Martin - I've said before, numerous times, that other projects shouldn't be called Sugar on a Stick or a variant thereof.
What's ouitside the scope is defining what anyone should call their project when it's not called Sugar on a Stick or a variant thereof. Perhaps I'm not expressing myself clearly, but I don't see a contradiction between what you're saying and what I'm saying? Sean On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Martin Dengler <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 10:34:49AM +0100, Sean DALY wrote: >> Again, this is a marketing discussion and in my view outside the scope >> of the question. > > I don't mind what we call it but it's darn pertinent to the question: > we cannot in good faith declare it best for the community to avoid > something unless we know what consequences that has. > > Tabitha's main question has a simple answer: > >> On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Tabitha Roder <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Can I suggest we start talking about what method we recommend others >> > use to define other Sugar on a USB naming conventions? > > answer: "anything not too close to 'Sugar on a Stick'. For a > definition of 'to close' that's more formal, our lawyers can talk to > your lawyers. Informally, just use common sense and we'll try to do > so too." > > You're ignoring reality if you think that we don't need to discuss > whether "SoaS" is off-limits, for example. Is it? > >> Sean > > Martin > _______________________________________________ SoaS mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas
