On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 10:34:49AM +0100, Sean DALY wrote: > Again, this is a marketing discussion and in my view outside the scope > of the question.
I don't mind what we call it but it's darn pertinent to the question: we cannot in good faith declare it best for the community to avoid something unless we know what consequences that has. Tabitha's main question has a simple answer: > On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Tabitha Roder <[email protected]> wrote: > > Can I suggest we start talking about what method we recommend others > > use to define other Sugar on a USB naming conventions? answer: "anything not too close to 'Sugar on a Stick'. For a definition of 'to close' that's more formal, our lawyers can talk to your lawyers. Informally, just use common sense and we'll try to do so too." You're ignoring reality if you think that we don't need to discuss whether "SoaS" is off-limits, for example. Is it? > Sean Martin
pgpXCey3qLlxf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ SoaS mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas
