On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 1:12 PM, andrewdps mstpa...@gmail.com wrote:
What could be possible error for
14-Sep-10 4:28:47 PM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log
SEVERE: java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException:
java.lang.NullPointerException
at
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Niall O'Connor
ocon...@jimmy.harvard.edu wrote:
Has anyone come across a situation where they have seen their facet field
values wrap into a new facet entry when the value exceeds 256 characters?
Yes, for indexed string fields, there currently is a limit of 256
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 4:54 PM, h00kpub...@gmail.com
h00kpub...@googlemail.com wrote:
SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Error while creating field
'metadata_last_modified{type=date,properties=indexed,stored,omitNorms}' from
value '2010-09-14T22:29:24+0200'
Different timezones are
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Brian Whitman br...@echonest.com wrote:
Hi all, brief message to let you know that we're in heavy hire mode at the
Echo Nest. As many of you know we are very heavy solr/lucene users (~1bn
documents across many many servers) and a lot of our staff have been
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 2:12 PM, brian519 bpear...@desire2learn.com wrote:
Once we see the error, it is persistent. Restarting Tomcat makes the error
stop. This is happening across a variety of deployments and networks, so I
don't think there is an actual network problem. Many other apps
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Ron Mayer r...@0ape.com wrote:
Ron Mayer wrote:
Yes, looks good now.
Thanks!
Great, thanks for the report!
-Yonik
http://lucenerevolution.org Lucene/Solr Conference, Boston Oct 7-8
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 1:20 AM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:
You _could_ use SolrJ with EmbeddedSolrServer. But personally I wouldn't
unless there's a reason to. There's no automatic reason not to use the
ordinary Solr HTTP api, even for an in-house application which is not a
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Ron Mayer r...@0ape.com wrote:
Short summary:
* Mixing Facets and Shards give me a NullPointerException
when not all docs have all facets.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2110
I believe the underlying real issue stemmed from your use of a complex
2010 at 1:32 PM, Markus Jelsma markus.jel...@buyways.nl wrote:
Interesting! I haven't met the appends method before and i'll be sure to give
it a try tomorrow. Try, the wiki [1] is not very clear on what it really does.
Here's a comment from the example solrconfig.xml:
!-- In addition to
?
Can you try trunk again now?
-Yonik
http://lucenerevolution.org Lucene/Solr Conference, Boston Oct 7-8
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Ron Mayer r...@0ape.com wrote:
Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Ron Mayer r...@0ape.com wrote:
Short summary:
* Mixing Facets and Shards
Folks, here's an upcoming Solr webinar sponsored by my employer.
It's Hoss on faceting, so it should be good!
-Yonik
http://lucenerevolution.org Lucene/Solr Conference, Boston Oct 7-8
--- Webinar Details
Join us for a free
Thanks for the report Ron, can you open a JIRA issue?
What version of Solr is this?
-Yonik
http://lucenerevolution.org Lucene/Solr Conference, Boston Oct 7-8
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Ron Mayer r...@0ape.com wrote:
Short summary:
* Mixing Facets and Shards give me a
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 8:37 AM, MitchK mitc...@web.de wrote:
10 % numShards(10) - 1 - doc 10 will be indexed at shard 1... and what
about the older version at shard 2? I am no expert when it comes to
cloudComputing and the other stuff.
If you can point me to one or another reference where I
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 9:47 AM, MitchK mitc...@web.de wrote:
are there any discussions about SolrCloud-indexing?
Not recently - personally I've been sidetracked by other stuff.
Mapping docs to shards is the easy part... take a hash of the id, and
then I imagine the shard id (the label for the
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 10:18 AM, MitchK mitc...@web.de wrote:
[...consistent hashing...]
But it doesn't solve the problem at all, correct me if I am wrong, but: If
you add a new server, let's call him IP3-1, and IP3-1 is nearer to the
current ressource X, than doc x will be indexed at IP3-1 -
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Walter Underwood wun...@wunderwood.org wrote:
On Sep 6, 2010, at 1:49 AM, Lance Norskog wrote:
1) The XML file must include the UTF-8 encoding metadata in the first line.
If it requires that, it isn't a legal XML parser. The encoding declaration is
optional
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Roland Villemoes r...@alpha-solutions.dk
wrote:
How can I retrieve all words from a Solr core?
I need a list of all the words and how often they occur in the index.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/TermsComponent
It doesn't currently stream though, so requesting
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Landon Kuhn landon9...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, I am using the ReversedWildcardFilterFactory, and I am
wondering if there is a way to prevent false matches when a query
token matches the reversed indexed token. For instance, the query
*zemog* matches documents
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Eric Grobler impalah...@googlemail.com wrote:
There is a huge difference doing facet sorting on lex vs count
The strange thing is that count sorting is fast when setting a small limit.
I realize I can do sorting in the client, but I am just curious why this is.
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 6:41 AM, Pooja Verlani pooja.verl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Sometimes while indexing to solr, I am getting the following exception.
com.ctc.wstx.exc.WstxEOFException: Unexpected end of input block in end tag
I think its some configuration issue. Kindly suggest.
I have
Conference, Boston Oct 7-8
Regards
Eric
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.com
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Eric Grobler impalah...@googlemail.com
wrote:
There is a huge difference doing facet sorting on lex vs count
The strange thing
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Peter Spam ps...@mac.com wrote:
So, I went through all the effort to break my documents into max 1 MB chunks,
and searching for hello still takes over 40 seconds (searching across 7433
documents):
8 results (41980 ms)
What is going on??? (scroll
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Eric Grobler
impalah...@googlemail.com wrote:
Thanks for the technical explanation.
I will in general try to use lex and sort by count in the client if there
are not too many rows.
I just developed a patch that may help this scenario:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Eric Grobler
impalah...@googlemail.com wrote:
Thanks for the technical explanation.
I will in general try to use lex and sort by count in the client if there
are not too many rows
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Eric Grobler impalah...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Solr experts,
There is a huge difference doing facet sorting on lex vs count
The strange thing is that count sorting is fast when setting a small limit.
I realize I can do sorting in the client, but I am just
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Peter Spam ps...@mac.com wrote:
This is a very small number of documents (7000), so I am surprised Solr is
having such a hard time with it!!
I do facet on 3 terms.
Subsequent hello searches are faster, but still well over a second. This
is a very fast Mac
in this mail...)
On 20.08.2010 16:57, Yonik Seeley wrote
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Nikolas Tautenhahn
nik_s...@livinglogic.de wrote:
But when I search for q=at%26s (=ats), I get nothing.
That's the correct encoding if you're typing it directly into a
browser address box.
http
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Nikolas Tautenhahn
nik_s...@livinglogic.de wrote:
Hi,
I have a problem with, for example, company names like ATS.
A Job is sending data to the solr 1.4 (also tested it with 1.4.1) index
via python in XML, everything is escaped properly ( becomes amp;).
When
Lance, have you figured out what the issue is?
Anyone know if this is a haversine limitation, or a bug?
-Yonik
http://lucenerevolution.org Lucene/Solr Conference, Boston Oct 7-8
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 1:54 AM, Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com wrote:
The Haversine formula in
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 11:05 PM, Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com wrote:
are latitudes equidistant on the surface of the sphere?
Yes - each degree of latitude is ~69 miles.
There is also a slight variation due to the earth not being a perfect sphere.
-Yonik
http://lucenerevolution.org
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:28 PM, harish.agarwal
harish.agar...@gmail.com wrote:
Just curious if there has been any progress on implementing sortMissingLast
on TrieFields?
Not yet - that info is not available from the lucene FieldCache.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 6:29 PM, Peter Karich peat...@yahoo.de wrote:
my queryResultCache has no hits. But if I am removing one line from the
bf section in my dismax handler all is fine. Here is the line:
recip(ms(NOW,date),3.16e-11,1,1)
NOW has millisecond resolution, so it's actually a
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Brad Dewar bde...@stfx.ca wrote:
When items are sorted, are all the docs with the sort field missing
considered tied in terms of their sort order, or are they indeterminate,
or do they have some arbitrary order imposed on them (e.g. _docid_)?
If it's a
Yep, or you can submit the query via POST, which has a much bigger
limit on the size of the body.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 3:58 PM, didier deshommes dfdes...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Alexandre,
Have you tried setting a higher headerBufferSize? Look in
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Peter Karich peat...@yahoo.de wrote:
Thanks a lot Yonik! Rounding makes sense.
Is there a date math for the 'LAST_COMMIT'?
No - but it's an interesting idea!
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Andrea Gazzarini
andrea.gazzar...@atcult.it wrote:
Hi,
I have a problem regarding a diacritic character on my query string :
*q=intertestualità
*
which is encoded in
*q=intertestualit%E0
The correct encoding is q=intertestualit%C3%A0
But I can see how
Update: it looks like this (what I consider buggy) behavior is common
to both firefox and IE.
Both correctly encode the path part of the URL, but neither encode the
query string part in UTF-8 (I believe for back compat with old buggy
websites). Chrome does use UTF-8 for both.
It's easy to verify
Perhaps a ps2 parameter to match pf2?
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Ron Mayer r...@0ape.com wrote:
Jayendra Patil wrote:
We pretty much had the same issue, ended up customizing the ExtendedDismax
code.
In your case its just a change of a single line
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Ron Mayer r...@0ape.com wrote:
Yonik Seeley wrote:
Perhaps a ps2 parameter to match pf2?
That might be nice.
I could try to put together such a patch if people were interested.
One more thing I've been contemplating is if my results might
be even better
Another option is the 3x branch - that should still be able to read
indexes from Solr 1.4/Lucene 2.9
I personally don't expect a 1.5 release to ever materialize.
There will eventually be a Lucene/Solr 3.1 release off of the 3x
branch, and a Lucene/Solr 4.0 release off of trunk.
-Yonik
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 12:24 PM, solr-user solr-u...@hotmail.com wrote:
Thanks Yonik but
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/branch_3x/solr/CHANGES.txt
says that the lucene index has changed
Right - but it will be able to read your older index.
Do you need Solr 1.4 to be able
FYI, I opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2036
for this.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 8:35 PM, entdeveloper
cameron.develo...@gmail.com wrote:
Apologies if this was resolved, but we just deployed Solr 1.4.1 and the stats
page takes over a
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 2:42 PM, oleg.gnatovskiy crooke...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh sorry guys, I didn't correctly submit my original post to the mailing
list. The original message was this:
Hello all. We are having some trouble with queries similar to the type shown
below:
name: pizza OR
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 3:16 PM, oleg.gnatovskiy crooke...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry guess I messed up my example query. The query should look like this:
name:pizza AND id:(10 OR 20 OR 30)
Thus if I do name:pizza^10 AND id:(10 OR 20 OR 30)^0 wouldn't a document
that has all the ids (10,20, and
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Otis Gospodnetic
otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com wrote:
I'm looking for a list of English words that, when stemmed by Porter stemmer,
end up in the same stem as some similar, but unrelated words. Below are some
examples:
# this gets stemmed to iron, so if you
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 6:37 AM, Michael McCandless
luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
Can you run CheckIndex on the index and post the output?
One of these days we need to get around to adding support for this in
Solr's admin interface.
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-566
-Yonik
Is membername an indexed field in the schema, and was it populated
with something that would match Khai?
If so, what is the fieldType in the schema for the membername field?
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Khai Doan khaitd...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
My
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:
I am now occasionally getting a Java GC overhead limit exceeded error in
my Solr. This may or may not be related to recently adding much better (and
more) warming querries.
When memory gets tight, the JVM kicks of a
Do you have any custom code, or is this stock solr (and which version,
and what is the request)?
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 12:30 AM, Manepalli, Kalyan
kalyan.manepa...@orbitz.com wrote:
Hi,
I am stuck at this weird problem during querying. While querying
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 6:09 AM, Eric Grobler impalah...@googlemail.com wrote:
I have a few questions :-)
a) Will the next release of solr be 3.0 (instead of 1.5)?
The next release will be 3.1 (matching the next lucene version off of
the 3x branch).
Trunk is 4.0-dev
b) How stable/mature is
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 2:23 PM, MitchK mitc...@web.de wrote:
why do we do not send the output of TermsComponent of every node in the
cluster to a Hadoop instance?
Since TermsComponent does the map-part of the map-reduce concept, Hadoop
only needs to reduce the stuff. Maybe we even do not need
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 2:40 PM, MitchK mitc...@web.de wrote:
That only works if the docs are exactly the same - they may not be.
Ahm, what? Why? If the uniqueID is the same, the docs *should* be the same,
don't they?
Documents aren't supposed to be duplicated across shards... so the
presence
As the comments suggest, it's not a bug, but just the best we can do
for now since our priority queues don't support removal of arbitrary
elements. I guess we could rebuild the current priority queue if we
detect a duplicate, but that will have an obvious performance impact.
Any other
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Paul p...@nines.org wrote:
I thought of another way to do it, but I still have one thing I don't
know how to do. I could do the search without sorting for the 50th
page, then look at the relevancy score on the first item on that page,
then repeat the search,
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Rodrigo Rezende rcreze...@gmail.com wrote:
I solved the problem.
The correct syntax is:
http://localhost:8983/solr/articles.0/select/?q={!func}query({!query
v='hello'})fl=Document.title,score,debugQuery=on
query() causes a new QParser to be created. so does
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Rodrigo Rezende rcreze...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, it is redundant, but I am using that to use the solr query
response as input of a plugin function:
http://localhost:8983/solr/articles.0/select/?q={!func}myFunction(query({!query
v='the query string here'}))
Yikes... confirmed! Something is very wrong here.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
Hmmm, I'll try and duplicate.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
2010/7/15 Koji Sekiguchi k...@r.email.ne.jp:
I see
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 4:39 PM, imranak imranak...@gmail.com wrote:
A general search like 'computer' returns results but 'com*er' doesn't return
any results.
This is due to issues with wildcards and stemming.
computer is indexed and searched as comput... but it's not
generally possible to stem
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
Originally, I had intended that it was just for one Field Sub Type, thinking
that if we ever wanted multiple sub types, that a new, separate class would
be needed
Right - this was my original thinking too.
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Mark Allan mark.al...@ed.ac.uk wrote:
[...]
The changes to AbstractSubTypeFieldType do not have any adverse effects on
the solr.PointType class, so I'd quite like to suggest it gets included in
the main solr source code. Where can I send a patch for someone to
There's an issue open for this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1565
I'm not sure off the top of my head how much is involved in making it
happen though.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Jan Høydahl / Cominvent
jan@cominvent.com wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Blargy zman...@hotmail.com wrote:
Can someone explain what the createWeight methods should do?
Its primary function is to add Searcher context to anything that needs
it (such as weighting a query).
If you're not dealing with relevancy-type queries, value sources
Solr's APIs are described as REST-like, and probably do qualify as
restful the way the term is commonly used.
I'm personally much more interested in making our APIs more powerful
and easier to use, regardless of any REST purity tests.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Robert Petersen rober...@buy.com wrote:
Hello I am trying to find the right max and min settings for Java 1.6 on 20GB
index with 8 million docs, running 1.6_018 JVM with solr 1.4, and am
currently have java set to an even 4GB (export JAVA_OPTS=-Xmx4096m
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com wrote:
Apparently this is not ReStFuL It is IMVHO insane.
Patches welcome...
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
.123_contentAttributeToken.facet.method=fc
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
-Original Message-
From: ysee...@gmail.com [mailto:ysee...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Yonik Seeley
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 1:38 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: OOM on uninvert field request
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Stephen Duncan Jr
stephen.dun...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm prototyping using StreamingUpdateSolrServer. I want to send a commit
(or optimize) after I'm done adding all of my docs, rather than wait for the
autoCommit to kick in. However, since
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Blargy zman...@hotmail.com wrote:
Can someone explain how I can override the default behavior of the tf
contributing a higher score for documents with repeated words?
For example:
Query: foo
Doc1: foo bar score 1.0
Doc2: foo foo bar score 1.1
Doc2
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Blargy zman...@hotmail.com wrote:
Yonik Seeley-2-2 wrote:
Depends on the larger context of what you are trying to do.
Do you still want the idf and length norm relevancy factors? If not,
use a filter, or boost the particular clause with 0.
I do want
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:
{!dismax qf=$some_qf} = no problem, and debugQuery reveals it is indeed
using the qf I desire.
{!dismax qf='$some_qf'} = Solr throws undefined field $some_qf.
Is this a bug in Solr?
Nope, it's by design.
Parameter
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
fq={!frange l=0 u=1}hsin(XXX,44.0,73.0,latitude,longitude,true)
...where XXX is the radius of hte earth in miles (i didn't bother to look
it up)
That's what the docs say, but it doesn't really work in my
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 7:38 AM, Furkan Kuru furkank...@gmail.com wrote:
facet.limit = default value 100
facet.minCount is 1
The document count that matches the query is 8-10K in average. I did not
calculate the terms (maybe using using facet.limit=-1 and facet.minCount=1)
My index entirely
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Furkan Kuru furkank...@gmail.com wrote:
We try to provide real-time search. So the index is changing almost in every
minute.
We commit for every 100 documents received.
The facet search is executed every 5 mins.
OK, that's the problem - pretty much every
Faceting on a full-text field is hard.
What version of Solr are you using?
If it's 1.4 or later, try setting
facet.method=enum
And to use the filterCache less, try
facet.enum.cache.minDf=100
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Furkan Kuru
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Andy angelf...@yahoo.com wrote:
Yonik,
Just curious why does using enum improve the facet performance.
Furkan was faceting on a text field with each word being a facet value. I'd
imagine that'd mean there's a large number of facet values. According to the
It's not clear if you're just trying to figure it all out, or get
something specific to work.
If you can give a specific example, we might be able to suggest easier
ways to achieve it rather than going escape crazy :-)
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 5:06 PM,
my
interest in figuring out proper escaping.
Jonathan
Yonik Seeley wrote:
It's not clear if you're just trying to figure it all out, or get
something specific to work.
If you can give a specific example, we might be able to suggest easier
ways to achieve it rather than going escape crazy
David, if it's fast for you to reproduce, would it be possible for you
to try the latest Jetty 6.1.24 and see if the issue still exists?
http://dist.codehaus.org/jetty/
Seems like we should upgrade to 6.1.24 anyway (there were quite a few
fixes in 6.1.23)
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Lukas Kahwe Smith m...@pooteeweet.org wrote:
Hi,
I have implemented a facet search, where users essentially select what should
not be included. I do this by constructing an fq filter where I match for the
deselected items that I then negate:
$fq
Wow, thanks for the heads-up David!
This probably got inadvertently changed when Jetty was upgraded...
sounds like we should prob change back to BoundedThreadPool as a
default!
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Smiley, David W. dsmi...@mitre.org wrote:
I'd
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Blargy zman...@hotmail.com wrote:
Can someone explain to be what the state of Solr/Lucene is... didn't they
recently combine?
Yes, it started in March. Development is combined (committers, dev
list, etc), but separate downloads and user lists will remain.
I
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Blargy zman...@hotmail.com wrote:
What version is (http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/trunk/)? Im
guessing its 4.0-dev
Yes.
but then where does 3.1 fit in?
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/branch_3x/
Say I am running 1.4 and want
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 6:12 AM, dan sutton danbsut...@gmail.com wrote:
In Solr 1.3 it looks like null fields were returned if requested with the fl
param,, whereas with solr 1.4, nulls are omitted entirely.
Can you elaborate on what you mean by null?
Is this a string field with a zero length
Have you seen
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/LocalParams
It may answer some of the questions, such as stating that backslash
escaping works within quoted strings.
I'd encourage you to try things out with the example server and adding
debugQuery=true to your requests... it's the easiest way to
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Blargy zman...@hotmail.com wrote:
Can someone explain a useful case for the RandomSortField?
People sometimes have requirements to show different results to
everyone (essentially randomly shuffling matches per person).
-Yonik
Apache Lucene Eurocon 2010
18-21 May
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Static Void static.void@gmail.com wrote:
What would be more useful would be randomizing closely related hits. IE hits
within 5% of each other
This is not the use case I've encountered multiple times in the past, but
it should also be doable by using the
Pure negatives in lucene syntax don't match anything (solr currently
only fixes this for you if it's a pure negative at the top-level, not
embeded).
Try changing
(NOT periodicite:annuel)
to
(*:* NOT periodicite:annuel)
But the second version below where you just removed the parens will be
more
Simply use what the default was in the example solrconfig.xml... there
is no need to modify that unless you are doing something advanced. In
the config below, you show maxOptimizedCommitsToKeep=1, which will
increase index size by always keeping around one optimized commit
point.
-Yonik
Apache
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
I'm trying to reproduce now... single thread adding documents to a
multithreaded client, StreamingUpdateSolrServer(addr,32,4)
I'm currently at the 2.5 hour mark and 100M documents - no issues so far.
I let it go
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Sascha Szott sz...@zib.de wrote:
In my case the whole application hangs and never recovers (CPU utilization
goes down to near 0%). Interestingly, the problem reproducibly occurs only
if SUSS is created with *more than 2* threads.
Is your application also using
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com wrote:
In solrconfig.xml, there is a parameter controlling remote streaming:
requestDispatcher handleSelect=true
!--Make sure your system has some authentication before
enabling remote streaming! --
requestParsers
, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Sascha Szott sz...@zib.de wrote:
In my case the whole application hangs and never recovers (CPU utilization
goes down to near 0%). Interestingly, the problem reproducibly occurs only
if SUSS is created with *more than
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 9:56 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
but as i understand the new cloud stuff (by which i mean: i don't
understand the new cloud stuff, but i've heard rumors) this will be
possible with that functionality.
Yeah, that should be the goal.
The
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Jason Rutherglen
jason.rutherg...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess I didn't explain it properly. I want to create a core on
the master, and then have N slaves also (aka replicate) create
those new core(s) on the slave servers, then of course, begin to
replicate (yeah,
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Jon Baer jonb...@gmail.com wrote:
From what I understand Cassandra uses a generic gossip protocol for node
discovery (custom), will the Solr-Cloud have something similar?
SolrCloud uses zookeeper, so node discovery is a simple matter of
looking there. Nodes
, Sascha Szott sz...@zib.de wrote:
Hi Yonik,
Yonik Seeley wrote:
Stephen, were you running stock Solr 1.4, or did you apply any of the
SolrJ patches?
I'm trying to figure out if anyone still has any problems, or if this
was fixed with SOLR-1711:
I'm using the latest trunk version (rev. 934846
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Chris Harris rygu...@gmail.com wrote:
The docs dated exactly *at* the epoch, though, are trouble, because I
can't tell those docs apart from the undated docs in my function
query.
Neither can Solr currently... it's a Lucene FieldCache limitation.
The other
This is an implicit cache (if you don't define it, it will still exist
and show up on stats.jsp).
Can you be more specific about FieldValueCache stats are not getting displayed
If you start the example server, go to the stats page, and search for
fieldValueCache, is it there? Or do you mean that
Looks like you're missing one of the index files... segments_n
It points to all the other index files.
-Yonik
Apache Lucene Eurocon 2010
18-21 May 2010 | Prague
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 6:20 AM, william pink will.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I was seeing this error from Solr this morning
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 1:04 PM, fabritw fabr...@gmail.com wrote:
Apologies for the second post, I noticed the json.nl=arrarr does work with
facet.field but not with facet.date?
Hmmm, this is because date faceting uses a SimpleOrderedMap instead of
a NamedList (implying that access-like-a-map
1101 - 1200 of 2724 matches
Mail list logo
