On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 3:39 AM, Tabitha Roder <[email protected]> wrote:
> If we are leaning towards: > Yes. Sugar on a Stick is the central pillar of our marketing strategy. > It's not trademarked, but should be. SL does not want to confuse its > users and a light touch like this is all that's needed. > > Can I suggest we start talking about what method we recommend others > use to define other Sugar on a USB naming conventions? This will help > those who create other distributions to know what to do if we > publicise that "Sugar on a Stick" is only to be used for the Sugarlabs > SoaS-Fedora distributions. > > Three people so far have weighed in to say that SoaS only means 'SoaS-Fedora' today, but could mean something else in the future. It sounds to me like we are leaning towards consensus on a reworded statement: "Sugar on a Stick" or "SoaS" is only to be used for a specific Sugarlabs project and its products. [Currently, for example, the SoaS project is only producing SoaS-Fedora.] Independent projects should use names that are not confusingly similar. " Is that accurate? When people ask for help, they need to know what they have. > > Tabitha > Yes, this aspect does not sound like a marketing question. SJ
_______________________________________________ SoaS mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas
