to submit the data because I have
to finish my master thesis until mid of may. But after that I promise to
upload new cellhunter cells periodically. At this momemt there are about
4 cells with over 200 measures. At
Hi,
Stefan Schmidt wrote:
I can see some technical problems you may face here. Cellhunter needs some db
fields for the group management and ranking. OpenBmap likes to have more fields
for quality informations about GPS and GSM. Different layouts of the databases,
etc.
What should work easily
Hi,
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 00:05:43 +0200
Stefan Schmidt ste...@datenfreihafen.org wrote:
I'm wondering what happended to the discussion about three different
databases available. Back at the last time this topic came up I felt
that there will be ongoing work to avoid this concurency and try to
14 matches
Mail list logo
