Evening all,
A subset of my documents have a field, filterMinutes, that some other documents
do not. filterMinutes stores a number.
I often issue a query that contains a filter query range, e.g.
q=filterMinutes:[* TO 50]
I am finding that adding this query excludes all documents that do not
Hi,
I am seeing an issue I do not understand and hope that someone can shed some
light on this. The issue is that for a particular search we are seeing a
particular result rank in position 3 on one machine and position 8 on the
production machine. The position 3 is our desired and roughly
attempts to make scores from different
queries (or even different indexes) comparable
Regards,
Jayendra
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Allistair Crossley a...@roxxor.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
I am seeing an issue I do not understand and hope that someone can shed some
light on this. The issue
That's what I think, glad I am not going mad.
I've spent 1/2 a day comparing the config files, checking out from SVN again
and ensuring the databases are identical. I cannot see what else I can do to
make them equivalent. Both servers checkout directly from SVN, I am convinced
the files are
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Allistair Crossley a...@roxxor.co.uk wrote:
Thanks. Good to know, but even so my problem remains - the end score should
not be different and is causing a dramatically different ranking of a
document (3 versus 7 is dramatic for my client). This must be down
mission.id and event.id if the same value will be overwriting the indexed
document. your ids need to be unique across all documents. i usually have a
field id_original that i map the table id to, and then for id per entity i
usually prefix it with the entity name in the value mapped to the
your first example is correct
document
entity name=newsfeed/entity
entity name=message/entity
/document
i have the same config for indexing 5 different tables
what you don't have from what i can see is a field name mapped to each column,
e.g.
field column=nf_text /
i always have to provide
handy thing is to facet.field=type and search (without a filter) as
then you'll get back counts for your Newsfeed Message results too.
On Oct 14, 2010, at 5:44 AM, Allistair Crossley wrote:
your first example is correct
document
entity name=newsfeed/entity
entity name=message/entity
/document
table (actualy Newsfeeds)
Le 14/10/2010 11:49, Allistair Crossley a écrit :
actually your intention is unclear ... are you wanting to run a single
search and get back results from BOTH newsfeed and message? or do you want
one or the other? if you want one or the other you could use my strategy
i think you need to look at ngram tokenizing
On Oct 14, 2010, at 7:55 AM, PeterKerk wrote:
I try to determine if a certain word occurs within a field.
http://localhost:8983/solr/db/select/?indent=onfacet=truefl=id,titleq=introtext:hi
this works if an EXACT match was found on field
actuall no you don't .. if you want hi in a sentence of hi there this is me
this is just normal tokenizing and should work .. check your field
type/analysers
On Oct 14, 2010, at 7:59 AM, Allistair Crossley wrote:
i think you need to look at ngram tokenizing
On Oct 14, 2010, at 7:55 AM
i think you answered the question by yourself ... these questions usually get
the response that there is no answer. solr/lucence scale and distribute to
whatever hardware you want to throw them.
you probably want to turn the question around - what is the maximum number of
documents that your
super
On Oct 14, 2010, at 8:00 AM, Anthony Maudry wrote:
Sorry for the late answer.
It works now thanks to you, Allistair.
I needed to use your uid field, common to the two entities but built in
different ways.
here is the result in a sample of the data-config.xml file
...
me also. great book, just wanted a bit more on complex DIH :)
On Oct 14, 2010, at 10:38 AM, Jason Brown wrote:
Not related to the opening thread - but wante to thank Eric for his book.
Clarified a lot of stuff and very useful.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Pugh
you will find it in the distribution at example/solr/config
On Oct 14, 2010, at 3:04 PM, Ibrahim Diop wrote:
Hi All,
I'm a new solr user and I just want to know which schema.xml file to modify
for this tutorial : http://lucene.apache.org/solr/tutorial.html
Thanks,
Ibrahim.
i would not cross-reference solr results with your database to merge unless you
want to spank your database. nor would i load solr with all your data. what i
have found is that the search results page is generally a small subset of data
relating to the fuller document/result. therefore i store
Morning all,
I would like to ngram a company name field in our index. I have read about the
costs of doing so in the great David Smiley Solr 1.4 book and just to get
started I have followed his example in setting up an ngram field type as
follows:
fieldType name=text_substring
thing I would try is to go to the analysis page, enter your test
data, and report back what each analysis stage prints out:
http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/analysis.jsp
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
On 8. okt. 2010, at 14.19, Allistair Crossley
, Markus Jelsma wrote:
How come your query analyser spits out grams? It isn't configured to do so or
you posted an older field definition. Anyway, do you actually search on your
new field?
On Friday, October 08, 2010 02:46:08 pm Allistair Crossley wrote:
Hi,
Yep, I was just looking
the
Prescott result.
So ngramming is working but it is not working when the query is something far
to the right of the indexed value.
Is this another user-error or have I missed something else here?
Cheers
On Oct 8, 2010, at 9:02 AM, Allistair Crossley wrote:
Oh my. I am basically being
/2010 10:49 AM, Allistair Crossley wrote:
Hi,
I was interested in gaining some insight into how you guys schedule updates
for your Solr index (I have a single index).
Right now during development I have added deltaQuery specifications to data
import entities to control the number of rows
I think that is just sending 2 fq facet queries through. In Solr PHP I would do
that with, e.g.
$params['facet'] = true;
$params['facet.fields'] = array('Size');
$params['fq'] = array('sex' = array('Men', 'Women'));
but yes i think you'd have to send through what the current facet query is and
/DataImportHandler#Interactive_Development_Mo
de
Ephraim Ofir
-Original Message-
From: Allistair Crossley [mailto:a...@roxxor.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 3:09 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: DIH sub-entity not indexing
Thanks Ephraim. I tried your suggestion
/lucene-solr-user/201008.mbox/%3
c9f8b39cb3b7c6d4594293ea29ccf438b01702...@icq-mail.icq.il.office.aol.com
%3E
Ephraim Ofir
-Original Message-
From: Allistair Crossley [mailto:a...@roxxor.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 2:49 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: DIH
Hello list,
I've been successful with DIH to a large extent but a seemingly simple extra
column I need is posing problems. In a nutshell I have 2 entities let's say -
Listing habtm Contact. I have copied the relevant parts of the configs below.
I have run my SQL for the sub-entity Contact and
Very clever thinking indeed. Well, that's certainly revealed the problem ...
${listing.id} is empty on my sub-entity query ...
And this because I prefix the indexed ID with a letter
field column=id name=id template=L${listing.id} /
This appears to modify the internal value of $listing.id for
I updated the SolrJ JAR requirements to be clearer on the wiki page given how
many of these SolrJ emails I saw coming through since joining the list. I just
created a test java class and imported the removed JARs until I found out the
minimal set required.
On Oct 4, 2010, at 8:27 AM, Erick
=contacts column=full_name /
/entity
/entity
/entity
Am I missing the obvious?
On Oct 4, 2010, at 8:22 AM, Allistair Crossley wrote:
Hello list,
I've been successful with DIH to a large extent but a seemingly simple extra
column I need is posing problems
i rewrote the top jar section at
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solrj
and the following code then runs fine.
import java.net.MalformedURLException;
import org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrQuery;
import org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrServer;
import
i would say question and answer are 2 different entities. if you are using the
data import handler, i would personally create them as separate entities with
their own queries to the database using the deltaQuery method to pick up only
new rows. i guess it depends if you need question + answers
, 10/1/10, Allistair Crossley a...@roxxor.co.uk wrote:
From: Allistair Crossley a...@roxxor.co.uk
Subject: Re: Any way to append new text to an existing indexed field?
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Friday, October 1, 2010, 7:46 AM
i would say question and answer are 2
different
no example anyone gives you will solve your class not found exception .. you
need to ensure the relevant jars (in dist) are included in your solr instance's
lib folder i guess?
On Oct 1, 2010, at 10:50 AM, Xin Li wrote:
Hi, there,
Just picked up SolrJ few days ago. I have my Solr Server
issue. If that's the case, I will
grab Perl solution, and come back to SolrJ later.
Thanks,
Xin
-Original Message-
From: Allistair Crossley [mailto:a...@roxxor.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 11:52 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: any working SolrJ code
it's in the dist folder with the name provided by the wiki page you refer to
On Sep 30, 2010, at 3:01 PM, Christopher Gross wrote:
Where can I get SolrJ? The wiki makes reference to it, and says that it is
a part of the Solr builds that you download, but I can't find it in the jars
that come
Hello list,
I am implementing a directory using Solr. The user is able to search with a
free-text query or 2 filters (provided as pick-lists) for country. A directory
entry only has one country.
I am using Solr facets for country and I use the facet counts generated
initially by a *:* search
Hi,
For us this is a usability concern. You either don't show Sweden in a pick-list
called Country and some users go away thinking you don't *ever* support Sweden
(not true). OR you allow a user to execute an empty result search - but at
least they know you do support Sweden.
It is we believe
This kind of thing is not limited to Solr and you normally wouldn't solve it in
software - it's more a network concern. I'd be looking at a web server solution
such as Apache mod_evasive combined with a good firewall for more conventional
DOS attacks. Just hide your Solr install behind the
37 matches
Mail list logo
