- Original Message -
From: William B. Ryan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 11:32 AM
Subject: Re: [SOCIAL CREDIT] Wants critical comment--Keith reads Zarlenga
And that does create a problem for the book in that
it will inhibit its selection
***] The cash comes into general circulation when the
Reserve Bank buys government stock from the
government [***
Does it purchase directly from government or
indirectly through the so-called open market as in
the United States? That creates a rake off to Wall
Street that is effectively
***] I found the book very useful for understanding a
lot of the political and philosophical issues that
have surrounded my impressions of Social Credit over
the years. That is why I suggested to Chick that I
would send my summary of it to his questioner. [***
I'm sure that it is useful and I
- Original Message -
From: William B. Ryan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 11:32
AM
Subject: Re: [SOCIAL CREDIT] Wants critical
comment--Keith reads Zarlenga
those old
conspiracy theory
diatribes
Because they are written by amateurs
***This is ridiculous. You haven't even seen the
book, but say it cannot be a work of scholarship for
the reason that you think you know the author's
political orientation and it doesn't agree with
yours. Scholarship indeed! ***
No, it's more than that, Keith. He can write a 798
page book
- Original Message -
From: William B. Ryan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 1:35 PM
Subject: Re: [SOCIAL CREDIT] Wants critical comment--Keith reads Zarlenga
He can write a 798 page book purportedly on the lost science of
money without mentioning
Deal all,
Victor Bridger is right in suggesting that Adam Buick's article in
Socialist Standard is of a poor journalistic standard. However, his
response in wanting to simply dismiss it is a bad advice.
For one thing, Robert Stafford seems to genuinely ask for a critique of
the critique; for
Chick, Please ask this correspondent to confirm his
address to me and I will send him a copy of the summary and evaluation I
am currently preparing of a book that bears directly on some of the most glaring
misconceptions in the essay he forwarded. I have mentioned the book here
before. It
Jessop, I'll just briefly touch upon your points for
the moment as my time is severely constrained. But
this is a continuing dialog.
1. Hoarding is not the problem. That is Gesellism,
not social credit.
2. Interest is not the problem and indeed you will
not find any statement to the effect
On Monday 08 Sep 2003 3:15 pm, Chick wrote:
This message was sent to the Alberta Social Credit Party by someone who
wants a response from the Social Credit perspective. I thought it might be
interesting to see what the list might have to say about it.
Chick
Thanks for forwarding this, Chick. There are several
things that are interesting about it. This
organization is marxist-anarchist. They would
eliminate government and money. The anarchist side
of their beliefs actually overlaps Douglas' theory.
Unlike them, however, Douglas was realist
11 matches
Mail list logo
