Hi,
I am using the stander highlighting.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HighlightingParameters
Cheers
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolR-InvalidTokenOffsetsException-with-Highlighter-and-Synonyms-tp4053988p4056240.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing
Hi Shawn;
I am sorry but what kind of Load Balancing is that? I mean does it check
whether some leaders are using much CPU or RAM etc.? I think a problem may
occur at such kind of scenario: if some of leaders getting more documents
than other leaders (I don't know how it is decided that into
Hi,
sorry for pushing, but I just replayed the steps with solr 4.0 where
everything works fine.
Then I switched to solr 4.2.1 and replayed the exact same steps and the
collection won't start and no leader will be elected.
Any clues ?
Should I try it on the developer mailing list, maybe it's a
Hi,
I am new in Solr and wish to use version 4.2.x for my app in production. I
want to show hundreds and thousands of markers on a map with contents coming
from Solr. As the user moves around the map and pans, the browser will fetch
data/markers using a BBOX filter (based on the maps' viewport
If you are accessing Solr from Java code, you will likely use the SolrJ
client to do so. If your users are hitting Solr directly, you should
think about whether this is wise - as well as providing them with direct
search access, you are also providing them with the ability to delete
your entire
Hi,
when we search with any new keyword at first time then solr 4.2.1 take to
much time to give the result.
we have 506 document is index in solr and it's size is 400GB.
now when We search for keyword test it will take 1 min to give the
response for 1 rows.
we fire the query from the
Hi
We have a simple SolrCloud setup (4.2.1) running with a single shard and
two nodes, and it's working fine except whenever we send an update request,
the leader logs this error:
SEVERE: shard update error StdNode:
http://10.20.10.42:8080/solr/ts/:org.apache.solr.common.SolrException:
Server at
Could be a bug in the higlighter. But before claiming that, I would still
play around different options, like hl.fragSize, hl.highlightMultiTerm.
Also, have you considered storing synonyms in the index?
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 9:42 AM, juancesarvillalba
juancesarvilla...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Things to google ;)
1. warmup queries
2. solr cache
How much RAM does you index take now?
Dmitry
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Montu v Boda montu.b...@highqsolutions.com
wrote:
Hi,
when we search with any new keyword at first time then solr 4.2.1 take to
much time to give the
Hi
currently, my solr is deploy in tomcat1 and we have given 4GB memory of that
tomcat
Thanks Regards
Montu v Boda
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/first-time-with-new-keyword-solr-take-to-much-time-to-give-the-result-tp4056254p4056261.html
Sent from the
Hi Walter;
You said: It is not safe to share Solr index files between two Solr
servers. Why do you think like that?
2013/4/16 Tim Vaillancourt t...@elementspace.com
If centralization of storage is your goal by choosing NFS, iSCSI works
reasonably well with SOLR indexes, although good
Thanks for your detailed explanation. However you said:
It will then choose one of those hosts/cores for each shard, and send a
request to them as a distributed search request. Is there any document
that explains of distributed search? What is the criteria for it?
2013/4/16 Upayavira
Furkan, see this post.
http://grokbase.com/t/lucene/solr-user/117t1eswyk/multiple-solr-servers-and-a-shared-index-again
Cumprimentos
--
Yago Riveiro
Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig)
On Tuesday, April 16, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Furkan KAMACI wrote:
Hi Walter;
You said:
Hi,
I got everything in place, my polygons are indexing properly, I played a
bit with LSP which helped me a lot, now, I have JTS 1.13 inside
solr.war; here is my challenge:
I have big polygon (A) which contains smaller polygons (B and C), B and
C have some intersection, so if I search for a
On Tue, 2013-04-16 at 12:22 +0200, Montu v Boda wrote:
we have 506 document is index in solr and it's size is 400GB.
now when We search for keyword test it will take 1 min to give the
response for 1 rows.
At this point, you have searched for other keywords before you measure
on
In the admin page you can monitor the cache parameters, like eviction. If
you cache evicts too much, you can increase its capacity. NOTE: this will
affect on RAM consumption, so you would need to change the tomcat config
too.
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Montu v Boda
Yes. Every node is really self-contained. When you send a doc to a
cluster where each shard has a replica, the raw doc is sent to
each node of that shard and indexed independently.
About old docs, it's the same as Solr 3.6. Data associated with
docs stays around in the index until it's merged
Hi Erick;
Thanks for the explanation. You said:
You cannot transfer just the indexed form of a document from one
core to another, you have to re-index the doc. why do you think like that?
2013/4/16 Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com
Yes. Every node is really self-contained. When you send
Did you find anything? I have the same problem but it's on update
requests only.
The error comes from the solrj client indeed. It is solrj logging this
error. There is nothing in solr itself and it does the update correctly.
It's fairly small simple documents being updated.
On 04/15/2013
Hi
Thanks for info.
we did the same thing but no effect for first time.
what to do for first time query with new keyword?
how we can make the query faster for first time with new keyword?
say for ex if i try to search the text key word test first time then it
will take to much time to
The query language is NOT pure boolean. Hoss wrote this up:
http://searchhub.org/2011/12/28/why-not-and-or-and-not/
Best
Erick
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Roman Chyla roman.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh, sorry, I have assumed lucene query parser. I think SOLR qp must be
different then,
Hi,
I have used Terms for auto-suggestion. But it just list the terms that
matches terms.prefix from index , along with these term suggestions, I have
to display the product groups that matches with the input prefix. Is it
possible in solr auto-suggest? Somebody could please help me on this
When a leader responses for a query, does it says that: If I have the data
what I am looking for, I should build response with it, otherwise I should
find it anywhere. Because it may be long to search it?
or
does it says I only index the data, I will tell it to other guys to build
up the response
Hi,
I am using pretty complex function queries to completely customize (not only
boost) the score of my result documents that are retrieved from an index of
approx 10e7 documents. To get to an acceptable level of performance I
combine my query with filters in the following way (very short
I cannot say that I have researched it, but I have always taken it to be
random.
Upayavira
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013, at 12:23 PM, Furkan KAMACI wrote:
Thanks for your detailed explanation. However you said:
It will then choose one of those hosts/cores for each shard, and send a
request to them
Hi,
I have used /terms for solr auto-suggestion list. It works fine for English
words. But I have problem on multi-language index words, I have tested for
Russian language. If there is Russian charcter in between the word, then it
gets displayed on suggesstion list like if I type 'кар', it list
Turns out I spoke too soon. I was *not* sending the query via POST.
Changing the method to POST solved the issue for me (maybe I was hitting a
GET limit somewhere?).
-Luis
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Marc des Garets m...@ttux.net wrote:
Did you find anything? I have the same problem but
Hi,
We are migrating to Solr 4.2 from Solr 3.6 and Solr 4.2 is throwing
Exception on Restart. What is More, it take a hell lot of Time ( More than
one hour to get Up and Running)
THE exception After Restart ...
=
Apr 16, 2013 4:47:31 PM
Are you actually trying to return 10,000 records, or is that the number of
hits, and you're only retrieving the top 10?
Cheers,
Duncan.
On 16 April 2013 12:39, Montu v Boda montu.b...@highqsolutions.com wrote:
Hi
Thanks for info.
we did the same thing but no effect for first time.
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 7:51 AM, Rogalon nico.beche...@me.com wrote:
Hi,
I am using pretty complex function queries to completely customize (not only
boost) the score of my result documents that are retrieved from an index of
approx 10e7 documents. To get to an acceptable level of performance
Can you share your auto-complete/suggestor configuration parameters?
Including the search component.
It sounds as if there is a field type with an analyzer that is mapping
characters.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: sharmila thapa
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2013 7:54 AM
Hi,
At moment, I am not considering store synonyms in the index, although is
something that I have to do some time.
Is strange that something common like multi-word synonyms have a bug
with highligting but I couldn't find any solution.
Thanks for your help.
--
View this message in
hi
we are trying to return 10,000 rows
it is necessary to return 1 rows because from that 1, we are pick
only top 100 record based on the user permission and permission is stored in
database not on solr.
and if we try to return 100 rows then it may possible that from the 100
rows, user
Hi Montu,
Regarding permissions, you may find this solution more elegant:
http://searchhub.org/2012/02/22/custom-security-filtering-in-solr/
http://hokiesuns.blogspot.com/2012/11/using-solrs-postfiltering-to-collect.html
--- On Tue, 4/16/13, Montu v Boda montu.b...@highqsolutions.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Montu v Boda montu.b...@highqsolutions.com
wrote:
hi
we are trying to return 10,000 rows
it is necessary to return 1 rows because from that 1, we are pick
only top 100 record based on the user permission and permission is stored
in
database not on
Am 16. April 2013 um 14:46 schrieb Yonik Seeley-4 [via Lucene]
ml-node+s472066n4056299...@n3.nabble.com:
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 7:51 AM, Rogalon [hidden email] wrote:
Hi,
I am using pretty complex function queries to completely customize (not only
boost) the score of my result
Why not just add a filter query for user permissions?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Montu v Boda
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2013 9:13 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: first time with new keyword, solr take to much time to give the
result
hi
we are trying
Problem solved for me as well. The client is running in tomcat and the
connector had compression=true. I removed it and now it seems to work
fine.
On 04/16/2013 02:28 PM, Luis Lebolo wrote:
Turns out I spoke too soon. I was *not* sending the query via POST.
Changing the method to POST solved
Is it possible to use same shards at different machines at SolrCloud?
Hi
problem is that the permission is frequently update in our system so that we
have to update the index in the same manner other wise it will give wrong
result.
in that case i think the cache will get effect and the performance may be
reduced.
Thanks Regards
Montu v Boda
--
View this
Hi
problem is that the permission is frequently update in our system so that we
have to update the index in the same manner other wise it will give wrong
result.
in that case i think the cache will get effect and the performance may be
reduced.
Thanks Regards
Montu v Boda
--
View this
Guido,
The field type solr.SpatialRecursivePrefixTreeFieldType can only
participate in distance reporting for indexed points, not other shapes.
In fact, I recommend not attempting to get the distance if the field isn't
purely indexed points, as it may get confused if it seems some small
shapes.
the problem is i need to deploy it on servers where i dont know what the
absolute path will be .. basically my goal is to load solr with a different
set of configuration files based on the environment its in. Is there a a
better different way to do this
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Shawn
David,
I have been following your stackoverflow posts, I understand what you
say, we decided to change the criteria and index an extra field (close
to your suggestion), so the sorting will happen now by polygon area desc
(Which induced another problem, calculation of polygon area on a
Shawn Heisey wrote:
Solr does have some *very* limited capability for doing joins between
indexes, but generally speaking, you need to flatten the data.
thanks!
So, using a dynamic schema I'd flatten the following JSON object graph
{
'id':'xyz123',
'obj1': {
'child1': {
'prop1':
Hello - I'm trying to add a switch statement into a JavaScript function that
we use during an import; it's to replace an if else block that is becoming
increasingly large.
Bizarrely, the switch block is ignore entirely, and it doesn't have any
effect whatsoever.
Our version info:
Solr
Hi,
Have you considered ManifoldCF?
Otis
--
SOLR Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm/index.html
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Montu v Boda
montu.b...@highqsolutions.com wrote:
Hi
problem is that the permission is frequently update in our system so that we
have to update
David,
I just peak it at github, the method will estimate well for our
purpose, but depends on JTS which we included in our Solr server only,
but we don't want LGPL libraries (v3) in our main project, kind of a
show stopper, I understand is needed for spatial4j, Lucene and Solr in
general,
On 4/16/2013 8:47 AM, Adeel Qureshi wrote:
the problem is i need to deploy it on servers where i dont know what the
absolute path will be .. basically my goal is to load solr with a different
set of configuration files based on the environment its in. Is there a a
better different way to do this
:
: If i disable update log in solr 4.2 then i get the following exception
: SEVERE: :java.lang.NullPointerException
: at
:
org.apache.solr.cloud.ShardLeaderElectionContext.runLeaderProcess(ElectionContext.java:190)
Hmmm.. if you don't have updateLog and you run in SolrCloud mode, solr
'obj1/child1/prop1_ss'
Try to stick to names that follow Java naming conventions: letter or
underscore followed by letters, digits, and underscores. There are place in
Solr which have limited rules for names because they support additional
syntax.
In this case, replace your slashes with
On 4/16/2013 9:17 AM, Marko Asplund wrote:
Shawn Heisey wrote:
So, using a dynamic schema I'd flatten the following JSON object graph
{
'id':'xyz123',
'obj1': {
'child1': {
'prop1': ['val1', 'val2', 'val3']
'prop2': 123
}
'prop3': 'val4'
},
'obj2': {
Thanks for detailed explanation.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-restart-is-taking-more-than-1-hour-tp4054165p4056355.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
: In Solr 3.x, I was relying on a postCommit call to a listener in the update
: handler to perform data update to caches, this data was used to perform
: 'realtime' filtering on the documents.
I can't find it at the moment, but IIRC this was a side effect of how
snapshots are now loaded on
It sure increased the performance .
Thanks for the input.
./zahoor
On 14-Apr-2013, at 10:13 PM, J Mohamed Zahoor zah...@indix.com wrote:
Thanks..
Will try multithreading with CloudSolrServer.
./zahoor
On 13-Apr-2013, at 9:11 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 13,
: Also when I checked the solr log.
:
: [org.apache.solr.handler.SnapPuller] Master at:
: http://192.168.2.204:8080/solr/replication is not available. Index fetch
: failed. Exception: Connection refused
:
:
: BTW, I was able to fetch the replication file with wget directly.
Are you certian
Hi
I am using SolrCloud (4.1) with 6 nodes.
When i index the documents from the mapper and as the load increases.. i see
these messages in my mapper logs…
WHich looks like it is slowing down my indexing speed.
2013-04-16 06:04:18,013 INFO org.apache.solr.common.cloud.ZkStateReader:
Updating
Hi,
We noticed a strange behavior in our solr cloud setup, we are using solr4.2
with 1:3 replication setting. We noticed that some of the documents were
showing up in search sometimes and not at other, the reason being the document
was not present in all the shards.
We have restarted
If you are using the default doc router for indexing in SolrCloud, then a
document only exists in a single shard but can be replicated in that shard
to any number of replicas.
Can you clarify your question as it sounds like you're saying that the
document is not replicated across all the replicas
Are you using a the concurrent low pause garbage collector or perhaps G1?
Are you able to use something like visualvm to pinpoint what the bottleneck
might be?
Otherwise, keep raising the timeout. This means Solr and Zk are not able to
talk for that much time - either something needs to be
That's what I am trying to say, the document is not replicated across all the
replicas for a specific shard, hence the query show different results on every
refresh.
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 11:34:18 -0600
Subject: Re: Document Missing from Share in Solr cloud
From: thelabd...@gmail.com
To:
Guido,
I encourage you to try to open-source the shape-related code you have to
Spatial4j. I realize that for some organizations, that can be really
difficult.
~ David
On 4/16/13 11:55 AM, Guido Medina guido.med...@temetra.com wrote:
David,
I just peak it at github, the method will
Ok, that makes more sense and is definitely cause for concern. Do you have
a sense for whether this is ongoing or happened a few times unexpectedly in
the past? If ongoing, then will probably be easier to track down the root
cause.
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Cool Techi
Can you file a JIRA issue? - minimum you should get a better error.
- Mark
On Apr 12, 2013, at 9:17 AM, vicky desai vicky.de...@germinait.com wrote:
If i disable update log in solr 4.2 then i get the following exception
SEVERE: :java.lang.NullPointerException
at
Leaders don't have much to do with querying - the node that you query will
determine what other nodes it has to query to search the whole index and do a
scatter/gather for you. (Though in some cases that request can be proxied to
another node)
- Mark
On Apr 16, 2013, at 7:48 AM, Furkan KAMACI
We just tried to use
.../solr/admin/cores?action=RENAMEcore=core0other=core5
to rename a core 'old' to 'new'.
After the request is done, the solr.xml has new core name, and the solr
admin shows the new core name in the list. But the index dir still has the
old name as the directory name. I
btw ... what is the field type of your unique ID field?
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Timothy Potter thelabd...@gmail.comwrote:
Ok, that makes more sense and is definitely cause for concern. Do you have
a sense for whether this is ongoing or happened a few times unexpectedly in
the past?
On 4/16/2013 2:02 PM, Jie Sun wrote:
We just tried to use
.../solr/admin/cores?action=RENAMEcore=core0other=core5
to rename a core 'old' to 'new'.
After the request is done, the solr.xml has new core name, and the solr
admin shows the new core name in the list. But the index dir still has the
Hi Shawn,
I do have persistent=true in my solr.xml:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8 ?
solr persistent=true
cores adminPath=/admin/cores
core name=default instanceDir=.//
core name=413a instanceDir=.//
core name=blah instanceDir=.//
...
/cores
/solr
the command I ran was to rename
Hi Mark;
When I speak with proper terms I want to ask that: is there a data locality
of spatial locality (
http://www.roguewave.com/portals/0/products/threadspotter/docs/2011.2/manual_html_linux/manual_html/ch_intro_locality.html
- I mean if you have data on your machine, use it and don't search
Is there any document that describes why indexing and querying performance
is better at SolrCloud compared to older versions of Solr?
I was examining that architecture to use: there will be a cloud of Solr
that just do indexing and there will be another cloud that copies that
indexes into them
Hi Otis and Jack;
I have made a research about highlights and debugged code. I see that
highlight are query dependent and not stored. Why Solr uses Lucene for
storing text, I mean i.e. content of a web page. Is there any comparison
about to store texts at Hbase or any other databases versus
: sorry for pushing, but I just replayed the steps with solr 4.0 where
: everything works fine.
: Then I switched to solr 4.2.1 and replayed the exact same steps and the
: collection won't start and no leader will be elected.
:
: Any clues ?
: Should I try it on the developer mailing list, maybe
I want to make it clear in my mind:
When a search query comes to a replica what happens?
-Does it forwards the search query to leader and leader collects all the
data and prepares response (this will cause a performance issue because
leader is responsible for indexing at same time)
or
- replica
Is it possible that different shards have different number of documents or
does SolrCloud balance them?
I ask this question because I want to learn the mechanism behind how Solr
calculete hash value of the identifier of the document. Is it possible that
hash function produces more documents into
Hi,
No, I believe redirect from replica to leader would happen only at
index time, so a doc first gets indexed to leader and from there it's
replicated to non-leader shards. At query time there is no redirect
to leader, I imagine, as that would quickly turn leaders into
hotspots.
Otis
--
Solr
They won't be exact, but should be close. Are you seeing some *big*
differences?
Otis
--
Solr ElasticSearch Support
http://sematext.com/
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Furkan KAMACI furkankam...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it possible that different shards have different number of documents or
People do use other data stores to retrieve data sometimes. e.g. Mongo
is popular for that. Like I hinted in another email, I wouldn't
necessarily recommend this for common cases. Don't do it unless you
really know you need it. Otherwise, just store in Solr.
Otis
--
Solr ElasticSearch Support
Correct. With SolrCloud you typically don't need to make this
separation (with ElasticSearch one can designate some nodes as
non-data nodes). SolrCloud won't necessarily always be faster because
it typically involves sharding and thus a distributed search, while
some non-SolrCloud setups can
If query comes to shard X on some node and this shard X is NOT a
leader, but HAS data, it will just execute the query. If it needs to
query shards on other nodes, it will have the info about which shards
to query and will just do that and aggregate the results. It doesn't
have to ask leader for
All in all will replica ask to its leader about where is remaining of data
or it directly asks to Zookeper?
2013/4/17 Otis Gospodnetic otis.gospodne...@gmail.com
Hi,
No, I believe redirect from replica to leader would happen only at
index time, so a doc first gets indexed to leader and from
No.
Otis
--
Solr ElasticSearch Support
http://sematext.com/
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Furkan KAMACI furkankam...@gmail.com wrote:
All in all will replica ask to its leader about where is remaining of data
or it directly asks to Zookeper?
2013/4/17 Otis Gospodnetic
Hi Otis;
Firstly thanks for your answers. So do you mean that hashing mechanism will
randomly route a document into a randomly shard? I want to ask it because I
consider about putting a load balancer in front of my SolrCloud and
manually route some documents into some other shards to avoid
Hi,
Replication when everything is working well is push:
* request comes to any node, ideally leader
* doc is indexed on leader
* doc is copied to replicas
If replica falls too far behind (not exactly sure what the too far
threshold is), it uses pull to replicate the whole index from leader.
Thanks again for your answer. If I find any document about such comparisons
that I would like to read.
By the way, is there any advantage for using Lucene instead of anything
else as like that:
Using Lucene is naturally supported at Solr and if I use anything else I
may face with some
Hi,
Routing is not random... have a look at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2341 . In short, you
shouldn't have to route manually from your app.
Otis
--
Solr ElasticSearch Support
http://sematext.com/
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 6:26 PM, Furkan KAMACI furkankam...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Otis;
You said:
It can just do it because it knows where things are.
Does it learn it from Zookeeper?
2013/4/17 Otis Gospodnetic otis.gospodne...@gmail.com
If query comes to shard X on some node and this shard X is NOT a
leader, but HAS data, it will just execute the query. If it needs
Use Solr. It's pretty clear you don't yet have any problems that
would make you think about alternatives. Using Solr to store and not
just index will make your life simpler (and your app simpler and
likely faster).
Otis
--
Solr ElasticSearch Support
http://sematext.com/
On Tue, Apr 16,
Hi,
It doesn't have the offset information, but checkout my patch
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4722 which outputs the position
of each term that's been matched. I'm eager to get some feedback on this
approach and any improvements that might be suggested.
Cheers,
Tricia
On Wed,
Hi,
Try Solr Suggester, though I'm not sure if you can group with it.
tried http://search-lucene.com/?q=suggester+groupfc_project=Solr but
it doesn't seem to yield much. If you need to group suggestions like
what you see on http://search-lucene.com/ for example, we use our own
AC from
Oui, ZK holds the map.
Otis
--
Solr ElasticSearch Support
http://sematext.com/
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Furkan KAMACI furkankam...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Otis;
You said:
It can just do it because it knows where things are.
Does it learn it from Zookeeper?
2013/4/17 Otis
See
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4532
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1535
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4619
Otis
--
Solr ElasticSearch Support
http://sematext.com/
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Furkan KAMACI furkankam...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Erick;
Replica asks to Zookeper and Leader does not do anything. Thanks for your
answer Otis.
2013/4/17 Otis Gospodnetic otis.gospodne...@gmail.com
Oui, ZK holds the map.
Otis
--
Solr ElasticSearch Support
http://sematext.com/
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Furkan KAMACI
Yesterday, we spent 1 hour with a client looking at their cluster's
performance metrics SPM, their indexing logs, etc. trying to figure
out why some indexing was slower than it should have been. We traced
issues to network hickups, to VMs that would move from host to host,
etc. Really fancy and
Hi Sam,
Sounds like you may want to disable caches, yes. But instead of
guessing, just look at the stats and based on that configure your
caches. You can get stats from Solr Admin page or, if you need
long-term stats and performance patterns, use SPM for Solr or
something similar.
Otis
--
Solr
On 4/16/2013 2:39 PM, Jie Sun wrote:
Hi Shawn,
I do have persistent=true in my solr.xml:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8 ?
solr persistent=true
cores adminPath=/admin/cores
core name=default instanceDir=.//
core name=413a instanceDir=.//
core name=blah instanceDir=.//
...
I don't want to bother but I try to understand that part:
When yo perform a commit in solr you have (for an instant) two versions of
the index. The commit produces new segments (with new documents, new
deletions, etc). After creating these new segments a new index searcher is
created and its
On Apr 16, 2013, at 1:36 AM, SuoNayi suonayi2...@163.com wrote:
Hi, can someone explain more details about what model is used to sync docs
between the lead and
replica in the shard?
The model can be push or pull.Supposing I have only one shard that has 1
leader and 2 replicas,
when the
Really nice presentation.
2013/4/17 Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com
On Apr 16, 2013, at 1:36 AM, SuoNayi suonayi2...@163.com wrote:
Hi, can someone explain more details about what model is used to sync
docs between the lead and
replica in the shard?
The model can be push or
: There will be a lot of data that will be indexed in Solr. My question is,
: does caching help in my case? As the filter queries will vary for almost all
: users ( because the viewport latitude/longitude would vary), in what ways
: can I use Caching to increase performance. Should I completely
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
