Regarding question 3, "Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?"
If we are leaning towards: Yes. Sugar on a Stick is the central pillar of our marketing strategy. It's not trademarked, but should be. SL does not want to confuse its users and a light touch like this is all that's needed. Can I suggest we start talking about what method we recommend others use to define other Sugar on a USB naming conventions? This will help those who create other distributions to know what to do if we publicise that "Sugar on a Stick" is only to be used for the Sugarlabs SoaS-Fedora distributions. Do we want them to use the abbreviation SoaS or not? e.g. SoaS-Ubuntu, SoaS-Suse, SoaS-Debian Do we want version numbers? Dates in the names? Should their be a letter that tells us the base like U for Ubuntu? What about another acronym? Does the TOAST example help us? When people ask for help, they need to know what they have. Tabitha _______________________________________________ SoaS mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas
