25 June 2014, Apache Solr™ 4.9.0 available
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 4.9.0
Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform
from the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful
full-text search, hit highlighting, faceted
May 2014, Apache Solr™ 4.8.1 available
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 4.8.1
Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform
from the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful
full-text search, hit highlighting, faceted
April 2014, Apache Solr™ 4.7.2 available
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 4.7.2
Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform
from the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful
full-text search, hit highlighting, faceted
Hello, I think you are confused between two different index
structures, probably because of the name of the options in solr.
1. indexing term vectors: this means given a document, you can go
lookup a miniature inverted index just for that document. That means
each document has term vectors which
I debugged the PDF a little. FWIW, the following code (using iText)
takes it to 9MB:
public static void main(String args[]) throws Exception {
Document document = new Document();
PdfSmartCopy copy = new PdfSmartCopy(document, new
FileOutputStream(/home/rmuir/Downloads/test.pdf));
you need the solr analysis-extras jar in your classpath, too.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 6:45 AM, Thomas Fischer fischer...@aon.at wrote:
Hello,
I'm migrating to solr 4.6.1 and have problems with the ICUCollationField
(apache-solr-ref-guide-4.6.pdf, pp. 31 and 100).
I get consistently the
mentioned are
loaded.
Do you know which jar is supposed to contain the ICUCollationField?
Best regards
Thomas
Am 19.02.2014 um 13:54 schrieb Robert Muir:
you need the solr analysis-extras jar in your classpath, too.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 6:45 AM, Thomas Fischer fischer...@aon.at
-analysis-extras-4.6.1.jar in dist.
Best
Thomas
Am 19.02.2014 um 14:27 schrieb Robert Muir:
you need the solr analysis-extras jar itself, too.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:25 AM, Thomas Fischer fischer...@aon.at
wrote:
Hello Robert,
I already added
contrib/analysis-extras/lib
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Thomas Fischer fischer...@aon.at wrote:
Hmm, for standardization of text fields, collation might be a little
awkward.
I arrived there after using custom rules for a while (see
RuleBasedCollator on http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UnicodeCollation) and
then
January 2014, Apache Solr™ 4.6.1 available The Lucene PMC is pleased
to announce the release of Apache Solr 4.6.1Solr is the popular,
blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform from the Apache Lucene
project. Its major features include powerful full-text search, hit
highlighting, faceted
This exception comes from OffsetAttributeImpl (e.g. you dont need to
index anything to reproduce it).
Maybe you have a missing clearAttributes() call (your tokenizer
'returns true' without calling that first)? This could explain it, if
something like a StopFilter is also present in the chain:
no, its turned on by default in the default similarity.
as i said, all that is necessary is to fix your analyzer to emit the
proper position increments.
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Manuel Le Normand
manuel.lenorm...@gmail.com wrote:
In order to set discountOverlaps to true you must have
its accurate, you are wrong.
please, look at setDiscountOverlaps in your similarity. This is really
easy to understand.
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Manuel Le Normand
manuel.lenorm...@gmail.com wrote:
Robert, you last reply is not accurate.
It's true that the field norms and termVectors are
Your analyzer needs to set positionIncrement correctly: sounds like its broken.
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Isaac Hebsh isaac.he...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
we implemented a morphologic analyzer, which stems words on index time.
For some reasons, we index both the original word and the stem
) positions look all right (for me).
2) fieldNorm is determined by the size of the termVector, isn't it? the
termVector size isn't affected by the positions.
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
Your analyzer needs to set positionIncrement correctly: sounds like its
which example? there are so many.
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
RE: the example folder
It’s something I’ve been pushing towards moving away from for a long time -
see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3619 Rename 'example' dir to
I think its a bug, but thats just my opinion. i sent a patch to dev@
for thoughts.
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmmm, so you're saying that merging indexes where a field
has been removed isn't handled. So you have some documents
that do have a
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 3:59 AM, Chris Collins ch...@geekychris.com wrote:
I am using 4.4 in an embedded mode and found that it has a dependency on
hadoop 2.0.5. alpha that in turn depends on jetty 6.1.26 which I think
pre-dates electricity :-}
I think this is only a test dependency ?
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 3:53 AM, ses stew...@ssims.co.uk wrote:
We are trying out the new PostingsHighlighter with Solr 4.2.1 and finding
that the highlighting section of the response includes self-closing tags
for
all the fields in hl.fl (by default for edismax it is all fields in qf)
where
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
: why? Those are my sort fields and they are occupying a lot of space (doubled
: in this case but I see that sometimes I have three or four old segment
: references)
:
: Is there something I can do to remove
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
: FieldCaches are managed using a WeakHashMap - so once the IndexReader's
: associated with those FieldCaches are no logner used, they will be garbage
: collected when and if the JVMs garbage collector get
did you do a (real) commit before trying to use this?
I am not sure how this splitting works, but at least the merge option
requires that.
i can't see this happening unless you are somehow splitting a 0
document index (or, if the splitter is creating 0 document splits)
so this is likely just a
Well, i meant before, but i just took a look and this is implemented
differently than the merge one.
In any case, i think its the same bug, because I think the only way
this can happen is if somehow this splitter is trying to create a
0-document split (or maybe a split containing all deletions).
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
shalinman...@gmail.com wrote:
The splitting code calls commit before it starts the splitting. It creates
a LiveDocsReader using a bitset created by the split. This reader is merged
to an index using addIndexes.
Shouldn't the addIndexes
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Mathias Lux m...@itec.uni-klu.ac.at wrote:
Hi!
I'm basically searching for a method to put byte[] data into Lucene
DocValues of type BINARY (see [1]). Currently only primitives and
Strings are supported according to [1].
I know that this can be done with a
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Mathias Lux m...@itec.uni-klu.ac.at wrote:
Another thing for not using the the SORTED_SET and SORTED
implementations is, that Solr currently works with Strings on that and
I want to have a small memory footprint for millions of images ...
which does not go
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 7:48 PM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com wrote:
So is there a good way, without optimizing, to purge any segments not
referenced in the segments file? Actually I doubt that optimizing would
even do it if I _could_, any phantom segments aren't visible from the
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
: I agree with you, 0xfffe is a special character, that is why I was asking
: how it's handled in solr.
: In my document, 0xfffe does not appear at the beginning, it's in the
: content.
Unless i'm
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
: 0xfffe is not a special character -- it is explicitly *not* a character in
: Unicode at all, it is set asside as not a character. specifically so
: that the character 0xfeff can be used as a BOM, and if the
If you use wikipediatokenizer it will tag different wiki elements with
different types (you can see it in the admin UI).
so then followup with typetokenfilter to only filter the types you care
about, and i think it will do what you want.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 7:53 AM, Furkan KAMACI
Where do you get the docid from? Usually its best to just look at the whole
algorithm, e.g. docids come from per-segment readers by default anyway so
ideally you want to access any per-document things from that same
segmentreader.
As far as supporting docvalues, FieldCache API passes thru to
If you have a good idea... Just do it. Open an issue
On Jun 11, 2013 9:34 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch arafa...@gmail.com wrote:
I think it is quite hard for beginners that basic solr example
directory is competing for attention with other - nested - examples. I
see quite a lot of questions on
done. let us know if you have any problems.
On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Krunal jariwalakru...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Sir,
Kindly add me to the contributor group to help me contribute to the Solr
wiki.
My Email id: jariwalakru...@gmail.com
Login Name: Krunal
Specific changes I would
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 4:19 AM, John Nielsen j...@mcb.dk wrote:
Schema with DocValues attempt at solving problem:
http://pastebin.com/Ne23NnW4
Config: http://pastebin.com/x1qykyXW
This schema isn't using docvalues, due to a typo in your config.
it should not be DocValues=true but
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Eoghan Ó Carragáin
eoghan.ocarrag...@gmail.com wrote:
I can see why the Fuzzy Suggester sees college as a match for colla but
expected the exactMatchFirst parameter to ensure that suggestions beginning
with colla to be weighted higher than fuzzier matches. I
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 6:46 AM, raulgrande83 raulgrand...@hotmail.com wrote:
Thank you for your help. I'm afraid it won't be so easy to change de jvm
version, because it is required at the moment.
It seems that Solr 4.2 supports Java 1.6 at least. Is that correct?
Could you find any clue of
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 12:07 PM, raulgrande83 raulgrand...@hotmail.com wrote:
JVM: IBM J9 VM(1.6.0.2.4)
I don't recommend using this JVM.
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Eric Wilson wilson.eri...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to use the suggester for auto-completion with Solr 4. I have
followed the example configuration for phrase suggestions at the bottom of
this wiki page:
I agree. Actually that top-level logic is fine. its the loop that
follows thats wrong: it needs to look at position increment and do the
right thing.
Want to open a JIRA issue?
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 9:15 PM, 李威 li...@antvision.cn wrote:
in org.apache.solr.parser.SolrQueryParserBase, there is
March 2013, Apache Solr™ 4.2 available
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 4.2
Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform
from the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful
full-text search, hit highlighting, faceted search,
fieldName,Reader reader) in LUCENE_34. Instead, there is a method required
to override: tokenStream(String fieldName, Reader reader). Is there a way
of incorporating the custom filter into the TokenStream?
Dmitry
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
MockAnalyzer
MockAnalyzer is really just MocKTokenizer+MockTokenFilter+
Instead you just define your own analyzer chain using MockTokenizer.
This is the way all lucene's own analysis tests work: e.g.
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Meng Muk
meng@uniqueinteractive.com wrote:
If I set the field type to text_en however it works, I'm guessing
something in the way the text is being analyzed is causing this exception
to appear? Is there a limitation in how storeOffsetsWithPositions should
25 December 2012, Apache Solr™ 3.6.2 available
The Lucene PMC and Santa Claus are pleased to announce the release of
Apache Solr 3.6.2.
Solr is the popular, blazing fast open source enterprise search
platform from the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include
powerful full-text search,
I think you are hitting solr-3589. There is a vote underway for a 3.6.2
that contains this fix
On Dec 20, 2012 6:29 PM, kirpakaro khem...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi folks,
I am having couple of problems with Japanese data, 1. it is not
properly
indexing all the data 2. displaying the exact
Your attachment didnt come through: I think the list strips them.
Maybe just open a JIRA and attach your screenshots? or put them
elsewhere and just include a link?
As far as the ultimate behavior, I think its correct. Keep in mind
tokens don't really get a script value: runs of untokenized text
I agree with James. Actually lucene tests will fail if a codec violates this.
Actually it goes much deeper than this.
From the lucene apis, when you call IndexReader.document() with your
storedfieldVisitor, it must visit the fields in the original order
added.
so even if you do:
add(title,
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Roman Chyla roman.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
The code here:
https://github.com/romanchyla/montysolr/blob/solr-trunk/contrib/adsabs/src/test/org/adsabs/lucene/BenchmarkAuthorSearch.java
The benchmark should probably not be called 'benchmark', do you think it
Hi again Markus. Sorry for the slow reply here.
I'm confused: are you saying the score goes negative? Are you sure there is
no 3.x segments? Can you check that docCount is not -1? Do you happen to
have a test, can you share your modified similarity, or give more details?
I just want to make sure
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Frederico Azeiteiro
frederico.azeite...@cision.com wrote:
Fo make some further testing I installed SOLR 3.5.0 using default Jetty
server.
When tried to start SOLR using the same schema I get:
SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Error loading class
:07 WET 2012
Server Start Time:Wed Nov 14 11:40:36 WET 2012
??
Thanks,
Frederico
-Mensagem original-
De: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com]
Enviada: quarta-feira, 14 de Novembro de 2012 16:28
Para: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Assunto: Re: Error loading class
Yes, its a subset
On Nov 14, 2012 1:18 PM, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote:
I am using ICUFoldingFilterFactory in my Solr schema. Now I am looking at
adding CJKBigramFilterFactory, and I've noticed that it often goes with
CJKWidthFilterFactory. Here are the relevant Javadocs for my
I think the UI uses this behind the scenes, as in no more
analysis.jsp like before?
So maybe try using something like burpsuite and just using the
analysis UI in your browser to see what requests its sending.
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Tom Burton-West tburt...@umich.edu wrote:
Hello,
I
Whenever I look at solr users' stacktraces for disjunctions, I always
notice they get BooleanScorer2.
Is there some reason for this or is it not intentional (e.g. maybe a
in-order collector is always being used when its possible at least in
simple cases to allow for out-of-order hits?)
When I
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Daniel Brügge
daniel.brue...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
i am running a SolrCloud cluster with the 4.0.0 version. I have a stopwords
file
which is in the correct encoding.
What makes you think that?
Note: Because I can read it is not the correct answer.
Hi Markus: how are the languages distributed across documents?
Imagine I have a text_en field and a text_fr field. Lets say I have
100 documents, 95 are english and only 5 are french.
So the text_en field is populated 95% of the time, and the text_fr 5%
of the time.
But the default IDF
You have a character encoding issue: this is telling you the file is
not correctly encoded as UTF-8.
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 6:11 PM, dm_tim dm_...@yahoo.com wrote:
I should have mentioned I tried that. I get the following exception:
SEVERE: Unable to create core: core0
you will have to use 'find' on your .ivy2 !
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Markus Jelsma
markus.jel...@openindex.io wrote:
Hi,
Where is that lock file located? I triggered it again (in another contrib)
and wil trigger it again in the future and don't want to remove my ivy cache
each time
Its not wonky. you just have to ensure you have nothing else (like
some IDE, or build somewhere else) using ivy, then its safe to remove
the .lck file there.
I turned on this locking so that it hangs instead of causing cache
corruption, but ivy only has simplelockfactory so if you ^C at the
wrong
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Aaron Daubman daub...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings,
We have a solr instance in use that gets some perhaps atypical queries
and suffers from poor (2 second) QTimes.
Documents (~2,350,000) in this instance are mainly comprised of
various descriptive fields,
calling reset() is mandatory part of the consumer lifecycle before
calling incrementToken(), see:
https://lucene.apache.org/core/4_0_0/core/org/apache/lucene/analysis/TokenStream.html
A lot of people don't consume these correctly, thats why these
tokenizers now try to throw exceptions if you do
October 12 2012, Apache Solr™ 4.0 available.
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 4.0.
Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform
from the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful
full-text search, hit highlighting, faceted
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:02 AM, O. Klein kl...@octoweb.nl wrote:
I don't want to tweak the threshold. For majority of cases it works fine.
It's for cases where term has low frequency but is spelled correctly.
If you lower the threshold you would also get incorrect spelled terms as
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Patrick Oliver Glauner
patrick.oliver.glau...@cern.ch wrote:
Hi
Thanks. But I see that 0xd835 is missing in this list (see my exceptions).
What's the best way to get rid of all of them in Python? I am new to unicode
in Python but I am sure that this use case
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 3:09 AM, Bernd Fehling
bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de wrote:
By the way while looking for upgrading to JDK7, the release notes say under
section
known issues about the PorterStemmer bug:
...The recommended workaround is to specify -XX:-UseLoopPredicate on the
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 4:43 PM, BadalChhatbar badal...@yahoo.com wrote:
Steve,
Those document tips didn't help.
errors i m getting are like (_TestUtil cannot be resolved).
Did you do these two steps:
1. ant eclipse
2. refresh your project
--
lucidworks.com
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Tom Burton-West tburt...@umich.edu wrote:
Thanks Robert,
I'll have to spend some time understanding the default codec for Solr 4.0.
Did I miss something in the changes file?
http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_0_0-BETA/
see the file formats section, especially
14 August 2012, Apache Solr™ 4.0-beta available
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 4.0-beta.
Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform from
the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text
search, hit highlighting,
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:20 AM, tech.vronk t...@vronk.net wrote:
Hello,
I wonder how to figure out the total token count in a collection (per
index), i.e. the size of a corpus/collection measured in tokens.
You want to use this statistic, which tells you number of tokens for
an indexed
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 4:24 PM, tech.vronk t...@vronk.net wrote:
Is there any 3.6 equivalent for this, before I install and run 4.0?
I can't seem to find a corresponding class (org.apache.lucene.index.Terms)
in 3.6.
unfortunately 3.6 does not carry this statistic, there is really no
clear
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 12:38 AM, Justin Engelman jus...@smalldemons.com wrote:
I have an autocomplete index that I return highlighting information for but
am getting an error with certain search strings and fields on Solr 3.5.
try the 3.6 release:
* LUCENE-3642, SOLR-2891, LUCENE-3717: Fixed
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Himanshu Jindal
himanshujin...@gmail.com wrote:
filter class=solr.SynonymFilterFactory synonyms=synonyms_ja.txt
ignoreCase=true expand=true
tokenFactory=solr.JapaneseTokenizerFactory randomAttribute=randomValue/
I think you have a typo here, it should be
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 3:13 AM, Laurent Vaills laurent.vai...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
Is there any chance to get his backported for a 3.6.2 ?
Hello, I personally have no problem with it: but its really
technically not a bugfix, just an optimization.
It also doesnt solve the actual
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 2:34 PM, roz dev rozde...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All
I am using Solr 4 from trunk and using it with Tomcat 6. I am noticing that
when we are indexing lots of data with 16 concurrent threads, Heap grows
continuously. It remains high and ultimately most of the stuff ends up
/swissbib/solr.versions/configs/current.home/viaf
Jul 16, 2012 5:27:48 PM org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader init
**end of Exception***
2012/7/21 Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com
Can you include the entire exception? This is really necessary!
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 2:58 AM, Oliver Schihin
Can you include the entire exception? This is really necessary!
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 2:58 AM, Oliver Schihin
oliver.schi...@unibas.ch wrote:
Hello
According to release notes from 4.0.0-ALPHA, SOLR-2396, I replaced
ICUCollationKeyFilterFactory with ICUCollationField in our schema. But this
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 12:10 AM, Aaron Daubman daub...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings,
I've been digging in to this for two days now and have come up short -
hopefully there is some simple answer I am just not seeing:
I have a solr 1.4.1 instance and a solr 3.6.0 instance, both configured as
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Aaron Daubman daub...@gmail.com wrote:
Apologies if I didn't clearly state my goal/concern: I am not looking for
the exact same scoring - I am looking to explain scoring differences.
Deprecated components will eventually go away, time moves on, etc...
etc...
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:11 AM, Vadim Kisselmann
v.kisselm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
my Test-Server with Solr 4.0 from trunk(version 1292064 from late
february) throws this exception...
Can you run Lucene's checkIndex tool on your index?
If that is clean, can you try a newer version?
Hello,
This is because Solr's Codec implementation defers to the schema, to
determine how the field should be indexed. When a core is reloaded,
the IndexWriter is not closed but the existing writer is kept around:
so you are basically trying to index to the old version of schema
before the
Thanks again for reporting this Brent. I opened a JIRA issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3610
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Brent Mills bmi...@uship.com wrote:
We're having an issue when we add or change a field in the db-data-config.xml
and schema.xml files in solr.
3 July 2012, Apache Solr™ 4.0-alpha available
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 4.0-alpha.
Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform from
the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text
search, hit highlighting,
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 5:50 AM, Rok Rejc rokrej...@gmail.com wrote:
- java.runtime.nameOpenJDK Runtime Environment
- java.runtime.version1.6.0_22-b22
...
As far as I see from the JIRA issue I have the patch attached (as mentioned
I have a trunk version from May 12). Any ideas?
its not
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
Does this suggest anything to anyone? Other than that we've
misanalyzed the logic in the tokenizer and there's a way to make it
burp on one thread?
it might suggest the different tokenstream instances refer to some
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 5:04 AM, Markus Jelsma
markus.jel...@openindex.io wrote:
Thanks Robert,
The difference in scores is clear now so it shouldn't matter as queryNorm
doesn't affect ranking but coord does. Can you explain why coord is left out
now and why it is considered to skew results
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 5:13 AM, Markus Jelsma
markus.jel...@openindex.io wrote:
Thanks but i am clearly missing something? We declare the similarity in the
fieldType just as in the example and looking at the example again i don't see
how it's being done differently. What am i missnig and
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Markus Jelsma
markus.jel...@openindex.io wrote:
Hi!
Ah, it makes sense now! This global configured similarity knows returns a
fieldType defined similarity if available and if not the standard Lucene
similarity. This would, i assume, mean that the two
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Markus Jelsma
markus.jel...@openindex.io wrote:
We simply declare the following in our fieldType:
similarity class=FQCN/
Thats not enough, see the example:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/trunk/solr/core/src/test-files/solr/conf/schema-sim.xml
--
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Tom Burton-West tburt...@umich.edu wrote:
But in Solr 3.6 I am not seeing the boost factor called out.
On the other hand it looks like it may now be incoroporated in the
queryNorm (Please see example below).
Is there a bug in Solr 3.6 debugQueries? Is
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:17 AM, anarchos78
rigasathanasio...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Is it possible to use two language analyzers for one fieldtype. Lets say
Greek and English (for indexing and querying)
For greek and english, its easy, they use totally different characters
so none of
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Tanguy Moal tanguy.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Any idea someone ?
I think this is important since this could produce weird results on
collections with numbers mixed in text.
I agree, i think we should just add ' Character.isLetter(ch)' to the
undoublet check?
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Naomi Dushay ndus...@stanford.edu wrote:
We are using the ICUFoldingFilterFactory with great success to fold
diacritics so searches with and without the diacritics get the same results.
We recently discovered we have some Korean records that use an alif
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 9:35 AM, OliverS oliver.schi...@unibas.ch wrote:
Hello
I read and tried a lot, but somehow I don't fully understand and it doesn't
work. I'm working on solr 4.0 (latest trunk) and use
ICUCollationKeyFilterFactory for my main field type. Now, wildcard queries
don't
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Ken Krugler
kkrugler_li...@transpac.com wrote:
What confuses me is that Suggester says it's based on SpellChecker, which
supposedly does work with shards.
It is based on spellchecker apis, but spellchecker's ranking is based
on simple comparators like string
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Ken Krugler kkrugler_li...@transpac.com wrote:
Hi list,
Does anybody know if the Suggester component is designed to work with shards?
I'm not really sure it is? They would probably have to override the
default merge implementation specified by SpellChecker.
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Bai Shen baishen.li...@gmail.com wrote:
I was under the impression that solr does Tika and the language identifier
that Shuyo did. The page at
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/LanguageDetectionlists them both.
processor
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 12:10 PM, carl.nordenf...@bwinparty.com
carl.nordenf...@bwinparty.com wrote:
Directly injecting the letter ö into synonyms like so:
island, ön
island, ön
renders the following exception on startup (both lines renders the same
error):
java.lang.RuntimeException:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Burton-West, Tom tburt...@umich.edu wrote:
Hello all,
I'm getting ready to upgrade from Solr 3.4 to Solr 3.6 and I noticed that
maxMergeDocs is no longer in the example solrconfig.xml.
Has maxMergeDocs been deprecated? or doe the tieredMergePolicy ignore it?
This is the term dictionary for 4.0's default codec (currently uses
BlockTree implementation)
.tim is the on-disk portion of the terms (similar in function to .tis
in previous releases)
.tip is the in-memory terms index (similar in function to .tii in
previous releases)
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at
12 April 2012, Apache Solr™ 3.6.0 available
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 3.6.0.
Solr is the popular, blazing fast open source enterprise search platform from
the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text
search, hit highlighting,
1 - 100 of 354 matches
Mail list logo
