I recommend first understanding the Solr API, and the parameters you need to
add the capabilities with just the /select API. Once you are familiar with
that, you can then learn what’s needed and apply that to the HTML and
JavaScript. While the /browse UI is fairly straightforward, there’s a
Hello,
My name is Clare Lee and I'm working on Apache Solr-6.6.0, Solritas right
now and I'm not able to do something I want to do. Could you help me with
this?
I want to be able to search solr with multiple fields. With the basic
configurations(I'm using the core techproducts and just changing t
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Steven White wrote:
> Thanks Yonik.
>
> 1) How would I enforce OR on the list of terms when AND is my default
> search Boolean setting in solrconfig.xml?
{!terms} is currently always a disjunction (OR)
> 2) And just to confirm that I understand your solution, he
Thanks Yonik.
1) How would I enforce OR on the list of terms when AND is my default
search Boolean setting in solrconfig.xml?
2) And just to confirm that I understand your solution, here is my current
implementation:
q=user-real-search-terms&fq={!join+fromIndex=sku_idex+from=SkuID+to=SkuFfolder
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Steven White wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> I need to search for terms in a field that will be AND'ed with user's real
> search terms, such as:
>
> user-real-search-terms AND FooField:(a OR b OR c OR d OR e OR ...)
>
> The list of terms in the field FooField can be as
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Steven White wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> I need to search for terms in a field that will be AND'ed with user's real
> search terms, such as:
>
> user-real-search-terms AND FooField:(a OR b OR c OR d OR e OR ...)
>
> The list of terms in the field FooField can be as
Hi folks
I need to search for terms in a field that will be AND'ed with user's real
search terms, such as:
user-real-search-terms AND FooField:(a OR b OR c OR d OR e OR ...)
The list of terms in the field FooField can be as large as 1000 items, but
will average around 100.
The list of OR'ed
very new to Solr. Any help or suggestion would be great help for me.
>
> Thanks in Advance,
> Soumik
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Wild-card-on-field-search-tp4093272.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
query syntax?
I am very new to Solr. Any help or suggestion would be great help for me.
Thanks in Advance,
Soumik
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Wild-card-on-field-search-tp4093272.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
: document accordingly. This works good in most cases. but we had a case where
: we ran into issue.
:
: DocA // Common title and is same for all county so no additional titles.
: Fighter
:
: DocB
: The Ultimate Street Fighter // Default
: Ultimate Fighter // For UK
:
:
: now querying f
thanks Eric,
is this what you are pointing me to ?
http://.../solr/select?q=if(exist(title.3),(title.3:"xyz"),(title.0:"xyz"))
I believe i should be able to use boost along with proximity too.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Cond
uch issue would really help.
> We are also planning to move to Solr4.1 so anything with this new Solr
> version will also do.
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Conditional-Field-Search-without-affecting-score-tp4040657.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
ng to move to Solr4.1 so anything with this new Solr
version will also do.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Conditional-Field-Search-without-affecting-score-tp4040657.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
It is not Eclipse related, neither codec related. There were two issues
I had a wrong configuration of NumericConfig:
new NumericConfig(4, NumberFormat.getNumberInstance(), NumericType.FLOAT))
I changed that to:
new NumericConfig(4, NumberFormat.getNumberInstance(Locale.US),
NumericType.FLO
The test checks we are properly getting/indexing data - we index database
and fetch parts of the documents separately from mongodb. You can look at
the file here:
https://github.com/romanchyla/montysolr/blob/3c18312b325874bdecefceb9df63096b2cf20ca2/contrib/adsabs/src/test/org/apache/solr/update/Te
: apparently, it fails also with @SuppressCodecs("Lucene3x")
what exactly is the test failure message?
When you run tests that use the lucene test framework, any failure should
include information about the random seed used to run the test -- that
random seed affects things like the codec used
apparently, it fails also with @SuppressCodecs("Lucene3x")
roman
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Roman Chyla wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a float field 'read_count' - and unittest like:
>
> assertQ(req("q", "read_count:1.0"),
> "//doc/int[@name='recid'][.='9218920']",
> "//*[@nu
below
10
s:
do i missing anything , or doing anything wrong??
i like to make a note that i am using solr version 1.4
Thanks
Meghana
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Mutivalue-field-search-on-different-ele
> i can't delete 1s ,2s ...etc from my
> field value , i have to keep text in
> this format... so i'll apply slop in my search to do my
> needed search done.
It is OK if you cant delete 1s, 2s, etc from field value. We can eat up
those special markups in analysis chain. PatternReplaceCharFil
i can't delete 1s ,2s ...etc from my field value , i have to keep text in
this format... so i'll apply slop in my search to do my needed search done.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Mutivalue-field-search-on-different-elements-tp3604213p3615816
> I have changed my multiValued field to single value filed..
> and now my field
> appears as below
> -
> 1s: This is very nice day. 3s: Christmas is about come and
> christmas
> 4s:preparation is just on
> -
> but by doing thi
ch i always have to apply slop in my search.
Thanks for reply.
Meghana.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Mutivalue-field-search-on-different-elements-tp3604213p3614365.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 6:11 PM, meghana wrote:
> Hi iorixxx,
>
> I have changed my multiValued field to single value filed.. and now my field
> appears as below
> -
> 1s: This is very nice day. 3s: Christmas is about come and christmas
> 4s:preparation is just
don't get my search : "christmas preparation" to be
matched on my search query , although i had set my positionIncrementGap to
0. any ideas why it is not matching ??
Please help me.
Meghana
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Mutivalue-
> setting positionIncrementGap is worked for me and it
> allowing me to search
> in 2 diff. consecutive elements.
> But as i explained before , i also want to display
> highlighting for which
> term / phrase search is made.
>
> So when we search with phrase and make highlighting on , it
> is not
returning
me highlighting on that phrase. Is there any solution to that ?
Thanks
Meghana
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Mutivalue-field-search-on-different-elements-tp3604213p3608892.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
me
highlighting on that words of phrase. can i handle this by doing some
configuration changes?
Thanks
Meghana
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Mutivalue-field-search-on-different-elements-tp3604213p3606597.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list
; , then this should match. if
> i set positionIncrementGap to 0 then do it will match? Or how value of
> positionIncrementGap behave on my search?
>
> Meghana
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Mutivalue-field-search-on-different-elements-tp3604213p3605938.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
with "christmas preparation" , then this should match. if
i set positionIncrementGap to 0 then do it will match? Or how value of
positionIncrementGap behave on my search?
Meghana
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Mutivalue-field-search-on-differen
ybody have any idea?
Thanks
Meghana
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Mutivalue-field-search-on-different-elements-tp3604213p3604213.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ent).
do anybody have any idea?
Thanks
Meghana
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Mutivalue-field-search-on-different-elements-tp3604213p3604213.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Many thanks.. I took the suggestion of using a and it did the
trick.
--Ronen
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/multi-value-field-search-tp3594701p3599082.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
You could use a synonyms file for the alternative names. That way you
do not need to store only index the alternatives.
For faceting use a field were the analysis chain does not use the
synonyms filter. For search the analysis chain will.
You also get the benefit of only storing the normative value
> The problem I have is that at search time, I have faceting turned on for
> this field and therefore, I get the four facets "canadian", "imperial",
> "bank", and "commerce", which all refer to the same record.
>
> How can I go about searching for any word contained in the company name but
> then
lp.
--Ronen
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/multi-value-field-search-tp3594701p3594701.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Thursday, November 18, 2010 12:42:49 pm Dario Rigolin wrote:
> On Thursday, November 18, 2010 12:36:40 pm Dario Rigolin wrote:
>
> Sorry wrong query:
>
> q=field1:("A BB1" AND "B BB2")
>
> Dario
q=field1:("A BB1 B BB2"~10)
I discovered that proximity search works well with multiple terms
C
On Thursday, November 18, 2010 12:36:40 pm Dario Rigolin wrote:
Sorry wrong query:
q=field1:("A BB1" AND "B BB2")
Dario
I think this question is more related to Lucene query search but I'm posting
here becuase I feel more "Solr User" :-)
I have multiple value field named field1 containint codes separated by a space
doc1
A BB1 B BB2 C BB3
A CC1 B CC2 C CC3
doc2
A BB1 B FF2 C FF3
A YY1 B BB2 C KK3
I would like
Hi,
you might want to use the Dismax-Handler.
Sven
--On Monday, January 18, 2010 02:58:09 PM +0100 Lukas Kahwe Smith
wrote:
Hi,
I realize that I can copy all fields together into one multiValue
field and set that as the defaultSearchField. However in that case
I cannot leverage the variou
Hi,
I realize that I can copy all fields together into one multiValue field and set
that as the defaultSearchField. However in that case I cannot leverage the
various custom analyzers I want to apply to the fields separately (name should
use doublemetaphone, street should use the world splitter
Hi,
When I'm doing normal search I'm using q=test +field:somevalue&otherparams...
How can I implement this using morelikethis by posting the text and q
is empty? I tried to use fq= but this is not what I want.
Thanks,
Renz
: Now, if I try to search for,
: *title:Advertise --- * I am getting following results:
...
: I forgot to put my dismax request handler.
dismax doesn't support any special syntax in the query string, if you want
to search for words only in a single field, make sure that is the only
fiel
Hi,
I forgot to put my dismax request handler.
explicit
0.01
text^0.5 features^1.0 name^1.2 sku^1.5 id^10.0 manu^1.1 cat^1.4
text^0.2 features^1.1 name^1.5 manu^1.4 manu_exact^1.9
ord(poplarity)^0.5 recip(rord(price),1,1000,100
Hi,
I have a content with *title* as "*Advertise*" under a *category* "*Sales*"
And also, I have 3 other contents with *titles "{TV, Web,Radio}"*
under a *category
"Advertise"*
**
Now, if I try to search for,
*title:Advertise --- * I am getting following results:
==
Title
AND+RES+TYPE:0+OR+RES+TYPE:1+AND+ALL:sun&fl=ALL
>>> The column may need to be URL-encoded.
>>>
>>> Otis
>>>
>>> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
>>> Simpy -- http://www.simpy.com/ - Tag - Search - Share
>>&g
2007 8:00:36 PM
Subject: Multiple field search with different values..
Hi All,
I need to know how to form a query using multiple fields which contains
same values?
I worked with single field and it working well.
For eg : http://localhost:8085/solr/select?q=sun*&fl=ALL
whe
> - Original Message
> From: nithyavembu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 8:00:36 PM
> Subject: Multiple field search with different values..
>
>
> Hi All,
>
>I need to know how to form a que
inal Message
From: nithyavembu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 8:00:36 PM
Subject: Multiple field search with different values..
Hi All,
I need to know how to form a query using multiple fields which contains
same values?
I worked w
same field and different values using OR operator?
Thanks.
-Nithya.V.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Multiple-field-search-with-different-values..-tf4137672.html#a11768630
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
49 matches
Mail list logo
