Thanks for the report.
I agree with Eric. If we would make it more clear, we can use the following
sentence then:
"Translating an IPv4 packet to carry it across the MAP domain will increase its
size (typically either 20 or 28 bytes with fragmentation).”
Cheers,
-Yong
> 2022年10月12日
Hi authors,
Before we submit this doc to IESG, we would like to ask the following
two questions on this doc:
1) Are you aware any IPR issues required for full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79?
2) Do you know any implementations?
Thanks,
Ian & Yong
Yong Cui has requested publication of draft-ietf-softwire-iftunnel-03 as
Proposed Standard on behalf of the SOFTWIRE working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-softwire-iftunnel/
___
Softwires
Dear authors and all ,
During the WGLC, we have some clear support and reasons to advance this I-D.
Before that, I would like to know:
1) if you know any IPR issues on this draft, and
2) if you know any implementations on this one?
Additionally, would you please use the button of “check nits”
Dear all,
There were the following progress on Softwire YANG and related work during the
past couple of months:
• draft-ietf-softwire-yang completed WGLC
• During expert review, a YANG module for the iana-iftunnel registry
was requested as the softwire module needs to reference
Hi Ian,
I’m not aware of any IPR related to draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicast.
Thanks for shepherding the draft.
Yong
> 在 2018年6月13日，10:24，Mingwei Xu 写道：
>
> We are not aware of any IPR related to draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicast.
>
> --
>
your editorial comments directly to the authors.
Thanks for reviewing the draft.
Yong Cui and Ian Farrer
___
Softwires mailing list
Softwires@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
Yong Cui has requested publication of draft-ietf-softwire-map-mib-12 as
Proposed Standard on behalf of the SOFTWIRE working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-softwire-map-mib/
___
Softwires
Hi, authors of draft-ietf-softwire-map-mib-11,
Before we submit this doc to IESG, we need to have the following answer from
each of your authors.
(7) Has each author confirmed that any and all appropriate IPR disclosures
required for full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79
Hi folk,
We don’t have major objections to advance the document during the WGLC.
As a result, before we advance the doc, we would encourage the authors to
update a new version to address the minor comments.
Thanks so much for the Ian’s thorough review and the authors’ contribution.
Yong
> 在
Hi folks,
The authors believe the document, Definitions of Managed Objects for MAP-E
(draft-ietf-softwire-map-mib-10), is mature for advancement. We are now issuing
a working group last call for it.
Please send your comments, either for or against, to the WG mailing list. The
WGLC will end on
Hi folks,
Thanks for all replies on this CFA.
During the CFA on draft-liu-softwire-lw4over6-dynamic-provisioning, there are
some comments, especially on the relationship between this one and the other
related docs.
Additionally, I’m not sure if the authors would like to spend enough time on
Hi folks,
Thanks for sending your opinion on this doc. We got a number of supports on ML
to adopt draft-sun-softwire-lightweight-4over6-deployment-04, including some
operators and vendors, while there is no opposite to this doc.
So we would like to claim the successful CFA and adopt this
Hi folks,
As you may know, we are going to close the wg soon.
So before we close it, we would like to ask the wg to see if you are interested
in advancing the draft as an Informational doc:
Dynamic IPv4 Provisioning for Lightweight 4over6
Hi folks,
As you may know, we are going to close the wg soon.
So before we close it, we would like to ask the wg to see if you are interested
in advancing the draft as an Informational doc:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sun-softwire-lightweight-4over6-deployment/
Please state your
your editorial comments directly to the authors.
Thanks for reviewing the draft.
Yong Cui, Suresh Krishnan and Ian Farrer
___
Softwires mailing list
Softwires@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
Dear all,
We updated the agenda as the following link.
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/94/agenda/agenda-94-softwire
Please let us know if we missed your request. The presenters, please send your
slides to the chairs by Wed. evening.
Thanks,
Yong
On 2015-10-4, at 上午8:34, Yong Cui <c
Hi folks,
The softwire WG will have a short time slot (one hour) on at IETF 93.
If you'd like to present a draft, please send your request to
softwire-cha...@tools.ietf.org in the following format:
draft name, link, time required, presenter's name.
Thanks,
Yong and Suresh
appreciated.
Thanks
BR
Yu
-Original Message-
From: Softwires [mailto:softwires-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tom Taylor
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2015 5:34 AM
To: Yong Cui; softwires@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Softwires] WGLC for draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-mib-07
I finally got
Hi folks,
This message starts a two week softwire working group last call on
advancing the draft of DS-Lite MIB as a Standards Track RFC.
After we had the first wglc on draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-mib-02,
there were some major comments. The authors have revised the
document including the
Hi folks,
According to the preliminary agenda, the softwire WG will have a 2 hour slot on
Tuesday afternoon, November 11, at the Honolulu IETF meeting.
Following please find the preliminary IETF agenda.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/91/agenda.html
If you'd like to present something in
Dear all,
Please find the Softwire agenda at the following link:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/90/agenda/softwire/
Please send us your slides by Tuesday if you haven't sent.
Thanks,
Yong
On 2014-6-26, at 下午11:08, Yong Cui cuiy...@tsinghua.edu.cn wrote:
Hi folks,
We will have a 2
Hi folks,
We will have a 2-hour session on THURSDAY afternoon, July 24, 2014.
If you intend to present something in the softwire session, please send your
request to Suresh and me by July 4.
The preferred format of your request is:
(title, link of your draft, presenter's name).
Thanks,
Hi folks,
We've uploaded the minutes for softwire session.
If you have any comments or corrections, please let us know by March 21.
Many thanks to Ole Troan for taking the notes and Cong Liu for updating it.
Yong Suresh
___
Softwires mailing list
Hi folks,
We will organize the Softwire WG meeting in Vancouver as a purely working
meeting.
Please note that there will be no call for agenda items this time.
Yong Suresh
___
Softwires mailing list
Softwires@ietf.org
Hi folks,
We will have our Softwires session on Tuesday morning in the coming IETF
meeting in Berlin.
If you would like to have a time slot, please reply this email and send
your request to Suresh and me in the following format by July 12 (Friday):
(name, title, link to IETF datatracker,
/7/9 Yong Cui cuiy...@tsinghua.edu.cn
Hi folks,
We will have our Softwires session on Tuesday morning in the coming IETF
meeting in Berlin.
If you would like to have a time slot, please reply this email and send
your request to Suresh and me in the following format by July 12 (Friday
Hi Chairs,
we would like to ask for a 10min slot to present the MAP-T draft. Overall,
aside from a few more editorial nits, we feel that the draft is ready for
WGLC after this meeting.
Regards,
W. Dec
2013/7/9 Yong Cui cuiy...@tsinghua.edu.cn
Hello Chairs,
we would like to ask for a 10min
Hi all,
This call is being initiated to determine whether there is WG
consensus towards adoption of draft-cai-softwire-6rd-mib-05 as a
softwire WG draft.
Please state whether or not you're in favor of the adoption by replying
to this email. If you are not in favor, please also state your
Hi all,
I would like to remind the speakers in softwire sessions.
If you haven't send your slides, please send to the chairs asap.
Softwire sessions start from the very beginning, Monday morning.
Yong
-Original Message-
From: Yong Cui cuiy...@tsinghua.edu.cn
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 10:01
Cui cuiy...@tsinghua.edu.cn
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 15:20:06 +0800
To: Softwires WG softwires@ietf.org
Cc: Yong Cui cuiy...@tsinghua.edu.cn
Subject: [Softwires] Call for agenda in IETF 86
Hi folks,
We will have two sessions in the coming IETF meeting
in Orlando according to the preliminary agenda
Hi Tom,
Public 4over6 employs DHCPv6 to get/produce an IPv6 address as the first
step. Because the CE's IPv4 address is independent to IPv6, so Public
4over6 does not care the ipv6 address allocation process in DHCPv6. In
other words, it should support both IPv6 prefix and an exact address.
Yong
Hi folks,
We will have two sessions in the coming IETF meeting
in Orlando according to the preliminary agenda:
1) Morning Session on March 11, Monday (2.5h);
2) Morning Session on March 13, Wednesday (2.5h).
If you would like to have a time slot, please reply this
email and send your request to
Hi folks,
We will have two sessions in the coming IETF meeting
in Atlanta according to the preliminary agenda:
1) Afternoon Session I on Tuesday (2h);
2) Afternoon Session I on Wednesday (1.5h).
Please send your request to Suresh and me in the following
format by Oct. 20 if you would like to
Hi authors of 6rd Radius,
When I reviewed this document again, there are some minor comments.
1. Line 6, Paragraph 1 of Section 1:
should be ³6rd adopts Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) ...²
2. Line 4 of the paragraph below Fig 2, Section 3:
The word ³lifetimes² should be ³lifetime².
understanding.
Yong
-Original Message-
From: Yong Cui cuiy...@tsinghua.edu.cn
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 13:07:30 +0800
To: softwires@ietf.org
Cc: suresh.krishnan suresh.krish...@ericsson.com
Subject: Slides for Softwire in IETF 84
Hi folks,
Our agenda was published at:
https
Hi folks,
Our agenda was published at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/84/agenda/softwire/
Please send your slides to Suresh and me by 4pm on Wed. (Vancouver time).
Thanks,
Yong
___
Softwires mailing list
Softwires@ietf.org
Hi folks,
As we discussed on DS-Lite Management Information Base (MIB)
in Paris meeting, the chairs would like to ask for WG adoption on
mailing list. Please review this document and send your comments
(especially your opinion on the adoption with your reasons) to the
mailing list by two weeks,
Hi folks,
This is a wg last call on draft-ietf-softwire-public-4over6-01.
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-softwire-public-4over6/
As usual, please send editorial comments to the authors and
substantive comments to the mailing list.
This wg last call will end on 2012 June 10 at 12pm
Hi folks,
This is a wg last call on draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-deployment-03.
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-deployment/
As usual, please send editorial comments to the authors and
substantive comments to the mailing list.
This wg last call will end on 2012 June 10
Hi folks,
This is a wg last call on draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast-02.
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast/
As usual, please send editorial comments to the authors and
substantive comments to the mailing list.
This wg last call will end on June 10 at 12pm
Hi folks,
As we discussed on Softwire Mesh Management Information Base (MIB)
in Paris meeting, the chairs would like to ask for WG adoption on the
mailing list. Please review this document and send your comments
(especially your opinion on the adoption with your reasons) to the
mailing list by
Folks,
According to your agenda, we haven't received the followings slides.
Please send your slides to Alain and me asap.
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/83/agenda/agenda-83-softwire.htm
3 Tetsuya Murakami / Ole Troan (Map team)
MAP Encapsulation (MAP-E) specification
Thanks for the demo.
Would you please also give a summary to the mailing list, especially for
someone who cannot join the demo.
Yong
From: Alistair Woodman awood...@isc.org
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 09:37:53 -0700
To: softwires@ietf.org
Cc: fdup...@isc.org
Subject: [Softwires] Demo of
Hi folks,
The WG chairs have discussed the agenda based on the presentation requests
and main tasks in our wg. Because we received a lot of requests and only
have limited time for presentation, some of the requests cannot be
scheduled this time.
The agenda has been published at ietf 83 site:
Hi folks,
We Softwire WG submitted draft-ietf-softwire-gateway-init-ds-lite-05 and
this draft was last-called during the end of last year.
However, there are related IPR disclosures and one of them is a patent
application in Chinese language. We contacted the IPR owner, Huawei, and
found that
Thanks for showing the demo.
Would you please give a short description about the demo? So those who
cannot attend this meeting can also know your demo.
Thanks,
Yong
From: Lee, Yiu yiu_...@cable.comcast.com
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 09:41:40 +
To: softwires@ietf.org softwires@ietf.org
Beijing interim meeting attendees,
Please REPLY this email to send your slides by this Thursday if you
presented something during the Beijing interim meeting.
We need to upload them on the ietf website.
Thanks,
Yong and Alain
___
Softwires mailing
Softwire Interim Meeting, 2011.9.26-27
Meeting venue, contact info, Agenda
MEETING VENUE
FIT Building, which is the first left building inside the East Gate of
Tsinghua University
Registration: West Lobby of FIT building during Monday morning 8:30~9:30am
Thanks so much, Dan.
Hope you can join the interim meeting.
Yong
-Original Message-
From: Dan Wing dw...@cisco.com
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 16:37:19 -0700
To: 'Alain Durand' adur...@juniper.net, softwires@ietf.org, Yong Cui
cuiy...@tsinghua.edu.cn
Subject: RE: [Softwires] Call
Hi folks,
Following our rough concensus during Quebec City meeting and
according to our charter/milestones, the chairs would like to
ask the mailing list for the confirmation to adopt the following
drafts:
1. Deployment Considerations for Dual-Stack Lite
Hi folks,
We, softwire wg chairs, in agreement with our ADs, are announcing
an interim meeting in Beijing on September 26 27. The date has
been chosen adjacent to the BBF meeting in Shangai to minimize
travel and visa issues.
The interim meeting will focus on 'stateless' solutions in general
To: Yong Cui cuiy...@tsinghua.edu.cn
Cc: softwires@ietf.org, liziye liz...@csnet1.cs.tsinghua.edu.cn, Yong
Cui cuiy...@tsinghua.edu.cn, iesg-secret...@ietf.org, Ralph Droms
(rdroms) rdr...@cisco.com
Subject: Re: [Softwires] Softwire Interim Meeting in Beijing
Yong,
Why is dIVI not included
The chairs of the Softwire WG would like to start a 2-week working
group last call on ³RADIUS Attribute for 6rd².
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-softwire-6rd-radius-attrib/
Please send substantive comments to the list and editorial comments
to the authors.
The wg last call ends on
According to our softwire WG milestones, some work items have not been
addressed, e.g. 6rd operational document. Some other drafts including our
MIBs also need further reviews.
So you are welcome to contribute to the WG.
Thanks for your effort,
- Alain Yong
A couple of comments below.
-Original Message-
From: IESG Secretary iesg-secret...@ietf.org
Reply-To: i...@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 09:36:54 -0700 (PDT)
To: IETF Announcement list ietf-annou...@ietf.org
Cc: softwires@ietf.org, Yong Cui cuiy...@tsinghua.edu.cn
Subject: [Softwires
I read your 4rd draft. As far as I know, the current 4rd draft supports 3
models:
1. An IPv4 prefix
2. Full IPv4 address (No port sharing)
3. IPv4 address and a range of ports
So case 2 is equal to 4over6. Is my understanding right?
yes, the 'service' provided should be the same.
I
I read your 4rd draft. As far as I know, the current 4rd draft
supports 3
models:
1. An IPv4 prefix
2. Full IPv4 address (No port sharing)
3. IPv4 address and a range of ports
So case 2 is equal to 4over6. Is my understanding right?
yes, the 'service' provided should be the same.
I
...@cable.comcast.com
Cc: Mark Townsley m...@townsley.net, Yong Cui
y...@csnet1.cs.tsinghua.edu.cn, softwires@ietf.org list
softwires@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Softwires] Questions on: draft-cui-softwire-host-4over6
Absolutely. L2TP tunnels are widely use in many areas including 4over6.
The motivation
Ole,
-Original Message-
reading drafts during the plenary post working group session.
1) what does this solution offer that isn't in RFC5571? different
encapsulation?
Similar but there is a major difference. RFC5571 is 6over4 using l2tpv2
to
punch through the NAT. This doesn't
Ole,
The IPv4/IPv6 address mapping is stateful, which is the almost same as
DS-Lite does on address/port mapping, but simpler (i.e. Without port
mapping).
Although L3TP is an important tunneling method, do you think IP-IP tunnels
are still widely used, including softwire mesh, DS-Lite, 6RD...?
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 07:30:57 -0800
To: softwires@ietf.org list softwires@ietf.org
Cc: Yong Cui cuiy...@tsinghua.edu.cn
Subject: [Softwires] Call for presentation
If you are planing to present something in the softwire wg in Prague,
please send agenda item requests to me and Yong by 3/16.
We also
again, DWard, for your efforts and sage guidance in leading the WG to
successful completion of a number of key deliverables.
Yong Cui, cuiy...@tsinghua.edu.cn, has accepted our invitation to
become co-chair with Alain. We're looking forward to working with Yong
and Alain, starting with the upcoming
63 matches
Mail list logo
