Hi Again,
Douglas has a good point... if you are a Linux developer. However, if our
target end users are to come from the education community, it is very doubtful
that they will be familiar with publications such as the excellent one he
references. Having many different names for different ve
Caryl Bigenho wrote:
> Hi... I guess I've become the minority. I still believe that the name
> "Sugar On A Stick" should be allowed for all distributions of Sugar on a
> usb stick or even a live CD. Sugar Labs can control and identify their
> special builds in a special way... "SoaS by SugarLa
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 8:20 PM, Caryl Bigenho wrote:
> Hi... I guess I've become the minority. I still believe that the name
> "Sugar On A Stick" should be allowed for all distributions of Sugar on a usb
> stick or even a live CD.
>
Caryl, I think I'm in the minority with you. And I don't th
Hi... I guess I've become the minority. I still believe that the name "Sugar
On A Stick" should be allowed for all distributions of Sugar on a usb stick or
even a live CD. Sugar Labs can control and identify their special builds in a
special way... "SoaS by SugarLabs" or whatever, but the ter
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Martin Dengler wrote:
>
> Tabitha's main question has a simple answer:
> answer: "anything not too close to 'Sugar on a Stick'.
It sounds as though you and Sean are in agreement here (and I haven't heard
disagreements yet).
SJ
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 3:39 AM, Tabitha Roder wrote:
> If we are leaning towards:
> Yes. Sugar on a Stick is the central pillar of our marketing strategy.
> It's not trademarked, but should be. SL does not want to confuse its
> users and a light touch like this is all that's needed.
>
> Can I su
Martin - I've said before, numerous times, that other projects
shouldn't be called Sugar on a Stick or a variant thereof.
What's ouitside the scope is defining what anyone should call their
project when it's not called Sugar on a Stick or a variant thereof.
Perhaps I'm not expressing myself clear
On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 10:34:49AM +0100, Sean DALY wrote:
> Again, this is a marketing discussion and in my view outside the scope
> of the question.
I don't mind what we call it but it's darn pertinent to the question:
we cannot in good faith declare it best for the community to avoid
something
Again, this is a marketing discussion and in my view outside the scope
of the question.
Developing and building a brand is lots of work and it's unrealistic
to try to limit what other brands can be, as opposed to what they
can't be - in other words, what is explicitly protected by copyright
and tr
Regarding question 3, "Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL
asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora
distribution?"
If we are leaning towards:
Yes. Sugar on a Stick is the central pillar of our marketing strategy.
It's not trademarked, but should be. SL does
10 matches
Mail list logo
