One more thing, is it a good idea to remove lens distortion and vignetting
from the captured images as a pre-process, or is it better to let Recap /
PhotoScan handle that automatically?
/Jens
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:41 PM, Stephen Davidson magic...@bellsouth.net
wrote:
this
And of course I found the answer in the PhotoScan documentation :)
FYI, PhotoScan wants completely unaltered images and handles the lens
distortion itself.
/Jens
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 7:31 AM, Jens Lindgren jens.lindgren@gmail.com
wrote:
One more thing, is it a good idea to remove lens
depends on what you want to do.
I think the main difference to the professional version is the ability to
orient the scene and to do 4D mesh generation (from video input).
cheers,
vincent
2014-06-04 16:02 GMT+02:00 Jens Lindgren jens.lindgren@gmail.com:
Thread resurrection time!
So I
Subject: Re: Photogrammetry - what do you use?
From: m...@vincentlanger.com
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
depends on what you want to do.
I think the main difference to the professional version is the ability to
orient the scene and to do 4D mesh generation (from video input).
cheers,
vincent
--
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 16:14:48 +0200
Subject: Re: Photogrammetry - what do you use?
From: m...@vincentlanger.com
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
depends on what you want to do.
I think the main difference to the professional version is the ability to
orient the scene and to do
...@listproc.autodesk.com
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Nicolas Esposito
Sent: 04 June 2014 16:10
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: Photogrammetry - what do you use?
I'm using it for scans of my face for some reference, since its more precise
then scanning
and then you tell me how this is more convenient than having a desktop
solution for this kind of stuff? please try to convince me ;)
cheers
vladimir
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Graham Bell graham.b...@autodesk.com
wrote:
If you have Maintenance Subscription or Desktop Subscription for
I see what you mean, but at least you don't need a beefy machine.
Here's another one I haven't heard much of yet:
http://www.3dflow.net/3df-zephyr-pro-3d-models-from-photos/
and then you tell me how this is more convenient than having a desktop
solution for this kind of stuff? please try to
Thanks for the answers guys. I've just tried both Recap 360 and PhotoScan
Standard.
Got a little bit cleaner mesh from Recap (holes were caped automatically,
etc), but they were surprisingly similar. They both failed at the exact
same locations.
Recap spit out just one 8k texture which was only
Be aware that there is no Photogrammetry solution, that I have found that
will deal well with
transparent and/or shiny objects. I do a lot of product modeling, from
prototypes, and I have
not found any Photogrammetry solution that works better than taking front,
side, top, and 3/4
view photos, and
: Re: Photogrammetry - what do you use?
From: magic...@bellsouth.net
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Be aware that there is no Photogrammetry solution, that I have found that will
deal well withtransparent and/or shiny objects. I do a lot of product modeling,
from prototypes, and I havenot
Marchena
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2014 11:20 AM
To: softimage list
Subject: RE: Photogrammetry - what do you use?
Hi Stephen,
I am curious to why it does not work with transparent/shiny objects (havent
really done any test with those kind of surfaces..). Do you mean that
the calibration
From: ml...@carbinestudios.com
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 18:46:52 +
Subject: RE: Photogrammetry - what do you use?
Photogrammetry software needs to make assumptions when it has nothing more than
color information. Specular highlights are going to be clipped
do you use?
and then you tell me how this is more convenient than having a desktop solution
for this kind of stuff? please try to convince me ;)
cheers
vladimir
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Graham Bell
graham.b...@autodesk.commailto:graham.b...@autodesk.com wrote:
If you have Maintenance
Jun 2014 14:13:28 -0400
Subject: Re: Photogrammetry - what do you use?
From: magic...@bellsouth.net
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Be aware that there is no Photogrammetry solution, that I have found that
will deal well with
transparent and/or shiny objects. I do a lot of product
this
http://3dprintingindustry.com/2013/09/16/3-sweep-sweeps-the-net-with-smart-2d-to-3d-conversion/
looks very promising, but still in development, I believe.
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Marc-Andre Carbonneau
marc-andre.carbonn...@ubisoft.com wrote:
Hello friends,
I am currently
Hello friends,
I am currently investigating photogrammetry and would love to get your advices,
opinions, experiences with such systems.
What hardware do you use? Which software? Best practices?
Thank you for any info!
MAC
PhotoScan from agisoft is the one I prefer!
with canon 550D or 5D
2014-01-29 Marc-Andre Carbonneau marc-andre.carbonn...@ubisoft.com
Hello friends,
I am currently investigating photogrammetry and would love to get your
advices, opinions, experiences with such systems.
What hardware do
I have a guy next to me doing a lot of Agisoft stuff and swears by it although
he points out he needs tons of memory (he has 24Gb!!!) to deal with the kind of
things he does (a bit of architecture and tons of images with a 7D) so… I
am considering to test it properly because I can't see any
@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: Photogrammetry - what do you use?
I have a guy next to me doing a lot of Agisoft stuff and swears by it although
he points out he needs tons of memory (he has 24Gb!!!) to deal with the kind of
things he does (a bit of architecture and tons of images with a 7D) so... I
am
...@listproc.autodesk.com] *On Behalf Of *Jordi Bares
*Sent:* 29 janvier 2014 10:26
*To:* softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
*Subject:* Re: Photogrammetry - what do you use?
I have a guy next to me doing a lot of Agisoft stuff and swears by it
although he points out he needs tons of memory (he
*Sent:* 29 janvier 2014 10:26
*To:* softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
*Subject:* Re: Photogrammetry - what do you use?
I have a guy next to me doing a lot of Agisoft stuff and swears by it
although he points out he needs tons of memory (he has 24Gb!!!) to deal
with the kind of things he does
Still using imagemodeler over here.
Nuke 8 has some interesting ways of creating pointclouds from a
bunch of images and linking hdri's:
http://youtu.be/dRpLNoSSUlM?t=44m31s
I've had a similar question a while ago about image modeler
@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: Photogrammetry - what do you use?
Still using imagemodeler over here.
Nuke 8 has some interesting ways of creating pointclouds from a
bunch of images and linking hdri's:
http://youtu.be/dRpLNoSSUlM?t=44m31s
Interesting topic here.
Was just testing agisoft photoscan for some non commercial related work,
and it seems to give pretty nice results with minimal user input.
Has anyone tried to compare a kinekt based approach such as skanect (
http://skanect.manctl.com) with a photogrammetrical approach for
/adamseeley
From: Marc-Andre Carbonneau marc-andre.carbonn...@ubisoft.com
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Sent: Wednesday, 29 January 2014, 15:28
Subject: RE: Photogrammetry - what do you use?
Oh yeah I forgot to specify
: adam_see...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Photogrammetry - what do you use?
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Hi,
Does anyone know if any packages accept RAW or HDR images and can create an HDR
for the final texture.
This should help as much as norml HDR environments do when lighting.
Adam
this is our experience, a coworker has maxed out one of our 48gb
machines... but he needs 24-30 gb average on a set of 50 images at 5k a
piece.
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 7:25 AM, Jordi Bares jordiba...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a guy next to me doing a lot of Agisoft stuff and swears by it
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Steven Caron
Sent: 29 janvier 2014 14:33
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: Photogrammetry - what do you use?
this is our experience, a coworker has maxed out one of our 48gb machines...
but he needs 24-30 gb average on a set of 50
: Photogrammetry - what do you use?
I have a guy next to me doing a lot of Agisoft stuff and swears by it
although he points out he needs tons of memory (he has 24Gb!!!) to deal with
the kind of things he does (a bit of architecture and tons of images with a
7D) so… I am considering to test
Hi Octavian, i used a couple of times skanect for people or indoor sets and
must say its a time saver. If you can, give it a try!
Francisco.
On Wednesday, January 29, 2014, Octavian Ureche okt...@gmail.com wrote:
Interesting topic here.
Was just testing agisoft photoscan for some non
31 matches
Mail list logo
