Any rule of thumb regarding the size of document limitation when storing it
in solr?
Otis Gospodnetic-5 wrote
> Use Solr. It's pretty clear you don't yet have any problems that
> would make you think about alternatives. Using Solr to store and not
> just index will make your life simpler (and
After a number of testing I found that running embedded zookeeper isn't a
good idea especially only run one Zookeeper instance. When the Solr instance
with ZooKeeper embedded gets rebooted it got confused who should be the
leader therefore it will not start while others(followers) are still
running
My bad about the attachment, there you go: http://i.imgur.com/XKtw32K.png
Thanks for the details answer and that helps alot.
Thank,
-Utkarsh
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 4/16/2013 10:01 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
> > Not sure if it's just me, but I'm not seeing yo
On 4/16/2013 10:01 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
> Not sure if it's just me, but I'm not seeing your inlined image.
It's not just you.
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 7:52 PM, Utkarsh Sengar wrote:
>> So I have 2 questions:
>> 1. What is the recommended memory for those 2 nodes?
>> 2. I am not sure what
On 4/16/2013 8:12 PM, Ashok wrote:
> It looks like any 'word' that starts with a digit is treated as a numeric
> string.
>
> Setting generateNumberParts="1" in stead of "0" seems to generate the right
> tokens in this case but need to see if it has any other impacts on the
> finalized token list..
Not sure if it's just me, but I'm not seeing your inlined image.
Otis
--
SOLR Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm/index.html
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 7:52 PM, Utkarsh Sengar wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have setup a solr4 instance (just one node) and I see this memory
> pattern:
>
> [im
Thank you Jack, yes it is tricky.
If my text is
x20-y30
I get two nice tokens x20 & y30 that I need to keep.
But the text 20x-30y is treated differently and I get nothing.
20x-y30 gives me just 'y30'
The docs on LucidWorks say
generateNumberParts: (integer, default 1) If non-zero, splits num
Hi,
Is there some profound reason why the defType is not passed onto the filter
query?
Both query and filterQuery are created inside the QueryComponent, however
differently:
QParser parser = QParser.getParser(rb.getQueryString(), defType, req);
QParser fqp = QParser.getParser(fq, null, req);
So
Because you told it to!!! With: generateNumberParts="0"
WDF is tricky... tell us exactly what rules you want it to follow and then
we can tell you how to set the options.
Maybe more to the point: why exactly do you think you want it use WDF? Not
that there aren't good reasons, but what specif
Hello,
I have setup a solr4 instance (just one node) and I see this memory pattern:
[image: Inline image 1]
Physical memory is nearly full and JVM memory is ok. I have ~40M documents
(where 1 document=1KB) indexed and in production env I am planning to setup
2 solr cloud nodes.
So I have 2 ques
Hi,
Why does WDF swallow all 'words' that start with a 'digit'?
My config is:
For some text like
20x-30y
I am expecting (& want) '20x' & '30y' to be returned & retained as the
tokens after WDF is done with it. But I get nothing as per the analysis
page.
Any idea why? I am using 4.1
Thanks
: Hello - I'm trying to add a switch statement into a JavaScript function that
: we use during an import; it's to replace an "if else" block that is becoming
: increasingly large.
:
: Bizarrely, the switch block is ignore entirely, and it doesn't have any
: effect whatsoever.
you haven't really
On 4/16/2013 4:48 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
Here's an excerpt from my solr.xml:
Sorry about the incomplete edit there. My solr.xml from 4.x uses
relative paths, but my 3.5 setup still has absolute paths. I was trying
to make the 3.5 excerpt have relative paths before I sent it, b
: There will be a lot of data that will be indexed in Solr. My question is,
: does caching help in my case? As the filter queries will vary for almost all
: users ( because the viewport latitude/longitude would vary), in what ways
: can I use Caching to increase performance. Should I completely tu
Really nice presentation.
2013/4/17 Mark Miller
>
> On Apr 16, 2013, at 1:36 AM, SuoNayi wrote:
>
> > Hi, can someone explain more details about what model is used to sync
> docs between the lead and
> > replica in the shard?
> > The model can be push or pull.Supposing I have only one shard tha
No. This is about 1 Solr server. You don't need to do anything with caches.
Otis
--
Solr & ElasticSearch Support
http://sematext.com/
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 6:50 PM, Furkan KAMACI wrote:
> I don't want to bother but I try to understand that part:
>
> "When yo perform a commit in solr you h
On Apr 16, 2013, at 1:36 AM, SuoNayi wrote:
> Hi, can someone explain more details about what model is used to sync docs
> between the lead and
> replica in the shard?
> The model can be push or pull.Supposing I have only one shard that has 1
> leader and 2 replicas,
> when the leader receive
I don't want to bother but I try to understand that part:
"When yo perform a commit in solr you have (for an instant) two versions of
the index. The commit produces new segments (with new documents, new
deletions, etc). After creating these new segments a new index searcher is
created and its cach
On 4/16/2013 2:39 PM, Jie Sun wrote:
Hi Shawn,
I do have persistent="true" in my solr.xml:
...
the command I ran was to rename from '413' to '413a'.
I think I see the problem. You have three cores that all point to the
same instanceDir, and no dataDir parameter.
Hi Sam,
Sounds like you may want to disable caches, yes. But instead of
guessing, just look at the stats and based on that configure your
caches. You can get stats from Solr Admin page or, if you need
long-term stats and performance patterns, use SPM for Solr or
something similar.
Otis
--
Solr
Yesterday, we spent 1 hour with a client looking at their cluster's
performance metrics SPM, their indexing logs, etc. trying to figure
out why some indexing was slower than it should have been. We traced
issues to network hickups, to VMs that would move from host to host,
etc. Really fancy and p
Replica asks to Zookeper and Leader does not do anything. Thanks for your
answer Otis.
2013/4/17 Otis Gospodnetic
> Oui, ZK holds "the map".
>
> Otis
> --
> Solr & ElasticSearch Support
> http://sematext.com/
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Furkan KAMACI
> wrote:
> > Hi Otis;
> >
>
See
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4532
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1535
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4619
Otis
--
Solr & ElasticSearch Support
http://sematext.com/
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Furkan KAMACI wrote:
> Hi Erick;
>
> Thanks for the e
Oui, ZK holds "the map".
Otis
--
Solr & ElasticSearch Support
http://sematext.com/
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Furkan KAMACI wrote:
> Hi Otis;
>
> You said:
>
> "It can just do it because it knows where things are."
>
> Does it learn it from Zookeeper?
>
> 2013/4/17 Otis Gospodnetic
>
Hi,
Try Solr Suggester, though I'm not sure if you can group with it.
tried http://search-lucene.com/?q=suggester+group&fc_project=Solr but
it doesn't seem to yield much. If you need to group suggestions like
what you see on http://search-lucene.com/ for example, we use our own
AC from http:/
Hi,
It doesn't have the offset information, but checkout my patch
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4722 which outputs the position
of each term that's been matched. I'm eager to get some feedback on this
approach and any improvements that might be suggested.
Cheers,
Tricia
On Wed, Ma
Use Solr. It's pretty clear you don't yet have any problems that
would make you think about alternatives. Using Solr to store and not
just index will make your life simpler (and your app simpler and
likely faster).
Otis
--
Solr & ElasticSearch Support
http://sematext.com/
On Tue, Apr 16, 20
Hi Otis;
You said:
"It can just do it because it knows where things are."
Does it learn it from Zookeeper?
2013/4/17 Otis Gospodnetic
> If query comes to shard X on some node and this shard X is NOT a
> leader, but HAS data, it will just execute the query. If it needs to
> query shards on ot
Hi,
Routing is not random... have a look at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2341 . In short, you
shouldn't have to route manually from your app.
Otis
--
Solr & ElasticSearch Support
http://sematext.com/
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 6:26 PM, Furkan KAMACI wrote:
> Hi Otis;
>
> Firstly
Thanks again for your answer. If I find any document about such comparisons
that I would like to read.
By the way, is there any advantage for using Lucene instead of anything
else as like that:
Using Lucene is naturally supported at Solr and if I use anything else I
may face with some compatibili
Hi,
Replication when everything is working well is push:
* request comes to any node, ideally leader
* doc is indexed on leader
* doc is copied to replicas
If replica falls too far behind (not exactly sure what the "too far"
threshold is), it uses pull to replicate the whole index from leader.
Ma
Hi Otis;
Firstly thanks for your answers. So do you mean that hashing mechanism will
randomly route a document into a randomly shard? I want to ask it because I
consider about putting a load balancer in front of my SolrCloud and
manually route some documents into some other shards to avoid bottlen
No.
Otis
--
Solr & ElasticSearch Support
http://sematext.com/
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Furkan KAMACI wrote:
> All in all will replica ask to its leader about where is remaining of data
> or it directly asks to Zookeper?
>
> 2013/4/17 Otis Gospodnetic
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> No, I believe "re
All in all will replica ask to its leader about where is remaining of data
or it directly asks to Zookeper?
2013/4/17 Otis Gospodnetic
> Hi,
>
> No, I believe "redirect" from replica to leader would happen only at
> index time, so a doc first gets indexed to leader and from there it's
> replicat
If query comes to shard X on some node and this shard X is NOT a
leader, but HAS data, it will just execute the query. If it needs to
query shards on other nodes, it will have the info about which shards
to query and will just do that and aggregate the results. It doesn't
have to ask leader for p
Correct. With SolrCloud you typically don't need to make this
separation (with ElasticSearch one can designate some nodes as
non-data nodes). SolrCloud won't necessarily always be faster because
it typically involves sharding and thus a distributed search, while
some non-SolrCloud setups can hold
People do use other data stores to retrieve data sometimes. e.g. Mongo
is popular for that. Like I hinted in another email, I wouldn't
necessarily recommend this for common cases. Don't do it unless you
really know you need it. Otherwise, just store in Solr.
Otis
--
Solr & ElasticSearch Support
They won't be exact, but should be close. Are you seeing some *big*
differences?
Otis
--
Solr & ElasticSearch Support
http://sematext.com/
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Furkan KAMACI wrote:
> Is it possible that different shards have different number of documents or
> does SolrCloud bala
Hi,
No, I believe "redirect" from replica to leader would happen only at
index time, so a doc first gets indexed to leader and from there it's
replicated to non-leader shards. At query time there is no redirect
to leader, I imagine, as that would quickly turn leaders into
hotspots.
Otis
--
Solr
Is it possible that different shards have different number of documents or
does SolrCloud balance them?
I ask this question because I want to learn the mechanism behind how Solr
calculete hash value of the identifier of the document. Is it possible that
hash function produces more documents into o
I want to make it clear in my mind:
When a search query comes to a replica what happens?
-Does it forwards the search query to leader and leader collects all the
data and prepares response (this will cause a performance issue because
leader is responsible for indexing at same time)
or
- replica c
: sorry for pushing, but I just replayed the steps with solr 4.0 where
: everything works fine.
: Then I switched to solr 4.2.1 and replayed the exact same steps and the
: collection won't start and no leader will be elected.
:
: Any clues ?
: Should I try it on the developer mailing list, maybe
Hi Otis and Jack;
I have made a research about highlights and debugged code. I see that
highlight are query dependent and not stored. Why Solr uses Lucene for
storing text, I mean i.e. content of a web page. Is there any comparison
about to store texts at Hbase or any other databases versus Lucene
Is there any document that describes why indexing and querying performance
is better at SolrCloud compared to older versions of Solr?
I was examining that architecture to use: there will be a cloud of Solr
that just do indexing and there will be another cloud that copies that
indexes into them and
Hi Mark;
When I speak with proper terms I want to ask that: is there a data locality
of spatial locality (
http://www.roguewave.com/portals/0/products/threadspotter/docs/2011.2/manual_html_linux/manual_html/ch_intro_locality.html
- I mean if you have data on your machine, use it and don't search i
Hi Shawn,
I do have persistent="true" in my solr.xml:
...
the command I ran was to rename from '413' to '413a'.
when i debug through solr CoreAdminHandler, I notice the persistent flag
only controls if the new data will be persisted to solr.xml or not, thus as
you can se
On 4/16/2013 2:02 PM, Jie Sun wrote:
We just tried to use
.../solr/admin/cores?action=RENAME&core=core0&other=core5
to rename a core 'old' to 'new'.
After the request is done, the solr.xml has new core name, and the solr
admin shows the new core name in the list. But the index dir still has the
btw ... what is the field type of your unique ID field?
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Timothy Potter wrote:
> Ok, that makes more sense and is definitely cause for concern. Do you have
> a sense for whether this is ongoing or happened a few times unexpectedly in
> the past? If ongoing, then
We just tried to use
.../solr/admin/cores?action=RENAME&core=core0&other=core5
to rename a core 'old' to 'new'.
After the request is done, the solr.xml has new core name, and the solr
admin shows the new core name in the list. But the index dir still has the
old name as the directory name. I loo
Leaders don't have much to do with querying - the node that you query will
determine what other nodes it has to query to search the whole index and do a
scatter/gather for you. (Though in some cases that request can be proxied to
another node)
- Mark
On Apr 16, 2013, at 7:48 AM, Furkan KAMACI
Can you file a JIRA issue? - minimum you should get a better error.
- Mark
On Apr 12, 2013, at 9:17 AM, vicky desai wrote:
> If i disable update log in solr 4.2 then i get the following exception
> SEVERE: :java.lang.NullPointerException
>at
> org.apache.solr.cloud.ShardLeaderElectionCo
Ok, that makes more sense and is definitely cause for concern. Do you have
a sense for whether this is ongoing or happened a few times unexpectedly in
the past? If ongoing, then will probably be easier to track down the root
cause.
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Cool Techi wrote:
> That's wh
Guido,
I encourage you to try to open-source the shape-related code you have to
Spatial4j. I realize that for some organizations, that can be really
difficult.
~ David
On 4/16/13 11:55 AM, "Guido Medina" wrote:
>David,
>
> I just peak it at github, the method will estimate well for our
>p
That's what I am trying to say, the document is not replicated across all the
replicas for a specific shard, hence the query show different results on every
refresh.
> Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 11:34:18 -0600
> Subject: Re: Document Missing from Share in Solr cloud
> From: thelabd...@gmail.com
>
Are you using a the concurrent low pause garbage collector or perhaps G1?
Are you able to use something like visualvm to pinpoint what the bottleneck
might be?
Otherwise, keep raising the timeout. This means Solr and Zk are not able to
talk for that much time - either something needs to be tun
If you are using the default doc router for indexing in SolrCloud, then a
document only exists in a single shard but can be replicated in that shard
to any number of replicas.
Can you clarify your question as it sounds like you're saying that the
document is not replicated across all the replicas
Hi,
We noticed a strange behavior in our solr cloud setup, we are using solr4.2
with 1:3 replication setting. We noticed that some of the documents were
showing up in search sometimes and not at other, the reason being the document
was not present in all the shards.
We have restarted zookeepe
Hi
I am using SolrCloud (4.1) with 6 nodes.
When i index the documents from the mapper and as the load increases.. i see
these messages in my mapper logs…
WHich looks like it is slowing down my indexing speed.
2013-04-16 06:04:18,013 INFO org.apache.solr.common.cloud.ZkStateReader:
Updating li
: Also when I checked the solr log.
:
: > [org.apache.solr.handler.SnapPuller] Master at:
: > http://192.168.2.204:8080/solr/replication is not available. Index fetch
: > failed. Exception: Connection refused
:
:
: BTW, I was able to fetch the replication file with wget directly.
Are you certi
It sure increased the performance .
Thanks for the input.
./zahoor
On 14-Apr-2013, at 10:13 PM, J Mohamed Zahoor wrote:
> Thanks..
> Will try multithreading with CloudSolrServer.
>
> ./zahoor
>
> On 13-Apr-2013, at 9:11 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
>
>>
>> On Apr 13, 2013, at 11:07 AM, J Mohamed
: In Solr 3.x, I was relying on a postCommit call to a listener in the update
: handler to perform data update to caches, this data was used to perform
: 'realtime' filtering on the documents.
I can't find it at the moment, but IIRC this was a side effect of how
snapshots are now loaded on slave
Thanks for detailed explanation.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-restart-is-taking-more-than-1-hour-tp4054165p4056355.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 4/16/2013 9:17 AM, Marko Asplund wrote:
Shawn Heisey wrote:
So, using a dynamic schema I'd flatten the following JSON object graph
{
'id':'xyz123',
'obj1': {
'child1': {
'prop1': ['val1', 'val2', 'val3']
'prop2': 123
}
'prop3': 'val4'
},
'obj2': {
"'obj1/child1/prop1_ss'"
Try to stick to names that follow Java naming conventions: letter or
underscore followed by letters, digits, and underscores. There are place in
Solr which have limited rules for names because they support additional
syntax.
In this case, replace your slashes with un
:
: If i disable update log in solr 4.2 then i get the following exception
: SEVERE: :java.lang.NullPointerException
: at
:
org.apache.solr.cloud.ShardLeaderElectionContext.runLeaderProcess(ElectionContext.java:190)
Hmmm.. if you don't have updateLog and you run in SolrCloud mode, solr
On 4/16/2013 8:47 AM, Adeel Qureshi wrote:
the problem is i need to deploy it on servers where i dont know what the
absolute path will be .. basically my goal is to load solr with a different
set of configuration files based on the environment its in. Is there a a
better different way to do this
David,
I just peak it at github, the method will estimate well for our
purpose, but depends on JTS which we included in our Solr server "only",
but we don't want LGPL libraries (v3) in our main project, kind of a
show stopper, I understand is needed for spatial4j, Lucene and Solr in
general
Hi,
Have you considered ManifoldCF?
Otis
--
SOLR Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm/index.html
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Montu v Boda
wrote:
> Hi
>
> problem is that the permission is frequently update in our system so that we
> have to update the index in the same mann
Hello - I'm trying to add a switch statement into a JavaScript function that
we use during an import; it's to replace an "if else" block that is becoming
increasingly large.
Bizarrely, the switch block is ignore entirely, and it doesn't have any
effect whatsoever.
Our version info:
Solr Specifica
Shawn Heisey wrote:
> Solr does have some *very* limited capability for doing joins between
indexes, but generally speaking, you need to flatten the data.
thanks!
So, using a dynamic schema I'd flatten the following JSON object graph
{
'id':'xyz123',
'obj1': {
'child1': {
'prop1':
On 4/16/13 10:57 AM, "Guido Medina" wrote:
>David,
>
>I have been following your stackoverflow posts, I understand what you
>say, we decided to change the criteria and index an extra field (close
>to your suggestion), so the sorting will happen now by polygon area desc
>(Which induced another p
David,
I have been following your stackoverflow posts, I understand what you
say, we decided to change the criteria and index an extra field (close
to your suggestion), so the sorting will happen now by polygon area desc
(Which induced another problem, calculation of polygon area on a
sphere)
the problem is i need to deploy it on servers where i dont know what the
absolute path will be .. basically my goal is to load solr with a different
set of configuration files based on the environment its in. Is there a a
better different way to do this
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Shawn Hei
Yes. They're called replicas.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Furkan KAMACI
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2013 9:49 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Same Shards at Different Machines
Is it possible to use same shards at different machines at SolrCloud?
Guido,
The field type solr.SpatialRecursivePrefixTreeFieldType can only
participate in distance reporting for indexed points, not other shapes.
In fact, I recommend not attempting to get the distance if the field isn't
purely indexed points, as it may get confused if it seems some small
shapes. F
Hi
problem is that the permission is frequently update in our system so that we
have to update the index in the same manner other wise it will give wrong
result.
in that case i think the cache will get effect and the performance may be
reduced.
Thanks & Regards
Montu v Boda
--
View this mes
Hi
problem is that the permission is frequently update in our system so that we
have to update the index in the same manner other wise it will give wrong
result.
in that case i think the cache will get effect and the performance may be
reduced.
Thanks & Regards
Montu v Boda
--
View this mess
Is it possible to use same shards at different machines at SolrCloud?
Problem solved for me as well. The client is running in tomcat and the
connector had compression="true". I removed it and now it seems to work
fine.
On 04/16/2013 02:28 PM, Luis Lebolo wrote:
> Turns out I spoke too soon. I was *not* sending the query via POST.
> Changing the method to POST solved
Why not just add a filter query for user permissions?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Montu v Boda
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2013 9:13 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: first time with new keyword, solr take to much time to give the
result
hi
we are trying t
Am 16. April 2013 um 14:46 schrieb "Yonik Seeley-4 [via Lucene]"
:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 7:51 AM, Rogalon <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I am using pretty complex function queries to completely customize (not only
> > boost) the score of my result documents that are retrieved from an
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Montu v Boda wrote:
> hi
>
> we are trying to return 10,000 rows
>
> it is necessary to return 1 rows because from that 1, we are pick
> only top 100 record based on the user permission and permission is stored
> in
> database not on solr.
>
> and if we tr
Hi Montu,
Regarding permissions, you may find this solution more elegant:
http://searchhub.org/2012/02/22/custom-security-filtering-in-solr/
http://hokiesuns.blogspot.com/2012/11/using-solrs-postfiltering-to-collect.html
--- On Tue, 4/16/13, Montu v Boda wrote:
> From: Montu v Boda
> Subjec
hi
we are trying to return 10,000 rows
it is necessary to return 1 rows because from that 1, we are pick
only top 100 record based on the user permission and permission is stored in
database not on solr.
and if we try to return 100 rows then it may possible that from the 100
rows, user d
Hi,
At moment, I am not considering store synonyms in the index, although is
something that I have to do some time.
Is "strange" that something "common" like multi-word synonyms have a bug
with highligting but I couldn't find any solution.
Thanks for your help.
--
View this message
Can you share your auto-complete/suggestor configuration parameters?
Including the search component.
It sounds as if there is a field type with an analyzer that is mapping
characters.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: sharmila thapa
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2013 7:54 AM
To
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 7:51 AM, Rogalon wrote:
> Hi,
> I am using pretty complex function queries to completely customize (not only
> boost) the score of my result documents that are retrieved from an index of
> approx 10e7 documents. To get to an acceptable level of performance I
> combine my qu
Are you actually trying to return 10,000 records, or is that the number of
hits, and you're only retrieving the top 10?
Cheers,
Duncan.
On 16 April 2013 12:39, Montu v Boda wrote:
> Hi
>
> Thanks for info.
>
> we did the same thing but no effect for first time.
>
> what to do for first time
Hi,
We are migrating to Solr 4.2 from Solr 3.6 and Solr 4.2 is throwing
Exception on Restart. What is More, it take a hell lot of Time ( More than
one hour to get Up and Running)
THE exception After Restart ...
=
"Apr 16, 2013 4:47:31 PM org.apache.solr.update.UpdateLo
Turns out I spoke too soon. I was *not* sending the query via POST.
Changing the method to POST solved the issue for me (maybe I was hitting a
GET limit somewhere?).
-Luis
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Marc des Garets wrote:
> Did you find anything? I have the same problem but it's on updat
Hi,
I have used /terms for solr auto-suggestion list. It works fine for English
words. But I have problem on multi-language index words, I have tested for
Russian language. If there is Russian charcter in between the word, then it
gets displayed on suggesstion list like if I type 'кар', it list ка
I cannot say that I have researched it, but I have always taken it to be
random.
Upayavira
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013, at 12:23 PM, Furkan KAMACI wrote:
> Thanks for your detailed explanation. However you said:
>
> "It will then choose one of those hosts/cores for each shard, and send a
> request to t
Hi,
I am using pretty complex function queries to completely customize (not only
boost) the score of my result documents that are retrieved from an index of
approx 10e7 documents. To get to an acceptable level of performance I
combine my query with filters in the following way (very short example):
When a leader responses for a query, does it says that: "If I have the data
what I am looking for, I should build response with it, otherwise I should
find it anywhere. Because it may be long to search it?"
or
does it says I only index the data, I will tell it to other guys to build
up the response
Hi,
I have used Terms for auto-suggestion. But it just list the terms that
matches terms.prefix from index , along with these term suggestions, I have
to display the product groups that matches with the input prefix. Is it
possible in solr auto-suggest? Somebody could please help me on this issu
The query language is NOT pure boolean. Hoss wrote this up:
http://searchhub.org/2011/12/28/why-not-and-or-and-not/
Best
Erick
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Roman Chyla wrote:
> Oh, sorry, I have assumed lucene query parser. I think SOLR qp must be
> different then, because for me it works a
Hi
Thanks for info.
we did the same thing but no effect for first time.
what to do for first time query with new keyword?
how we can make the query faster for first time with new keyword?
say for ex if i try to search the text key word "test" first time then it
will take to much time to execut
Did you find anything? I have the same problem but it's on update
requests only.
The error comes from the solrj client indeed. It is solrj logging this
error. There is nothing in solr itself and it does the update correctly.
It's fairly small simple documents being updated.
On 04/15/2013 07:
Hi Erick;
Thanks for the explanation. You said:
"You cannot transfer just the indexed form of a document from one
core to another, you have to re-index the doc." why do you think like that?
2013/4/16 Erick Erickson
> Yes. Every node is really self-contained. When you send a doc to a
> cluster
Yes. Every node is really self-contained. When you send a doc to a
cluster where each shard has a replica, the raw doc is sent to
each node of that shard and indexed independently.
About old docs, it's the same as Solr 3.6. Data associated with
docs stays around in the index until it's merged away
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
